Re: [Discuss] on prioritizing next steps for Snowdrift.coop

2016-02-18 Thread Mica Semrick
I think that finishing the personas and epics for the minimum viable user profile is a good idea. I've been reading wiki pages so I can begin to reorganize and form coherent lines through multiple pages, but what those lines look like and the exact working needs to be driven by the audience for

Re: [Discuss] on prioritizing next steps for Snowdrift.coop

2016-02-18 Thread charles
I like the idea of the MVP being snowdrift.coop (as a project) on the snowdrift.coop (platform) being a working project. You don't need introductory material, you don't need anything else except functionality. MINIMUM MINIMUM MINIMUM Viable Product. Minimum being the key word. Design it for yo

Re: [Discuss] on prioritizing next steps for Snowdrift.coop

2016-02-18 Thread Aaron Wolf
On 02/18/2016 12:24 AM, Stephen Michel wrote: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 12:18 AM, char...@thefnf.org wrote: >> Before you dive into process for process sake and die a death of a >> thousand cuts by the toolchain... I'm seeing lots of massive brain >> dumps, grandiose plans, long lists. That's a hug

Re: [Discuss] on prioritizing next steps for Snowdrift.coop

2016-02-18 Thread Stephen Michel
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 12:18 AM, char...@thefnf.org wrote: Before you dive into process for process sake and die a death of a thousand cuts by the toolchain... I'm seeing lots of massive brain dumps, grandiose plans, long lists. That's a huge amount of information. You'll die from analysis par

Re: [Discuss] on prioritizing next steps for Snowdrift.coop

2016-02-17 Thread charles
Before you dive into process for process sake and die a death of a thousand cuts by the toolchain... How about a vastly simplified approach (can still use the tools of course but in a more streamlined fashion) 1) Define core personas. (project patron, project contributor). 2) Define what