bpa wrote:
> FORTH - my introduction to threaded code.
> I thought there was already a FORTH port done and was in the DECUS
> library - or maybe you did it.
It was after my attempt - I contributed some code.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing
bpa wrote:
> A fellow PDP-10 coder on DECystem-10/DECsystem-20 with odd instruction
> mnemonics such as HRRZM, AOBJN.
> The indirect bit where, in assembler, you could do multiple levels of
> table lookup in just one instruction - great fun to code but nearly
> impossible to maintain.
You can
bpa wrote:
> Same here.
>
> The odd part is they didn't seem to define "byte" - because there used
> to be ambiguity, many network protocol standards used the term "octet"
> for a 8 bit quantity.
Indeed. On the PDP-10 (and PDP-20) a byte could be anything from 5 bits
up. Memory was 36 bits
philippe_44 wrote:
> Yes, shipping can be done anywhere, its always around 10USD
Great! So please count me in for 2!
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people"
I would be interested in 2, but is shipping from Canada? I am in the
Netherlands...
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953
chavezdaniel wrote:
> I have used both Family and Premium without issues. If you want lossless
> FLAC you need to go for the HiFi ones that are slightly more expensive,
> though
Good to know, and yes, I know the non-"HiFi" ones are lossy, but so was
Spotify...
> According to the Deezer
I have a bunch of questions about Deezer integration.
1) What Deezer plans/subscriptions are needed? I assume "Free" is not
supported, but is Family/Premium enough?
2) Number of devices - "Premium" seems to allow 3 devices, but do the
individual players connected to LMS/msb count as separate
mamema wrote:
> https://www.worldcat.org/title/psychoacoustics-facts-and-models/oclc/184984467
I dare you to post that in the audiophile section :)
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
threej wrote:
> Yes, and probably half of them are right ;-)
Or not...
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953
threej wrote:
> No, but the difference is evident.
You do realize that is what pretty much everyone who hasn't done a
double-blind say? :)
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that
threej wrote:
> I'd thought Spotify quality was pretty good, but I hear greater space
> and detail in the same songs I'd been listening to via Spotty plugin in
> LMS.
Double blind and level matched?
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of
garym wrote:
> there is a Deezer app in App Gallery in mysqueezebox.com. I suspect it
> has to be installed along with the Deezer plugin I see in LMS. I've
> never used it.
OK! Thanks!
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high
garym wrote:
> seems to be a Deezer plugin. See:
> https://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?104738-Deezer-Plugin/page16=deezer
Ah, thanks! I guess I have to go through mysqueezebox.com to install it?
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art
I guess there is nothing for Deezer LMS integration...?
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953
I do admire the very British humor of James Blunt - he threatens to
release new music if Spotify doesnt remove Joe Rogans podcast.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool
philippe_44 wrote:
> With the first batch of SqueezeAMP
> (https://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?110926-pre-ANNOUNCE-SqueezeAMP-and-SqueezeliteESP32)
> likely being shipped this week, I'm wondering what future I should give
> to the device part of this project.
>
> Although it's open
slartibartfast wrote:
> Don't feed the troll
Sorry - I just happened to read this thread before I saw the other one.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people"
johnny gh wrote:
> here it's impossible!!
What is impossible here?
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch,
Roland0 wrote:
> A (quite entertaining) 'review'
> (https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2019/09/neil-young-feel-music-evolved-and-half-assed/599044/)
> at The Atlantic
With wonderfully silly prose like "MP3s, and Ill try to be as
scientific as I can here, are evil. They go
mgraves wrote:
> With respect to MQA, I appreciate that's it's technically very clever.
Is it?
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch,
left channel wrote:
> "Earth will be changed forever when Amazon introduces high quality
> streaming to the masses, said rock icon Neil Young. This will be the
> biggest thing to happen in music since the introduction of digital audio
> 40 years ago."
>
BJW wrote:
> b/c mobile internet isn't free, and afaik, doesn't have the reach or
> penetration of broadcasting. that isn't to say it won't tho,
> eventually.
