On 01/15/2013 10:58 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Again, thanks to Simon Phipps for retweeting the information.
It appears that one should *not* assume that OpenJDK does not share
vulnerabilities with the Oracle Java SE and JDK:
The log of changes to OpenJDK for the recent vulnerability
On 01/16/2013 10:36 AM, NoOp wrote:
...
Security releases for OpenJDK and Icedtea were released yesterday (Tues
Jan 17). Of course I reckon that it will take awhile for the builds to
get pushed to the distro's.
http://blog.fuseyism.com/index.php/2013/01/16/security-and-browser-plugins/
http
On 01/12/2013 09:53 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 2013-01-12 9:22 PM lj wrote:
Hi all,
I am not sure if this is the correct list for this message.
I recently read this article about a Java 1.7 Security Problem.
The article states The U.S. Department of Homeland Security has recommended
that
Why are the emailed bug reports also including HTML?
Example:
From: bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org
To: ...
Subject: [Bug 57873] mork (Thunderbird / Icedove / Seamonkey / ...) multi
address books multi profile support
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2012 00:30:51 +
Message-ID:
On 10/04/2012 06:17 PM, NoOp wrote:
...
Sorry for the multiple postings. Sent the first one on 03 Oct. When I
didn't see it, I tried again, etc.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how
On 10/03/2012 10:10 AM, Terrence Enger wrote:
Another usere has stumbled into the development list [1]. Clearly, he
needs to be directed elsewhere, but I am unsure where to direct him.
The situation w.r.t. forums seems to be in flux, and I am reluctant to
send him to a mail list that I not
On 10/03/2012 10:10 AM, Terrence Enger wrote:
Another usere has stumbled into the development list [1]. Clearly, he
needs to be directed elsewhere, but I am unsure where to direct him.
The situation w.r.t. forums seems to be in flux, and I am reluctant to
send him to a mail list that I not
On 10/03/2012 10:10 AM, Terrence Enger wrote:
Another usere has stumbled into the development list [1]. Clearly, he
needs to be directed elsewhere, but I am unsure where to direct him.
The situation w.r.t. forums seems to be in flux, and I am reluctant to
send him to a mail list that I not
On 08/14/2012 05:23 AM, Fabian Rodriguez wrote:
On 08/14/2012 05:09 AM, Anthony Easthope wrote:
..
* Libreoffice is perfect for use within university's / schools as it
can be easily distributed thanks to the GNU license the same goes
for Zotero
You are referring to the client component.
On 06/12/2012 08:56 AM, Charles-H.Schulz wrote:
For Ubuntu fans out there, make it viral :-)
http://www.muktware.com/3681/using-hud-libreoffice
Best,
Interesting comment from:
Ralf Hersel 1 day ago
Warning! Don't do it. Do not install 'lo-menubar' to get HUD
functionality in standard Ubuntu
On 05/18/2012 06:57 AM, GwenDragon wrote:
Hello,
No new ideas to fix the problem of incorrect reimport of formatting
in LibreOffice 3.5 with the Kallos (and other font families) font problem?
Are you using the OpenType version of Kallos ITC?
If so you might want to have a look through some
On 05/21/2012 01:18 PM, Bruce Byfield wrote:
On Sunday, May 20, 2012 09:54:21 PM NoOp wrote:
On 05/18/2012 03:14 PM, Bruce Byfield wrote:
On Friday, May 18, 2012 11:29:33 AM NoOp wrote:
On 05/17/2012 03:15 PM, Marc Paré wrote:
...
There is a need for a few templates for academic use
On 05/18/2012 03:14 PM, Bruce Byfield wrote:
On Friday, May 18, 2012 11:29:33 AM NoOp wrote:
On 05/17/2012 03:15 PM, Marc Paré wrote:
...
There is a need for a few templates for academic use; a built-in
...
You might want to contact/collaborate with Orest Kinasevyc. He wrote
several
On 05/17/2012 03:15 PM, Marc Paré wrote:
...
