Is there a way to break the $.each loops?
I'd like it to be
$.each(object, function() {
break;
});
but it doesen't seem so.
Andreas
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
On 1/4/07, Karl Swedberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I should have mentioned that I changed the HTML as well. I added an ID to
the submit button (submit-member). Notice how the event is being triggered
now: $('#submit-member').click(function() {...});
yes, I have that, and the event is happening
and yes, I've gone over to using a button type, and will likely cut
out the form tags too. thanks for that suggestion Doug.
--
Daniel McBrearty
email : danielmcbrearty at gmail.com
www.engoi.com : the multi - language vocab trainer
BTW : 0873928131
OK, I've fixed it. I also had a table which was used to align elements
which I had omitted for clarity. I looked up prev(), and saw that it
looks for the unique previous element ... removed the table and all
is OK.
My code us now this:
(in myapp.js )
$(document).ready(function() {
Hi guys,
I have a really really strange problem. I have the following case,
which I think is actually a browser bug that occurs in all major
browsers:
1.) I have a mousemove event attached to the document
2.) If I move out of the window holding a key pressed, the event still
fires, which is what
Christof,
I'm afraid that I simply don't take Safari users into account. Hardly a
great thing, but I focus on three browsers: Firefox and IE7, and then IE6.
In that order. The work I do is targetted at corporate users who run Windows
2000 and Firefox, and all the JS work I do is for those users.
Gavin M. Roy wrote:
I've released 0.11 of the jquery-modalContent plugin with the following
changes:
2006-12-19 patch from Tim Saker [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
1) Keyboard events are now only permitted on visible elements belonging to
the modal layer (child elements).
Has anybody written a game of Memory with jQuery that I can save myself
a lot of work from?
For those who can't remember how the game was played, here's an aweful
example:
http://www.queendom.com/mindgames/mindstretching/memory-games/memory-game1/index.html
--
Peter Bengtsson,
work
Thanks Aaron, Jörn for your responses.
Aaron - your solution gave me what I was after -
I'd seen that [...] structure in a couple of
posts in Nabble but I couldn't figure out how to
use it (or even if it was what I needed).
Jörn - in my context I'm using a class element
(class=deleteA) in
Hi
I have a suggestion to make for the interface elements plugin. I hope it
is ok to post it here, since the interface elements website does not
have a forum on its own (yet).
Selections can be done with CTRL-click, but CTRL-click on the Mac
simulates the right mouse button. So whenever I do a
Hi Daniel,
Thx for your suggestion. I will update the code.
Stefan
Daniel Lorch wrote:
Hi
I have a suggestion to make for the interface elements plugin. I hope it
is ok to post it here, since the interface elements website does not
have a forum on its own (yet).
Selections can be done
Hi!
A colleague of mine yesterday sent this mail, but didn't arrive to the
list. Now I try to resend it.
Best Regards,
Felhő
---
Hi,
I've just started working with jQuery (switched over from prototype) and
while I'm enjoying the experience very much, I've run into
since blockUI is generally a very useful thing i'd like
to propose a fairly simple workaround: just don't do the
blending when firefox/linux is detected - only display the
popup.
@bander: Thanks for the feedback. 3 seconds is an interesting value
because that's exactly how long the server
I can't seem to find the center() plugin that is listed at visualjquery.com,
anyone know where it is?
http://jquery.com/dev/svn/trunk/plugins/center/center.js?format=txt
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
On 04/01/07, Mike Alsup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
since blockUI is generally a very useful thing i'd like
to propose a fairly simple workaround: just don't do the
blending when firefox/linux is detected - only display the
popup.
@bander: Thanks for the feedback. 3 seconds is an
Andreas Wahlin schrieb:
Is there a way to break the $.each loops?
I'd like it to be
$.each(object, function() {
break;
});
but it doesen't seem so.
Andreas
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Doug Tabacco schrieb:
True, but if it's not meant to be submittable, you could always just
remove the form tags as well.
I always think of graceful degradation when building scripts/pages. With
JavaScript off any form is submittable, no matter if it is meant to be
or not.
