On 12/3/07, Mike Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> James, I'm think what I'm getting at more is not the fact that its
> "magical", maybe that is the wrong choice of word. But my opinion is more of
> the fact that it doesn't conform to the rest of the django database
> commands.
I suppose it
Thank you.
On 3 дек, 11:37, Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 03-Dec-07, at 10:17 AM, Ivan Markeyev wrote:
>
> > Have no idea, how to post ticket on djangoproject.com. Server return
> > to me "500 Internal Server Error (Submission rejected as potential
> > spam)".
>
> add your
James, I'm think what I'm getting at more is not the fact that its
"magical", maybe that is the wrong choice of word. But my opinion is more of
the fact that it doesn't conform to the rest of the django database
commands.
I do think you put it aptly in asking do we want to be more SQL-style or
On 03-Dec-07, at 10:17 AM, Ivan Markeyev wrote:
> Have no idea, how to post ticket on djangoproject.com. Server return
> to me "500 Internal Server Error (Submission rejected as potential
> spam)".
add your name and email address in the 'preferences' page of the
wiki, and you will be allowed
On 12/2/07, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frankly, I have found the slicing syntax hard to understand and
> error-prone myself. I think one of the reasons it seems magic is that
> it's one of the *rare* cases in which we use a Python
> "magic-syntax-ism" (like operator overloading,
On 12/2/07, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frankly, I have found the slicing syntax hard to understand and
> error-prone myself.
I guess I'm curious as to what's difficult or error-prone about it;
I've never run into a problem where slicing was the cuplrit, and it
feels like a more
On Dec 2, 2007 8:31 AM, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 20:00 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > To clarify, code such as the following can be a little confusing:
> >
> > p = MyModel.objects.filter(foo__id = self.id).order_by('-timestamp')[:
> > 1]
> > if p:
On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 20:44 -0800, SmileyChris wrote:
> I tried actually using lazy today for something and couldn't get it to
> work.
> It seems to me that the current implementation is basically broken.
>
> For example, I was trying to do lazy(my_function, list)
> __proxy__.__init__ tries to
Have no idea, how to post ticket on djangoproject.com. Server return
to me "500 Internal Server Error (Submission rejected as potential
spam)".
As i understand, 'name' and 'codename' columns for 'auth_permission'
table generated automatically from object class name. 'name' are
consist 'Can
I tried actually using lazy today for something and couldn't get it to
work.
It seems to me that the current implementation is basically broken.
For example, I was trying to do lazy(my_function, list)
__proxy__.__init__ tries to setattr(self, k, [promise]), but that
won't actually work for any
On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 12:17 -0800, mezhaka wrote:
> I have an assertion statement in my urls.py. When it throws an
> AssertionError I do not get it. Instead I get the ImproperlyConfigured
> error like this: http://dpaste.com/26524/. I had to dig into the
> django code to understand what's
I have an assertion statement in my urls.py. When it throws an
AssertionError I do not get it. Instead I get the ImproperlyConfigured
error like this: http://dpaste.com/26524/. I had to dig into the
django code to understand what's happening. I have checked the svn for
previous version of
Le 30 nov. 07 à 07:33, Adrian Holovaty a écrit :
>
> Let's get a definitive list of features we want in Django 1.0, and
> let's release it.
Just great.
>
> Without further ado, here's my list:
>
> * newforms-admin
> * queryset-refactor
> * django.newforms becomes django.forms
> * Model-level
Simon Willison wrote:
> I'd love to have a simpler alternative to the regexp method that is
> more friendly for developers who haven't fully grokked regular
> expression syntax yet.
while i agree that simplifying things is always a good idea, i think
that "developers who haven't fully grokked
On Dec 2, 2007 8:04 PM, akaihola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Changeset 5073 [1] added support for Unix DES crypt passwords (see
> ticket 3316 [2] for discussion).
>
> Many systems use MD5-based crypt shadow passwords (see e.g. man 3
> crypt or its on-line version [3], under heading "GNU
On 12/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I can see two fundamentally different approaches to this problem:
>
> 1. Deal with it at the ORM level, perhaps by getting MySQL to emulate
> timezone aware datetimes by using two dB fields - a naive datetime,
> and a varchar
On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 00:19 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This ticket as been stuck in 'design decision needed' for a few months
> now. I recently needed to solve this problem for a site I was
> building, and came up with a workaround, so perhaps an account of my
> approach can serve to get
On Sun, 2007-12-02 at 00:43 -0600, Jeremy Dunck wrote:
> Does it make sense for execute_sql to raise StopIteration even when
> it's called with a result_type other than MULTI?
No, it doesn't. I noticed that the other day, too, and I'm going to
change it.
Malcolm
On Fri, 2007-11-30 at 20:00 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> To clarify, code such as the following can be a little confusing:
>
> p = MyModel.objects.filter(foo__id = self.id).order_by('-timestamp')[:
> 1]
> if p:
> return p[0]
>
> To a python developer who is unfamiliar with django's
On 12/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> This ticket as been stuck in 'design decision needed' for a few months
> now. I recently needed to solve this problem for a site I was
> building, and came up with a workaround, so perhaps an account of my
> approach can serve to get
Changeset 5073 [1] added support for Unix DES crypt passwords (see
ticket 3316 [2] for discussion).
Many systems use MD5-based crypt shadow passwords (see e.g. man 3
crypt or its on-line version [3], under heading "GNU Extension"). This
extension to the crypt library prefixes the encrypted
This ticket as been stuck in 'design decision needed' for a few months
now. I recently needed to solve this problem for a site I was
building, and came up with a workaround, so perhaps an account of my
approach can serve to get the 'design decision' ball rolling...
In a nutshell, the problem is
22 matches
Mail list logo
