On 9/24/06, Mike Alsup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the global responders for individual requests -- as Klaus points out, there> are often XHR requests that don't merit the user's attention.You can't really "override" the global responders. If you declare
local handlers they are called in addition
> Mike, I agree, right now there is no override mechanism. It would be
> pretty
> easy to add one though -- add an optional boolean argument
> (supressGlobalResponders or something) on the ajax function, and then
> check
> its value before invoking the global responders. You could then utilize a
>
Andre, Zörn,
Those are both good ideas for overriding the global callbacks. I'd
like that capability.
Mike
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
While I'm I can't answer your problem, I can say that load works fine for me
in IE6, and for it not to work would have been noticed much sooner as it's
quite a widely used part of jQuery.
The test suite also confirms that it's working as well.
Ok So... name... It's used further up the scrip
How about having a list as an item of the sublist?
Menu 1
Menu 2
Menu 2.1
Menu 2.2
Menu 3
Menu 4
I'm not overly sure about Suckerfish though, as I don't have it to hand. But
most JS-based menu systems work using lists, and something like this would
be acceptabl
Try this:
$.post("handler.php", { data: "comments=" + comment_value + "&id=" + userid,
success: comment_success(userid) }, function(data){ alert("Data Loaded: " +
data); } )
I hope this is what you're looking for.
As you can see, the callback comes after the params.
Junior wrote:
>
> I have
Bah...
This is a popularity contest! All this shows it that:
43% of folks love code bloat
33% love even more code bloat, because it does one thing that's cool
19% enjoy unnecessary functions that they'll never use
12% of people are kidding themselves
11% of people saw the name and thought 'cool'
This just shows that we need to do something to push up the profile of jQuery. We're obviously making progress, but Prototype and Scriptaculous are the king and queen at the moment.Anyone up for a jQuery marketing side-project?
-- YehudaOn 9/25/06, Dan Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bah...This
Julius Lucks wrote:
>
> The app throws up about 10 or so of these divs and what I see is the
> textareas appear and then blip out of existence.
That could make it slow. You're expecting it to perform '10 or so
simultaneous operations locally. Hide works (as I understand), by first
switching the
@ Yehuda Katz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
> This just shows that we need to do something to push up the profile of
> jQuery. We're obviously making progress, but Prototype and Scriptaculous are
> the king and queen at the moment.
I'm not sure it stays like this for long. jQuery is only, what, one month
Always.
I think more publicity of the cool side of jQuery needs highlighting.
Games, chat clients, guerilla advertising... It's all cool.
wycats wrote:
>
> This just shows that we need to do something to push up the profile of
> jQuery. We're obviously making progress, but Prototype and Scri
Hi Mike,
I too vote for putting the form plugin to the core.
> The recent increase in questions about form serialization and form
> submission makes me wonder the following about why the form plugin is
> not used more:
>
> 1. Is it not meeting your needs?
No.
> 2. Did you not know it exist
Fil wrote:
>
> jQuery is only, what, one month old?
>
Try thirteen months! :) It moved from beta to stable last month, but it has
been around for over a year now.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Ajaxian-Framework-Results-tf2324688.html#a6485512
Sent from the JQuery mai
> > jQuery is only, what, one month old?
>
> Try thirteen months! :) It moved from beta to stable last month, but it has
> been around for over a year now.
Yes I know that. But the official release is only one month old.
-- Fil
___
jQuery mailing lis
Yes. But this is classed as 'web 2.0' so everything is aged from its beta
release! ;)
Fil wrote:
>
>> > jQuery is only, what, one month old?
>>
>> Try thirteen months! :) It moved from beta to stable last month, but it
>> has
>> been around for over a year now.
>
> Yes I know that. But the of
I'm interested to know how to extend the selector syntax to accept things
like axis definitions etc. (I know from the forum that we should be using
the .parents() methods etc but I'd like to extend the selector syntax
myself.)
While the .parent() and .children() methods etc work very well when co
No doubt.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Rey Bango
Sent: Friday, September 22, 2006 4:44 PM
To: jQuery Discussion.
Subject: Re: [jQuery] Visual jQuery Magazine
I think thats what you call the 5:30am proof-reading error. ;o)
Rey...
Andy
Hi
all,
I want to
selecting
all input and select elements that are not hidden, while remaining there
original dom order..
but when i
use$('input','select') or .find('input','select') it first adds all input
elements and then all select elements, which causes me to lose the dom
order..
