Re: [pfSense-discussion] miniupnpd No buffer space available

Hi Scott Yes, I made a dirty fix. It's all I got this far. 256 was default. I raised it to 512. Will come back with more information. Dennis Scott Ullrich wrote: On 3/28/08, Dennis Karlssson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Scott I use both CP and FW schedules. I have a feeling that you are

Re: [pfSense-discussion] miniupnpd No buffer space available

On 3/28/08, Dennis Karlssson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Scott > > I use both CP and FW schedules. I have a feeling that you are just working around the problem and not solving it. >From a shell do this: sysctl net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_buckets How many buckets are defined by default? 256? Take

Re: [pfSense-discussion] miniupnpd No buffer space available

Hi Scott I use both CP and FW schedules. Dennis Scott Ullrich wrote: On 3/28/08, Dennis Karlssson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Bill Deactivating and activating the Traffic Shaper did the job. I am not quite understanding this. Are you using captive portal? Or schedule firewall rules?

Re: [pfSense-discussion] miniupnpd No buffer space available

On 3/28/08, Dennis Karlssson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Bill > > Deactivating and activating the Traffic Shaper did the job. I am not quite understanding this. Are you using captive portal? Or schedule firewall rules? Mar 27 23:22:49 kernel: ipfw: install_state: Too many dynamic rules

Re: [pfSense-discussion] miniupnpd No buffer space available

Hi Bill Deactivating and activating the Traffic Shaper did the job. Thank you. Dennis Bill Marquette wrote: On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:41 PM, Dennis Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi I get lots of these in the System log. miniupnpd[96542]: sendto(udp_notify): No buffer space availab

Re: [pfSense-discussion] SPAM / eMail Filtering

I'm running Postfix + Policyd + MailScanner + Spamassassin + ClamAV on a VM and extremely happy about it. Start with MailScanner (http://www.mailscanner.info/) and work you up with the other modules. A must on those days is greylisting (policyd in my case), with this feature alone I catch >90%

Re: [pfSense-discussion] SPAM / eMail Filtering

Check out Or if you want to build the functionality yourself John Sam Newnam wrote: Check out “mailscanner” and mailwatch interface… they work really well… Sam Newnam **SystemSam Technologies** www.systemsam.com

Re: [pfSense-discussion] SPAM / eMail Filtering

Curtis LaMasters wrote: This probably is the right place to be asking this but hopefully someone will still help. Are there any SPAM/eMail filtering devoted projects like pfSense. I'm just trying to find an extremely cheap (hopefully free) alternative to a Barracuda for a small company. Than

RE: [pfSense-discussion] SPAM / eMail Filtering

Untangle.com. Several people in the Untangle forums use Untangle for filtering and pfSense as the firewall. Doug www.vbcnetworks.com From: Curtis LaMasters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 4:24 PM To: discussion@pfsense.com Subject: [pfSense-discussion] SPAM / eMail

RE: [pfSense-discussion] SPAM / eMail Filtering

Check out "mailscanner" and mailwatch interface... they work really well... Sam Newnam SystemSam Technologies www.systemsam.com 336-790-8780 From: Curtis LaMasters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, March 28, 2008 4:24 PM To: discussion@pfsense.com S

[pfSense-discussion] SPAM / eMail Filtering

This probably is the right place to be asking this but hopefully someone will still help. Are there any SPAM/eMail filtering devoted projects like pfSense. I'm just trying to find an extremely cheap (hopefully free) alternative to a Barracuda for a small company. Thanks. -- Curtis LaMasters ht

Re: [pfSense-discussion] miniupnpd No buffer space available

On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:41 PM, Dennis Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > > I get lots of these in the System log. > miniupnpd[96542]: sendto(udp_notify): No buffer space available > > I read this; > http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php?topic=7058.0;prev_next=next The > miniupnpd devel

Re: [pfSense-discussion] miniupnpd No buffer space available

> Well, I think a pfSense developer can answer that better. No, they can't - other than your statement of "I get lots of these in the System log" they don't know if your system is working or not. They might be able to make a general assumption, but unless you are seeing operational issues (i.e. a s