From the initial
Brandon Aaron schrieb:
The dimensions plugin does not overwrite anything anymore. It only
*extends*. If you are currently using the .height() and .width()
methods from the core and then include dimensions.js, it will *not*
break anything. If it does, then please log it in the bug tracker so
Perhaps a better option would be for the overlay to use the same
background (image or colour) as the page? The effect would be the same
as having a page with only the loading message on it.
I think that would be rather jarring visually. The page should remain
visible, just not usable.
For
Webunity | Gilles van den Hoven schrieb:
Gavin M. Roy wrote:
I've released 0.11 of the jquery-modalContent plugin with the following
changes:
2006-12-19 patch from Tim Saker [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
1) Keyboard events are now only permitted on visible elements
On 04/01/07, Klaus Hartl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andreas Wahlin schrieb:
Is there a way to break the $.each loops?
I'd like it to be
$.each(object, function() {
break;
});
but it doesen't seem so.
Andreas
___
jQuery
Also, why does a string get returned as an array instead of a string?
I think that's just a firebug thing. It sees that the object has a
length prop and treats it like an array.
But more interesting is that your test did not produce the expected results.
Wow, lots of code... for my Thickbox adaption the following worked fine:
html, body {
min-height: 100%;
}
#yourDiv {
height: 100%;
}
#yourDiv has to be a direct child of the body...
Ah, thanks. But what if i want to overlay an overlay?
Gilles
Upon upgrading to jQuery 1.0.4 some of my slideUp/Down elements
started to flicker. With 1.0.3 this problem did not exist.
http://www.appelsiini.net/~tuupola/jquery/slideupdown/slideupdown5.html
http://www.appelsiini.net/~tuupola/jquery/slideupdown/slideupdown6.html
(Click the blue box in the
Giles, by any chance do you have an example of overlaying an overlay? I'd be
interested in seeing how that worked.
Scott
Webunity | Gilles van den Hoven wrote:
Wow, lots of code... for my Thickbox adaption the following worked fine:
html, body {
min-height: 100%;
}
#yourDiv {
I've just begun using javascript and jquery and I'm very impressed
with what can be acheived using it. Thank you for an excellent
product! :)
This may seem like a basic question but I've just started working with
javascript and am learning as I go. Why is it that
$(document).ready(function()
smoore wrote:
Giles, by any chance do you have an example of overlaying an overlay? I'd be
interested in seeing how that worked.
It was just theoretical ;)
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
I noticed it Firefox, but surprisingly it doesn't happen for me in Safari.
I'm injecting html into a div then sliding it down, and I assumed I might
not have written the code correctly, but I also noticed it on normal
elements as well.
Brian
Mika Tuupola wrote:
Upon upgrading to jQuery
I have a sortable list which contains quite a bit of html which includes a
child ul, and I noticed when I drag the element not all the css styles are
retained in the ghosted item. For example the child ul has the list-type:
none, but when its drug the bullets appear. A couple elements with
On 1/4/07, Klaus Hartl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Brandon Aaron schrieb:
The dimensions plugin does not overwrite anything anymore. It only
*extends*. If you are currently using the .height() and .width()
methods from the core and then include dimensions.js, it will *not*
break anything. If
Let me see what I can come up with. The app is not public, but maybe I
can throw something together that demonstrates the problem and put it on
my website.
Cheers,
Chris
bmsterling wrote:
Is there a way we can see this in action, I looked at the code and nothing
jumps out at me.
--
I'm not actually able to reproduce the flicker on Firefox 2 on mac or
Firefox 1.5 on pc with either link. However, I do believe it is
possible to have a flicker if the system is bogged down and here is
why.
Previous to 1.0.4 there were problems with nested and dynamically
loaded html into
Webunity | Gilles van den Hoven schrieb:
Wow, lots of code... for my Thickbox adaption the following worked fine:
html, body {
min-height: 100%;
}
#yourDiv {
height: 100%;
}
#yourDiv has to be a direct child of the body...