> BTW, curious to know answers to Mike's questions about the deserialize
> plugin
Hi Ashutosh,
Regarding your question,
1. I think your deserializer is a great plugin and I expect to use it
in the future but I haven't had an actual use case for it yet. So it
hasn't been a matter of it not meeti
I'm attempting to use Sortables to sort a list of images but can't get the onchange callback to work. I am able to drag and drop the elements just fine. I've also tried other callbacks like onDrag and tried 'onChange' as well.
Here is my code: $('ul').Sortable({ onchange: function(){alert
Hi Jorn,
> ...As long as this is
> introduced with a major release with proper release notes, it shouldn't
> be a big problem to upgrade.
I disagree with this statement. If my codebase is dependent on a
specific type of return value from a method and I've used that method in
numerous places i
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Rey Bango wrote:
> I refer back to EasyDOM that, at the moment, will only work on v1.0a.
> The upgrade to v1.0.1 broke the functionality. Further, I recall an
> email that I sent out early this month that referred to the set()
> method, which is used in EasyDOM, to which John
> I want to selecting all input and select elements that are not hidden, while
> remaining there original dom order..
You can do that with expressions. I think this will work:
$('#myForm :visible')
Mike
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http
Thanks Dave. I think as long as its not a regular occurence (breaking
backward compatibility) and its well thought out, then it shouldn't be
an issue.
Rey...
Dave Benjamin wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Rey Bango wrote:
>
>
>>I refer back to EasyDOM that, at the moment, will only work on v1.0a
On 9/25/06, Dan Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> While I'm I can't answer your problem, I can say that load works fine for me
> in IE6, and for it not to work would have been noticed much sooner as it's
> quite a widely used part of jQuery.
>
> The test suite also confirms that it's working
Expect a corrected copy (call it issue 1.01) tonight.-- YehudaOn 9/23/06, Klaus Hartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:Yehuda Katz schrieb:> One of the nice things about having a *digital* publication is that I
> can make these changes :). Expect an updated copy of the Visual jQuery> Magazine in a few da
That's certainly true of me! I didn't use JS at all until I came across
jQuery. Now I'm using it _all_ the time.
-Original Message-
> The motto will be "I never liked javascript, until I met jQuery".
> -- Fil
__
This em
http://www.politieknieuws.nl/Home/tabid/36/Default.aspx
just added the innerfade plugin to the politieknieuws site. Just below
the tabs it rotates to the most read newsitems on the portal
thanks for the plugin, now all i need to remove is the scrollign
photobar with jquery and the site is even fa
Hey guys,I finally got around to doing a bit of documentation on my editInPlace plugin. You can check it out at http://jquery.com/docs/Plugins/editInPlace/
There are two major benefits of my plugin over the "official" one: * Gives "submit" and "cancel" buttons * Supports checkboxes and select boxes
In my editInPlace script, I do:$(editable).animate({opacity: .5}, "normal", function() {$(editable).animate({opacity: 1}, "normal")});which results in a slow emphasis. I think it works better than the yellow-fade for emphasizing success of an update.
What do you guys think?-- Yehuda KatzWeb Develop
Armand,
Looks good, but it's tough to click on a particular item as the ticker
cycles awfully fast...
Maybe consider using the newsTicker plugin:
http://www.texotela.co.uk/code/jquery/newsticker/
It's very lightweight and pauses on hover, so individual items can be
"frozen", allowing for easie
Got this worked out. I didn't realize I needed id's on the LI elements.On 9/25/06, Kevin Bosak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:I'm attempting to use Sortables to sort a list of images but can't get the onchange callback to work. I am able to drag and drop the elements just fine. I've also tried o
Sorry to be doing this, but I just want to try one last round of promotion.The Visual jQuery Magazine is about to fall off the bottom of the front page of the Programming Category. To try to forestall that for a bit, please digg it if you haven't already (and ask your friends to do so as well!).
Yo
I don't think you should symbolize success or failure through colors
or subtle effects. People with disabilities can't easily recognize
that. Better create a text that shows "Saving successful." and obeys
the font size the user has set (and voiceover etc.).
Am 25.09.2006 um 17:11 schrieb Ye
I should point out that, after Digg's recent changes, it'll quite easily spot
'cartels' which regularly vote on the same stories.
