Re: [pfSense-discussion] extending LAN private network

On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 12:34 -0700, David Rees wrote: I'm fairly new to VLANs - why is it bad practice to use vlan1? -Dave Especially in a Cisco environment VLAN-1 is, beside being the default VLAN, also used by several management protocols like CDP, VTP, VQP, ... Some of them carries network

Re: [pfSense-discussion] PHP uses 100% CPU on 1.2 and 1.2.1-RC2

To reply to the static routes part of your problem: I know the situation in ZA and I suggest you to use BGP information (even through a route server) to get rid of those static. PfSense comes with RIP and BGP packages, use them and save yourself a lot of time to manually sort out routes. All

Re: [pfSense-discussion] SIP Phones and SIPROXD

...or you setup a small pbx (asterisk, askozia, ...) to have only one SIP connection transiting your NAT. Another possibility is to enable NAT awarness on SIP but that's not always possible (either the device cannot or your SIP provider don't allow it). And to also respond to Adam: you are

Re: [pfSense-discussion] SPAM / eMail Filtering

- Daniele Guazzoni Senior Network Engineer, CCNP, CCNA Linux and AMD-x86_64 or do you still with Windows and Intel ? -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailGate, and is believed to be clean.

Re: [pfSense-discussion] Traffic shaper bug ?

into. Jan Hoevers -- regards - Daniele Guazzoni Senior Network Engineer, CCNP, CCNA Linux and AMD-x86_64 or do you still with Windows and Intel ? -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailGate

[pfSense-discussion] Traffic shaper bug ?

so I still have plenty of CPU power to analyze and shape. It is a 1.2-RC4. Bug or hidden feature ? -- regards - Daniele Guazzoni Senior Network Engineer, CCNP, CCNA Linux and AMD-x86_64 or do you still with Windows and Intel

[pfSense-discussion] GUI Log hang on 1.2-RC4 ?

I just noticed that the whole GUI logging hangs. The firewall still run fine and syslog messages are sent out normally, only the GUI stopped. I've got to reboot to get it working again... regards - Daniele Guazzoni Senior Network

[pfSense-discussion] Re: [m0n0wall] Groups in rules

Yep, like pfSense does, I guess Scott, Chris and Bill have nothing against backporting the code to m0n0wall ;-) Daniele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Has the concept of address groups ever been considered. Other firewalls I know allows the admin to group IP-adresses into named groups which

[pfSense-discussion] Alias edit

- Daniele Guazzoni Senior Network Engineer, CCNP, CCNA Linux and AMD-x86_64 or do you still with Windows and Intel ? -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailGate, and is believed to be clean.

[pfSense-discussion] update: web interface gone after upgrade to 1.0.2

I can access the console via ssh and already tried to restart the webconfigurator and the whole without success... regards - Daniele Guazzoni Senior Network Engineer, CCNP, CCNA Linux and AMD-x86_64 or do you still with Windows

Re: [pfSense-discussion] Package installation / removal problem ?

Small correction: only dashboard stalls Daniele Guazzoni wrote: I'm running 1.2-BETA-2-TESTING-SNAPSHOT-07-05-2007 and it stalls on adding and removing packages. Known issue ? regards - Daniele Guazzoni Senior Network Engineer

Re: [pfSense-discussion] Package installation / removal problem ?

? Dashboard is still very much a work in progress and has a few issues. Scott On 7/17/07, Daniele Guazzoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Small correction: only dashboard stalls Daniele Guazzoni wrote: I'm running 1.2-BETA-2-TESTING-SNAPSHOT-07-05-2007 and it stalls on adding and removing

[pfSense-discussion] Snort rules

I've noticed that after a rule update snort forgot that change I made. For instance I disabled the robot rules in web-misc.rules and after the update they are enabled. Any way to keep the settings ? -- regards - Daniele Guazzoni

Re: [pfSense-discussion] 16 instance of Snort running ???

Yep, reinstalled, downloaded rules and now it's back to normality. Thanks Scott Ullrich wrote: On 4/10/07, Daniele Guazzoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I upgraded to 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT-03-27-2007, running with the snort package installed. Before the upgrade everything was ok, now I have 16 instances

[pfSense-discussion] 16 instance of Snort running ???

I upgraded to 1.0.1-SNAPSHOT-03-27-2007, running with the snort package installed. Before the upgrade everything was ok, now I have 16 instances of snort running and crashing regularly. Known problem ? regards - Daniele Guazzoni

[pfSense-discussion] Snort problem correction

- Daniele Guazzoni Senior Network Engineer, CCNP, CCNA Linux and AMD-x86_64 or do you still with Windows and Intel ? -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailGate, and is believed to be clean.

Re: [pfSense-discussion] Box hangs because of PHP ?

: No, this is not a known problem. You might try upgrading to the recent snapshot: http://snapshots.pfsense.com/FreeBSD6/RELENG_1/updates/ Scott On 3/22/07, Daniele Guazzoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Fellows I have pfSense 1.0.1 installed on a VIA mini-ITX which regularly hangs. The behaviour is that the firewall

Re: [pfSense-discussion] Box hangs because of PHP ?

Yep, and changed to snort to ac mode. Now it looks ok. Thanx Scott Ullrich wrote: You probably have the checkboxes checked to associate the blocked IP with the reason. Turning this off should result in lowered CPU usage. On 3/22/07, Daniele Guazzoni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Update done. I