Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-05-07 Thread nowork
Hi, I'm having trouble listening to NPR Radio at 32kbps CBR with SqueezeSlave. The sound output is like "chimpunks." (Higher bitrate music plays fine). I don't want to cross post (http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=63052) but I am trying to figure out if SqueezeSlave has near-term p

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-03-25 Thread ralphy
Unfortunately squeezeslave doesn't support mono files in any format. Only 16bit 44.1KHz stereo streams, everything else needs to be transcoded on SC. Or as you have done, convert the file before added it to the library. Not sure but SC might be able to convert mono streams to stereo using sox o

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-03-25 Thread bulek
Hi, I'm using squeezeslave-0.8-25-lnx26-alsa-i686 on Ubuntu 710 and I spot that it dies on certain wav files (log at the bottom). I've also tried win32 version and it stops on same file, works ok on others Same problem happens when I trigger play of speech announcements made by Festival...

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-03-12 Thread ralphy
Luke, Squeezeslave doesn't currently support wma, you'll need to transcode those files/streams. There are details on the wiki, although I see it hasn't been updated for 7.3 http://wiki.slimdevices.com/index.php/WMA I'm still working on creating a library from the rockbox wma decoder to use wit

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-03-12 Thread Luke Redpath
Just bumping this thread for two reasons: ralphy, if git isn't your thing, if you can make your subversion repository public (google code isn't bad for free svn hosting) then I'd be happy to maintain a git mirror using git-svn. Also, regarding my problems with streams; it seems that the problem

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-03-05 Thread ralphy
I think you're right. Looking through the code, it only uses tcp 3483, not even udp. I haven't done a remote SS via open ports in a long time. Maybe something is broken. I started using openvpn a couple years ago and never looked back. Let me know if you don't get it working and I'll try it h

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-03-03 Thread Luke Redpath
I don't know what SCM tool you use but if you use Git, I'd highly recommend GitHub (I highly recommend Git too to be honest). I had 3483 open but I think I neglected to open 9000 (didn't think the players needed this one) so I'll give it another test tomorrow. -- Luke Redpath LUKE REDPATH Fre

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-03-03 Thread ralphy
Thanks Luke, I placed the binary and plist file on sourceforge for people to try as I don't have a Mac. I've added your build changes to my repository and will release a new patch in the next day or two. I've also merged the daemonize patch. https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-03-02 Thread Luke Redpath
OK, building it with the static libs set explicitly seems to do the trick; I gave it to a friend to try out and it ran without any errors. He wasn't able to get it to connect to my server over the net though (I believe I had the right ports open on my router) but this may be a separate issue. Fee

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-03-01 Thread ralphy
Looks like it's still trying to load the dynamic libraries. I'm a little surprised how different the Mac implementation is. I've played around with the crt0 thing on linux and it's not pretty either, best to stay away from it. Let's try building the binary by specifying the static libraries on

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-02-28 Thread Luke Redpath
OK, using -static-intel seemed to do the trick; will this be suitable? Source: http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/library-not-found-crt0/ Edit, doesn't seem to work. I gave it to a friend to run on his system and it failed: > > dyld: Library not loaded: /opt/local/lib/libmad.0.dylib > Re

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-02-28 Thread Luke Redpath
No joy so far, but happy to keep looking at this with your help. Output of 'file squeezeslave': > > /opt/local/bin/squeezeslave: Mach-O executable i386 > /opt/local/lib contains libFLAC.a, libmad.a, libogg.a, libvorbis.a and libvorbisfile.a. I did a make clean and recompiled but it is failin

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-02-28 Thread ralphy
Try adding a -static like this, delete bin/squeezeslave and run make again. Code: ${CC} -o bin/squeezeslave $^ -static -L/opt/local/lib -lmad -lFLAC -lvorbisfile -lvorbis -logg /System/Library/Frameworks/CoreAudio.framework/CoreAudio /System/Library/Frameworks/Audio

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-02-27 Thread Luke Redpath
I'm happy to share the binary but I don't know how portable it is; forgive my lack of knowledge in this area, but will it require the dependencies to be installed in the same location as mine to work? -- Luke Redpath Luke

