A couple of thoughts.
1) yep, great to see the list reviving a bit, and to hear from folks again. :-)
2) About the Adobe breakfast, and “knowing about it”, I’ll just share that it
was also posted on the Adobe CF Community portal, which is a hybrid blog and
gateway to the CF forums. The posting
Thanks for stepping in, John, and for handling things going forward.
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of John Mason
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2018 11:08 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org; l...@lgriffin.net
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] strange behavior with
Yep, and for any wanting to know about still other editors, including those
that DO support CFML (or not), and links to such CFML plugins or extensions
where needed, see the category of my CF411.com site:
http://www.cf411.com/editors
And for those wanting to learn more about hidden gems in
Wow, I don’t know if there’s anyone with that ability. There was for a time,
but then the group moved to a new system. Then it went quiet for a few years.
Now that it’s reviving again, surely some like Les will say “I don’t care to be
here anymore”. I’m just not sure who has control anymore to
Jeff has posted this question also in the Adobe forums. Folks may want to see
my reply there (just written), if not also reply there.
https://forums.adobe.com/message/10198418#10198418
(Cross-posting is always risky, Jeff. Some will see one but not the other. And
only you, or others watching
Dude, they’re getting the band back together! :-)
So Frank, on your observation, can you offer a simple 2-3 line proofcase? I
realize you gave us code, but not with the values you’re really using for the
vars.
Sometimes, when you create such an example, you find out that it’s not what you
Jeff, do you mean the default/home page of some acfug site, or are you asking
if people are having such a problem with other/all sites?
I’ll say that I’ve not seen any such problem. If you’re still having the issue,
I’d be more inclined to suspect an issue on a particular server’s
Jeff, before I proceed, let me note that the basics haven’t changed (running
the keytool to put a cert into cacerts), so even an old article should suffice.
That said, one thing such old articles generally don’t take into account,
though (and this makes folks think the instructions must not be
Mike, before folks might dig any further into this(and though this may already
be an obvious thing you've checked), have you confirmed that the problem isn't
something simpler, like the CFIDE/scripts folder being blocked or not there in
the site you're using?
You mention confirming there are
Thanks for the update, Bettina. And while I realize you are opting to go with
the other route, you may want to at least understand what was amiss here, as it
could come back to bite you in other ways (perhaps other templates, or other
related problems.)
So as for the failing bat file, did you
Chris, sadly there’s no simple answer to your question 1.
Are you trying to run CF11 on the same machine as CF9? That could have problems
due to web server configuration issues. Are you putting it on a new machine?
That could go well, but since this is IIS I’ll note that you could unexpectedly
Here are a couple of things to consider:
- a catch will fail to work if the code in the catch causes an error itself, in
which case the error will be passed up to the next higher errorhandler in the
chain, or dumped to the screen like a traditional CF error. That said, I see
your code shows
What version of CF are you on, Chris? Why not use CFDOCUMENT? Since CF9, it
can generate your word doc (a real one, rather than you trying to send plain
text to the user via CFCONTENT), and I I'm pretty sure it would support
conversion of HTML tags to corresponding word features. (I have to admit
But did you simply try testing a connection between CF10 and Exchange 2013?
If it's that you do not yet have CF10 installed, do note that you can
install the Developer (or Trial) edition for free.
If you do that, I'd recommend you not install it on a prod server running CF
9 or earlier, unless
CF10 added support for Exchange 2010, not 13. (See that and other features
of CF10 here:
http://www.carehart.org/blog/client/index.cfm/2012/3/7/charlie_areharts_ulti
mate_cf10_new_features_list0
As for CF11/Splendor, the feature set is not complete, but I see no
reference to 2013 in the PDFs
Good stuff, Jason.
And I'll add, Jeff, that there are indeed other options for dealing with
spreadsheets in CFML, and some have been shared by others here. I have a
list of them as a category in my CF411 site:
http://www.cf411.com/excel
There may be many more than most realize, and Jeff
trying to do I did years ago
working for another company and it was fairly simple (though lengthy code).
It was 3rd party UDF but worked. I'm almost wondering if I may need to
create the entire spreadsheet with CF including formulas, etc.
