Hi,
I was thinking the same about UbuntuGIS, count me in.
Jachym
P.S. Thank you all for this positive feedback in the discussion
Dne 25.9.2013 15:54, Daniel Morissette napsal(a):
FYI I talked with Alan yesterday about setting up a PSC for UbuntuGIS to
increase this project's bus number.
The newest version of Portable GIS doesn't require quite so many admin
privileges, but I've also slimmed it down dramatically so it fits on a
smaller USB stick, so it contains a lot less software (no gvsig, no mysql
etc). It is used extensively for training courses in the UK, without too
many
Folks,
I have initiated an RFC for a project management committee for
OSGeo4W. I'd encourage everyone interested in participating to joint
the osgeo4w-dev mailing list and to continue detailed discussion
there.
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/osgeo4w-dev
I think this list
FYI I talked with Alan yesterday about setting up a PSC for UbuntuGIS to
increase this project's bus number.
Let's see what OSGeo4W does, and UbuntuGIS will likely adopt a similar
approach.
I agree with those who wrote that we should aim to share as much as
possible between the various
Hi,
On Wed, 25. Sep 2013 at 06:43:21 -0700, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
I have initiated an RFC for a project management committee for OSGeo4W.
Thanks.
I'd encourage everyone interested in participating to joint the osgeo4w-dev
mailing list and to continue detailed discussion there.
Frank,
The RFC http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo4w/wiki/rfc1_pmc looks pretty good,
thanks for putting that together. Once the PSC is formed, I'm keen on
writing a second one where we could start thinking about the primary
objectives and requirements of the system we should realize, I think we all
have
Tamas,
I agree with you, Daniel and Jurgen that we would be focused on windows
though I am optimistic that OSGeo4W could also be a source for those trying
to make custom windows installers (ie. Portable GIS, what I used to do with
FWTools and possibly even Jeff with MS4W).
Once we have a PSC, we
Hi,
On Wed, 25. Sep 2013 at 15:36:17 -0700, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
I agree with you, Daniel and Jurgen that we would be focused on windows
though I am optimistic that OSGeo4W could also be a source for those trying
to make custom windows installers (ie. Portable GIS, what I used to do with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 24/09/2013 02:08, Angelos Tzotsos ha scritto:
I am in favor of both OSGeoLive and OSGeo4W going through a few weeks
incubation
process.
Hi all.
Incubation is not an issue. The problem, IMHO, is to find a good and productive
governance model.
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 2:08 AM, Angelos Tzotsos gcpp.kal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I am in favor of both OSGeoLive and OSGeo4W going through a few weeks
incubation process.
Best,
Angelos
I'd like to add that I think both projects could be working together
very closely. For me the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 22/09/2013 10:41, Daniel Morissette ha scritto:
Personally I'd treat OSGeo4W as a software project, with a PSC,
committers, etc. We should do the same with OSGeo-Live actually,
take it out of the Marketing committee and treat it as a sofware
On 13-09-23 11:08 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I see two possibilities here:
* osgeo4w is an official foundation project, and as such it does not
need to apply for incubation (it would be circular reasoning); in this
case the PSC should be appointed by the foundation, or
* it is an
On 09/24/2013 02:57 AM, Daniel Morissette wrote:
On 13-09-23 11:08 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I see two possibilities here:
* osgeo4w is an official foundation project, and as such it does not
need to apply for incubation (it would be circular reasoning); in this
case the PSC should
On 13-09-22 3:44 AM, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
Hi all.
I agree with Tamas: we first have an issue with governance; once this is
solved, we can deal with tech issues.
Anyone a suggestion to move forward? To me, the first candidates that
come to mind are Frank, Tamas, and Juergen: anyone else?
Board,
14 matches
Mail list logo