There is a need for a few templates for academic use; a built-in
...
You might want to contact/collaborate with Orest Kinasevyc. He wrote
several templates for APA Style 5th 6th editions for students:
On 05/16/2012 08:57 AM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
https://www.libreoffice.org/advisories/
CVE-2012-1149 Integer overflows in graphic object loading
An integer overflow vulnerability in LibreOffice graphic loading code
could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service (application
On 05/16/2012 01:09 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 12:29 -0700, NoOp wrote:
Any idea if 3.5.3 also addresses this one that also came out today?
http://www.openoffice.org/security/cves/CVE-2012-2149.html
This is actually libwpd, which gets bundled into non-distro builds
On 03/26/2012 02:33 AM, Help_Please wrote:
Ok then. Thanks. Maybe it will be corrected soon. My copy of Secunia PSI
is reporting a problem/potential update to LibreOffice to version 3.5.1.2
and I already have 3.5.1.2 installed. This again is because of the
version conflict (I'm pretty
On 03/23/2012 05:24 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi NoOp,
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 2:56 AM, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
On 03/22/2012 06:31 PM, Italo Vignoli wrote:
NoOp wrote:
It would be nice if someone 'official' (ala TDF) could post the
CVE-2012-0037 notice on both the user
Why is it that security advisories such as this:
https://www.libreoffice.org/advisories/CVE-2012-0037/
are not posted on the user or announce lists?
The only way I found out about this was via a Redhat bug report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=791296
[Bug 791296 - (CVE-2012-0037)
On 03/22/2012 06:31 PM, Italo Vignoli wrote:
NoOp wrote:
It would be nice if someone 'official' (ala TDF) could post the
CVE-2012-0037 notice on both the user and announce lists.
It is now reported on the blog post.
Well just how many users are subscribed to a blog post? Nor do I think
On 02/10/2012 05:44 AM, 1920...@googlemail.com wrote:
The freedesktop.org Icon Theme Specification defines a 'document-save'
icon as: document-save The icon for the save action. Should be an arrow
pointing down and toward a hard disk.
On 02/08/2012 06:17 AM, Pedro wrote:
...
In any case I managed to hack the Tango theme and replace the new icons with
the old ones (BTW someone forgot to update the saveastemplate icons in the
new Theme ;) )
You can't use your old tango theme from 3.4.x because the folder structure
has been
On 12/30/2011 08:12 AM, M Robinson wrote:
...
I haven't heard of Delete/Eraser that works as well on SSDs as
traditional hard drives. That said USB will be the most common storage
media soon enough. Who saves to CDs at work?
I don't think the icon is a big deal, the whole interface is
On 11/25/2011 02:19 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,
FYI: It was not me asking for that change, nor Friedrich, but I'd like
to reply to this:
NoOp wrote on 2011-11-25 23:11:
Why not experiment with the moderators or test list instead? Why the
discuss list?
Because a real test can
In an earlier thread I specifically asked about 3.3.4 on 12 Oct:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/7035
where I was informed that the security fix was backported to 3.3.4.
So I don't know what to believe.
Gary Lee (NoOp)
2011/11/22 NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net
On 11/25/2011 02:00 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Regina Henschel wrote:
All mailing lists I'm described to (and
believe me that are a lot) behave in the way that a click on Antwort
auf diese Nachricht replies to the list. So keep the
documentfoundation.org lists to behave this way too.
Only
On 10/02/2011 09:07 AM, Italo Vignoli wrote:
On 30 September 2011 02:46, NoOpgl...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
I must say that I *am* surprised that LO haven't the technical/political
ability/tenacity to properly post information regarding this issue in
the same manner as the links provided (OOo,
the continued threads that are liable to crop up
regarding this in each list in the future.
On 09/07/2011 05:16 PM, NoOp wrote:
For those that continue to insist on top posting on the LO lists: please
consider bottom posting with interspersed replies.