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Charlie Arehart char
Jeff, while you await a reply from anyone, and while you did reply kindly to
my last note, you didn't really answer what I had asked: are you confirming
you have the LATEST UPDATES installed for whatever version of CF you have?
You want to rule that out before assuming it just can't work as you
Jeff, I have never used any of that functionality, but since you say you are
on CF9, have you applied any/all updates? There may be bugs that were
long-since fixed, but I find that many people (or their server admin's)
never bother to update CF, especially 9 and earlier since it was often quite
a
, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Charlie Arehart char...@carehart.org
wrote:
Jeff, I have never used any of that functionality, but since you say you are
on CF9, have you applied any/all updates? There may be bugs that were
long-since fixed, but I find that many people (or their server admin's)
never bother
with no other firewall or load balancer in
between itself and the LDAP server.
On 2/24/2014 8:26 AM, Charlie Arehart wrote:
OK, but even if it's a Tomcat app (as is CF10+ itself), that doesn't
rule out IIS as a player in the equation. They (or a customer) could
choose to implement it behind IIS
Thanks for the update. The issues all apply to CF7 as well. And even more
so, in that Adobe may have only created updates for 8 and 9, for security
vulnerabilities in recent years (support for 7 would have been dropped by
Adobe when 9 came out in 2009. So it's all the more vital to lockdown the
Well, Jeff, it could be any of a number of things, but I think you're on the
right track that it's more of a config thing than a code thing.
My first guess (from helping others with a similar kind of breakin) is that
the bad guys may have gotten in through the CFIDE/componentutils folder,
which
Management and Planning
(404) 273-7131 (C)
From: mailto:ad...@acfug.org ad...@acfug.org [ mailto:ad...@acfug.org
mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Charlie Arehart
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 5:51 PM
To: mailto:discussion@acfug.org discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] CFmail
. Thank you for looking into this.
Jay Jayaraman
Central Billing Services
Financial Management and Planning
(404) 273-7131 (C)
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Charlie Arehart
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2013 5:51 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG
, maybe I
was rushing through it. Your comments make sense.
Thanks again,
On Nov 6, 2013 9:47 PM, Charlie Arehart char...@carehart.org wrote:
Wow, Ajas, the answer is that it's ABSOLUTELY NOT the case.
When you get ANY release of CF, it DOES NOT come with all the updates. And
as for 9.0.1
adobe site earlier, maybe I
was rushing through it. Your comments make sense.
Thanks again,
On Nov 6, 2013 9:47 PM, Charlie Arehart char...@carehart.org wrote:
Wow, Ajas, the answer is that it's ABSOLUTELY NOT the case.
When you get ANY release of CF, it DOES NOT come with all the updates
...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Charlie Arehart
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 9:23 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] CFmail issue with CF10
Are you saying that the CF9 and CF10 deployments are on the same box?
Yes. Both deployments are in the same box
If not, the unreachable
links and will probably test that out on a development
environment as time allows.
Thanks for the info.
-Troy
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Charlie Arehart
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2013 8:07 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: RE: [ACFUG Discuss] resetting
Wow, Ajas, the answer is that it's ABSOLUTELY NOT the case.
When you get ANY release of CF, it DOES NOT come with all the updates. And
as for 9.0.1 specifically, there were 4 CHFs and many individual security
fixes since it was released. The same is true for all releases.
FWIW, I addressed
Ajas, that was so with IIS 6 but no longer so with IIS 7 (particularly
without running in IIS 6 compat mode, as you indicated). In IIS 7, the
settings no longer propagate to newly added sites. You do have to run the
wsconfig tool to either do a remove/re-add of all sites, or you can
individually
Troy, it Is true that when you add a new CF Admin user, even one with all
admin roles allowed, it does NOT give them the security roles, so only
that original Admin user can add a new user.
No, you say that after running the passwordreset you still can't get in, but
did you restart CF? You do
Rob, while it could be hacking, I'd propose that it could be that
spiders/bots or other automated request agents (including possibly your own
monitoring or load balancing pings to CF pages) could be the cause of that
unexpectedly high rate of requests.