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-02-27 Thread ralphy
Thanks Luke. Would you be willing to make your binary available on the sourceforge squeezeslave site? Send me a pm if you'd like. Also, I'll update the squeezeslave repository with your OSX changes. Ralphy -- ralphy ra

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-02-26 Thread Luke Redpath
I've spent a bit of time trying to compile this on OSX Leopard and I finally had some success, so I thought I'd outline the steps I took if anybody else would like to give it a try. Most of my issues seemed to stem from the fact that my dependencies were installed using MacPorts which puts header

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-02-23 Thread ralphy
Something must have changed. Have you checked your sound card levels using the windows mixer program? Sounds like the levels have been changed. -- ralphy ralphy's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-02-22 Thread Chrobrego
I use Windows XP. I have used first local system user, and them my own user name but this did not change anything. I wonder where it does come from? Sound is shattered, unlistenable. -- Chrobrego Chrobrego's Profile: http:

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-02-22 Thread ralphy
What OS? Are you using a different user when starting as a service vs command line? -- ralphy ralphy's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=3484 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthre

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-02-21 Thread Chrobrego
If I run SqueezeSlave as a service, it sounds awful. But sound is normal if I launch manually SqueezeSlave. Why? -- Chrobrego Chrobrego's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=15230 View this thread: htt

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-02-18 Thread ralphy
The best way I've found is to shutdown squeezecenter and delete the player settings block from server.prefs. The forget this player and reset player settings in SC still keep the settings for the initial player type in server.prefs. Each player block starts with a line that looks like this, with

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-02-17 Thread SamG
ralphy;396590 Wrote: > There's no issue using -O as all it does is report the player type as > softsqueeze instead of squeezeslave when connecting to SC. > > Did you create a new player by adding a never used before MAC address > by adding a -m00:00:00:00:00:03 to the command line after adding t

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-02-15 Thread ralphy
There's no issue using -O as all it does is report the player type as softsqueeze instead of squeezeslave when connecting to SC. Did you create a new player by adding a never used before MAC address by adding a -m00:00:00:00:00:03 to the command line after adding the patch? SC seems to remember

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-02-14 Thread SamG
ralphy;396293 Wrote: > Okay, the progress bar status is a know issue with squeezeslave and > since pause seems to be working correctly in 0.8-26, despite the > progress bar, I'll consider the issue a TODO item. It's not an issue > with Squeezecenter. Okay. I agree that as long as playback is f

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-02-14 Thread ralphy
Okay, the progress bar status is a know issue with squeezeslave and since pause seems to be working correctly in 0.8-26, despite the progress bar, I'll consider the issue a TODO item. It's not an issue with Squeezecenter. The portaudio libary doesn't return the correct stream position status a

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-02-13 Thread SamG
jwmelvin;396087 Wrote: > I just stumbled across a new clue. For me, squeezeslave 0.8-26 does not > actually start the song over, it just gives that appearance. The time > progress bar starts over but the song starts from where it was paused. Thanks for confirming this. Looks like a SqueezeCenter

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-02-13 Thread SamG
ralphy;395925 Wrote: > I've sent you a PM regarding the binary. I sent you the binary via email. > This is not expected behaviour. Unfortunately, I don't see the pause > problem. I use the 0.8-25 win32 binary all day, every day at work and > pause it constantly. The track starts exactly wher

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-02-13 Thread jwmelvin
I just stumbled across a new clue. For me, squeezeslave 0.8-26 does not actually start the song over, it just gives that appearance. The time progress bar starts over but the song starts from where it was paused. -- jwmelvin --

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-02-13 Thread jwmelvin
ralphy;395925 Wrote: > I've sent you a PM regarding the binary. > This could be related to the version of SC I'm still running 7.2.2 - > r24134 at work, actually at home too. What version of SC are you > running? > I'm running 7.3.3 - 24976 on Ubuntu 8.10. ralphy;395925 Wrote: > > Would yo

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-02-13 Thread ralphy
I've sent you a PM regarding the binary. This is not expected behaviour. Unfortunately, I don't see the pause problem. I use the 0.8-25 win32 binary all day, every day at work and pause it constantly. The track starts exactly where I paused it. I do it so often that I've mapped the keyboard a

