[steering-discuss] next SC call tomorrow
Hello, this is just a short reminder that the next steering committee call will take place tomorrow, Wednesday, at 1600 UTC. Details are, as usual, in the wiki: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/TDF/Steering_Committee_Meetings#Next_Call Florian -- Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108 Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [steering-discuss] Re: trademark use request
Hi, Simon Phipps wrote on 2011-08-22 21:29: I'm not sure about binding as I think explained is actually an assertive word, but sure, that's fine too. I was just trying to be concise! I'm not a native speaker, so you have much more insight into the English language than I do. ;-) So, the current proposal would be: LibreOffice and The Document Foundation are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Uses are explained our trademark policy. Alex, how does that sound from a legal point of view? Is it strong enough? Thanks, Florian -- Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108 Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[steering-discuss] Re: trademark use request
Le 23/08/11 10:18, Florian Effenberger a écrit : Hi Florian, Alex, how does that sound from a legal point of view? Is it strong enough? Usage is explained in our trademark policy. Alex -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[steering-discuss] Re: trademark use request
Le 23/08/11 10:18, Florian Effenberger a écrit : Second thoughts, subject to international copyright laws. Uses are explained our trademark policy. better still : Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy. Alex -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [steering-discuss] Re: trademark use request
On 23 Aug 2011, at 13:03, Alexander Thurgood wrote: Le 23/08/11 10:18, Florian Effenberger a écrit : Second thoughts, subject to international copyright laws. Uses are explained our trademark policy. better still : Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy. I agree that's more precise English. I am a little concerned it's uncommon usage that those with English as a second language might consider difficult, and thus I prefer your earlier suggestion: Usage is explained in our trademark policy. No big issue though, just a preference. I'd welcome your comment. S. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[steering-discuss] Re: trademark use request
Le 23/08/11 15:25, Simon Phipps a écrit : Hi Simon, better still : Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy. I agree that's more precise English. I am a little concerned it's uncommon usage that those with English as a second language might consider difficult, and thus I prefer your earlier suggestion: Usage is explained in our trademark policy. No big issue though, just a preference. I'd welcome your comment. Not wishing to get into a battle on semantics, my personal preference is still the second suggestion, but I would agree with you that non-native English speakers might find the less archaic wording of my first suggestion easier to grasp from the outset. Ultimately, choose whatever everyone feels comfortable with. Alex -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[tdf-discuss] DK: 25, 000 hospital staff Copenhagen region to use open source office suite
Hi DK: 25,000 hospital staff Copenhagen region to use open source office suite http://www.osor.eu/news/dk-25-000-hospital-staff-copenhagen-region-to-use-open-source-office-suite* read more: http://www.computerworld.dk/art/118515 http://www.computerworld.dk/art/118467 http://www.computerworld.dk/art/118512 * in blog Brazil: http://softwarelivre.org/furusho/blog/13-hospitais-de-copenhaga-migram-para-libreoffice-sao-25-mil-usuarios http://softwarelivre.org/libreoffice/blog/13-hospitais-de-copenhaga-migram-para-libreoffice-sao-25-mil-usuarios Resgard *Furusho, Vitorio* Ativist Free Software, LibreOffice and ODF ODF Alliance Awardhttp://www.odfalliance.org/blog/index.php/site/odf_alliance_awards/ Free Software Furusho http://softwarelivre.org/furusho LibreOffice http://broffice.org/ Membro da The Document Foundation http://www.documentationfoundation.org/ -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[tdf-discuss] [QA] Opening a .doc file - Regression in Libreoffice 3.4 ???
