Re: [slim] Building a house server?

2005-04-18 Thread Michael Peters
On Mon, 2005-04-18 at 08:29 -0400, Jim Dibb wrote: The only time I really have a problem is when the SpamAssassin daemon goes crazy and chews up the whole CPU. That happens from time to time and I don't know why. How do you filter? My utility box that does everything - fetchmail pops,

Re: [slim] Apple lossless vs Flac

2005-03-30 Thread Michael Peters
On Wed, 30 Mar 2005 15:06:14 -0800 (PST), Chris Glushko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't use Apple Lossless for the iPod. I keep all the files in Appple Lossless on iTunes. When I want to put something on the iPod, I just convert the files to AAC in iTunes, transfer them and then delete

[slim] ape, lame, and static

2005-03-24 Thread Michael Peters
fc4 on x86 using the linux port of mac squeezebox produces static. When I remove the -x from the lame switch, it behaves. I don't know much about ape's format - but the man page for lame says if you get static, try adding the -x switch. Is this an OS platform difference - cpu dependent - or is

Re: [slim] Slim Devices SB2 disappointment SB for sale.

2005-03-23 Thread Michael Peters
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:46:10 -0800, michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Phil Karn [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jack Coates wrote: You might want to do some research on modern virtual memory management... swap is necessary no matter how much RAM you have. I disagree. I see no reason for a

Re: [slim] Linux command-line tagger

2005-03-22 Thread Michael Peters
On Tue, 22 Mar 2005 10:28:43 -0500, Michael Haan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't remember the exact command, but something like id3v2 -l 11_*.flac came back: 11_Frogs.flac No tags found Or something like that. Most of these files (they're all flac) were ripped/tagged with

[slim] Tagging Classical Music

2005-03-22 Thread Michael Peters
I just bought a flac album from Magnatune - Elizabeth Wolff - Moments Musicaux Here is what the file listing looks like (magnatune had spaces which I replaced with _ as I can't stand spaces in a file name): 01-Sergei_Rachmaninoff_-_6_Moments_Musicaux_Op._16_-_Andantino-Elizabeth_Wolff.flac

Re: [slim] Linux command-line tagger

2005-03-21 Thread Michael Peters
On Mon, 21 Mar 2005 22:39:48 -0500, Michael Haan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anyone recommend a good command-line tagger (I'm already using abcde to rip - just need something to use for the occasional fix). I've tried audiotool, id3v2 and id3tool but they don't seem to read the

[slim] Fedora Core 4 Testers

2005-03-20 Thread Michael Peters
For those testing Fedora Core 4 (Linux) - I'm working on an rpm spec file for eventual inclusion in rpm.livna.org It packages things differently than the standard SlimDevices supplied rpm, the intention is to use system installed perl modules where possible etc. and reduce what is in the CPAN

[slim] [OT] Free decent indy music

2005-03-18 Thread Michael Peters
I apologize if this is frowned upon - but I found a huge stash of free indy music, a lot of it is pretty good (various styles). It's a rather large bt download, but there is a smaller bt download if you just want to same to see if it's worth downloading the set.

Re: [slim] Using linux to generate a FLAC file of a complete CD

2005-03-18 Thread Michael Peters
On Sat, 19 Mar 2005 00:09:52 + (UTC), Andy Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't have cdrdao, any idea how to do it with cdparanoia? 2) cueconvert -f album.toc -f album.cue Don't have this one either...source? You may be able to do it with cdparanoia - but there probably is a

Re: [slim] abcde usage (with flac)

2005-03-17 Thread Michael Peters
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 10:41:26 -0500, Michael Haan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just started using abcde to rip to flac last night. It seemed a little slow, but given everything that was going on on the box, and the processes nice level, I wasn't surprised. Anyway, I haven't yet figured

Re: [slim] Portable SB2 Setup

2005-03-17 Thread Michael Peters
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 23:19:09 -0500, Mike Hartley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Although my collection is currently in WMA lossless with no drm (no lectures please, it made sense at the time :-) ) I'd be willing to re-rip everything if it was not too horrible from a process perspective. If

Re: [slim] Portable SB2 Setup

2005-03-17 Thread Michael Peters
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 22:26:52 -0700, JJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For any other computer you'll probably want a monitor, keyboard, and pointing device. You could run the server headless, but if you run into problems, say while camping, then you'll want to be able to get on the computer and

Re: [slim] SlimServer on Linux PPC ?

