Mark Lanctot;255944 Wrote:
{snip} On the bright side, Logitech Harmony was looking at the server
software formerly known as Jive so there might be a Harmony universal
remote in the future that works like an SBC but could also be used as a
universal remote.
Any hints as to when one could
Below is a copy of an email I sent to SlimDevices sales and support.
Users comments would be greatly appreciated as we may be able to get
SlimDevices to come out with right product.
---
Dear Management Designers (I hope this gets to you),
I was thrilled when I saw that SlimDevices would be
noduplicates wrote:
Below is a copy of an email I sent to SlimDevices sales and support.
Users comments would be greatly appreciated as we may be able to get
SlimDevices to come out with right product.
---
Dear Management Designers (I hope this gets to you),
I was thrilled when I saw that
noduplicates;257107 Wrote:
The SqueezeBox Controller will miss its opportunity to be a runaway hit
and quash the pricier competition (Sonos). If you must make and sell
this product with this small screen, I would debut a prototype on your
website of a more expensive larger LCD screen
Peter,
I agree with Erland about the problems of cannabalizing sales of the
current device by releasing a new one and that SlimDevices has already
made a commitment to the current device. However, history and
companies such as Apple have shown that building the right device the
first time out
Hi,
this new controller seems nice. I currently have a SB2 setup at home,
but find the display hard to read from some distance. I also like the
album art display. I have a few questions:
- Is it possible to control SoftSqueeze from the squeezebox
controller?
Not sure if this is the right place to post, but will the final version
of the controller support MusicIP mixes? It's the one thing missing
from my current Jive install which keeps me using the supplied remote.
--
Siduhe
- Is it possible to control SoftSqueeze from the squeezebox
controller?
Sure.
- Why dont you make a kitchen radio/music player for me?
Why questions are hard to answer...
Michael
___
discuss mailing list
discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
ezkcdude;256353 Wrote:
Will the controller be able to turn the receiver on/off? I have a jive
remote now, and one of the things that bothers me is that it can't turn
the SB3 on (or off). I have to use the IR remote or SlimServer.
Really? I can with my beta Jive remote, i have been able to
Will the controller be able to turn the receiver on/off? I have a jive
remote now, and one of the things that bothers me is that it can't turn
the SB3 on (or off). I have to use the IR remote or SlimServer.
--
ezkcdude
There are 10 kind of people in the world - those who understand binary
and
On 9-Jan-08, at 4:37 AM, ezkcdude wrote:
Will the controller be able to turn the receiver on/off? I have a jive
remote now, and one of the things that bothers me is that it can't
turn
the SB3 on (or off). I have to use the IR remote or SlimServer.
You should have an option to turn the
I'm currently using a Dell Axim as a dedicated controller for my SB3 and
it really is a dedicated device, I have no extra software installed and
just have the IE home page set to SlimServerIP/Handheld. It looks to
me as if, after reading all 20 pages of this thread, the new Duet
controller (DC)
Skunk;255938 Wrote:
...the glass-half-full way of looking at that is you can get both for
only $100 more than the price of an Sb3...
There again, the glass half empty arguement is that I already have a
type of receiver and a type of controller - they are just called an SB3
and its remote
Tradewind25 wrote:
Skunk;255938 Wrote:
...the glass-half-full way of looking at that is you can get both for
only $100 more than the price of an Sb3...
There again, the glass half empty arguement is that I already have a
type of receiver and a type of controller - they are just
Tradewind25;256485 Wrote:
What is the point of having an SB3 if it lacks the expandibility of the
Duet??
As Peter has pointed out, the expandability of the SB3 and the SBR
(Squeezebox receiver) are identical. Why else have an SB3? Some people
don't want to spend the money on the SBC (the new
Quoting Tradewind25
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I just think it a shame that Logitech appear to have effectively made
the SB3 obsolete. What is the point of having an SB3 if it lacks the
expandibility of the Duet??
There is no obsolescence, and the SB3 is as expandable as it's always been.
I
Quoting Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well, perhaps slimserver 1.0 ;)
I'll do you one better and suggest that on most days, SlimServer or
SqueezeCenter is obsolete by the time the next nightly build comes out
:)
My slimp3 still works as it did on day one. In fact, thanks to the
software
The point is that the SB3 has a display on every unit. I don't see
how it has been made obsolete...