Sorry if this is not the proper list to ask, but before filing a bug I'd like to know if someone has seen this before: The following .doc file does open correctly in OpenOffice.org 3.3.0 and OpenOffice.org 3.2.1 but neither in LibreOffice 3.4.2 nor in LibreOffice 3.4.3 OOO340m1 (Build:301) - tested on Debian and LinuxMint: http://www.tullverket.se/download/18.4ab1598c11632f3ba9280009674/enhetsdokument+anvands+vid+import+och+export+4+blad_tv718_3.doc Seems like a problem with lookup in many fields (Error: Source reference not found), also looks like cell formatting is separated onto another page than the form tables. Curiously in LibreOffice 3.4.3 OOO340m1 the file is always opened as read-only, no matter which permissions or filesystem is used. Of course this could simply be a corrupted file, still it opens correctly in OOo. Any ideas ? Regards, Sveinn í Felli -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [tdf-discuss] [QA] Opening a .doc file - Regression in Libreoffice 3.4 ???
On 2011-08-24 08:47, Sveinn í Felli wrote: Sorry if this is not the proper list to ask, but before filing a bug I'd like to know if someone has seen this before: The following .doc file does open correctly in OpenOffice.org 3.3.0 and OpenOffice.org 3.2.1 but neither in LibreOffice 3.4.2 nor in LibreOffice 3.4.3 OOO340m1 (Build:301) - tested on Debian and LinuxMint: http://www.tullverket.se/download/18.4ab1598c11632f3ba9280009674/enhetsdokument+anvands+vid+import+och+export+4+blad_tv718_3.doc Seems like a problem with lookup in many fields (Error: Source reference not found), also looks like cell formatting is separated onto another page than the form tables. Curiously in LibreOffice 3.4.3 OOO340m1 the file is always opened as read-only, no matter which permissions or filesystem is used. Of course this could simply be a corrupted file, still it opens correctly in OOo. Any ideas ? I can confirm on Suse OOO3.2.1 opens it ok and in LO3.3.4 the layout is wrecked. steve -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
[tdf-discuss] Re: [QA] Opening a .doc file - Regression in Libreoffice 3.4 ???
On 08/23/2011 01:47 PM, Sveinn í Felli wrote: Sorry if this is not the proper list to ask, but before filing a bug I'd like to know if someone has seen this before: The following .doc file does open correctly in OpenOffice.org 3.3.0 and OpenOffice.org 3.2.1 but neither in LibreOffice 3.4.2 nor in LibreOffice 3.4.3 OOO340m1 (Build:301) - tested on Debian and LinuxMint: http://www.tullverket.se/download/18.4ab1598c11632f3ba9280009674/enhetsdokument+anvands+vid+import+och+export+4+blad_tv718_3.doc Seems like a problem with lookup in many fields (Error: Source reference not found), also looks like cell formatting is separated onto another page than the form tables. Curiously in LibreOffice 3.4.3 OOO340m1 the file is always opened as read-only, no matter which permissions or filesystem is used. Of course this could simply be a corrupted file, still it opens correctly in OOo. Any ideas ? Regards, Sveinn í Felli Opens fine in OOo 3.2.1 (go-oo/Ubuntu version), OOo 3.3.0, and OOo-Dev 3.4.0 . Does *not* open properly in *any* LO versions that I currently have installed (3.3.3 and 3.4.2). You've found YALOB (Yet Another LO Bug); of which there seem to more more of every day oddly enough with previous OOo files. I see rapid regression with *every* new LO update and have actually started using older OOo go-oo packages for stability. Note to others who may think that I do not use or have installed LO: $ locate versionrc /opt/libreoffice/basis3.3/program/versionrc /opt/libreoffice/program/versionrc /opt/libreoffice/ure/bin/versionrc /opt/libreoffice3.4/basis3.4/program/versionrc /opt/libreoffice3.4/program/versionrc /opt/libreoffice3.4/ure/bin/versionrc /opt/ooo-dev/basis3.4/program/versionrc /opt/ooo-dev/ure/bin/versionrc /opt/ooo-dev3/program/versionrc /opt/openoffice.org/basis3.3/program/versionrc /opt/openoffice.org/ure/bin/versionrc /opt/openoffice.org3/program/versionrc /usr/lib/openoffice/basis3.2/program/versionrc /usr/lib/openoffice/program/versionrc /usr/lib/ure/bin/versionrc and I have LO installed for testing on Ubuntu 11.04 and 11.10. -- Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