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-02-11 Thread SamG
I also recently compiled squeezeslave-0.8 on a Fedora x64 system. It is working pretty well at the moment, though there are a couple of FLAC files on which it consistently stutters. One interesting thing I noticed was that hitting the pause button on the web interface and then hitting play start

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-02-11 Thread ralphy
jwmelvin;394934 Wrote: > Awesome, thanks! > ... > And it compiled into a functioning binary. > I'd really appreciate it if you'd provide the binary so I can post it on sourceforge. Send me a PM if you like. > A new question - can Squeezeslave use ReplayGain? I was hoping that > compiling v25

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-02-11 Thread ralphy
jwmelvin;395015 Wrote: > I did a little testing and if I use the -O option (for oldplayer type) > then the setting page shows replaygain as an option. > > But then pause does not work, from the web interface or CLI. > > Maybe this is something I need squeezeslave v8-26 for, to specify other >

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-02-11 Thread ralphy
Squeezeslave has supported replay gain since at least 0.7.5 if not before. Unfortunately the squeezeslave player type in squeezecenter disables replayGainMode by default. If your running SC on linux you can change the line in server/Slim/Player/SqueezeSlave.pm from 'replayGainMode' => 0,

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-02-10 Thread jwmelvin
I did a little testing and if I use the -O option (for oldplayer type) then the setting page shows replaygain as an option. But then pause does not work, from the web interface or CLI. Maybe this is something I need squeezeslave v8-26 for, to specify other player types? -- jwmelvin -

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-02-10 Thread jwmelvin
Awesome, thanks! I installed: libmad0, libmad0-dev, vorbis-tools, libflac-dev, libogg-dev, and libvorbis-dev And it compiled into a functioning binary. A new question - can Squeezeslave use ReplayGain? I was hoping that compiling v25 would let me do so, but no option shows up in the setting

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-02-10 Thread ralphy
The build can't find the header files from libmad, flac, ogg and vorbis. You need these packages installed before you'll be able to compile successfully. I don't know ubuntu linux, but there may be libary only and development packages for each, if so, you'll need the development ones as well. -

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-02-09 Thread jwmelvin
That seems to help considerably, thank you. But it still errors out: mel...@rocco:~/squeezeslave/squeezeslave-0.8-25$ make -f makefile.linux26 gcc -Wall -s -m64 -O3 -DNDEBUG -DUSE_SIGNALS_FOR_RESTART -fomit-frame-pointer -c -Ilib/portaudio/pa_common -Ilib/portaudio/pablio -Ilib/portmixer/px_commo

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-02-09 Thread ralphy
Try changing the line in makefile.linux26; Code: From CFLAGS=-Wall -s -march=i686 -O3 -DNDEBUG -DUSE_SIGNALS_FOR_RESTART -fomit-frame-pointer to CFLAGS=-Wall -s -m64 -O3 -DNDEBUG -DUSE_SIGNALS_FOR_RESTART -fomit-frame-pointer --

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2009-02-08 Thread jwmelvin
ralphy;363046 Wrote: > Sorry, don't have a 64-bit linux system. The 64-bit versions for > previous releases were contributed. Does anyone know if it's possible to compile 0.8 for 64-bit Linux? I'm also using Ubuntu 8.10. With my limited experience, I can't seem to get it to compile from source.

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-11-26 Thread bobkoure
autopilot;362727 Wrote: > Hi, im running Visa 64 and was wondering how to suppress the DOS box > also. Google -srvany-. -- bobkoure bobkoure's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14646 View this threa

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-11-24 Thread toddrc
I am getting closer... probably. I have tried the "Target" path for the SqueezeSlave shortcut with and without "127.0.0.1" at the end. In both cases, as soon as I choose SqueezeSlave or try to synchronize with it, the player refuses to play. -- toddrc --

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-11-24 Thread ralphy
Dean L. Surkin;361063 Wrote: > Any idea when the Linux AMD64 version (for Debian/Ubuntu) will be > available? Thanks. > > --Dean L. Surkin Sorry, don't have a 64-bit linux system. The 64-bit versions for previous releases were contributed. -- ralphy -

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-11-24 Thread ralphy
f948lan;361064 Wrote: > For anyone interested, I've had a go at adding text mode display and > control support into squeezeslave, including LCDd and lircd support. > > See http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=55178 for details > and patches to try it out. > > It's Linux only at the m