On Jan 9, 2008 12:20 PM, Tradewind25
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just think it a shame that Logitech appear to have effectively made
the SB3 obsolete. What is the point of having an SB3 if it
Tradewind25;256485 Wrote:
There again, the glass half empty arguement is that I already have a
type of receiver and a type of controller - they are just called an SB3
and its remote control. All want to do is to add another, low-cost,
receiver. Who's to say that, were I to purchase the new
So much talk about the interface/controller. My primary concern is audio
quality (I own 2 SB3's but ditched the transporter).
Is the Wolfson DAC (does anybody know the exact type ?) an improvement
or quite the contrary... ?
Is there more to say about audio quality on this product ? Because if
JulianL;256462 Wrote:
I'm currently using a Dell Axim as a dedicated controller for my SB3 and
it really is a dedicated device, I have no extra software installed and
just have the IE home page set to SlimServerIP/Handheld. It looks to
me as if, after reading all 20 pages of this thread, the
wtfaidh wrote:
So much talk about the interface/controller. My primary concern is audio
quality (I own 2 SB3's but ditched the transporter).
Is the Wolfson DAC (does anybody know the exact type ?) an improvement
or quite the contrary... ?
Is there more to say about audio quality on this
On Jan 9, 2008 2:13 PM, wtfaidh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So much talk about the interface/controller. My primary concern is audio
quality (I own 2 SB3's but ditched the transporter).
Is the Wolfson DAC (does anybody know the exact type ?) an improvement
or quite the contrary... ?
Is
The transporter is, IMHO, to expensive compared to a same priced CD
player. The SB3 is superb in everyday-easy-to-use.
For me improving SBx audio quality would make the difference, not the
interface...
--
wtfaidh
From what has been stated so far it would appear that the sound quality
of the Receiver and the SB3 are pretty much identical.
So this is not about sound quality, it is about user experience and
operational functionality. Nothing wrong with that.
The Transporter is about sound quality.
The DAC measures slightly worse, from what has been written, but most
people have said it sounds quite good.
The digital path is identical, so if you're using your own DAC, it
should be equivalent.
But if audio quality in the analog domain is your primary concern, I
would suggest a Transporter
Peter;256540 Wrote:
wtfaidh wrote:[color=blue]
Audio quality is hardly a subjective matter. Whole flamewars can be
fought over this. SD claims it's the same quality. Please buy one and
let us know what you think so the flamewars may start ;)
Regards,
Peter
True, and I will buy one
autopilot;256517 Wrote:
The reasons it beats all the other devices for me are;
1) Always on wifi - because it mostly in the dock wifi is always on -
other devices like the PSP, PDA etc constantly lose the connection when
idle - it takes a few seconds to log on and drives me mad when i
thing-fish;256567 Wrote:
Note that even though those were dealbreakers for the most part, it WAS
fun to use the DS to control the music. It actually looked good and
was quite operational, but only while it was a live connection.
I've tried the PSP and smartphones and also suffered the same
wtfaidh;256552 Wrote:
The transporter is, IMHO, to expensive compared to a same priced CD
player. The SB3 is superb in everyday-easy-to-use.
I'm not sure I understand this comment. You are saying that the £1300
TP is too expensive to compare with a £1300 CD player? Why?
--
Fifer
I really like this new product announcement, but there are some things I
wish they would improve on.
The good:
They have had an obvious needed for a hand-held controller with a
visual screen for quite a while. They have delivered on that nicely
with the new SB Controller.
The Duet is perfectly
BetterDAC;256578 Wrote:
I think they should have enabled the embedded DAC within the controller
so that we could use it for a headphone, or similar. To leave it to the
community of developers is more reflective of the start-up roots of SD
than of the professional capabilities of Logitech
Most of the views on the new Duet are based on us being current users.
Here's a different viewpoint
I had persuaded a colleague of mine that an SB3 would be a good
purchase for him, and he was going to get one over Xmas. As it happens
he didn't get round to it, so after the break I
BetterDAC;256578 Wrote:
The Wolfson DAC is a disappointment for those of us that like audiophile
sound but prefer the convenience of digital streaming.