Ah, thanks. But what if i want to overlay an
Shane Graber - jQuery schrieb:
I've just begun using javascript and jquery and I'm very impressed
with what can be acheived using it. Thank you for an excellent
product! :)
This may seem like a basic question but I've just started working with
javascript and am learning as I go. Why is
Ahh.. This might explain why 1.0.4 breaks a hack I made to fix an IE bug. I
create an iframe element to shield DHTML layers absolutely positioned
over select boxes. I was using $().show(10) to force the expansion of the
Iframe within the box. This gives the box the exact dimensions required to
Just use the bgiframe plugin found in the plugins folder in SVN
(http://jquery.com/dev/svn/trunk/plugins/bgiframe/bgiframe.js?format=txt)
It will take care of the proper height, width, etc.
--
Brandon Aaron
On 1/4/07, Jeremy Dill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ahh.. This might explain why 1.0.4
Hi,
Your tablesorter jquery plugin make my life more easy. In our site we use
a lot of tables and Your plugin help us vey much.
But, we have tables with to much th with colspan in thead,
and your plugin don't work with these.
I make small modification to your jquery.tablesorte plugin to correct
Is this likely to be updated? The last version was for 1.0.2 of jQuery
and I have come across a few bugs with it. For instance, I tried it on
a page with little content and the overlay did not cover everything
(i.e. white background at the bottom). Also, if you shrink the browser
(tested on
I know this was asked before but I don't think it was answered.
Is there a way to determine if a width was applied to an element? I can get
the _current_ width via .css() or .curCSS and let's say it's 421px. I need
to know whether that came from a inline or stylesheet rule width: 421px or
that
Currently you could use the private method $.curCSS(element, property)
to get the value contained within the style sheet. Just using .css()
will use the private method $.css(element, property) which when
looking for height or width it will calculate it.
This is something on the table of proposals
Done a test (requires Firebug - or Firebug lite (which I presume would
also work)).
var foo = [one, 2, three, new Date()];
$.each(foo,
function()
{
if(this === 2) return false;
console.log(typeof this);
}
)
This logs:
[o, n, e]
2
Currently you could use the private method $.curCSS(element, property)
to get the value contained within the style sheet.
I tried that, but .curCSS also uses the calculated width (.currentStyle or
.getComputedStyle) which retrieves a value without saying where or how it
got that value. It could
When using the following code:
alert($('#ContactSelect').attr('tabIndex'));
I get [TypeError: elem has no properties.] when ContactSelect does not exist
on the page.
To avoid this error, I am doing this:
if ($('*').index(document.getElementById('ContactSelect'))!=-1)
Hi there,
is there any easy possibility to send a GET request like when sending it
via normal html? I am trying to simply load an URL with some GET
parameters, but I cannot load it in the foreground, but only with
getting a result set which represents the whole HTML code.
I already tried via
is there any easy possibility to send a GET request like when sending it
via normal html? I am trying to simply load an URL with some GET
parameters, but I cannot load it in the foreground, but only with
getting a result set which represents the whole HTML code.
That sounds like the default
I've got a stumper... well it's a stumper to me. I'm hoping someone here
can help me with it. I posted the problem before, but it's slightly
different now.
In the function to follow, I'm adding a div element to the DOM that
represents a row. Each row has a unique ID. For each of these divs
Mike Alsup schrieb:
is there any easy possibility to send a GET request like when sending it
via normal html? I am trying to simply load an URL with some GET
parameters, but I cannot load it in the foreground, but only with
getting a result set which represents the whole HTML code.
I'm developing a test site for a major bank using jQuery, but the folks are
not used to seeing the screen change so fast. I am using show/hide to show
different screens. They are not happy with the screens showing so fast
because they think the web users will not notice the differences in the
are you loading an entire html file into a body? ouch... that would
insert the scripts too, which would re-execute.. and loop infinitely,
you might want to get 'just the guts' and then insert that.
On 1/4/07, Arne-Kolja Bachstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
is there any easy
You could wrap the everything in a DIV and then call .hide() on that
div. Pretty interesting request ... I want the application to be
slower! lol...
--
Brandon Aaron
On 1/4/07, fidoogle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm developing a test site for a major bank using jQuery, but the folks are
not
What about absolutely positioning a div with a white background over
everything witha z-index of like 1. Just flash it for like 500
miliseconds and viola.