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-11-23 Thread maggior
By default, it listens to the local loopback adress (127.0.0.1). On my server where I use squeezeslave, I use the command line squeezeslave -s -r3. This means run in background mode and retry every 3 seconds if squeezecenter is not running. It doesn't hurt to be explicit about the IP address, b

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-11-23 Thread Chris Laplante
"C:\Program Files\squeezeslave-0.8-12-win32\squeezeslave.exe 127.0.0.1" space between the .exe and the 127. -Chris On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 7:27 PM, maggior <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > When you run squeezeslave, it appears as another player in the web > interface and on the controller (if you

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-11-23 Thread maggior
When you run squeezeslave, it appears as another player in the web interface and on the controller (if you have one of those). To listen to the same music on you PC as on your other player, you need to synchronize them. This can be done either through the web interface or via the menus on the sq

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-11-23 Thread toddrc
JJZolx;362970 Wrote: > I assume that's the target of a shortcut? > > You have to tell Squeezeslave where the SqueezeCenter server is, unless > both are running on the same computer. Something like: > > "C:\Program Files\squeezeslave-0.8-12-win32\squeezeslave.exe" > 192.168.1.2 That was the ta

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-11-23 Thread JJZolx
toddrc;362965 Wrote: > I just set up my Squeezebox and the first thing I wanted to be able to > do is listen to the same music on my computer as what was being played > in the other room. I have installed squeezeslave and am probably > missing something rather obvious. > > I did not fully unders

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-11-23 Thread toddrc
I just set up my Squeezebox and the first thing I wanted to be able to do is listen to the same music on my computer as what was being played in the other room. I have installed squeezeslave and am probably missing something rather obvious. I did not fully understand this instruction: 5a) ...

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-11-23 Thread autopilot
Hi, im running Visa 64 and was wondering how to suppress the DOS box also. I want a headless player, but a DOS box is not headless :) I have tried -o, but i still get a DOS box. Many thanks. -- autopilot *Lounge :* Squeezebox Classic -> Cambridge Audio Azur 640a -> Mission 701's. *Bedroom :

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-11-18 Thread f948lan
For anyone interested, I've had a go at adding text mode display and control support into squeezeslave, including LCDd and lircd support. See http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=55178 for details and patches to try it out. It's Linux only at the moment -- f948lan -

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-11-18 Thread Dean L. Surkin
Any idea when the Linux AMD64 version (for Debian/Ubuntu) will be available? Thanks. --Dean L. Surkin -- Dean L. Surkin Dean L. Surkin's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=14034 View this thread: htt

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-11-14 Thread pippin
kelvinelk;359827 Wrote: > Hi Pippin, > > the command that has worked for me for some time is: > aoss /usr/local/bin/squeezeslave --signal --oldplayer --volume sw -r3 > -s -m 01:01:01:01:01:0a mythtv > > where mythtv is the server name where squeezecenter resides > > this requires alsa-oss inst

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-11-14 Thread kelvinelk
Hi Pippin, the command that has worked for me for some time is: aoss /usr/local/bin/squeezeslave --signal --oldplayer --volume sw -r3 -s -m 01:01:01:01:01:0a mythtv where mythtv is the server name where squeezecenter resides this requires alsa-oss installed (I don't recall installing anything e

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-11-13 Thread pippin
Could somebody give me a complete dummies' guide on how to get this running on my ubuntu server? I only get "PortAudio error: Host error." I've tried to install any PortAudio stuff I could find but have no idea how to find out if it's configured correctly... -- pippin --- see iPeng at penguinl

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-11-05 Thread Fletch
Is Jim asking about SqueezePlay or SqueezeSlave? -- Fletch Fletch's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=529 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=54124 _

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-11-05 Thread Michael Herger
> Squeezeplay isn't likely to receive any direct support in > SqueezeCenter, It's already there: Slim::Player::SqueezeSlave. If some feature is missing, then this is the place to fix it. Michael ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com h