Re: [pfSense-discussion] miniupnpd No buffer space available

RB wrote: Esotericism aside, then, can you please explain what issue you are seeing other than the log entry appearing? That is not apparent; your original question simply states that you are seeing a lot of them. Do you find miniupnpd to be misbehaving at all? Well, I think a pfSense develop

Re: [pfSense-discussion] Pfsense without NAT

Look at the mailing list archive please. Matthias May answered your question on the 14th of March. --Bill On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 6:18 AM, John Dakos [ Enovation Technologies ] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hello all. > > a question. > > we have 1 lan 2 wan > > and load balance for 2 wans > >

Re: [pfSense-discussion] miniupnpd No buffer space available

> Ok, the log was too long. But is it really something to argue about? Esotericism aside, then, can you please explain what issue you are seeing other than the log entry appearing? That is not apparent; your original question simply states that you are seeing a lot of them. Do you find miniupnpd

Re: [pfSense-discussion] miniupnpd No buffer space available

RB wrote: http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#volume Ok, the log was too long. But is it really something to argue about? If someone should tell me about how lazy I was, it should be the one who answered my question instead of filling everyones mailboxes with this shit?

Re: [pfSense-discussion] miniupnpd No buffer space available

> > then please discuss that. > > > > I was. > > I wasn't bumping up my question I was adding information. http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#volume

Re: [pfSense-discussion] miniupnpd No buffer space available

RB wrote: That's not going to win you any friends, particularly in CS/engineering circles where a large majority of us really don't care for other humans. I have friends already, but thanks for your concern. then please discuss that. I was. I wasn't bumping up my question I was addi

Re: [pfSense-discussion] miniupnpd No buffer space available

On 3/28/08, Dennis Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well you snipped the useful information. Then please snip it for us, since no one really has an interest in sifting through your 1055 other irrelevant log-spam lines. > I hear not being an asshole is quite a virtue too. That's not going to

Re: [pfSense-discussion] miniupnpd No buffer space available

I wasn't really upset when I asked "anyone?" and added more information about my problem, was I? David Nordin wrote: I'm only telling you to allow more than 20 hours to pass before getting upset On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Dennis Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >

Re: [pfSense-discussion] miniupnpd No buffer space available

I'm only telling you to allow more than 20 hours to pass before getting upset On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 3:39 PM, Dennis Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well you snipped the useful information. > > I hear not being an asshole is quite a virtue too. > > > David Nordin wrote: > > I hear patience

Re: [pfSense-discussion] miniupnpd No buffer space available

Well you snipped the useful information. I hear not being an asshole is quite a virtue too. David Nordin wrote: I hear patience is a great virtue, along with limiting the length and information to relevant useful volumes On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Dennis Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [pfSense-discussion] miniupnpd No buffer space available

I hear patience is a great virtue, along with limiting the length and information to relevant useful volumes On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Dennis Karlsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Noone? > > Mar 28 12:17:41 last message repeated 160 times > Mar 28 12:15:01 login: login on console a

Re: [pfSense-discussion] miniupnpd No buffer space available

Noone? Mar 28 12:17:41 last message repeated 160 times Mar 28 12:15:01 login: login on console as root Mar 28 12:07:41 last message repeated 160 times Mar 28 12:00:01 login: login on console as root Mar 28 11:57:41 last message repeated 160 times Mar 28 11:47:41 last messa

Re: [pfSense-discussion] Pfsense without NAT

hello all. a question. we have 1 lan 2 wan and load balance for 2 wans we dont want firewall and NAT from pfsense, we have another router to do that. i disable from the system tab the firewall who disable and nat together but i have no internet! any idea ? ps : when i try this con

[pfSense-discussion] SNMP via WAN not permitted

Hi I get these messages when I try to retrieve data via snmp over WAN. Mar 28 09:05:09 snmpd[548]: sendto: Operation not permitted Bind to LAN interface only is not checked. On m0n0wall it's possible to do this. Is this feature removed from pfSense?