-js
On 1/4/07, fidoogle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm developing a test site for a major bank using jQuery, but the folks
are
not
Why don't use just do something like .hide('slow') and .show('slow')?
Or you could try Klaus Hartl's excellent Tabs plugin:
Info:
http://www.stilbuero.de/2006/11/05/tabs-version-2/
Demo:
http://www.stilbuero.de/jquery/tabs/
--Karl
_
Karl Swedberg
www.englishrules.com
Have you tried implementing a loading message? Perhaps using the block
UI plug-in? This would overlay the entire screen with a transparent
(semi-transparent?) layer over which you could put a message like
Please Wait Then when the call returns you can unblock the UI and
change the page...
No, you didn't really. But I have to use some JS to do this, because the
html form won't work that way. I am using a CMS that builds a form
around all the content which prevents a form from being usable in the
usual way, because nested forms don't work. So I have to manually read
out the
Instead of faking a reload, why don't you just add a status text message
that would signal the user of what has just occurred... then status fades
after a few seconds.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of fidoogle
Sent: Thursday, January
Hi folks,
How can I tell what class (or classes) an element has? For instance I've
got an elements like:
div class=classA classB/div
div class=classA classC/div
How can I select all elements that have classA and ClassB but not classC?
I'd also like to know how to select all items of a
Jeremy Dill schrieb:
When using the following code:
alert($('#ContactSelect').attr('tabIndex'));
I get [TypeError: elem has no properties.] when ContactSelect does not
exist on the page.
To avoid this error, I am doing this:
if
if ThisIndex is off by one .. you'd see the missing last click
symptom... it's hard to tell because the code is large and I can't see
if the classes get set correctly... you can simple slam the click on
all the elements... it is overkill but that may shed some more light.
On 1/4/07, Christopher
Christopher Jordan schrieb:
Hi folks,
How can I tell what class (or classes) an element has? For instance I've
got an elements like:
div class=classA classB/div
div class=classA classC/div
How can I select all elements that have classA and ClassB but not classC?
$('div.classA,
Thanks Jake. I've been thinking that something is off by one, but I
can't tell where it's getting that way. I've been putting debugging
alerts all over the place. It seems to loop through the requisite number
of times. :o/
I'll give something like you suggest a go... see what that tells me.
Christopher,
When I have a problem like this, I take a peek at what's really going
on with firebug... I was turned on to firebug by the folks here
first... it makes debugging almost fun!
Jake
On 1/4/07, Christopher Jordan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks Jake. I've been thinking that something
Klaus Hartl wrote:
Christopher Jordan schrieb:
Hi folks,
How can I tell what class (or classes) an element has? For instance I've
got an elements like:
div class=classA classB/div
div class=classA classC/div
How can I select all elements that have classA and ClassB but not classC?
or even better, use a slower effect, like slideUp, hide ('slow') or
something, which would draw the users attention
On 1/4/07, Michael E. Carluen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Instead of faking a reload, why don't you just add a status text message
that would signal the user of what has just
Hi,
I'm afraid that I simply don't take Safari users into account. Hardly a
great thing, but I focus on three browsers: Firefox and IE7, and then IE6.
In that order. The work I do is targetted at corporate users who run
Windows 2000 and Firefox, and all the JS work I do is for those users.
Would you like an Array iterator that works the way you'd
expect? Here is a simple one:
Array.prototype.each = function( yields ) {
for( var i = 0, n = this.length; i n; i++ ) {
if( yields( this[i], i ) === false )
break;
}
};
That's a good, workable solution!
Cheers,
Dan
Christof Donat wrote:
Hi,
I'm afraid that I simply don't take Safari users into account. Hardly a
great thing, but I focus on three browsers: Firefox and IE7, and then
IE6.
In that order. The work I do is targetted at corporate users who
I'd love to do that, but my app doesn't work in FF... :o( Know of a good
(and free) javascript console debugger for IE?
Chris
Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ wrote:
Christopher,
When I have a problem like this, I take a peek at what's really going
on with firebug... I was turned on to firebug by the folks here
first...