I realize you would think that your access
Thanks for the kind regards. As for your question, that's something I've
always wondered myself. :-)
In fact, you will see that on the Adobe blog entry about that
maxworkerthreads bug (from a few years ago) that I had asked this question
specifically, and I never got an answer. I always wanted to
and skillful execution; it represents
the wise choice of many alternatives.
On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 11:42 PM, Charlie Arehart char...@carehart.org
wrote:
Thanks for the kind regards. As for your question, that's something I've
always wondered myself. :-)
In fact, you will see that on the Adobe blog entry
I often see people trying to make XML processing work in one way when there
are far better ways, just not well understood. I would always recommend to
anyone doing XML processing in CFML that they take 30 minutes to look over
what I think is a classic on this topic, by Nate Weiss, Utilizing XML
Ajas, do you realize that CF 9.0 does not support running on IIS 7? You can
maybe finagle it, as blog entries like this show, but you're trying to force
a shoe that doesn't fit. Why not just update to 9.0.1, which does add IIS 7
support?
As for why things are not working as is, since you have to
: [ACFUG Discuss] ColdFusion Builder freezes abruptly
Thanks Charlie:
This is very useful. I should switch to the CF Express edition and see if those
freezes stop.
_
From: Charlie Arehart char...@carehart.org
To: discussion@acfug.org
Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2013 3:43 PM
Subject
Also, what's the significance of the 5 minutes? Is that perhaps your CF
(or application's) session timeout? Is it the time that IIS's app pool is
set to recycle? Either may be a clue to help you dig further.
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Cameron
I'll save Cameron (or others) from a reply. :-) Charles is not something
they can disallow. :-) It's not a server proxy, but rather a client one.
You can use it (and tools like it, including some built into browsers) to
track the requests made from a given web page, whether to components like
OK. But the “5 minutes” you mention sounds intriguing, so do keep thinking
about that.
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Chris
Sent: Tuesday, September 03, 2013 2:34 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Unable to invoke CFC error
Glad to help.
And FWIW, Charles is not the only one that can analyze flex/flash remoting/AMF
calls, as I mention on my list. But your problem may or may not be about that
so much as perhaps something else in the formation of the request being sent to
the server, and it may not be about AMF.
: [ACFUG Discuss] ColdFusion Builder freezes abruptly
Charlie,
Mind pointing out some of the over looked features in the pay version?
Scott Dowling
(615) 260-9549
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 10:42 PM, Charlie Arehart char...@carehart.org
wrote:
I didn't see anyone mention it: Troy, did
Thanks for that heads-up, Doug. I'd missed news of it, even attending some
recent MS user groups, sadly. There are at least a couple of interesting
topics. Thanks.
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Douglas Knudsen
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 8:36 PM
To:
Thanks, Bill. Thankfully, we have many anchors-and indeed buoys,
lighthouses, and radars, if I can stretch the analogy-- both in the wider CF
world and in the ACFUG specifically. :-) I've learned from so many of them,
and I acknowledged as much in my prefatory remarks of the CF10 WACK book.
We
alternatives.
On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Charlie Arehart char...@carehart.org
wrote:
Doug, here's something even some experienced hoster's don't know: after
installing CF10, and/or adding updates, for many of the updates you need to
then rebuild the web server connector (meaning they have
Doug, here's something even some experienced hoster's don't know: after
installing CF10, and/or adding updates, for many of the updates you need to
then rebuild the web server connector (meaning they have to open CF's web
server config tool, then remove and re-add the connection of a site or all
Sorry, I was in a hurry when I wrote. I meant windowshow
viewothergeneralprogress.
Anyway, even without a connection to the sever, the progress view may be
useful to understand background processing in CFB (and Eclipse).
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf
Thanks for your kind regards, Chris. And isn’t it funny how troubling software
can sometimes be like a petulant child: just when you starting watch it, it
tends not to act up. :-)
But patience, grasshopper. Yep, let’s see how it goes over time. Also, turn on
the progress view
Good to hear. (Well, that's a sad part of my business: sometimes it helps
to have another failure, but if it's new info that confirms or denies
something, at least it's an advancement to the solution.)