Why not go with the Transporter then?
Unlike their other devices, SD didnt even bother to name what Wolfson
DAC they are using, perhaps
BetterDAC;256578 Wrote:
Thus wed like to get the most out of our digital recordings and the
DAC is the weak link right now. So for me thats the biggest
disappointment since it seems they may be targeting a different
customer than us streaming audiophiles.
I don't see it that way because
kdf;256430 Wrote:
On 9-Jan-08, at 4:37 AM, ezkcdude wrote:
Will the controller be able to turn the receiver on/off? I have a
jive
remote now, and one of the things that bothers me is that it can't
turn
the SB3 on (or off). I have to use the IR remote or SlimServer.
You should
Quoting ezkcdude [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I don't. Does that mean I have an old version of the controller? I've
upgraded the software several times. ???
ok, so here we go...
What is the SC build number (check server settings for the version string)
What is the jive build number? See
Something is not right.
Turn on/off XXX is usually below Choose Player or Extras if you
only have one player.
--
bpa
bpa's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=1806
View this thread:
kdf;256617 Wrote:
Quoting ezkcdude ezkcdude.32y0cz1199922301 (AT) no-mx (DOT)
forums.slimdevices.com:
I don't. Does that mean I have an old version of the controller?
I've
upgraded the software several times. ???
ok, so here we go...
What is the SC build number (check server
A couple of questions
- will it be possible to generate MusicIP playlists using the
Squeezebox Controller? (you can do this by holding down the play button
on the current IR remote)
- planned date for UK availability of Squeezebox Controller?
--
mikerob
ezkcdude;256620 Wrote:
SC build number? I don't see that anywhere. Under About Jive, it says
the following:
From the web interface: SettingsStatus
--
Skunk
http://www.last.fm/user/TheSkunk/
Skunk's Profile:
Skunk;256623 Wrote:
From the web interface: SettingsStatus
Do you mean SlimServer or the Jive remote? Either way I can't find any
menu that says Status.
--
ezkcdude
There are 10 kind of people in the world - those who understand binary
and those who don't.
SHINYMETAL
'*Site*'
ezkcdude;256625 Wrote:
Do you mean SlimServer or the Jive remote? Either way I can't find any
menu that says Status.
Squeezecenter. At the bottom right is settings. The link looks like a
gear. In settings is status.
--
Skunk
http://www.last.fm/user/TheSkunk/
Skunk;256626 Wrote:
Squeezecenter. At the bottom right is settings. The link looks like a
gear. In settings is status.
I remember something about Squeezecenter, but I don't think I have it.
Is that a replacement for SlimServer?
--
ezkcdude
There are 10 kind of people in the world - those
It's my understanding that a WiFi router is only as fast as the units it
speaks to. i.e. If you have a N WiFi router and you match it with one
say SBC or SBR maxing at G speeds then the whole system defaults to
max G speeds. I ask because the SBC appears to be on 100% of the
time.
Am I way out
Quoting IRJ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Am I way out here?
I know that was the case with 802.11G, that having any device on the
network with 802.11B caused a dramatic slow down (although completely
down to B). I don't know what the draft N claims, but my specific
router (Belkin Pre-N) claims to
ezkcdude;256629 Wrote:
I remember something about Squeezecenter, but I don't think I have it.
Is that a replacement for SlimServer?
Edit: Ok, I realized SqueezeCenter is the newest version of SlimServer
7.0. I hadn't gotten around to installing it, so I'm doing so now.
Let's see what
kdf;256634 Wrote:
Part of the expectation of the Beta program was to keep up with the
changes. You've missed out on a lot by staying at v477 of Jive.
There were a few tricky updates along the way, which I hope don't leave
you stuck now. If you have an sdcard handy, that will probably
Mark Lanctot;256592 Wrote:
Why not go with the Transporter then?
Becasue the Transporter is $2,000 and SB Receiver is $150. I was
looking for a good solution for several rooms, and the Transporter
isn't priced right for that. All they had to do was invest another $3
per Receiver and
Skunk;256596 Wrote:
I don't see it that way because most audiophiles had the SB3 connected
to an external DAC anyway. Even a lot of non-audiophiles just connect
it to a HT receiver, negating the quality of the built in converter.