If the same people digg the same articles, then what'll happen is that, by
issue 3 - 6 or so, our votes will be nigh on worthless as they will be
reweighted to prevent
Yehuda, next time put a combination of 'Most Amazing Video Ever!',
'Ruby', 'Free', 'Ajax' and 'OSX' and you'll never move off the front
page :)
Again, nice work on the magazine.
--
-David
Quoting Yehuda Katz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Sorry to be doing this, but I just want to try one last roun
The title was 'cool', not 'accessible'! ;-)
You're probably right, but somehow text with large letters saying 'SUCCESS'
or 'FAILURE' just don't seem 'cool' enough.
Konstantin K?fer wrote:
>
> I don't think you should symbolize success or failure through colors
> or subtle effects. People wit
David,
Add "top 10" and "bush" to that list.
Will
> Yehuda, next time put a combination of 'Most Amazing Video Ever!',
> 'Ruby', 'Free', 'Ajax' and 'OSX' and you'll never move off the front
> page :)
>
> Again, nice work on the magazine.
>
> --
> -David
>
> Quoting Yehuda Katz <[EMAIL PROTECT
Coolaid!
It's just a damned shame that the wiki chews the code tags.
wycats wrote:
>
> Hey guys,
>
> I finally got around to doing a bit of documentation on my editInPlace
> plugin. You can check it out at
> http://jquery.com/docs/Plugins/editInPlace/
>
> There are two major benefits of my pl
Dan ,
Just append the DOM w/ a paypal donate button.
"Ajax has been successfully implemented, now send me cash to continue"
> The title was 'cool', not 'accessible'! ;-)
>
> You're probably right, but somehow text with large letters saying 'SUCCESS'
> or 'FAILURE' just don't seem 'cool' enough.
Well hopefully, by that time the magazine will have taken off on it's own
and it won't be a problem.
Good point though.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Dan Atkinson
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 11:01 AM
To: discuss@jquery.com
Subject: R
Lol!
That's so cruel!
Will Jessup wrote:
>
> Dan ,
>
> Just append the DOM w/ a paypal donate button.
>
> "Ajax has been successfully implemented, now send me cash to continue"
>
>
>> The title was 'cool', not 'accessible'! ;-)
>>
>> You're probably right, but somehow text with large lette
Yup. When I get some time, I may add a "plugin" section to visualjQuery.com with some of my plugins (I have some other cool stuff I worked on for a VERY AJAXy project I did).-- Yehuda
On 9/25/06, Dan Atkinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Coolaid!It's just a damned shame that the wiki chews the code t
We should work up a digg-strategy based on the new digg algorithm. I was quite happy about the diggs, but I know it could have been a lot better.At some point, I'll do a site redesign, and we can digg that up.
-- YehudaOn 9/25/06, David Olinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yehuda, next time put a com
Here's the proposed title for issue two:
BREAKING NEWS: MOST AMAZING FREE NON-RIAA WEB 2.0/AJAX MAGAZINE EVER WITH
PHOTOS!
The use of specific words are well known to SEO folks now. A good freelancer
can make hundreds of dollars a day by digging stories to the front page.
References:
http://www
BTW: I think Accessibility is super-important (there will even be an article in Issue 2 of the Magazine about it), but it's a bit foolish to never use any effects because of accessibility concerns. It's pretty much a given that the way the Accesible functionality will work will be less "rich-app-li
If someone writes a plugin which determines that the user is partially
sighted, then I'll be there with alert boxes and size 128 fonts on my site*.
And cool stuff for the rest.
Has someone written something like this?
*Please note, there will be no size 128 fonts on my site. But, I'll cater
for
Looks great! It would be a cool addition if there were a way to edit
everything inside a ; sort of like the ajaxSubmit feature but for
editing, and have one Submit button at the bottom. It's probably a bit out
of the scope of this plugin, but would be a cool idea nonetheless. At least
I'd use it,
> I need help to make the following code works in IE :
>
> document.writeln("");
> var tablename = "some_table";
> $("#"+name).load("table_query.php", {table: tablename});
> document.writeln("<\/select>");
>
> Script table_query.php return elements. This code
> From: Dan Atkinson
>
> Also, I'm unsure why you want to use document.writeln as I
> find jQuery's methods much more compact and neat.