I realiz(s)e that the existing:
http
On 09/22/2011 02:52 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 09/21/2011 11:16 PM, Cor Nouws wrote:
...
I know there are problems in 3.4 that are not present in 3.3. (and why).
And what the situation should be: that all problems have been described
in an issue and that the really annoying ones qualified
On 09/21/2011 11:16 PM, Cor Nouws wrote:
Hi Gary,
NoOp wrote (21-09-11 05:11)
If 3.4.x then I *highly* recommend trying 3.3.4 instead. To me it seems
that 3.4.x (3.4.3) is full of bugs and should never have been released
at all, particularly with this statement:
http
On 09/19/2011 02:35 AM, jef.peeraer wrote:
i try to upgrade all my OOo users to LO, but encounter a serious problem.
i have a template for labels to be printed on a ql-1060 (which has
default labels of 102 mm (4) width). The label format in the template
is user defined, 10,2 cm width and 6
.
Following /not/ snipped on purpose:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 7:16 AM, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
For those that continue to insist on top posting on the LO lists: please
consider bottom posting with interspersed replies.
I realiz(s)e that the existing:
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help
For those that continue to insist on top posting on the LO lists: please
consider bottom posting with interspersed replies.
I realiz(s)e that the existing:
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/
doesn't specifically clarify anything with regards to top/bottom
posting. However at the
On 09/05/2011 07:19 AM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
Hello,
I waht to invite you to our Monthly bug Hunting Session, what sill start
tomorrow, Tuesday 2011-09-06 at 13:00 UTC.
...
Rainer,
You may find this helpful when making these type of announcements:
On 08/23/2011 01:47 PM, Sveinn í Felli wrote:
Sorry if this is not the proper list to ask, but before
filing a bug I'd like to know if someone has seen this before:
The following .doc file does open correctly in
OpenOffice.org 3.3.0 and OpenOffice.org 3.2.1 but neither in
LibreOffice
On 08/01/2011 03:42 AM, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
Given that the release of LibreOffice 3.4.2 is targeted at enterprise
users, I find it surprising that the product is thought to be ready for
release. At lease 2 significant bugs have been introduced and remain
present that would, to my
On 07/18/2011 05:12 PM, Robert Boehm wrote:
On 07/18/2011 07:04 PM, plino wrote:
Robert Boehm wrote:
Obviously, if the version preferred by the installer is the only
version that the installed files will work with
is the only choice, then well, OK. But if it's compatible with the
latest
On 07/18/2011 06:07 PM, plino wrote:
NoOp wrote:
I'd recommend a followup to the dev list. plino, when you do that you
might also add links to the security notices for the earlier version of
VC++ 2008.
The Dev list is for devs only. I have unsubscribed from it.
I got crap for posting
On 07/16/2011 06:53 PM, Marc Paré wrote:
I have just installed Mageia Linux on a couple of boxes and due to the
fact that some of the websites the owners of these boxes wish to access
work best with sun java, I removed java openjdk. This then led to a
warning that the Oracle report builder
On 07/07/2011 12:05 PM, Cor Nouws wrote:
Hi Gary,
NoOp wrote (07-07-11 19:52)
On 07/07/2011 06:19 AM, Cor Nouws wrote:
Can you please explain how you create a text box in Writer, that you can
rotate? Did you do that via copy/paste with Draw?
View|Toolbars|Drawing
Click on the 'T'|write
On 07/04/2011 04:07 PM, Robert Derman wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 06/25/2011 03:37 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 25 Jun 2011, at 08:33, Ian Lynch wrote:
Manfred wrote:
I still believe that PDF
On 06/25/2011 03:37 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 25 Jun 2011, at 08:33, Ian Lynch wrote:
Manfred wrote:
I still believe that PDF is the best solution to distribute final
versions
of text (and maybe other
In the past I'd answered a few questions regarding OOo ECCN[1] and
pointed the poster to Sun's ECCN[2]. What are the implications for LO
general with regards to ECCN? I do see that Novell/Attachmate Group do
list an ECCN for LO[3] with a category of 5D992.