Mike Alsup schrieb:
No, you didn't really. But I have to use some JS to do this, because the
html form won't work that way. I am using a CMS that builds a form
around all the content which prevents a form from being usable in the
usual way, because nested forms don't work. So I have to
do jquery selectors support something like 'select every
[EMAIL PROTECTED] OR password]', eg: $('[EMAIL PROTECTED]|password]) ? ..
i know i can select them like
$('[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]'), but the other method could
be faster, if supported, i think :)..
Briz schrieb:
I'm mostly interested in how to cleanly and reliably deal with scope
issues in callbacks.
I haven't read every detail of your example. Some suggestions:
- Do not extend Object.prototype. That can give you quite a lot of trouble
- Try to gather all necessary callbacks inside the
I'm afraid that I simply don't take Safari users into
account. Hardly a great thing, but I focus on three
browsers: Firefox and IE7, and then IE6.
In that order. The work I do is targetted at corporate
users who run Windows 2000 and Firefox, and all the
JS work I do is for those
I'm relatively new to jQuery. I've been playing around w/the API a bit and
slowly implementing it into some work.
Today I've been making some modifications to the Autocomplete library to
meet certain requirements of a project. One of the modifications I've made
is to allow local data to be passed
Peter Bengtsson schrieb:
Has anybody written a game of Memory with jQuery that I can save myself
a lot of work from?
For those who can't remember how the game was played, here's an aweful
example:
http://www.queendom.com/mindgames/mindstretching/memory-games/memory-game1/index.html
I
Hodicska Gergely schrieb:
As far as I can see, this is because
invoking the effect changes the display style of my element to block.
My question is, is this the intended/desired behaviour or should this be
considered a bug? Is there maybe a way to circumvent this changing of
the display
Another thing I'm noticing is that IE breaks the link underline when using
the below code. But if you then click anywhere else on the page after
clicking the link, the underline reappears.
And if you change 'var all_link' to $(this).html( # Hide All My Items );
it breaks in IE but works as
Michael Geary schrieb:
Hmm... This would make a nice patch for jQuery itself - when it concatenates
all the files to make the various dist versions, add this line to the end
of the merged code:
window.jQuery_onload jQuery_onload();
John et al, what do you think?
The implementation is
- Use your object function (jQuery.foo) only as a constructor, try to
put all methods into jQuery.foo.prototype (less stuff in cunstructor -
better OO design)
Obviously you can't access self from your methods, so you have to
design everything well enough to be able to work without self
Hmm
Hello folks,
I'm seeking help in dynamically REMOVING an inline script block
within the head tags.
My current application involves a case study editor, wherein users
add/delete/edit branches to a decision tree. The visual
representation of the tree is generated by COOLjsTree
Jeremy Dill schrieb:
I have intentions of someday creating a
jquery plugin to replace select boxes with customizable css dropdowns (while
maintaining the selectbox hidden in form).
There are already at least two implementations, though both
work-in-progress, afaik. I think one was written by
Klaus Hartl schrieb:
Andreas Wahlin schrieb:
Is there a way to break the $.each loops?
I'd like it to be
$.each(object, function() {
break;
});
but it doesen't seem so.
Andreas
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
Dan G. Switzer, II schrieb:
jQuery.fn.autocompleteLocal = function(data, options) {
return jQuery.fn.autocomplete(null, options, data);
}
But this doesn't work. How can I extend the jQuery.fn.autocomplete plug-in
to do what I want?
Your example doesn't make much sense. Maybe something
Felix Geisendörfer schrieb:
Personally I prefer wrapping all of my class code inside a function
over using prototype to extend it.
By using the prototype you force yourself to design without relying on
the closure everywhere. If this results in a better design or not is
more or less personal
$('script').remote();
Should do the trick right? Assuming that you put that before the call to
Mike's function (which probably adds script tags).
Andy Matthews
Senior Coldfusion Developer
Office: 877.707.5467 x865
Direct: 615.627.9865
Fax: 615.467.6249
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andreas, if I remember correctly, the following should work:
$.each(object, function() {
return false;
});
That isn't supported. The necessary code was removed due to
unsolved problems. Actually the stuff that Michael just
posted would help a lot to solve it, though I'm not
Thanks, gentlemen. This is very helpful; exactly the kind of advice I was
looking for.
