Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] Tipbox, FLO software for getting feedback…

2016-05-17 Thread Peter Harpending
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 02:08:42PM -0600, Michael Siepmann wrote: > This does look interesting. It seems particularly useful for people who > want to invite PGP-encrypted messages from anonymous senders. For > Snowdrift, I wonder whether it would be better to just have a feedback > form on the

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] Let's take care of the blog

2016-05-17 Thread Bryan Richter
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 02:06:11PM -0700, Aaron Wolf wrote: > On 05/17/2016 02:04 PM, Stephen Michel wrote: > > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Bryan Richter wrote: > >> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:16:09AM -0700, Aaron Wolf wrote: > >> > >> On 05/17/2016 10:21 AM, Bryan

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] Let's take care of the blog

2016-05-17 Thread Stephen Michel
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Bryan Richter wrote: On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:16:09AM -0700, Aaron Wolf wrote: On 05/17/2016 10:21 AM, Bryan Richter wrote: > Website work is blocked on taking care of the blog, so let's do that. > We have to make some decisions,

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] [Snowdrift-team] modifying donations to feed into the mechanism

2016-05-17 Thread Peter Harpending
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 03:48:54PM -0400, Stephen Michel wrote: > To me, it seems like arrears is the clear superior option for MVP. Holding > funds adds significant legal complexity for what seems like a small benefit > -- and it's something that we could transition to later anyway. > > Imagine

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] [Snowdrift-team] modifying donations to feed into the mechanism

2016-05-17 Thread Stephen Michel
To me, it seems like arrears is the clear superior option for MVP. Holding funds adds significant legal complexity for what seems like a small benefit -- and it's something that we could transition to later anyway. Imagine we're doing arrears, because that's the easier way. Then, because we

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] Let's take care of the blog

2016-05-17 Thread Aaron Wolf
On 05/17/2016 10:21 AM, Bryan Richter wrote: > Website work is blocked on taking care of the blog, so let's do that. > We have to make some decisions, but first we need to agree on what > purpose we are trying to achieve. > > To frame the "purpose" discussion, I'll pose the first question: Where

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] Let's take care of the blog

2016-05-17 Thread Peter Harpending
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 10:21:23AM -0700, Bryan Richter wrote: > Website work is blocked on taking care of the blog, so let's do that. > We have to make some decisions, but first we need to agree on what > purpose we are trying to achieve. > > To frame the "purpose" discussion, I'll pose the

[Snowdrift-discuss] Let's take care of the blog

2016-05-17 Thread Bryan Richter
Website work is blocked on taking care of the blog, so let's do that. We have to make some decisions, but first we need to agree on what purpose we are trying to achieve. To frame the "purpose" discussion, I'll pose the first question: Where does the blog live? The decision flowchart starts with:

Re: [Snowdrift-discuss] Next Meeting

2016-05-17 Thread mray
On 14.05.2016 02:40, Stephen Michel wrote: > Was yesterday a good Thursday or a bad Thursday? > Hi there I wasn't available due to not having internet access in the appartment we are staying in. I'll be here for the whole week. > Very belated: I do have a pgp key, but I receive very little