On Wed 1 February 2006 15:05, Robin Bowes wrote:
Patrick Dixon said the following on 02/01/2006 02:32 PM:
In the Gallery!
(I missed Status Quo too)
Which Gallery?
http://www.jssaudio.co.uk/JSSWeb/My_Homepage_Files/Page3.html
A
___
Discuss
Twisleton-Wykeham-Fiennes Wrote:
It is true that you system has to be pretty good to hear the
difference. I had difficulty hearing it before i got the TacT RCS. I
imagine headphones would do the job at a lower cost, however.
Just out of interest - are you switching your phase before you go
On Fri 13 January 2006 01:57, P Floding wrote:
JJZolx Wrote:
I've added the following comment to bug/request #1976. Hopefully it
would cover all needs in this issue:
If it's important to you, then vote for the bug. Don't just CC
yourself. By voting you automatically get CC'd with
On Thu 12 January 2006 20:12, Michaelwagner wrote:
P Floding Wrote:
With a high resolution system (a phase coherent one) the difference
between correct and incorrect polarity on some recordings are very
dramatic.
I have one of those test setup CDs that plays honks and chirps at
different
On Tue 13 December 2005 18:22, JJZolx wrote:
snip
I think an interface similar to this would be wonderful. One thing
about AJAX, though, is that you need a very responsive server.
SlimServer just isn't there yet, and certainly on many of the hardware
platforms where it finds itself running,
On Tue 13 December 2005 21:57, radish wrote:
I was suggesting the use of PHP only for the web interface.
Fair enough, sounds a lot more reasonable.
If you're gonna write the backend in something a little meatier (for
example, Java) then there are some very nice web scripting systems
On Tue 6 December 2005 17:06, enduser wrote:
Dan Goodinson Wrote:
enduser Wrote:
There is no nice solution other than building in a quality peak
limiter
or running a scanner/filter on the digital data stream before it gets
sent out the digital port for digital-to-digital situations.
This article looks quite interesteing and informative and probably relevant...
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/8590
I like the figure of $1.08/G with 3.2TB of storage.
Although if you don't feel like doing it yourself then my local favourite
server company is well worth a look:-
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 08:14, Daniel Cohen wrote:
On 28/11/05 at 16:24 -0800, mcremer wrote
Yes, I did so, once with the Email.pm and once without it. The plugin
still doesn't show up, neither in the plugins section on the web
interface, nor on the equivalent menu item on the SB2 itself
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 12:57, max.spicer wrote:
Alex Twisleton-Wykeham-Fiennes Wrote:
does this occur only when both speakers are connected to the squeeze
box?
I'm not sure. I'll experiment tonight.
Also, how are the speakers powered? Is there a separate supply for each
On Wednesday 16 November 2005 15:38, radish wrote:
I think Max is in the UK. Over there it's much harder to disable earth
on an earthed plug, you'd have to take the plug apart and unwire it. In
some cases even that isn't possible.
If you have a sealed plug, then use an extension cable that
On Tuesday 15 November 2005 21:47, max.spicer wrote:
Whilst I wait for my T-Amp to arrive, I've got my SB3 plugged into some
Labtek computer speakers. The speakers themselves don't actually sound
too bad, but they have a fairly loud hum when the SB3 is plugged in.
When powered on, but with
On Wednesday 09 November 2005 19:14, Jim wrote:
Mike Anderson Wrote:
For what it's worth, I'd be glad to pay another $50 or whatever for a
really slick GUI
Find 100 others with $50, and in the pure interests of money I'll make
one :D
if you can make a slick GUI that performs all the
On Thursday 13 October 2005 13:50, Fifer wrote:
Just me in Scotland too.
should be a bit better now...
(although that should be North Middleton, but Edinburgh is obviously the
closest proper town that they handle)
Alex
___
Discuss mailing list
On Wednesday 21 September 2005 12:52, Dan Goodinson wrote:
My server is more or less dedicated, as is basically just a fileserver.
Having said that, there is one other app which is constantly running -
Folding At Home. (Kind of similar to Seti At Home or whatever). As
a result, my CPU is
On Wednesday 21 September 2005 12:58, PAUL WILLIAMSON wrote:
Pardon the interruption, but this is probably
the best group to ask this question of...
I need songs that have the word Money somewhere
within the lyrics. I just got asked this morning to make
up a CD filled with them. The only
On Monday 19 September 2005 14:21, JulianL wrote:
Please excuse the slightly provocative title for this thread. This is
definitely not me having a pop at the implementers, I am just hoping to
stimulate discussion or even better find that there is a feature already
in the software to do what I
On Tuesday 13 September 2005 01:50, HoZ wrote:
The ability to have software apply correction filters before the data
hits the network is very appealing to me and looks to be substantially
more affordable than the hardware alternatives. From the research I�ve
done thus far, I think I would be
On Thursday 01 September 2005 09:32, Robin Bowes wrote:
Robin Bowes wrote:
seanadams wrote:
A fine idea - please file a request at bugs.slimdevices.com. It's
something we'd need to do in firmware, right at the end of our audio
process.
Actually, you could do this on the server by
On Thursday 01 September 2005 17:32, ephemere wrote:
(1) Doing it on the server is probably not the right thing for anything
other than a PCM stream because it would require a decode-encode step.
Agreed.
(2) I'm no expert, but it's more complicated than just a delay and gain
adjustment. The
GDG
On Sunday 21 August 2005 04:04, gdg wrote:
In my opinion the single biggest limitation of using the Squeezebox and
the Slimserver software is the inability to create playlists
dynamically. In other words one can't easily create impromptu playlists
from the listening position (using the
On Friday 05 August 2005 15:20, MeSue wrote:
Colin Burn-Murdoch Wrote:
how about a SqueezeBox-BoomBox
I would LOVE a Squeezebox Boombox to take out by the pool with me. In
fact, I searched this forum just the other day to see if this idea had
ever been tossed around--didn't turn up this
Matt
On Tuesday 02 August 2005 16:02, Matt Alioto wrote:
Would it then jump to the end of the currently auditioned track or
would
it
continue playing it? My gut reaction is to continue playing because
it is
easy to jump forwards with the FF button if you need to, but you might
want
gdg
On Monday 01 August 2005 10:51, gdg wrote:
Dan,
I guess the intro scan function solves the problem of building a
quick playlist. The flip side of the issue is that I would like to put
together playlists at my own pace, sometimes quickly and sometimes as
an ongoing process. In a perfect
On Tuesday 02 August 2005 02:11, Matt Alioto wrote:
How about a send to plugin
During the playback of any song, playlist item ect..
Hold down some button on the remote. A send to dialog would appear on
the screen allowing you to choose an existing playlist to add that song
to or option to
Mat
On Tuesday 02 August 2005 03:05, Matt Alioto wrote:
Sorry Alex, I didn't see your post cause of the prepended subject line.
The serious flaws part was cut off.
sorry - thought that I would try and make it more accurate and relevant to the
discussion... ;-)
The reason I suggested to
Matt
On Tuesday 02 August 2005 03:23, Matt Alioto wrote:
How about using my selection option and have the selection default to
the last Playlist you sent to, Or to a predefined configurable default
send to playlist? Would that be more acceptable?
that would make more sense.
Maybe a dual
27 matches
Mail list logo