Indeed. It makes more sense to improve mobile internet coverage than to
deploy a parallel FM infrastructure.
"To try to judge the
BJW wrote:
> one wonders if digital FM broadcasting will gain enough of a foothold to
> actually survive?
Why would it? There is mobile Internet...
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
Ah, yes, Neil Young is a perfect example of how even if you are a great
musician, it doesn't mean you have any clue about how audio works.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that
d6jg wrote:
> The Behringer is 48/16 only.
Yes, that is more than enough unless you are a dog or a bat.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people" - Paul W
Hmm. My wife uses the alarm on the Radio in the mornings. She used to
turn it off with the power button, but the alarm would turn off for the
rest of the days in the week and had to be reactivated every evening.
After I instructed her to turn off the alarm by using the tuning button
(first
"Class T" was just a fancy name for tripath's class D stuff. Class D is
much older than tripath.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953
Jeff07971 wrote:
> Yes and it is Linus (We're not worthy) Torvalds so
He still (at that point) had the familiar swedish-speaking-finn
accent... :)
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
Fermon wrote:
> I was using X40 and it was way better than standard built in.
How did you do the level matching?
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people" -
SamS wrote:
> As much as I love LMS, it's just getting a bit old/inflexible for me.
What flexibility do you lack?
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people" -
iPhone wrote:
> Many valid points as always dhallag. Yet I continue to see the major
> issue with today's Generation and today's hardware/software integration,
> which is today's youth mainly just want to use the latest and greatest
> ideas.
I think it is worse than that. When I was growing up,
cathcam wrote:
> For the most part, all cloud services are the same. Pull you in, lock up
> your data, charge to access it, add services to maintain it.
Absolutely. Unfortunately most people don't seem to mind these days.
> How many companies do you know that offer the right to leave and take
Ikabob wrote:
> what if SONOS made their devices compatible with the Squeezeboxes. I
> would be very inclined to buy SONOS products to add to my SB ecosystem.
> It might be a profitable venture for SONOS.
The whole SONOS business idea is based on tying you into a closed
system.
"To try to
DanSmedra wrote:
> An overwhelming majority of Squeezebox owners who are also audiophiles
> recognize that the SB onboard DAC is not up to audiophile quality.
What is that statement based on? How large is that "overwhelming"
majority?
By the way, there is a separate "audiophile" section for
andifor wrote:
> => The difference is subtle, but I can hear it. And please don't ask me
> to explain, *why* it sounds different. I have no clue of the technical
> details :o)
Thanks for the description! How many tests did you do, and how many of
those did you get right? And how did you
drmatt wrote:
> Like all individual's opinions, we are really not interested how they
> were decided upon. When he wants to write a scientific paper about it
> then he'll have to show his working...
If it is just a subjective opinion, and we treat it as such, then yes.
Some of us might still
andifor wrote:
> Yes, I have.
Good. How did you do it?
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953
andifor wrote:
> Well, you are invited to check for differences between a Receiver and a
> microRendu. I have them both available and can connect them my DAC. - I
> don't say, which device sound better (I just say, there is a
> difference). Where ever this difference comes from.
Have you
Recoveryone wrote:
> The point is this, I made no comment about anyone's personal level or
> ability, I even conceded my point with the test results presented by
> Mnyb. So to make a comment about someone on a personal level (and that
> was the context of his remark) I returned one in kind.
celo wrote:
> Let me ask this. Last night my wife and I did a blind test running the
> SBT via power bank and stock AC adapter.
Blind test, but not double blind?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clever_Hans
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art
bpa wrote:
> I think keep this thread to the use of Net::UDAP - otherwise this
> digression will fill it.
Indeed. There is an "audiophile" subforum for discussing imagined
improvements in sound quality.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art
Recoveryone wrote:
> Imagine what your life would be if you actually did something worth
> while :)
Well, toby10's suggestion makes more sense than your 5G one...
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear
If a machine that uses NTP (Network Time Protocol) starts up with the
time/date badly wrong, it can take a while for it to drift back into
correct time.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
iPhone wrote:
> I didn't say MP3 was dead, I said I wish it was and it would JUST go
> away quietly.