Given that questions eventually will
On 06/15/2011 08:20 AM, Marc Paré wrote:
Le 2011-06-15 10:09, plino a écrit :
Nabble posts are working.
Thanks ;)
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Ping-Florian-nntp-gmane-posts-to-user-list-still-not-getting-to-the-list-tp3061361p3067421.html
Sent
On 06/13/2011 11:29 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi Gary,
NoOp wrote on 2011-06-14 03.00:
Any idea when the issue with posting to the user list
(gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.user) ala your change from
@libreoffice.org to @global.libreoffice.org will be fixed? On that list
Florian,
Any idea when the issue with posting to the user list
(gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.user) ala your change from
@libreoffice.org to @global.libreoffice.org will be fixed? On that list
you are still missing contributions from gmane user/contributors. I
would have expected that
On 06/12/2011 01:43 AM, Francois Tigeot wrote:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 10:31:28AM +0200, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
Le 12/06/11 03:04, Uwe Altmann a écrit :
Meanwhile Adabas is a legacy product. I wonder if anyone uses it in a
productive environment. Surely not on a Mac.
As has been
On 06/11/2011 04:47 AM, Francois Tigeot wrote:
...
I think the picture is clear enough; I'll have a word on the developers list
and try to disable the Adabas D driver.
Please don't.
$ cat /etc/adabasrc
DBROOT=/opt/adabas
DBCONFIG=${DBCONFIG:-${HOME}/.adabas}
On 06/11/2011 01:45 AM, Francois Tigeot wrote:
...
Where did you find your download copy ? Is it recent ?
I had a look at the official website here :
http://www.softwareag.com/Corporate/products/adabas/rela_3rd_prod/adad/default.asp
and there's no download link.
The Download free Adabas D
On 06/11/2011 11:02 AM, Francois Tigeot wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:41:54AM -0700, NoOp wrote:
On 06/11/2011 04:47 AM, Francois Tigeot wrote:
I think the picture is clear enough; I'll have a word on the developers
list
and try to disable the Adabas D driver.
Please don't
On 06/11/2011 12:42 PM, Francois Tigeot wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 11:47:54AM -0700, NoOp wrote:
I'd experimented with Adabas D with OpenOffice.org. Unfortunately, I
can't test with LO due to not being able to use *any* data source:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32948
On 06/08/2011 08:59 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jun 7, 2011, at 7:04 PM, NoOp wrote:
Repeat.
On 06/06/2011 06:05 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 06/04/2011 05:10 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
...
Whether OOo lives or dies in Apache, Oracle has made it abundantly
clear that this is it... This is one
On 06/07/2011 01:01 AM, Cor Nouws wrote:
...
Apologies if this may have already been asked answered. If so, can
someone point me to the appropriate messages within the hundreds of posts
many, many threads on the ASF incubator list, or on this list?
Well, as much letters I spend on the
Repeat.
On 06/06/2011 06:05 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 06/04/2011 05:10 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
...
Whether OOo lives or dies in Apache, Oracle has made it abundantly
clear that this is it... This is one promise I fully expect Oracle
will keep :/
Interesting...
Could you clarify
On 06/07/2011 05:26 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 21:05, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
On 06/04/2011 05:10 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
...
Whether OOo lives or dies in Apache, Oracle has made it abundantly
clear that this is it... This is one promise I fully expect Oracle
On 06/04/2011 05:10 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
...
Whether OOo lives or dies in Apache, Oracle has made it abundantly
clear that this is it... This is one promise I fully expect Oracle
will keep :/
Interesting...
Could you clarify that statement?