As for your question, FR is mainly a monitor of CF (or whatever java based
server process you
Like you, I would think this is not memory related. I think that's just a
really old error message, from the days when even the then Macromedia
engineers could only throw up their hands and guess when something was
amiss.
I recently saw this error message happening for a client where we found
Chris, there could be any number of explanations, but one is that you may be
running out of memory (within the heap of CFB).
You can try to find out if that's possibly an issue by turning on the heap
monitor within cfb (an available feature under windowpreferencesgeneral),
to see if perhaps you
Yep, that is one bummer about using the AdminAPI for such things. But then
it is indeed an admin settings, so that's their thinking. (And that's why I
assumed you would be able to find the value in the AdminAPI somewhere.)
If perhaps you had reason to want to make it more generally available to
Good questions, Nathan. I'm not aware of an answer to the first, but it
would be great for someone to research and publish it. As for the second,
I'm not aware of a variable, but I suspect it can be gotten from the Admin
API. I'm not in a position to try to get that right now, but let's see if
Hey folks, just wanted to share a heads-up that I'll be presenting 2
sessions tomorrow (Wednesday) night at the ACFUG meeting:
Updating/Hotfixing ColdFusion 10, 9 and 8: Tips and Traps
and
Locking down the #ColdFusion Administrator: Your First Line of Defense
Against Hackers
For the talk
Hi Scott, I will, yes. Likely just before (or just after) the talk tomorrow
night.
I'll throw out as well (for those who don't know) that I can help with
either challenge as well, on a consulting basis (remotely, short-term, and
even on-demand). More at the consulting page of my carehart.org
Glad to hear you find things resolved, Brooks. But to be clear, the
resources I pointed to did clarify that this was a JVM issue (I just didn't
say that specifically in my pointing them out). :-)
They did also talk about changing the TTL value. Finally, they did also
propose that just restarting
Brooks, do you mean you were reading *that* CF caches DNS entries? Yes,
that's so. And while there doesn't seem to be a way to clear it (other than
to restart CF), there is a way to control how long it's set to live. For
more, see these blog entries (one really old, one relatively old):
Same here, Frank. I've never heard of there ever being a gettingstarted
directory in CFIDE, ever. I've checked multiple machines just now, and find
none.
I do recall there being one some number of releases ago, but never in the
CFIDE that I recall. Perhaps in CFDOCS. I don't recall if it was
drop me a
note with your address and I'll try to email you directly (rather than
through meetup.com)? My address is char...@carehart.org.
Thanks.
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Charlie Arehart
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2013 2:42 PM
To: discussion
...@franksdomain.net]
Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2013 9:20 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Cc: Charlie Arehart
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] ACFUG meeting tomorrow night (May 1): Solr with
James Mccullough
Unfortunately, I wanted to be there, but could not make it to the meeting...
Is there a video
Just a heads up. We do have an ACFUG meeting tomorrow night (May 1): Solr
with James Mccullough
For more info, and to RSVP, see:
http://www.meetup.com/AtlantaCFUG/events/113809862/
/charlie
PS Normally meetings are announced only on the announcement list, which you
can sign up for at the old
and found this. Perhaps this might lead you
to something.
http://marakana.com/bookshelf/jboss_admin_tutorial/security.html
HIH
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 19, 2013, at 10:40 PM, Charlie Arehart char...@carehart.org wrote:
Using what web server? That’s the crux of where any
Using what web server? That's the crux of where any such protection would be
done.
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Mike Staver
Sent: Friday, April 19, 2013 1:30 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CF 9 IP restriction
Does anyone
Yes.
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Ajas Mohammed
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 2:51 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] Re: New CF Vulnerability - Check your servers
Thanks Cameron.
There were 2 more hotfixes
Yes, again. :-)
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Ajas Mohammed
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 8:54 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CF 9 64 bit installer file
No, both files were same size and same name. I guess when I
Steve, this is a point I just made in one of my replies this week to Ajas,
but to reiterate, any security hotfixes created by Adobe are created for
9.0, 9.0.1, and 9.0.2. So no, you are not in any danger, as long as you
always apply the latest HFs.