It won't. But it shouldn't bother you if you don't use it. It is still
way better than cassette tapes and minidisks.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
JJZolx wrote:
> I still say the $2000 price tag that Sean Adams slapped on the
> Transporter is still one of the best practical jokes anyone with disdain
> for audiophiles has ever played.
It is what makes it audiophile, isn't it? :)
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be
drmatt wrote:
> Just because no-one knows how ipv6 works.. :)
:)
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953
drmatt wrote:
> Wait till they enforce ipv6, then there will be none.
Not sure IPv6 will change anything. Yes, a linear scanning of the
address space is not feasible, but scanning routing tables is.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of
pablolie wrote:
> When I change some tags, it bothers me that the files appear under "New
> Music", which ideally I'd like to be exclusively for recent additions to
> my library. Does anyone know if there's a way to edit the content of
> "New Music"?
I just run a script that resets file
I am in Amsterdam, and spotify is (and has been) working fine for me
this week.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953
R1200CL wrote:
> Based on what ?
Based on it not being a technical problem, but a licensing/business
strategy problem.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many
toby10 wrote:
> I think MQA will just be added to the long list of failed formats in a
> market with still too many formats and formats that are just fine for
> 95% of the market. A better mouse trap doesnt always succeed if the
> existing and simpler mouse traps are catching plenty of mice
DanSmedra wrote:
> [h=2]Looks like MQA gets a boost.
Or not - maybe it is a first step of becoming a proprietary,
walled-garden service for Sprint (and Softbank in Japan) customers.
Telcos don't have a very good record on that score...
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be
DanSmedra wrote:
> Your first sentence (assertion) is at odds with everything I've read
> about MQA over the past two years.
Then you must have been reading very selectively.
> Your second statement suggests you're not aware of the issues. Numerous
> articles are available to read and become
Recoveryone wrote:
> I don't think MQA will go the way of DVD-A, since its main audience is
> the download fan base. The download fan base is the largest group of
> audio listening today, so for a format that can offer a better SQ than
> Mp3 AND ITunes will finally open up the ears of a
DanSmedra wrote:
> So the questions seems to be, who worked on the TIDAL app for Squeezebox
> (Logitech, TIDAL, or combo), who is capable of doing modifications for
> MQA today, and are they 'in the works'?
I am rather sceptical about MQA licensing a squeezebox implementation.
> Modification
mherger wrote:
> I do understand you point. But right now you don't have a choice.
> Somebody could pick up the pieces and write yet another Spotify
> implementation. But as of today it's probably mysb.com or no Spotify.
>
Ack, and understood. :)
"To try to judge the real from the false
chbla wrote:
> I think it is yeah, I'm using it - is there a reason against using it?
Not as such, but some of us are trying to be dependent on as few "out
there in the cloud" resources as possible.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of
Stig Nygaard wrote:
> Unless you got some special reason to choose something else, go for the
> official Spotify app.
Isn't that dependent on mysqueezebox.com?
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a
netchord wrote:
> i've been listening to the MQA files via my transporter, not decoded of
> course, but to my ears they sound superior to the same album in non MQA
> format.
That indicates that the source material is different
(mastering/EQ/whatever), as undecoded MQA should sound the same as
hagensieker wrote:
> Still every service I use has an app.
Yes, that is annoying, but I guess it is how vendors want it - lock-in
into *their* app, rather than something that can be integrated. :(
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high
Just have to ask how Sonos works better with Spotify? I am a very happy
LMS/Spotify user, and wondering if I am missing out on something...
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that
bernt wrote:
> Yes, LMS is the best music server software but it's a kind of boring to
> use.
"Kind of boring" is high praise for software. I prefer the content to be
exciting, not the software. :)
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of
RiccardoR wrote:
> P.S.: The audio of the Raspberry is HORRIBLE!!