1. @ASF: What happens to OOo if ASF votes *not*
On 06/02/2011 03:14 AM, plino wrote:
Another interesting article (especially the comments on the post and the
answers by Rob Weir)
http://www.robweir.com/blog/2011/06/apache-openoffice.html
...
Marbux speaks out:
http://www.itworld.com/marbux
(Paul E. (Marbux) Merrell, J.D. )
commenting on:
quote
REDWOOD SHORES, CA--(Marketwire - Jun 1, 2011) - With today's proposal
to contribute the OpenOffice.org code to The Apache Software
Foundation's Incubator, Oracle continues to demonstrate its commitment
to the developer and open source communities. Donating OpenOffice.org to
Apache gives
On 06/01/2011 09:23 AM, M Henri Day wrote:
2011/6/1 NoOp ...
More:
http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/statements-on-openofficeorg-contribution-to-apache-nasdaq-orcl-1521400.htm
It will be interesting to see how this works out how TDF will work
with ASF.
Fascinating, NoOp
On 06/01/2011 05:53 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 09:51:09AM -0700, NoOp wrote:
...
TDF's Statement:
http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2011/06/01/statement-about-oracles-move-to-donate-openoffice-org-assets-to-the-apache-foundation/
TDF's statement included :
Today
On 05/24/2011 11:43 PM, Volker Merschmann wrote:
Hi,
2011/5/25 NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net:
Is there one?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/
doesn't show or refer to one.
The german wiki page
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Local_Mailing_Lists/de has some
additions
Is there one?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/
doesn't show or refer to one.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive:
On 05/21/2011 11:04 AM, Robert Derman wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 05/19/2011 05:18 PM, NoOp wrote:
If you are a wikipedia member/contributor, perhaps you can have a look at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_OpenDocument_software
No mention of LibreOffice.
Appearantly
On 05/19/2011 05:18 PM, NoOp wrote:
If you are a wikipedia member/contributor, perhaps you can have a look at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_OpenDocument_software
No mention of LibreOffice.
Thanks Dubyus:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title
On 05/19/2011 10:23 AM, plino wrote:
Hi Tor
Please no. We who have had to look at that codebase and even fix some
problems
in it are glad that it is abandoned. It is a huge unmaintainable pile of
XSLT,
and then some silly C# code around that.
(snip)
Furthermore, this allegedly
On 05/19/2011 11:03 AM, Andras Timar wrote:
2011/5/19 plino pedl...@gmail.com:
Then I think it's time to create a proper C/C++ ODF importer for Word. If
this worked properly then this would be a further step in promoting ODF as a
de facto open format alternative.
ODF support is present in
If you are a wikipedia member/contributor, perhaps you can have a look at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_OpenDocument_software
No mention of LibreOffice.
However, before updating the page, be aware of:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.user/4599
On 05/03/2011 02:17 AM, Manfred Usselmann wrote:
On Mon, 02 May 2011 19:49:53 -0700
NoOp...
Sorry, but I'd have to disagree...
http://openoffice.org/terms_of_use
The resources are owned and operated by Oracle.
It's no contraction that the resource is made available by Oracle and
the forum
On 04/30/2011 01:56 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Harold Fuchs wrote:
Has Oracle given permission for TDF to use its forum, or doesn't TDF need
such permission? Does TDF *want* to use an Oracle resource?
I think Drew has already explained this on multiple mailing lists,
anyway: the forums at
To all the LibreOffice/TDF users/contributors in Japan areas affected
by the earthquake,
I wish you, your families, and friends well.
Gary
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts
On 03/10/2011 03:08 AM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
...
infrastructure budget. I'm not commenting on the language (you also
insulted me above, so don't throw the first stone), but he surely knows
what he is doing in technical terms.
My sincere apologies.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail
On 03/10/2011 02:47 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier wrote:
Hi Charles, *,
Charles Marcus schrieb:
On 2011-03-10 8:09 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
The one situation where unsubscribing is difficult is when the
reply asking for confirmation to unsubscribe is flagged as spam and
thus not sorted
On 03/10/2011 05:09 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 6:17 AM, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
On 03/09/2011 06:16 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
...