Zörn, re: changing Object.prototype, I just did that for this example so ie
wouldn't throw an error when using .toSource().
I'm investigating this because jQuery has allowed me more time to think
about better
Michael Geary schrieb:
The code I posted does solve this problem completely - simply use objectEach
instead of $.each, and change your callback function to take explicit
parameters instead of using this.
Using this in an object iterator doesn't make much sense anyway. You need
two arguments
Jörn,
That was it. I'm having trouble figuring out the namespace of the plug-ins.
Thanks!
-Dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jörn Zaefferer
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 5:05 PM
To: jQuery Discussion.
Subject: Re: [jQuery] Q:
Hi,
That looks really dodgy, sorry.
What if the browser downloads script and script2 at the same time, and
script2 finishes first?
It doesn't. script2 is not downloaded at all, it is like a inline script. As
you might know scripts are evaluated in the order they are in the HTML code,
that
You could also read in the file using Coldfusion or PHP and remove the
script block that way.
-
Andy Matthews
Senior Coldfusion Developer
Office: 877.707.5467 x865
Direct: 615.627.9865
Fax: 615.467.6249
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.dealerskins.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Hi,
I'm seeking help in dynamically REMOVING an inline script block
within the head tags.
I guess you whant to remove values in a variable. You should not do that by
removing script-tags, because that does not remove the variables in it. Send
your data as JSON and write a refresh function
Hi all,
i found a little Bug in the great Nifty Corners Plugin, found at,
http://labs.pb-projects.de/nifty/index.html
The function same-height works not correct, see the Demo:
http://olaf-bosch.de/bugs/jquery/nifty/
Cane we fix that?
To know well, correct selektor also does not work, i must
Hi,
The new front-end platform is running on PHP 5 with the Smarty
Template Engine (http://smarty.php.net) for templating, presentation
plugins and front-end caching.
Sorry for the offtopic, but maybe Template Lite would be a better choice
in case of a high traffic site.
I think that's just getting too fancy for this plugin. This is meant
to be a very low overhead solution and I'd like to get the size down
to 1K if possible.
Well, I couldn't get it under 1K, but it's under 2! (packed)
I've made the following changes to blockUI:
- ghosting is not performed
do jquery selectors support something like 'select every [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OR password]', eg: $('[EMAIL PROTECTED]|password]) ? .. i know i can select
them like $('[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]'), but the other method
could be faster, if supported, i think :)..
I think you can do
Hi,
As you might know scripts are evaluated in the
order they are in the HTML code, that is that script will be
evaluated before script2 is.
Interesting - is that guaranteed even when the scripts are added
dynamically?
Well, I don't know about any guarantees, but it works in all test I
Hi folks,
I've got another simple question. Is this not how you set an element's
attribute?
[from inside an .each()]
$(this).attr(AttributeName, Value);
I thought that worked... I thought it had worked for me in the past.
Is there any reason that this wouldn't work:
var i = 1;
..that's basically the same as
$('[EMAIL PROTECTED],[EMAIL PROTECTED]'), but the docs say using
:text is faster.. but it would be nice to have the ability to select
elements in such manner ( eg. $('[EMAIL PROTECTED]|bar]') or
$('[EMAIL PROTECTED]|bar]') )
i had a need for such things a few
On Thursday, January 04, 2007 9:41 AM fidoogle said:
They are not happy with the
screens showing so fast because they think the web users will not
notice the differences in the screens. They've asked me to put in
page reloads. In their minds they want the code to go back to the
server to
I just took a look at the code for $.each and noticed that is passes two
arguments to the callback, the name/index of the current item and the item
itself (in that order).
Test page: http://aheimlich.freepgs.com/tests/jquery/each-test/
On 1/4/07, Michael Geary [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
This is a necessary limitation.
May I ask you to explain why is this necessary. (We user earlier
prototype and scriptaculos did not use this approach.) (Sorry for
mentioning prototype on this mail list, I'm just curious about this topic.)
A possible workaround is to put the
inline
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