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-11-05 Thread JJZolx
Can I suggest something for Squeezeplay, perhaps as an option... Can it try to emulate an SB2/3, or possibly a Receiver? That is, actually identify itself to SqueezeCenter as one of those players? Another possibility might be to identify itself as SoftSqueeze. Squeezeplay isn't likely to recei

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-10-29 Thread erland
maggior;354795 Wrote: > I am using squeezeslave on Linux with the options -s -r3. -s tells it > to run in the background and not expect input from the keyboard. > Thanks, -r3 and -s seems to have solved my issues. -- erland Erland Isaksson 'My homepage' (http://erland.isaksson.info) 'My do

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-10-29 Thread maggior
erland;354488 Wrote: > Does the -r or --retry parameters work on the Linux version ? > > I can run them with any time but it never succeeds to re-connect to > SqueezeCenter after a SqueezeCenter restart. > > If I run them with a retry seconds parameter it just says: > > Code: -

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-10-29 Thread ralphy
Yes, it's been that way since the option was added depending on your getopt library. SS thinks the 2 is the IP address and it's retrying using the default of 5 Error connecting to 0.0.0.2:3483 Sleeping for 5 s. ^ | It's related to the problem I've run into using optional arguments with

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-10-29 Thread erland
Does the -r or --retry parameters work on the Linux version ? I can run them with any time but it never succeeds to re-connect to SqueezeCenter after a SqueezeCenter restart. If I run them with a retry seconds parameter it just says: Code: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/opt/sque

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-10-27 Thread JJZolx
oreillymj;354083 Wrote: > ok, that was all fine expect I didn't have the appParameters key. > > But I still get a DOS window with the following, even if I specify -o > 0, or --output 0 I dunno. I've never seen a DOS window running a service using srvany. With 0.7 it seemed like the output dev

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-10-27 Thread oreillymj
ok, that was all fine expect I didn't have the appParameters key. But I still get a DOS window with the following, even if I specify -o 0, or --output 0 Output devices: 0: Primary Sound Driver 1: C-Media Wave Device 2: Modem #1 Line Playback (emulated) 3: Primary Sound Capture Driver 4: C-Media

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-10-27 Thread JJZolx
oreillymj;353920 Wrote: > I'd be interested to know how you set up Squeezeslave as an XP service. > > I tried with Srvany.exe but wasn't able to suppress the DOS window. > > Here's the registry parameters I tried passing into srvany.exe > > "C:\Program Files\SqueezeCenter\squeezeslave.exe" -o

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-10-27 Thread oreillymj
Jim, I'd be interested to know how you set up Squeezeslave as an XP service. I tried with Srvany.exe but wasn't able to suppress the DOS window. Here's the registry parameters I tried passing into srvany.exe "C:\Program Files\SqueezeCenter\squeezeslave.exe" -o 0 -s >NULL -- oreillymj --

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-10-26 Thread ralphy
maggior;353262 Wrote: > > I looked at the output from -help and it does just show 5 sets of hex > digits. Thanks for catching this. The fix will be in the next release. I've also updated the help screen to clearly describe the difference between -r/--retry. -- ralphy --

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-10-26 Thread ralphy
JJZolx;353372 Wrote: > Command line parsing with Squezeslave has always been a little hit or > miss.0.7 was worse. I was going to fix the cli parsing for this release as it's always bugged me as well, but figured it would break too many "run scripts" that people were using. I've come across

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-10-25 Thread JJZolx
Philip Meyer;353369 Wrote: > I tried -r, but it asked for a value, so I then tried --retry 5 and it > then said "Error no such host: 5". It seems that --retry doesn't look > for a param, but -r requires a param. > > -r 5 works. Command line parsing with Squezeslave has always been a little hit

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-10-25 Thread Phil Meyer
>Did you add the -r/--retry option? The help text is a little confusing >- I don't believe it retries by default. It won't reconnect without >it. I didn't know that I had to do that - I assumed it would retry by default (or if not, that the process would end). I tried -r, but it asked for a va

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-10-25 Thread JJZolx
Philip Meyer;353263 Wrote: > I needed to stop and restart SqueezeSlave after I stopped and restarted > SqueezeCenter too (other players reconnected, but SS did not). Did you add the -r/--retry option? The help text is a little confusing - I don't believe it retries by default. It won't reconne