2005-03-17 Thread Michael Peters
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 08:20:30 +0100, Vince [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm looking to know if someone has already installed SlimServer 6 on Linux for Power PC. My plan is to run SlimServer on a mac mini with Linux (Yellow Dog Distribution probably).

Re: [slim] Linux command-line tagging / ripping (flac) software recommendations

2005-03-16 Thread Michael Peters
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:10:49 -0500, Michael Haan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Having just gotten my myth tv box running, and relocating my slimserver (now 6.0 - thanks to those who helped) install to it, I'm ready to rip and tag the CDs that have piled-up over the past two months and I'd really

Re: [slim] OGG VORBIS Support in Firmware

2005-03-16 Thread Michael Peters
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 19:29:52 +0100, Christian Pernegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just so there is some clarity on the subject, here is where I am coming from completely. snip Your post is extremely informative and I'm sure Fedora users appreciate your work. However, there is exactly one

Re: [slim] OGG VORBIS Support in Firmware

2005-03-16 Thread Michael Peters
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 14:54:59 -0800, Michael Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On my 2Hz athlon machine - That should read 2GHz ;) -- http://mpeters.us/ ___ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/lists/listinfo

Re: [slim] OGG VORBIS Support in Firmware

2005-03-16 Thread Michael Peters
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 00:06:46 +0100, Christian Pernegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are you sure you're cpu bound and not disk bound? The 2.4 disk elevator is a nightmare and the 2.6 default is not perfect either. It also happens with my flac files which are on a separate dedicated hard disk

Re: [slim] OGG VORBIS Support in Firmware

2005-03-15 Thread Michael Peters
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 11:42:40 +0100, Christian Pernegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] But there's one thing I just noticed: STREAMING. I Yes - if SlimServer could stream in ogg, there's a good chance it would make it into distros like Fedora etc. Streaming in flac/PCM is OK but not a lot of people keep

Re: [slim] OGG VORBIS Support in Firmware

2005-03-15 Thread Michael Peters
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 11:26:49 +0100, Christian Pernegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OGG is an open format. OGG is the default for the FEDORA distribution. MP3 was eliminated from FEDORA due to licensing considerations. You can of course obtain MP3 and install it, but the fact remains that MP3

Re: [slim] OGG VORBIS Support in Firmware

2005-03-15 Thread Michael Peters
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 15:13:26 +0100, Christian Pernegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes - if SlimServer could stream in ogg, there's a good chance it would make it into distros like Fedora etc. Again, what has support of a particular format got to do with putting slimserver in a distribution?

Re: [slim] OGG VORBIS Support in Firmware

2005-03-15 Thread Michael Peters
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 10:09:21 -0600, Michael Alletto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If a product states that it supports it it will just confuse people. Why? I mean really, OGG? Naming is everything and that name sucks. I don't think it sucks. It's no worse than mp3 or aac or flac. You try

Re: [slim] OGG VORBIS Support in Firmware

2005-03-15 Thread Michael Peters
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 22:23:32 +0100, Christian Pernegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This would only be relevant if you were streaming formats other than mp3 to the sb as mp3, i.e. if you were transcoding to mp3 on the server. As long as you just pass through mp3 data to the Squeezebox you

Re: [slim] OGG VORBIS Support in Firmware

2005-03-15 Thread Michael Peters
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 22:31:06 +0100, Christian Pernegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wait a minute, didn't you just bash mp3 halfway around the list because it was patent encumbered? Yet you consider AAC? I just don't get you... I didn't bash mp3. It is a very good lossy codec. mp3 (and aac)

Re: [slim] Prefered Archiving Format

2005-03-15 Thread Michael Peters
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 12:27:00 +1000, Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I suppose one thing to also consider is which encoder to use and does it have CCD or similar titling database support (on that note do lossless formats support tagging??) Anyways, if anybody has some advice that you think

Re: [slim] OGG VORBIS Support in Firmware

2005-03-14 Thread Michael Peters
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 18:33:08 +0100, Christian Pernegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I do know that transcoding to WAV is not insignificant; and am skeptical of the overhead requirements for FLAC. Regardless, the bandwidth requirements for a FLAC transmission is greater than that of ogg.