Comparing the SB3 to Squeezebox Receiver you get the same
BetterDAC;256642 Wrote:
I use an external DAC for my stereo system, but I am not going to make
that kind of investment for multiple rooms in my house. Nor do I need
that level of music in those other rooms. The SB receiver is priced
perfect for multiple rooms, and they could have really
Have you had a chance to compare the SB3 DAC to the SBR DAC? How
audible is the difference?
On Jan 9, 2008 8:25 PM, BetterDAC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But given the DAC
that SD chose, it seems to me that Slim assumes their target customers
primarily listen to lossy compressed music.
BetterDAC;256641 Wrote:
Mark Lanctot;256592 Wrote:
Why not go with the Transporter then?
Becasue the Transporter is $2,000 and SB Receiver is $150. I was
looking for a good solution for several rooms, and the Transporter
isn't priced right for that. All they had to do was invest
On 9-Jan-08, at 5:46 PM, ezkcdude wrote:
Yeah, I was busy the last several months as I had to move for a new
job. You're right about missing out on a lot, though! The improvements
made are quite substantial, not the least of which is the on/off
feature.
phew. I had this vision that you
ezkcdude;256648 Wrote:
BetterDAC;256641 Wrote:
What qualifies you to make this judgement?
I am able to understand the difference between $2,000 and $150.
--
BetterDAC
BetterDAC's Profile:
BetterDAC;256653 Wrote:
I am able to understand the difference between $2,000 and $150.
I believe ezkcdude was asking for why you stated this:
it was natural to expect a better DAC than the SB3.
Why do you believe the SBR has a worse DAC than the SB3?
--
snarlydwarf
Does the lack of VFD (and its processor/memory usage) make 24/96
playback any more likely?
--
Skunk
http://www.last.fm/user/TheSkunk/
Skunk's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2685
View this
snarlydwarf;256655 Wrote:
I believe ezkcdude was asking for why you stated this:
Why do you believe the SBR has a worse DAC than the SB3?
I shouldn't say it's worse. In fact the specs from the Wolfson website
show that it has some good features, but it seems that Slim doesn't
take full
On Jan 9, 2008 10:50 PM, BetterDAC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I shouldn't say it's worse. In fact the specs from the Wolfson website
show that it has some good features, but it seems that Slim doesn't
take full advantage of them. At least not yet. But given the criticism
that the SB3 didn't
mikerob;256621 Wrote:
- will it be possible to generate MusicIP playlists using the
Squeezebox Controller? (you can do this by holding down the play button
on the current IR remote)
Launching MusicIP mixes from the SqueezeBox Controller doesn't work in
the current software, but this is
I have a Squeezebox 3. I wish to add one of the new Receivers in
another room, and ideally synchronize the two.
Can I achieve this with my current SB3 remote, or would I also need to
purchase one of the new Controllers?
(I think I read that the Receiver requires the Controller to configure
http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/video-logitech-squeezebox-duet/
--
James_B
James_B's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=11309
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41813
Can the text on the controller be made bigger?
Some of us here have less than stellar eyesight and variable font size
is a blessing.
--
NickP
NickP's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9123
View
James_B;255899 Wrote:
http://www.engadget.com/2008/01/06/video-logitech-squeezebox-duet/
QUOTE]
Thanks for the link, but nor sure this does anything to answer my
question.
--
Tradewind25
Geoff J.
Tradewind25's
Tradewind25;255864 Wrote:
I have a Squeezebox 3. I wish to add one of the new Receivers in
another room, and ideally synchronize the two.
Can I achieve this with my current SB3 remote, or would I also need to
purchase one of the new Controllers?
(I think I read that the Receiver requires
Well maybe I missed something amazing about this, but it just seems to
be a big clunky remote, based on a early ipod design but just large
enough to ensure they can emboss a logo on it. What happened to
elegance in design?? :s
Buying a Nokia 770 would do the same but with more features right?
Fifer;255902 Wrote:
Sorry Peter, but for those of us who agree with it (and there are many)
it's far from worn out. For us, it's the truth.
I'm somewhere in between in this argument. I expected the controller
also be good AV System remote given that SD is now part of Logitech.