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-10-25 Thread Phil Meyer
>A new Squeezeslave 0.8 release is now available at > Seems to be working okay in 7.3 for me, except for synchronisation - SqueezeSlave initially lagged behind my Boom player. Having skipped a track, it now seems to be in sync though. I noticed the following in the log: [12:59:35.9904] Slim::P

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-10-25 Thread maggior
JJZolx;353059 Wrote: > Six pairs of hex digits, not five. I must have miscounted - I thought the help screen showed 5 sets of hex digits. I'll have to try again. As you can tell, I don't deal with MACs much :-). -- maggior Rich - Setup: 2 SB3s, 1 duet, 1 receiver. SuSE 10.2 Server

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-10-25 Thread ralphy
JJZolx;352702 Wrote: > Hmm... I'm using the previous version (0.7?) and it works just fine with > 6.5 and SqueezeCenter 7 all the way up through the current revisions of > 7.3. I just meant that I'd tested 0.8-12 with SC versions in that range. Yes, version 0.7.5.1 also works with all these ver

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-10-24 Thread JJZolx
maggior;353054 Wrote: > I'm trying to use the -m option to set a different MAC. I receive an > error "Cannot parse mac address 00:00:00:00:02". > > Any ideas on how to get around this? Six pairs of hex digits, not five. -- JJZolx Jim

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-10-24 Thread maggior
I'm trying to use the -m option to set a different MAC. I receive an error "Cannot parse mac address 00:00:00:00:02". Any ideas on how to get around this? I'm using the Windows version 0.8-12. Thanks! -- maggior Rich - Setup: 2 SB3s, 1 duet, 1 receiver. SuSE 10.2 Server running Sq

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-10-24 Thread ralphy
bobkoure;352876 Wrote: > -Thank you!- > One very minor issue: when I upgraded to 7.2.1 this AM, I discovered > that the web interface was unable to add tracks with ss2 (the cover > icon at the top of the right-hand panel would, just jump a tiny bit > when I clicked "add track" in the left panel.

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-10-24 Thread bobkoure
-Thank you!- On my system, the earlier w32 version was essentially unusable (jumped tracks, froze) - but this one works just fine. One very minor issue: when I upgraded to 7.2.1 this AM, I discovered that the web interface was unable to add tracks with ss2 (the cover icon at the top of the right-h

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-10-24 Thread bobkoure
BTW, here's an easy way to use ss2 from the GUI 1) move or copy the files into a folder where you plan to keep them (I used c:\program files\squeezeslave2, but you can use whatever you like) 2) use windows explorer to navigate to that directory (if you're not there already from the above) 3) ri

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-10-24 Thread ralphy
I currently don't have access to a Mac to build the OSX version. I've been looking at the hack to allow you to run OSX under vmware, but I have a few more updates planned for squeezeslave first. I'm hoping someone who has one will step up and create a binary. The source is availabe on sourcefor

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-10-23 Thread JJZolx
Just downloaded 0.8 and have it running fine on Windows XP as a service. Seems less temperamental about command line switches, whereas the previous version had some issues. Which is nice. Two questions regarding the --volume option. In the Help, there's this: Code: -v

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-10-23 Thread pippin
JJZolx;352702 Wrote: > Hmm... I'm using the previous version (0.7?) and it works just fine with > 6.5 and SqueezeCenter 7 all the way up through the current revisions of > 7.3. But it's lacking a usable OSX version. As is this one :-( Maybe somebody can help out (I am pretty clueless on Mac prog

Re: [slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-10-23 Thread JJZolx
ralphy;352678 Wrote: > What's new in Squeezeslave 0.8 > > Works with squeezecenter versions 6.5.4 through 7.2.1. Hmm... I'm using the previous version (0.7?) and it works just fine with 6.5 and SqueezeCenter 7 all the way up through the current revisions of 7.3. -- JJZolx Jim --

[slim] Annouce: New Squeezeslave 0.8 release availabe on sourceforge

2008-10-23 Thread ralphy
A new Squeezeslave 0.8 release is now available at https://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=105169&package_id=176494 What's new in Squeezeslave 0.8 Works with squeezecenter versions 6.5.4 through 7.2.1. Binaries available for Windows, Linux and Solaris both Sparc and Intel. Win3