In article mailman.1.1295997573.20658.discuss-gnus...@gnu.org,
Ivan Vuãica ivuc...@gmail.com wrote:
* that does not mean GNUstep is not helpful -- because it is!
I would make the argument that it is increasingly helpful to have
GNUstep around given the growth of the iPhone and iPad. Part of
- Original message -
(...)
..back off with disagreement
Here is a non-rhetoric question, since I don't know the current
situation: Does, and can, FSF invest its energy and resources into
GNUstep?
FSF isnt intereted by making it more popular than making it more free. As we
On 26. sij. 2011., at 10:41, Banlu Kemiyatorn obj...@gmail.com wrote:
- Original message -
(...)
..back off with disagreement
Here is a non-rhetoric question, since I don't know the current
situation: Does, and can, FSF invest its energy and resources into
GNUstep?
FSF isnt
In article mailman.10.1295920702.26185.discuss-gnus...@gnu.org,
Zhang Weiwu, Beijing zhangwe...@realss.com wrote:
On 01/25/2011 06:25 AM, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
Linux, *BSD, Solaris... a big mess, don't you think? A maze...
GNUstep has its shortcomings, but I think that generally Linux
Biggest challenge is when one has to delve into the dungeons of OS-
specific programming. Despite POSIX's existence, each platform has
slightly different ideas about how stuff works. An example that comes
to mind is asynchronous sockets - different even between POSIX
operating systems. Even
On 25 Jan 2011, at 09:33, Ivan Vučica wrote:
Biggest challenge is when one has to delve into the dungeons of OS-specific
programming. Despite POSIX's existence, each platform has slightly different
ideas about how stuff works. An example that comes to mind is asynchronous
sockets -
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:02:25AM +, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
GNUstep has NSNetServices (Bonjour), but for sure there are things it does
not have. We welcome contributions to fill in any gaps. However, the fact
that there are and always will be gaps does not mean that the vast
On 25 Jan 2011, at 10:12, Niels Grewe wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 10:02:25AM +, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
GNUstep has NSNetServices (Bonjour), but for sure there are things it does
not have. We welcome contributions to fill in any gaps. However, the fact
that there are and
On 25 Jan 2011, at 01:58, Zhang Weiwu, Beijing wrote:
Consider application authors delver binary due to the fact the source
code is thus not available, is a byte-code approach possible solution to
this BUSINESS PROBLEM? Application vendors deliver half-compiled code,
and standardized
2011/1/25 Banlu Kemiyatorn obj...@gmail.com
I personally believe that 3 ways to bring GNUstep to the mass are..
1) Make a large but stupid company to adopt it and flood a lot of
money into it. Ha! one almost did too bad they suddenly realized they
shouldn't do that in first place, at least
Hi,
GNUstep has NSNetServices (Bonjour), but for sure there are things it does not
have. We welcome contributions to fill in any gaps. However, the fact that
there are and always will be gaps does not mean that the vast majority of
funtionality is already provided and porting is therefore
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 23:10, Riccardo Mottola mul...@ngi.it wrote:
Even with just gnustep-core you have enough power to write a portable (to
the mac) application of the caliber of a full office suite. It was done on
OpenStep, it oculd be done again. Of course this is not a direct porting.
- Original message -
GTK did not become popular just because it's something people are
comfortable working in; it became particularly popular after having a
complete environment (GNOME), where people met GTK every day, became
AFAICR, Gimp Tool Kit rose because of GIMP
popular. QT
I picked my words carefully in the previous mail: GIMP ToolKit got a
lot exposure because of GNOME, not GIMP. Before that it was just
another toolkit, like many others in the X11 world. And GNOME became
popular primarily because Canonical likes it more than KDE, and
Canonical is a
Hi,
Zhang Weiwu, Beijing wrote:
Hi. I have one question as a stupid user: why there is no commercial Mac
OS X application that was ever offered also offer GNU Step binary?
because there are? TestPlant and Cenon come to my mind.
Generally, if you code with some care, porting is very easy,
On 01/25/2011 06:25 AM, Riccardo Mottola wrote:
Linux, *BSD, Solaris... a big mess, don't you think? A maze...
GNUstep has its shortcomings, but I think that generally Linux is not
such a well-defined and interesting target for many applications.
Sadly perhaps, but it is reality.
Consider
16 matches
Mail list logo