As for not updating to Java 7, yes, technically
Ajas, I think there's an important explanation for what you're seeing, that
you may not be considering.
First, as Troy has said, yes, the installer does not change based on Std,
Ent, Trial, or Dev. The one installer does ask during installation which of
those you want.
But second, as for the
Glad to help. A few more thoughts.
First, to be clear, I made no mention of CF10 at all. Not sure what led you
to bring that up. :-)
As for your situation, I do now understand that you would want 9.0 and not
9.0.2. That's fine. I was just clarifying the situation.
So if you have a 9.0
Thanks for the clarifications. As for the CF9 backwards licensing, the good
news is that a CF 9 license is indeed for any version: 9.0, 9.0.1, or 9.0.2.
:-)
As for your having the 2 files, the old and one from a few months, if they
are the same, I thought you had said you found one had a
No, Mike. Both the CFIMAGE tag (and functions) and even the CFCONTENT tag
(if you had reason to want to you that) offer means to generate their
results from an object in memory. It just may be vital to convert it from
the form you obtain from the DB into a form that can be sent by these
Sounds like a winner. Thanks for stepping up to present that topic, Bettina.
As long as you're asking us for more possible related topics, I'd think
you'd want to address the autohotfix mechanism. Besides how it works, you
could clarify how one MUST apply them even with a download of CF10 made
process. Thanks for volunteering Charlie!! Looks like we have a lot of
great meetups in the near future!!
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Charlie Arehart char...@carehart.org
wrote:
Sounds like a winner. Thanks for stepping up to present that topic, Bettina.
As long as you're asking us
Yes, there are various issues like that which will now bite people who had
not done any of the security fixes until this one. I've been meaning to do a
blog entry to highlight them, but have just been too busy.
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Ajas Mohammed
at 7:31 PM, Charlie Arehart char...@carehart.org
wrote:
Yes, there are various issues like that which will now bite people who had
not done any of the security fixes until this one. I've been meaning to do a
blog entry to highlight them, but have just been too busy.
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org
and skillful execution; it represents
the wise choice of many alternatives.
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:56 AM, Charlie Arehart char...@carehart.org
wrote:
Ok, call off the alarm (those of you on 9.0.2). It turns out that the
confusion about the new hotfix (regarding 9.0.2) was just a mistake
:-)
Thanks. I will note that they did just yesterday kindly add me to the
acknowledgements section of the security advisory, a first for me. :-)
Various issues caused the delay. Nothing nefarious. I got a call from
someone on PSIRT explaining the situation. I was just happy to get the
mention.
Thanks for sharing it here, Cam.
Do beware, though: for those on 9.0.2, there's a glitch in the hotfix (a
missing web-inf.zip within the cf902.zip).
I've added a comment on the blog entry that points to that
(http://blogs.coldfusion.com/post.cfm/coldfusion-security-update-for-version
entry,
on the hotfix and more.
http://www.carehart.org/blog/client/index.cfm/2013/1/15/Part3_serious_securi
ty_threat
Still planning a part 4, with post mortem and more. A bit busy now to commit
to when. :-)
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Charlie
Yep, that is the same, and while they work on a real fix, that bulletin
warns of some key things to lock down in the meantime (as I did in my blog
entries, though /CFIDE/componentutils was not one I'd seen used in any of
the compromises I found. It was always CFIDE/adminapi, and I have asked
Adobe
Please see this, the first message pinned to the top of the messages area on
the meetup site for the ACFUG:
http://www.meetup.com/AtlantaCFUG/messages/boards/thread/16786512
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Ramirez, Ruben -
Curtis 1000
Sent: Friday,
at 11:10 PM, Charlie Arehart char...@carehart.org
wrote:
Glad to hear it helped.
As for the properties file, that's the first I've ever heard of using that
(in Windows or Unix). Since you seem to indicate its use with Windows,
what's it for? (I could google it, sure, but I'd like to hear your
Ah, got it now. I missed that this was a silent install. Thanks for your
patience with me, Mike. :-)
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Mike Staver
Sent: Thursday, December 06, 2012 6:32 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] ColdFusion 10
Glad to hear it helped.