And you mentioned that one could have learned from OOo lists:
Ha, that is a good one. The OOo lists have explicit
an administrative interface, where list owners
can edit some settings and (un)subscribe people. I agree that a lack of
this is really ugly. However, it needs time and resources, so if anyone
volunteers to code, let us know. :-)
NoOp wrote on 2011-03-09 04.05:
1. Why are unsubscribed posts even
On 03/09/2011 06:16 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
...
And you mentioned that one could have learned from OOo lists:
Ha, that is a good one. The OOo lists have explicit unsubscribe
instructions in *every* footer, but still people complain about not
knowing to unsubscribe. So having that in
Of late there are multiple posts on the users list regarding mail list
subscribe and unsubscribe issues.
A post back in October [tdf-discuss] Mailing list user preferences?:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/100
[Note: I tried to find the thread in:
On 03/08/2011 07:05 PM, NoOp wrote:
...
4. Why is it necesary to send an email for unsubscribe instructions?
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org
etc at all? Hello... is this some type of secret handshake that takes
place to get off of the users list?
This list
On 02/27/2011 10:47 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,
NoOp wrote on 2011-02-27 22.52:
Found it.
security.enable.ssl2 was set to true. Reset it to false the page now
loads fine.
thanks for sharing! There are quite some other reports of issues with
the SSL certificate, so if anyone
On 02/27/2011 07:10 AM, M Henri Day wrote:
...
Interesting ! I checked this out in FF, Chromium, and Opera and at first
glance everything looked fine. However, that latest Opera contains a feature
that allows one to check security information with respect to a website, and
under the
On 02/27/2011 11:52 AM, M Henri Day wrote:
2011/2/27 NoOp snipped
On 02/27/2011 07:10 AM, M Henri Day wrote:
...
That's OK as it is pulling the images from an http vs http:
http://www.libreoffice.org/assets/resized_screenshots_avoid/Screenshot-12.png
In other words, its mixed only
On 02/27/2011 01:09 PM, M Henri Day wrote:
2011/2/27 NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net
On 02/27/2011 11:52 AM, M Henri Day wrote:
2011/2/27 NoOp snipped
On 02/27/2011 07:10 AM, M Henri Day wrote:
...
That's OK as it is pulling the images from an http vs http:
http://www.libreoffice.org
On 02/27/2011 12:15 PM, NoOp wrote:
...
Looks like a SeaMonkey profile issue. Just tried on a different machine
the regular profile gets the errors. Switched to a clean 'test'
profile and https://www.libreoffice.org/download works fine (linux). Now
I just have to find the correct mozilla
Florian, you need to update the new StartCom Certs to include
libreoffice.org.
www.libreoffice.org uses an invalid security certificate.
The certificate is only valid for the following names:
*.documentfoundation.org , documentfoundation.org
(Error code: ssl_error_bad_cert_domain)
On 02/25/2011 12:30 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Which site did you open? Seems to work here?
NoOp wrote on 2011-02-25 21.25:
Florian, you need to update the new StartCom Certs to include
libreoffice.org.
http://www.libreoffice.org/
Click on Download
http://www.libreoffice.org/download
On 02/25/2011 12:42 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 02/25/2011 12:30 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Which site did you open? Seems to work here?