I'd still have
bretonfou;255058 Wrote:
The new commander look to me as a mere wifi micro PDA, ideally
one could control any streaming media server with
any form of computing device with communication facility
(it could be my macbook, a bluetooth phone, a wifi phone, a pda or what
people calle a smart
GCFL;254822 Wrote:
can anyone tell me if the controller will be able to be used (or
possibly modified) as a universal remote (to access the CD player,
etc.)?
Apologies if this has been answered already but I'm just going through
this thread - there are no official plans to include universal
Mark Lanctot;255944 Wrote:
On the bright side, Logitech Harmony was looking at the server software
formerly known as Jive so there might be a Harmony universal remote in
the future that works like an SBC but could also be used as a universal
remote.
Hope springs eternal! This is what I
gorman;255746 Wrote:
Regarding Softsqueeze... anyone knows if the Controller is capable of
interfacing with it?
Well, SoftSqueeze behaves like a hardware player, and the controller
can access all hardware players, so it should be possible.
I haven't tried it with the beta version of the
toby10;27 Wrote:
Adding just some simple IR learning would be sufficient for my purposes.
Unfortunately the IR hardware in the controller is an emitter only, no
receiver so no learning function.
However the SB (not the new receiver) has a learning function through
the IRBlaster plugin so
tamanaco;255940 Wrote:
I wanna hold my beer in one hand and the remote in the other. I want to
be able to throw it to my wife with one hand without spilling any of my
beer, so the remote has to be sturdy.
While throwing probably isn't a good idea -unless she's a better than
average catcher-
cparker wrote:
Well maybe I missed something amazing about this, but it just seems to
be a big clunky remote, based on a early ipod design but just large
enough to ensure they can emboss a logo on it. What happened to
elegance in design?? :s
Buying a Nokia 770 would do the same but with
How's the jitter performance of the SBR vs. the SB3/2?
--
rblnr
rblnr's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4504
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41813
I believe Sean has said that the digital path is basically identical,
although there are differences in PSUs.
FWIW, the spec page lists less than 50 ps (standard deviation) for
both SB3 and SBR.
On Jan 8, 2008 10:41 AM, rblnr
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How's the jitter performance of the SBR vs.
Oh I should say - congratulations to the Logitech SMS people!
This does seem to answer several user requests - a headless SB, a
lower-priced SB (but without cutting corners) and a graphical wifi
remote, with a colour screen that displays album art.
--
Mark Lanctot
Sean Adams: So you mean,
Not currently. From all reports the SBC interface is far more
responsive than the web interface (via Nokia 770 or otherwise). Many
people have reported that the N770 works, but is a little
unresponsive.
On Jan 8, 2008 8:14 AM, cparker
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Buying a Nokia 770 would do the
tamanaco;256010 Wrote:
Heck, we don't even know for sure if they plan to incorporate it.
They've said pretty clearly that they do not plan to incorporate it.
The SBC is not a universal remote. It lacks the hard buttons and
doesn't have a touchscreen.
This doesn't mean that the community
Mark Lanctot;255967 Wrote:
Unfortunately the IR hardware in the controller is an emitter only, no
receiver so no learning function.
However the SB (not the new receiver) has a learning function through
the IRBlaster plugin so there is a convoluted pathway involving an SB,
IRBlaster and an
Skunk wrote:
Tradewind25;255864 Wrote:
I have a Squeezebox 3. I wish to add one of the new Receivers in
another room, and ideally synchronize the two.
Can I achieve this with my current SB3 remote, or would I also need to
purchase one of the new Controllers?
(I think I read that the
Mark Lanctot;256011 Wrote:
They've said pretty clearly that they do not plan to incorporate it.
The SBC is not a universal remote. It lacks the hard buttons and
doesn't have a touchscreen.
Sure, they're unlikely to incorporate Harmony functionality in the SBC,
but I don't see why they
Will the Duet be available in stores or only on the internet?
--
tforce
tforce's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=12666
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=41813
Mark Lanctot;255966 Wrote:
Well, SoftSqueeze behaves like a hardware player, and the controller can
access all hardware players, so it should be possible.
I haven't tried it with the beta version of the controller though.