Re: [slim] Wow

2005-03-14 Thread Michael Peters
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 18:12:14 +, Steven Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you know if the 'blank tracks' problem has been solved yet? I don't know about that - but I do know that I have some probably improperly encoded mp3's that 5.4.0 could not see (neither could Rhythmbox - but iPod and

Re: [slim] Re: Re: Re: Problem starting 6.0b1on FC3 (was Problem starting5.4.0on FC3)

2005-03-14 Thread Michael Peters
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 06:59:44 -0500, John Rakestraw [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm a Linux user (but definitely not a power user) -- thought I'd point out that I installed Slimserver 6.0b1 on FC3 last week and it hasn't crashed since. (I have seen problems (e.g., in playlist display) that

Re: [slim] OGG VORBIS Support in Firmware

2005-03-14 Thread Michael Peters
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 18:33:08 +0100, Christian Pernegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Don't get me wrong, I like .ogg - I just see no point in implementing a portable format directly on the squeezebox. I do. If it used could use ogg for streaming lossy format, there is a better chance that it

Re: [slim] Suggestions for 802.11g Wireless Router?

2005-03-14 Thread Michael Peters
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 16:36:09 -0800, Joshua Uziel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I really wish Consumer Reports could evaluate stuff like this. They could save a lot of people a lot of time and money. Agreed. I got it 'cause it was the cheapest on the market... you get what you pay for... but

Re: [slim] Open firmware for SB2?

2005-03-13 Thread Michael Peters
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 08:53:35 -, Patrick Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it's worked very well for Linux. Really? As someone struggling to get FC3 configured, googling for information produces many more people with Linux problems than there are solutions out there. Linux runs beautifully

Re: [slim] Suggestions for 802.11g Wireless Router?

2005-03-13 Thread Michael Peters
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 01:44:10 -0800, Phil Karn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The WRT54G is a big seller in most retail outlets (there's usually a big pallet of 'em at the local Fry's) and it is often heavily discounted and/or sold with rebates. You can usually tell a big sale on them is going on

Re: [slim] Suggestions for 802.11g Wireless Router?

2005-03-13 Thread Michael Peters
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 11:57:26 -0800 (PST), Chris Glushko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would suggest staying away from Netgear. I just replaced my WR614 today. Even with the latest firmware, my netgear router was never very stable and under intense use (i.e. a few hours of Bittorrent w/

Re: [slim] [OT?] Kitchen speaker system

2005-03-13 Thread Michael Peters
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 13:32:02 -0500, Ian Whalley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm about to install a squeezebox system in the kitchen, and the speakers will need to reside on top of wall-mounted cupboards, and will be not easily accessible. This makes most powered-speakers unsuitable, as I won't

Re: [slim] Apple Lossless vs. FLAC

2005-03-10 Thread Michael Peters
Yes - currently there is not a working flac plugin for QuickTime (which is needed to manage flac in iTunes) What I do is rip to flac, transcode via a shell script from flac to mp3 (lame 192VBR), and use mp3 on my iPod. iTunes doesn't know about my flac files, but it doesn't need to either. aac

[slim] Re: Squeezebox2

2005-03-10 Thread Michael Peters
I will eventually re-encode all of my CDs to flac, ogg and mp3 simultaneously (with a custom script). That's kind of what I do know. I actually rip to flac (well, I use cdparanoia and have a set of scripts I use to create metadata - I don't use the lookup services, they are wrong too often - so

Re: [slim] Squeezebox2

2005-03-09 Thread Michael Peters
On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 14:18:40 +0100, /rist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If all audio decoding is now done in software, is there any chance the Squeezebox2 will ever decode ogg natively? I have most of my music in ogg format, and the way they are played now (with decoding-recoding on the server

Re: [slim] Best stand-alone setup for SlimServer

2005-03-09 Thread Michael Peters
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 17:26:42 -0500, Jeff Fila [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What are your thoughts on the best stand-alone server set up. I'm building a server that's sole purpose is to run SlimServer. I was thinking about ClarkConnect in stand-alone mode. That way I could manage it from a web