The standard audio output in the first versions was pretty bad, but it
has gotten a bit better.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a
This has not been a good year.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953
Thanks! On my tablet the login was blocked - assume because of weird
screen size.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953
I tried this site from my android tablet for the first time - and can't
log in, because the top of the screen (including the login link) is
covered by a Tapatalk for Android ad. Any hints of how to get rid of the
thing?
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
HipGirl wrote:
> You need to use a program to compress your files, then you can store
> more music.
Actually ALAC files are already compressed pretty efficiently (almost as
efficiently as FLAC), so a separate compression program won't be able to
improve the result much (unless you have enormous
Owen Smith wrote:
> Well I'm listening to Classic FM HD with the iPad app on my Air2, but I
> can't really say it sounds any better. But then I'm listening on the
> Air2's builtin speakers which sound pretty rubbish anyway.
Any idea what they actually mean by "HD"?
"To try to judge the real
paulsi wrote:
> Ok, I am not that smart. What is IFTT.com??
"If This Then That", an online service where you can set simple action
rules to connect devices and services (such as twitter etc.).
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high
Bafpund wrote:
> I use the Triode plugin in LMS 7.9.0 an it works like a charm. However,
> the LMS interface is outdated and I prefer Spotify's desktop, which I
> already used in Windows 10 and now would like to use in Linux.
OK, fair enough, if that is what you prefer.
"To try to judge the
mherger wrote:
> Does it only happen with Spotify tracks? I've seen issues with them,
> too. But then I learned that they were under DDOS fire. Somebody
> attachedk their DNS service (and others like Twitter, Netflix etc.). So
>
> this might have been a temporary thing due to those attacks.
>
Any reason for not using either of the LMS spotify plugins?
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953
Yes, Dutch sorting rules are somewhat interesting. Don't get me started
on "IJ"... :)
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people" - Paul W Klipsch, 1953
And it is not a product yet. Just a kickstarter project. I like the
description of kickstarter as "you take the same risks as a VC, but have
no control and no upside".
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will
cd1999 wrote:
> I'm also using Spotify (Triode plugin @ 320k) and it seems that the
> quality of the audio is significantly better.
There has been reports that Spotify actually compresses and equalizes
the material, so it might be that the difference is not down to bit
rate.
"To try to
toby10 wrote:
> My bad guys. Brain fart. I was confusing kbps with hi-res. I need a
> vacation. :)
Who doesn't :)
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will fool many people"
toby10 wrote:
> Yeah, should rephrase that (I will above). The 192k streams will get
> downsampled to 24/48 anyway so there is no real benefit to getting the
> 192k streams.
Garym is talking about a 192 kbit/s data rate mp3 stream, not a 192 khz
sample rate PCM stream.
"To try to judge the
rkrug01 wrote:
> Look into mp3fs https://khenriks.github.io/mp3fs/ which is a fuse file
> system which converts flac to MP3 on the fly.
A great setup, and one I use, but more suited to constantly keeping your
collection synchronized between your home and car. Sounds like the OP
wants to
Man in a van wrote:
> a certain movie clip springs to mind
Indeed. 'This one' (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YFKT4jvN4OEhttp://).
:)
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will
drmatt wrote:
> the sound quality is just incredible - even from a lowly SBT playing
> flacs over WiFi from a home built server, and running off its bog
> standard wall wart PSU. :)
As it should be in any decently designed DAC - if your DAC is sensitive
to source, there is something wrong.
drmatt wrote:
> How do you suggest I go about measuring my perception that the sound
> wasn't as good?
I suggest you check out the two ITU recommendations I mentioned.
> Hope the OP appreciates your efforts to prevent opinions getting in the
> way of his pursuit of the truth.
Nothing wrong
drmatt wrote:
> Also possible. Annoying if so cos trust me I do not have a spare..
So worth trying to isolate the issue. Next time your system goes into
the weird mode, try turning the DAC on and off to see if it fixes the
problem.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be
drmatt wrote:
> You still can't measure to tell the difference between the type of sound
> I prefer and the type you prefer.
You keep making claims without any factual support. We don't know that
we can't measure to tell the difference between the type of sound you
prefer and the type I prefer
drmatt wrote:
> My suspicion is I have a dodgy spdif output chip that is dropping output
> stream resolution at times, but on a warm relink to the DAC goes back to
> full res.
