[slim] Re: Transporter vs. SB3

2006-07-28 Thread ailean
Fifer Wrote: I think you can opt for a pony instead of the free SB3. But I agree with Mark. It's a music player, not a Swiss Army knife. My statement was more about how well Slim Devices could do a media player compared to everyone else and there dog, there general architecture and UI are

[slim] Re: Transporter vs. SB3

2006-07-27 Thread ailean
I was definitely drooling when first spotted the 'Transporter' but $2k for a new Slim box that still only does audio? EK! :) I'd been wishing for a while that Slim would do a full media player with video support as there interface just out does pretty much anything I've seen but at $2k with

[slim] Re: Transporter vs. SB3

2006-07-27 Thread 325xi
First thing I said when saw Transportes was: Kudos to Slim Devices. On the other hand, $2K tag presumes certain level of refinement, not just a bunch of features. When I was buying my $3.5K CD player from SimAudio, I read everything I could about their design approach - and refinement was the

[slim] Re: Transporter vs. SB3

2006-07-27 Thread Mark Lanctot
ailean Wrote: I was definitely drooling when first spotted the 'Transporter' but $2k for a new Slim box that still only does audio? EK! :) I'd been wishing for a while that Slim would do a full media player with video support as there interface just out does pretty much anything I've seen

[slim] Re: Transporter vs. SB3

2006-07-27 Thread 325xi
Well said, Mark! -- 325xi 325xi's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=5661 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=25810 ___

Re: [slim] Re: Transporter vs. SB3

2006-07-27 Thread Marc Sherman
Mark Lanctot wrote: If we're going to list the things it doesn't have, it doesn't have steel-belted radials either. I'm pretty sure that it is also completely lacking in ponies. - Marc ___ discuss mailing list discuss@lists.slimdevices.com

[slim] Re: Transporter vs. SB3

2006-07-27 Thread RadioClash
Too much dough -- RadioClash RadioClash's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=2839 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=25810

[slim] Re: Transporter vs. SB3

2006-07-26 Thread Robert_W
In keeping with the original Transporter vs SB3 question I also would like to know how they stack up to each other in terms of sound quality. I suppose we'll have to wait for the independent reviews to start coming in but I'd really like to know how the 2 devices sound side by side on the same

Re: [slim] Re: Transporter vs. SB3

2006-07-26 Thread ron thigpen
JJZolx wrote: What kind of audiophile buys a $2000 source component without hearing it first? It appears that the 30 day trial applies to this product as well. And how better to try out a component but in your listening room, connected to your gear?

[slim] Re: Transporter vs. SB3

2006-07-26 Thread GeeZa
Under a properly conducted level-matched A/B/X test I would imagine no audible difference between the Transporter and SB3. There is nothing in the Transporter spec that I can see significantly improving the sound quality for most users. Balanced analogue XLRs are nice but generally not necessary

[slim] Re: Transporter vs. SB3

2006-07-26 Thread Sleestack
GeeZa Wrote: A functionally identical product line that now goes from $299 to $1999 with a gaping void in between is frankly silly. Your opinions on audiophile concerns would naturally lead you to that conclusion. Nevertheless, I don't think everyone feels that AES digital outputs, the

[slim] Re: Transporter vs. SB3

2006-07-26 Thread seanadams
GeeZa Wrote: There is nothing in the Transporter spec that I can see significantly improving the sound quality for most users. That is an interesting comment. If not lower noise, lower distortion, higher sample rates etc, what COULD the specs possibly offer that would improve sound quality?

[slim] Re: Transporter vs. SB3

2006-07-26 Thread GeeZa
seanadams Wrote: That is an interesting comment. If not lower noise, lower distortion, higher sample rates etc, what COULD the specs possibly offer that would improve sound quality? Are you asserting that there is no room for improvement in SB3? If so, I'm flattered, but respectfully

[slim] Re: Transporter vs. SB3

2006-07-26 Thread sfraser
Robert_W Wrote: In keeping with the original Transporter vs SB3 question I also would like to know how they stack up to each other in terms of sound quality. I suppose we'll have to wait for the independent reviews to start coming in but I'd really like to know how the 2 devices sound side

[slim] Re: Transporter vs. SB3

2006-07-25 Thread mwoodroof
Fair enuff! That is pretty much what I thought, just wanted to see if that was the general concensus round here... -- mwoodroof mwoodroof's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=4190 View this thread:

[slim] Re: Transporter vs. SB3

2006-07-25 Thread docbee
I can't find any info about the mentioned transporter device via google. Any good link as a starting point would be welcome. -- docbee docbee's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=26 View this thread:

[slim] Re: Transporter vs. SB3

2006-07-25 Thread SadGamerGeek
docbee Wrote: I can't find any info about the mentioned transporter device via google. Any good link as a starting point would be welcome. The Home tab at the top of this page is a good place to start. :) -- SadGamerGeek

[slim] Re: Transporter vs. SB3

2006-07-25 Thread docbee
Sorry for the silly question. I just directly go the forum without visiting the home section. Anyway, thanks for the answer :-) Looks much like a studio gadget, but the price is somehow out of bounds... at least for my impression. -- docbee

[slim] Re: Transporter vs. SB3

2006-07-25 Thread Sleestack
docbee Wrote: Sorry for the silly question. I just directly go the forum without visiting the home section. Anyway, thanks for the answer :-) Looks much like a studio gadget, but the price is somehow out of bounds... at least for my impression. I don't think it is a studio gadget at all.