Re: [slim] Gapless playback with mp3 - another shot

2005-03-09 Thread Michael Peters
On Wed, 09 Mar 2005 18:50:45 -0800, Phil Karn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can somebody give me some background on gapless playback? I don't understand why it's a big problem. I'll try in a non technical way. The mp3 container has to be specific size increments, so you end up with empty data at

Re: [slim] Best stand-alone setup for SlimServer

2005-03-09 Thread Michael Peters
On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 16:21:05 -0800, Marshall Clow [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm going to try a mac mini (as soon as it arrives). Small, silent, Firewire, USB2, 100-T, 802.11 G. Mac Mini's really are nice. Sorry for going off topic - but the small form and good looks really is a big plus. I'm

Re: [slim] 48khz sampling rate plays slow

2005-03-08 Thread Michael Peters
On Tue, 08 Mar 2005 14:03:15 +, Andrew Lucas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I was messing with WAV's recorded with a 48khz sampling rate, on my squeezebox's these play back slow regardless of using internal or external DAC's, is this what I should expect? Do they work properly if encoded

Re: [slim] Squeezebox2

2005-03-08 Thread Michael Peters
On Tue, 8 Mar 2005 23:03:18 -0800, Steven Spies [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Native FLAC and Cross Fading on the SB2, Right On! Please tell me the SB2 supports FLAC ReplayGain, fingers crossed. If not, I'm sure it would be relatively easy to add it since it's done in software, correct? --

Re: [slim] Re: MP3 Tag Fix - Recommendations

2005-03-07 Thread Michael Peters
flac I believe does record the charset used to write the tags, rather than assuming it is one in particular. At least if using their native tags. No wether the playback software respects that or not is a different question entirely. As far as being future safe - if you used the charset specified

Re: [slim] Convert AAC to FLAC ?

2005-03-06 Thread Michael Peters
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 17:36:56 -0500, Sally Shears [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm... On my Mac OS X, looking at an AVI file (plays in VLC, not in QuickTime), I see: $file xyz.avi xyz.avi: RIFF (little-endian) data, AVI So, it still won't tell me what I really want to know: Which application

Re: [slim] More Than One Server

2005-03-06 Thread Michael Peters
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 16:31:19 -0700, Chuck Pelto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mar 6, 2005, at 9:35 AM, Christian Pernegger wrote: You can have a maximum of one SlimServer running per device, but you can access its web interface on as many computers as you like, it runs on port 9000 as

Re: [slim] More Than One Server

2005-03-06 Thread Michael Peters
On Sun, 6 Mar 2005 17:21:02 -0700, Chuck Pelto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Mike, I've tried the http://192.168.0.XXX:9000/ and the http://my-computer.local:9000/. Neither worked. The other machine just sat their spinning it's wheels. However, it never did 'timeout'. Regards, Chuck

Re: [slim] Balancing

2005-03-06 Thread Michael Peters
On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 17:30:58 +0100, Christian Pernegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A future device might want to incorporate an ability to adjust balance between speakers via the remote device. I'd rather have less preamp functionality on a component, not more. If I could I would even

Re: [slim] A question about SB audio frequencies

2005-03-05 Thread Michael Peters
On Sat, 5 Mar 2005 18:38:08 -, Patrick Dixon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I assume that any music ripped from CD (whether coded as lossy or lossless) will be replayed by the SB at 44.1KHz. So when (if ever) is 48KHz replay required? I ripped the audio from my U2 Rattle Hum DVD I believe it

Re: [slim] Squeezebox installation creates IP address conflict

2005-03-03 Thread Michael Peters
Not sure if you're running the Sveasoft firmware, but if you are adding an entry like 10.0.0.3 00:04:20:05:91:BF sbox to the 'Dhcpd' section of the 'Management' section under 'Administration' on the web interface will do what you are asking. I have no such section (stock, 3.03.1 firmware)

Re: [slim] US Supreme Court

2005-03-03 Thread Michael Peters
On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 17:55:09 -0600, Ben Klaas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But it cracks me up that these companies' even try to pretend that they created their software for anything other than illegal file sharing (be it music or other). I get new Linux distros from BitTorrent when