Rather unlikely. I would suspect your DAC getting into some funky mode,
and resynchronizing when you unplug and replug
drmatt wrote:
> Probably best to just move it to the pedantry section.
Indeed. Factual accuracy is a true sign of pedantry.
Sent from my ZQ864e36 using Firefox.
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear
drmatt wrote:
> My ears. Haha. YMMV.
Yes - the key part of that is "YMMV". And "haha". :)
> Obviously you can't measure sound quality can you??
Obviously I can. A lot of what makes up good sound quality as an
objective criteria can be quantified and measured, and subjective
preferences can
drmatt wrote:
> I am however certain that using the digital volume or replaygain on the
> SB results in poorer, not just quieter, sound...
What's your certainty based on?
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery
drmatt wrote:
> My view was that disabling RG and setting fixed 100% vol will never hurt
> the quality and it /can/ degrade it. So I figured it was a fair punt!
Disabling RG will not hurt quality, but you lose the RG functionality,
so there should be a somewhat better reason that "it won't
drmatt wrote:
> Well I have a 16 bit DAC with an analogue pre-amp and volume control
> after it. The DAC is 24 bit capable to be fair, but I choose to use the
> pre amp section for volume control instead of the SB output level as I
> find it better...
Fair enough, but not something I would
drmatt wrote:
> Well, in my case I have an external DAC so I want the original bits off
> the CD sent to it at 44k/16b. The volume and replaygain are applied
> within this precision and are audible.
So you have a 16-bit DAC that does the volume processing at 16 bits?
Must be a really old one.
drmatt wrote:
> Always disable replaygain when doing critical listening as it's done in
> the digital domain and adds aliasing at the LSB. And have the output
> volume at 100% too and use an external pre amp.
I am always careful of any advice that includes the word "always". :)
I guess this
Mnyb wrote:
> there are some in whos believe system you should send pcm/wav to the
> player , which is nonsense.
"but it is more bits, so has to be better!" :)
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a
dhallag wrote:
> Is there an easy way to verify the bitrate my music is playing at?
What happened to good old "trust your ears"? :)
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid gilt
edge that will
banned for life wrote:
> That would depend on the VPN. Some VPN connections take ALL of the
> traffic down the road to the office while some allow for simultaneous
> connections to both networks... OpenVPN/PolarVPN provide simultaneous
> connections, for example, while the Windows VPN client
firedog wrote:
> Roon has now released "RoonSpeakers" - endpoint software that makes
> audio HW compatible with Roon.
Does it use a proprietary protocol, or some more open / compatible /
future proof solution (a la AES67)?
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In
epoch1970 wrote:
> Nowadays the "hide my ass/make me appear as being in another country"
> feature has made VPNs popular, so redirecting the default route has
> become a standard setup of VPN clients from which it can be surprisingly
> difficult to evade...)
Your PC still has to be able to
pablolie wrote:
> when I work from home I am connected to the corporate VPN. my LMS is of
> course set up on my home network. so when i am on my work computer, i
> need to switch to the home computer every time i want to control LMS.
But you connect to the VPN through your home network? In that
Mnyb wrote:
> Sound quality or not is provided by the player the server serves and
> everyone is happy :)
And, almost magically, it makes no difference if the connection between
the server and the player is a $1000 ethernet cable made from pure
virgin mountain gold, or is a 1 mile internet
rkrug wrote:
> I'll probably add some more logging and info
Logging? Info? Next you will be suggesting comments and documentation!
:)
Julf
"To try to judge the real from the false will always be hard. In this
fast-growing art of 'high fidelity' the quackery will bear a solid g
rkrug wrote:
> But I hate re-inventing the wheel - did somebody write a script for
> this
> already?
Code:
#!/bin/sh
if [ $# -ne 1 ]
then
echo usage: $0 music_dir
exit 1
fi
find $1 -type f -name '*.flac' | (
while read file
do
if ! flac -stw
1 - 100 of 389 matches
Mail list logo