It works fine at least in the Windows SDK version of the Controller
On Jan 8, 2008, at 10:16 AM, tforce wrote:
Will the Duet be available in stores or only on the internet?
Duet will be available in both retail and online stores around the
world, though the specific retailers haven't been announced yet.
The individual Receiver and Controller units will also
radish;256029 Wrote:
Sure, they're unlikely to incorporate Harmony functionality in the SBC,
but I don't see why they couldn't build a new Harmony with Jive built
in. That could be rather sweet.
I know a couple Harmony devs are at least looking at Jive since they
posted here. No idea
I took the opportunity to add the Squeezebox Receiver here:
http://wiki.slimdevices.com/index.cgi?HardwareComparison
Correct away if you see any inaccuracies. Some of it was guesswork
since the SBR isn't officially released.
--
Mark Lanctot
Sean Adams: So you mean, aside from the fact that
wdrazek;256124 Wrote:
So, Sonos is $750 per additional room whereas Duet is $399.
As it does not appear that you must have a separate controller for each
receiver, the cost per additional room is actually $150 (149).
--
ds2021
For those who claim Duet is out of touch with real world pricing in the
US, consider:
The Duet provides what the SB3 does, but has a vastly improved color
screen handheld remote control for $100 more at $399. Sonos charges
$900 for its base system, but does include a low power built in digital
There is a headphone jack on the controller.
On Jan 8, 2008 3:36 PM, Mike Siegel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
jack on the Controller?
mvalera;254681 Wrote:
I'm happy to announce that we have launched the all new Squeezebox™
Duet!
Squeezebox™ Duet lets you listen to the music you love in
I saw it asked elsewhere, but didn't see a response: Is that a headphone
jack on the Controller?
mvalera;254681 Wrote:
I'm happy to announce that we have launched the all new Squeezebox
Duet!
Squeezebox Duet lets you listen to the music you love in any room in
your home. Access
To those that likes the SqueezeBox Controller to be a universal remove I
can honestly say that I had the exact same idea until I felt the Jive
prototype.
After having the chance to use the Jive prototype I've changed my
feelings a bit. A Harmony remote based on Jive software would be really
Jim, thanks for the answer! I didn't want to try locate the info myself
in the JHive-threads and besides, I think it's good for others to read
in this duet-thread instead of trying to search for the info and
perhaps not finding it. So thanks to you and bklaas for clearing this
out. And good to
erland;256144 Wrote:
To those that likes the SqueezeBox Controller to be a universal remove I
can honestly say that I had the exact same idea until I felt the Jive
prototype.
After having the chance to use the Jive prototype I've changed my
feelings a bit. A Harmony remote based on Jive
Is the Controller basically a handheld receiver that doubles as a
controller for different SB devices?
Mitch Harding;256146 Wrote:
There is a headphone jack on the controller.
On Jan 8, 2008 3:36 PM, Mike Siegel
Mike.Siegel.32vzwo1199828403 (AT) no-mx (DOT) forums.slimdevices.com
My understanding is that the headphone jack currently cannot be used
to play streaming music, but it sounds like that will be enabled
eventually.
On Jan 8, 2008 4:38 PM, Mike Siegel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the Controller basically a handheld receiver that doubles as a
controller for
Ive read somewhere, that like the SB3, the Controller is always on.
With my SB3, however, I can at least switch it off at the mains at the
end of day or when it isnt being used for an extended period.
Does this mean that the controller cant be switched off at all?
--
smg
smg wrote:
I’ve read somewhere, that like the SB3, the Controller is always on.
With my SB3, however, I can at least switch it off at the mains at the
end of day or when it isn’t being used for an extended period.
Does this mean that the controller can’t be switched off at all?
Yes it
The reciever is always on... appart from when you pull the plug :)
The remote us usually on, and goes into power save when not in use (the
accelerometer wakes it up when you pick it up, very cool). You can
switch it off though. The home button acts as a power button as well.
Holding it down will
Peter;255463 Wrote:
smg wrote:
Ive read somewhere, that like the SB3, the Controller is always on.
With my SB3, however, I can at least switch it off at the mains at
the
end of day or when it isnt being used for an extended period.
Does this mean that the controller cant be
401 - 500 of 639 matches
Mail list logo