Re: [slim] Squeezebox installation creates IP address conflict

2005-03-02 Thread Michael Peters
On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 14:00:36 -0800, Phil Karn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The best way is to assign a fixed, static IP address to each host on your own local network. There's really no point in allocating IP addresses dynamically to your own hosts given that you have such an abundant supply of

Re: [slim] Squeezebox installation creates IP address conflict

2005-03-02 Thread Michael Peters
On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 19:43:34 -0500, Jay Sissom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a linksys WRT54G. Can you tell me how to do this? I can find no setting to allow this in the WRT54G. I also have that router. The default lease time is a day. Go to Setup - Basis Setup Scroll down to DHCP Server

Re: [slim] iTunes Downloaded Music Questions (related to Slimp3)

2005-03-01 Thread Michael Peters
On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 14:59:06 -0800, Jack Coates [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah, I like him. I also like Lara St. John and (to a lesser degree) I love Lara St. John! Another one from Magnatune I like is Lisa DeBenedictis. Over at http://www.mindawn.com/ - there is a really neat band, Frogg

Re: [slim] MP3beamer Questions and Answers

2005-02-28 Thread Michael Peters
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 17:51:05 -0500, Jeffrey Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yes most of my beefs with Linspire and now MP3beamer are with their marketing and lack of providing anything of substance while providing a charge on something you can get for free. I do not like the distro myself

Re: [slim] Linux box to stream music, interface look familiar?

2005-02-28 Thread Michael Peters
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 19:16:49 -0800, Pbox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The point I was going to make, excatly. However there is one more thing to note. Linspire also releases their code under GPL. So it is a give and take. Slimserver guys should take a note of the lsongs application.

Re: [slim] switched to wireless -- now squeezebox reboots at random

2005-02-25 Thread Michael Peters
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 23:21:23 -0800, Ralph Edington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As far as I can tell, Squeezebox is COMPLETELY and TOTALLY WORTHLESS for the advertised purpose of wireless music. Maybe you got a bad unit. Did you try contacting customer support? -- http://mpeters.us/

Re: [slim] Forum Style rather than Lists

2005-02-25 Thread Michael Peters
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:26:44 -0600, momerath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Another solution is to use Gmail for your mailing lists. It has a unique interface that closely resembles the flat-threaded forum style that seems most popular (I prefer branching threads personally). Its also much faster

Re: [slim] Bit-correct digital out on Squeezebox?

2005-02-25 Thread Michael Peters
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:34:03 +0100, Steinar Bjaerum [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am thinking about playing an uncompressed WAV, recording the signal at the digital output and comparing the recording with the original WAV. Be careful when you are doing so - a lot of sound cards will resample

Re: [slim] Linux box to stream music, interface look familiar?

2005-02-25 Thread Michael Peters
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:19:28 -0600, Michael Alletto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS4933903950.html Scroll down to the pictures of the web interface. Does it look like slimserver to anyone else? And they are charging $70 for the software only. If they are

Re: [slim] Need advice on housing 30K of songs

2005-02-24 Thread Michael Peters
I have no idea about iTunes etc. but I do have a recomondation - if at all possible, rip to flac - even if it means burning to DVD for space reasons (it probably will) You can fit quite a few albums in flac on a DVD-R, if you go with the newer dual layer stuff you can fit even more albums in flac

Re: [slim] Why didn't they buy a SqueezeBox?

2005-02-22 Thread Michael Peters
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 09:13:49 -0500, Chip Hart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As someone who has abandoned his MP101, I'd encourage you to check out the MP101 mailing list(s) (http://groups.yahoo.com/group/NetgearMP101Group/) before purchasing one. 95% of the

Re: [slim] Why I didn't buy a Squeezebox

2005-02-22 Thread Michael Peters
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:25:31 -0800, George Van Wagner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't know about others, but I'm perfectly willing to answer the question. I didn't buy a Squeezebox because every time I've looked at ordering one, the wireless units are listed as a 6-8 week wait. Very first

Re: [slim] Why didn't they buy a SqueezeBox?

2005-02-21 Thread Michael Peters
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 07:52:03 -0500, Jeffrey Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bennett, Gavin (LDN Int) wrote: The bit for SlimDevices to read, please make it. a) WiFi at 80211.g b) a lot cheaper c) have a Unique Selling Point - the Open Source aspect is a good USP but