I don't know if it relates to this specific code, but there are things you
can do with document.writeln that you can't do with DOM manipulation.
Specifically, t
> From: Yehuda Katz
>
> In my editInPlace script, I do:
>
> $(editable).animate({opacity: .5}, "normal", function()
{$(editable).animate({opacity: 1}, "normal")});
>
> which results in a slow emphasis. I think it works better than
> the yellow-fade for emphasizing success of an update.
>
> What d
Yehuda,
I like it! But I keep getting "null" for the value parameter when I pass it
onto my PHP processor. "ID" comes through OK...
Any ideas?
My code, simply:
$(document).ready(function() {
var url="test_proc.php";
$(".editable").editInPlace(url);
});
(assign to all element
Nice anecdote.You can check out a demo here:http://www.visualjquery.com/plugins/animate.html-- Yehuda
On 9/25/06, Michael Geary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Yehuda Katz>> In my editInPlace script, I do:>> $(editable).animate({opacity: .5}, "normal", function(){$(editable).animate({opacity: 1}
Do you have a link?-- YehudaOn 9/25/06, dizzledorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yehuda,I like it! But I keep getting "null" for the value parameter when I pass itonto my PHP processor. "ID" comes through OK...Any ideas?My code, simply:$(document).ready(function() {
var url="">$(".ed
http://www.engagingdesigns.com/sandbox/editinplace/
Thanks,
--DIZZLE
wycats wrote:
>
> Do you have a link?
>
> -- Yehuda
>
> On 9/25/06, dizzledorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Yehuda,
>>
>>
>> I like it! But I keep getting "null" for the value parameter when I pass
>> it
>> onto my
What's up with the [EMAIL PROTECTED] stuff in the value section of the code?-- YehudaOn 9/25/06, dizzledorf <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://www.engagingdesigns.com/sandbox/editinplace/Thanks,--DIZZLEwycats wrote:>> Do you have a link?>> -- Yehuda>> On 9/25/06, dizzledorf <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
Hi All!
I have been working hard to get filtering into the next release of
TableSorter. So i have put up a "rough" demo of how it will work.
The demo is located here:
http://motherrussia.polyester.se/pub/jquery/demos/filter/filter-demo.html
In the full release filtering on dates will work and
This is exactly what was in the code section of
http://jquery.com/docs/Plugins/editInPlace/.
I simply copied it into a file called "editinplace.js".
Is there a .js file that can be downloaded directly?
wycats wrote:
>
> What's up with the [EMAIL PROTECTED] stuff in the value section of the
>
> The Visual jQuery Magazine is about to fall off the bottom of the front page
> of the Programming Category. To try to forestall that for a bit, please digg
> it if you haven't already (and ask your friends to do so as well!).
You do realize that that's not how Digg works, right? Stories get dugg
There was a glitch along the way. I've updated it with what should be a correct version.-- YehudaOn 9/25/06, dizzledorf <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:This is exactly what was in the code section of
http://jquery.com/docs/Plugins/editInPlace/.I simply copied it into a file called "editinplace.js".Is th
On 9/25/06, John Resig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Visual jQuery Magazine is about to fall off the bottom of the front page> of the Programming Category. To try to forestall that for a bit, please digg> it if you haven't already (and ask your friends to do so as well!).
You do realize that tha
Yehuda,
That was it. Replaced the mangled ("[EMAIL PROTECTED]") version with the
one you just posted and it's running smoothly.
Nice work!
--DIZZLE
wycats wrote:
>
> There was a glitch along the way. I've updated it with what should be a
> correct version.
>
> -- Yehuda
>
> On 9/25/06,
Christian Bach schrieb:
> Hi All!
>
> I have been working hard to get filtering into the next release of
> TableSorter. So i have put up a "rough" demo of how it will work.
>
> The demo is located here:
> http://motherrussia.polyester.se/pub/jquery/demos/filter/filter-demo.html
>
> In the full re
Cool. The next step would be to get a working checkbox ;)-- YehudaOn 9/25/06, dizzledorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:Yehuda,That was it. Replaced the mangled ("[EMAIL PROTECTED]") version with the
one you just posted and it's running smoothly.Nice work!--DIZZLEwycats wrote:>> There was a glitch alo
Hey guys,I'm going to be putting together a video to be posted on YouTube as an advertisement for jQuery.I'd love to get MP3 or text testimonials from you guys explaining why the switch to jQuery changed the way you do _javascript_. MP3s are ideal, but I can work with text too.