As for the properties file, that's the first I've ever heard of using that
(in Windows or Unix). Since you seem to indicate its use with Windows,
what's it for? (I could google it, sure, but I'd like to hear your
perspective, such as what led you to use it at all. I've
Glad to have helped.
As for that problem you're experiencing, here's good news.
First, it's not at all a Solaris issue. I've seen it on other OS's as well.
Second, while I plan to do a blog entry with more details, the quick
solution is just to clear all the cookies for whatever domain
Mike, this need to run the updates on a non-connected machine is indeed
addressed. Just not on the administrator screen (perhaps something they
should change).
The question was asked as a comment in the most recent blog entry about
updater 5, and I offered an extended explanation and answer to
Steve, are you referring to the latter part of this thread (about Rick
wanting off the list)? Or are you referring to the original discussion about
running CF on Mac? Just curious.
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Steve Ross
Sent: Wednesday, November 28,
Great to hear. Thanks for the update, and glad to help.
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Dusty Hale
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2012 2:24 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] running coldfusion apps on Mac
Charlie:
Yea I
R, no need to holler. This seems the first such request you've ever made,
right? Let me try to help.
(If perhaps you got added to the list and didn't request it, that would be
pretty hard to have happen, but I suppose it could. On the other hand, if
you did add yourself previously and now you
Dusty, there are a few potential problems.
First, are you saying that you installed CF10 telling it to connect to IIS
during the installer, telling it to run with all sites? And then after
that, did you load up the CF Admin with localhost or 127.0.0.1 (which
worked), but now find that when you
Yes, no, no.
I note you said using mura and railo. Thanks for that clarification. Some
with such polls say have used, which could be answered positively by
anyone who's looked into the thing but is not currently using it. That
generally seems an important distinction. Glad you phrased it as you
Cool stuff, indeed. Thanks for the additional info. Again, I recommend
anyone who's looking for a break from the rat race to consider the
possibility. :-)
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Dusty Hale
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2012 8:53 AM
To:
And Frank, note more specifically in the reference Howard offered that
students/teachers can get a Creative Cloud membership (with those tools you
seek and more) at just $20/month. More at
http://store1.adobe.com/cfusion/store/html/index.cfm?event=displayProductca
tegoryOID=7335802store=OLS-EDU.
Server yes, surfer no. :-) Thanks, Wes, for the thought. (But it's
Arehart, not Earhart. Common mistake, so no worries.)
And Dusty, so that's where you went to? Didn't know.
But guess what: I was just there this past week until yesterday! Was helping
the folks at Britt. (For the yanks here,
And January is among the nicest times of the year there, right? (We got to
experience some of the rainiest weather of the year last week, but also a
couple of pretty days.)
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Dusty Hale
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2012 6:49
Wow, wouldn't that be funny, indeed, if we might have hooked up there and
yet have not been able to for a while here in Atlanta.
Indeed, when was the last time you got down to a meeting, for everyone to
enjoy your company? :-)
Anyway, enjoy the trip and the country. Just be prepared: it's not
I already spoke to Ed directly (as he had emailed me separately too), and
I'm just seeing this. But I'll share what I did, in case it may help other
readers here.
Good news: Adobe does indeed offer free updated extensions/tag help/tag
completion/etc for Dreamweaver for each release, up to CF10.
I would suspect that it may be only made worse by increasing the heap. :-)
Strap on your seatbelts. If the problem was easily understood and solved,
you'd have found the answer elsewhere. I'll share here some thoughts you
don't see/hear often. It will take a few paragraphs to give proper context,
Cool stuff. Thanks for sharing, Jason.
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Jason Delmore
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2012 4:09 PM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CFLDAP and memory errors
Rob,
I think the memory part of this error
Good to hear. Thanks for the update.
/charlie
From: ad...@acfug.org [mailto:ad...@acfug.org] On Behalf Of Mike Staver
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2012 12:34 AM
To: discussion@acfug.org
Subject: Re: [ACFUG Discuss] CF 10 Dynamic Java Loading
So, I reached out to the JavaLoader mail list
1 - 100 of 644 matches
Mail list logo