NoOp wrote on 2011-02-25 21.25:
Florian, you need to update the new StartCom Certs to include
libreoffice.org.
http://www.libreoffice.org/
Click
On 02/25/2011 01:12 PM, NoOp wrote:
...
http://img638.imageshack.us/f/screenshot6z.png/
On the tab with that page open and this url:
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/installation/linux/
if I right click on 'Installation' I get this url:
https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/installation
On 02/25/2011 01:14 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 02/25/2011 01:12 PM, NoOp wrote:
...
http://img638.imageshack.us/f/screenshot6z.png/
On the tab with that page open and this url:
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/installation/linux/
if I right click on 'Installation' I get this url:
https
On 02/21/2011 02:16 PM, Mark Preston wrote:
I'm about ready to load up LibreOffice and start running it for work
but have really one simple question before I do. Background is I will
be running it on Windows Vista, currently run OpenOffice and will be
using it near daily including with MS
On 02/21/2011 12:18 AM, M Henri Day wrote:
2011/2/21 NoOp ...
Perhaps try iBus instead?
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ibus
NoOp, thanks for your suggestion. Alas, I found myself unable to get IBus to
work ; for example, after installing IBus according to the instructions on
the Ubuntu
On 02/21/2011 01:16 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi Peter,
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Peter Junge snipped wrote:
On 02/21/2011 04:18 PM, M Henri Day wrote:
SCIM is AFAIK really outdated.
SCIM works fine, worked fine for the past years.
...
On 02/20/2011 07:39 AM, M Henri Day wrote:
I recently had occasion to reinstall 64-bit Ubuntu 10.10 (n b, not because
of a problem in Ubuntu itself, but because I replaced Windows Vista with
Windows 7 on the Windows side of this dual-boot machine and thereafter
failed in my attempts to restore
On 02/14/2011 12:13 PM, twcw chenhall wrote:
On 12/02/11 00:55, NoOp wrote:
RC1 PreRelease missing 32bit debs
http://www.libreoffice.org/download/pre-releases/
64bit .debs are there, but not the 32bit .debs.
Clicking on 'Linux x86 (deb) results in:
null
Also checking:
http
On 02/12/2011 02:17 AM, M Henri Day wrote:
2011/2/12 Robert Holtzman hol...@cox.net
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:46:02PM +0100, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
Christophe Strobbe schrieb:
I hope they are, but[...]
Hi,
I see several problems:
On 02/10/2011 12:32 PM, abenglen wrote:
I have used OpenOffice for several years, and now I am trying to install
LibreOffice on a Windows XP computer. About 4/5th the way thru installing
(according to progress on the status bar), installation stops (hangs) and
goes no further. There was no
RC1 PreRelease missing 32bit debs
http://www.libreoffice.org/download/pre-releases/
64bit .debs are there, but not the 32bit .debs.
Clicking on 'Linux x86 (deb) results in:
null
Also checking:
http://download.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/testing/3.3.1-rc1/deb/
On 02/04/2011 12:18 AM, M Henri Day wrote:
2011/2/4 Harold Fuchs hwfa.libreoff...@gmail.com
...
Google translator translates your 戴安理 as Diane Li. Why, please? I have
*no* Chinese of any description (Mandarin, Cantonese, ...) whatsoever so, if
it's a pun or similar, please explain.
Oh, and
On 02/01/2011 01:44 AM, Magnus Johansson wrote:
I have made two test files with the kind of EPS images I work with. I put the
test together with OOo in the ODT document and then printed a PDF file of
that document with CUPS-PDF; I hope I managed to upload and attach them here
properly. With
On 01/30/2011 04:01 AM, Magnus Johansson wrote:
Halló Sveinn, and thanks for your reply. I don't know if my EPS images are
vector graphics or bitmapped. How can I find out?
This discussion is probably better over on the libereoffice user list -
that way you might find more answers.
I've had
On 01/27/2011 03:34 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi there,
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 18:43 -0800, NoOp wrote:
It also still uses soffice.exe et all in Windows; meaning that LO still
takes over OOo if both are installed in parallel.
Unfortunately, there is some inevitability of conflict here
On 01/27/2011 05:01 PM, Johanes Lee wrote:
Hi,
I downloaded LibreOffice 64-bit for Deb Version:
LibO_3.3.0_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
But extracted as following directory
LibO_3.3.0rc4_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US
Install success,
Found this version information in the
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