Send your comments t
Hi folks,
after the discussion about the global ajax handlers and the question, if
the form plugin should be merged into the core, I'd like to know
wheather anyone has any other issues, problems or ideas for the AJAX
module that can be addressed. Now is the time!
I'm currently adding lots of t
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Yehuda Katz wrote:
> Good fyi. I'd quibble about the front-page of the programming section.
> I'm sure there are *some* people that check sections of interest to
> them. May not be a whole lot of people, but there are certainly *some.*
> Am I missing something?
I get the p
On 9/26/06, Yehuda Katz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You guys have put Visual jQuery on the map. If you can help with one final
> push, I'd be eternally grateful.
I'd suggest getting a Visual jQeury Magazine article on Ajaxian.com. I
think it has a reasonable amount of readers. You can use the
con
I did so a few days ago. They didn't pick up the story.On 9/25/06, Justin Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:On 9/26/06, Yehuda Katz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:> You guys have put Visual jQuery on the map. If you can help with one final> push, I'd be eternally grateful.I'd suggest getting a Visual j
I know ajaxian has a lot of readers, when i figured out the mooglets API, ajaxian linked to it, and i just about tripled my hits for the days that that article was on the front page.On 9/25/06,
Justin Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/26/06, Yehuda Katz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> You guys ha
I am writing a routine that can accept any element.
I need to determine whether the element is displayed inline,
as a box or some other display type.
Is there a way to determine this if it has not already been
set by a style?
An unstyled A tag should return a display type of inline,
wh
There is a bug in Droppables right now (I have the latest code, and the bug is also present on the Droppables demo page on interface.eyecon.ro), where the tolerance : "pointer" isn't working. I debugged a little and
jQuery.iDrop.pointer is using the value of jQuery.iDrag.dragged.dragCfg.pointer.x
www.visualjquery.com
go to .css
Will
>
> I am writing a routine that can accept any element.
>
> I need to determine whether the element is displayed inline, as a box
> or some other display type.
>
> Is there a way to determine this if it has not already been set by a
> style?
>
> An unstyled
same here, seldom did i use javascript... until jquery came, and the
jquery plugins, the best!!! c",)
Chris Mcleod wrote:
> That's certainly true of me! I didn't use JS at all until I came across
> jQuery. Now I'm using it _all_ the time.
>
> -Original Message-
>
>> The motto will be "I
Hi,
Has anyone tested this patch? I've just run into some problems with
opacity in IE and I'm hoping this can fix it... Is there any reason for
it not to find its way into the code?
Cheers,
Kelvin :)
Brandon Aaron wrote:
> I just added a patch to trac [1] that resolves the opacity issues (at
Ah, got it.
.css returns the currentStyle
Thanks
-Geoff
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Will Jessup
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 4:03 PM
To: jQuery Discussion.
Subject: Re: [jQuery] how to get the display value of an element?
www.vis
I don't know who is the administrator of this maillist, and I received
a man his email is [EMAIL PROTECTED], and he talk with me some
jQuery questions, and he said he tried to subscribe this maillist, but
failed. So he asked me talk to the administrator that adding him into
this maillist, very than
Is it permissable to have more than one
$(document).ready(function() {})
per page?
If it is not, would this be a good workaround?
$(document).ready(function() {runGlobalJQueryFunctions();runLocalJQueryFunctions();
return false;
});
The reason is that one group is managing a global header and an
I had the same problem asked JR, and all of a sudden I was subscribed!
On 9/25/06, limodou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know who is the administrator of this maillist, and I received
> a man his email is [EMAIL PROTECTED], and he talk with me some
> jQuery questions, and he said he tri
On 9/26/06, Kelvin Luck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Has anyone tested this patch? I've just run into some problems with
> opacity in IE and I'm hoping this can fix it... Is there any reason for
> it not to find its way into the code?
>
> Cheers,
>
I don't test it, but I have the same probl
On 26/09/06, Glen Lipka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is it permissable to have more than one
$(document).ready(function() {})
per page?Absolutely. The function is just appended to the handler I believe.Chris
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http:
> Is it permissable to have more than one
> $(document).ready(function() {})
> per page?
Yes, as many as you want. They will be called in the same order that the
$(document).ready() calls were made.
