Although Norway is not part of the EU, it is a part of EFTA
Anyways, to get access to the EU's inner marked, EFTA (and their
members) agreed to implement EU's laws and directives.
Interesting, as we (Switzerland) are also members of EFTA, but I haven't
heard of Switzerland implementing such a
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 09:55:39AM +0100, T wrote:
Although Norway is not part of the EU, it is a part of EFTA
Anyways, to get access to the EU's inner marked, EFTA (and their
members) agreed to implement EU's laws and directives.
Interesting, as we (Switzerland) are also members of EFTA,
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 02:57:35PM -0800, kdf wrote:
There was a recent ruling in Europe (not sure if it was EU-wide) that has
decided that copying from one format to another was illegal. This means, if
you buy a CD, you can only EVER copy it to another CD. I got too annoyed
before I could
Quoting John L Fjellstad [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 02:57:35PM -0800, kdf wrote:
There was a recent ruling in Europe (not sure if it was EU-wide) that has
decided that copying from one format to another was illegal. This means,
if
you buy a CD, you can only EVER copy it
Basically, it's Norway implementing an EU directive they had no say
in, that was put into EU law after great lobbying by the recording
industry.
Of course they had no say in it, as they're not in the EU.
But why did they implement it, and in such a manner?
Tom
On Sat, Mar 05, 2005 at 10:12:35PM +0100, T wrote:
Of course they had no say in it, as they're not in the EU.
But why did they implement it, and in such a manner?
Although Norway is not part of the EU, it is a part of EFTA (which is
kinda of a trade block, I guess. Haven't really looked
Quoting Johan Hübner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
kdf wrote:
There was a recent ruling in Europe (not sure if it was EU-wide) that has
decided that copying from one format to another was illegal. This means,
if
you buy a CD, you can only EVER copy it to another CD.
being a european lawyer I
kdf wrote:
Quoting Johan Hübner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
kdf wrote:
There was a recent ruling in Europe (not sure if it was EU-wide) that has
decided that copying from one format to another was illegal. This means,
if
you buy a CD, you can only EVER copy it to another CD.
being a european lawyer I
Quoting Johan Hübner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
kdf wrote:
Quoting Johan Hübner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
kdf wrote:
There was a recent ruling in Europe (not sure if it was EU-wide) that has
decided that copying from one format to another was illegal. This means,
if
you buy a CD, you can only
I've kept out of this thread until now because most people tend to view my
views
as a little radical. But here's my cue.
as a person who has to perform daily in order to meet demands, [...]
A cinema ticket at one of the big movie-houses here costs 8-10 EUR.
The same movie on a DVD will set you
-
To: Slim Devices Discussion discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
Subject: Re: [slim] US Supreme Court
Well - your
I appreciate everyone's responses and am understanding the situation a bit
better now. I do think it's time for the music industry to entirely
overhaul their cost and distribution structure to be more fair to the
artists and the consumers.
Something Christian wrote got me thinking and I wanted
The price I have to pay for my entertainment has nothing to do with
the#12288;work#12288;involved in the first place - so much for artist
compensation.
This isn't true at all. Certainly the one-time cost and the work that goes
into producing a high-quality movie is far greater than the amount
Patrick Cosson wrote
FYI...Slim Devices, along with other emerging technology companies,
submitted an Amicus (friend of the court) Brief to the US Supreme Court in
defense of the landmark 1984 Betamax ruling.
Below you can find an articled from the Associated Press summarizing the
case
Because it gets right to the question of whether or not technology can legally exist for making copies of copyrighted material.
From: "Aaron Zinck" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Slim Devices Discussion discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
To: discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
Subject: Re: [slim]
consideration of such a
thing is just vile.
-kdf
From: Aaron Zinck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Slim Devices Discussion discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
To: discuss@lists.slimdevices.com
Subject: Re: [slim] US Supreme Court
Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 17:28:19 -0500
Patrick Cosson wrote
FYI
--- Aaron Zinck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I find this interesting, and while I'm not sure where I stand
with respect
to this case (I don't know enough about it) I don't understand
what
financial/business interest Slim Devices has in this case.
I'm no lawyer
and may be a bit dense about
I find this interesting, and while I'm not sure where I stand
with respect to this case (I don't know enough about it) I
don't understand what financial/business interest Slim
Devices has in this case. I'm no lawyer and may be a bit
dense about these types of things, but it seems as
On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 17:55:09 -0600, Ben Klaas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But it cracks me up
that these companies' even try to pretend that they created
their software for anything other than illegal file sharing (be
it music or other).
I get new Linux distros from BitTorrent when
--- Michael Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 17:55:09 -0600, Ben Klaas
I get new Linux distros from BitTorrent when they come out.
Everything
from the Mozilla foundation has a bittorrent link. So, there
are
definitely non-pirate applications that P2P is good for...
20 matches
Mail list logo