Note that there is a handy shortcut for $(document).ready():
$( function(){} );
-Mike
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Michael Geary wrote:
>> Is it permissable to have more than one
>> $(document).ready(function() {})
>> per page?
>
> Yes, as many as you want. They will be called in the same order that the
> $(document).ready() calls were made.
If it gets called at all.
Am I the only one he
On 9/26/06, Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> jQuery questions, and he said he tried to subscribe this maillist, but> failed. check this out: http://jquery.com/discuss/
-- Laziness, DRY always.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/
On 9/26/06, Realazy XA Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/26/06, Ⓙⓐⓚⓔ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > jQuery questions, and he said he tried to subscribe this maillist, but
> > > failed.
> >
>
> check this out: http://jquery.com/discuss/
>
He said he tried many times, but he cann't receive
That should be fixed in the newest jquery, old versions had problems.On 9/25/06, Dave Benjamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Michael Geary wrote:>> Is it permissable to have more than one
>> $(document).ready(function() {})>> per page?>> Yes, as many as you want. They will be call
On 9/26/06, limodou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
He said he tried many times, but he cann't receive any back email.ooops...try another email or ask John Resig ( but jQuery magazine say he will not reply the mailing list anymore -_- )
-- Laziness, DRY always.
__
On 9/26/06, Realazy XA Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/26/06, limodou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > He said he tried many times, but he cann't receive any back email.
> >
>
> ooops...try another email or ask John Resig ( but jQuery magazine say he
> will not reply the mailing list anymore
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Matt Stith wrote:
>
> On 9/25/06, Dave Benjamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Am I the only one here that finds $(document).ready() to be completely
>> unreliable? IE seems to be the main culprit. If I don't put the
>> $(document).ready() call in a script block after the
I've been using it very successfully thus far and have been trying to
find some time to write some tests for it. However, my only concern is
that it will conflict with other filters in IE. I plan on addressing
that once I find the time to write the tests.
We are actually sending the project I just
> ooops...try another email or ask John Resig ( but jQuery magazine say he
> will not reply the mailing list anymore -_- )
I didn't say that! I just said that, due to the community being so
active, I rarely have to reply to the mailing list. With that being
said, I'm quite sick right now, so it mi
I haven't seen this behavior and I've been using jQuery very heavily.
Perhaps it was an older version as Matt sugested. I'm using latest SVN
and haven't had but just a couple of issues.
Brandon
On 9/25/06, Dave Benjamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Michael Geary wrote:
>
> >>
On 9/26/06, John Resig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I just said that, due to the community being soactive, I rarely have to reply to the mailing list. so sorry for my misunderstanding. :(-- Laziness, DRY always.
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
h
The current revision in SVN is 346. A quick glance over the check-ins
didn't show a particular reversion # that the issue you are having was
fixed in. I have been using the latest SVN revision since around 289
and haven't seen this issue.
Brandon
On 9/25/06, Dave Benjamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot
> > I just said that, due to the community being so
> > active, I rarely have to reply to the mailing list.
> so sorry for my misunderstanding. :(
Ha, don't worry about it ;-)
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Brandon Aaron wrote:
> The current revision in SVN is 346. A quick glance over the check-ins
> didn't show a particular reversion # that the issue you are having was
> fixed in. I have been using the latest SVN revision since around 289
> and haven't seen this issue.
I can't
I don't see the 'more' in IE but I do in Safari and Firefox. I noticed
that in Firebug the console.log statment seems to get called twice but
I could only find it once in all the javascript loaded for the home
page. Does firebug double log or is the /lisp/spoomusic.js getting
loaded twice? Can you
hey mike, thanks for taking the trouble to answer!regarding backward compatibility - a necessary evil - along ur line of thought, maybe we can have small backward-compatibility layers that can be peeled off if and when the user gets a chance to upgrade his/her code
-ashutoshOn 9/25/06, Mike Alsu
Agreed and that would be really beneficial.
Rey...
> thought, maybe we can have small backward-compatibility layers that can
> be peeled off if and when the user gets a chance to upgrade his/her code
> -ashutosh
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Brandon Aaron wrote:
> I don't see the 'more' in IE but I do in Safari and Firefox. I noticed
> that in Firebug the console.log statment seems to get called twice but
> I could only find it once in all the javascript loaded for the home
> page. Does firebug double log or is th
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
