I had a few comments on some of these and was going to post them to
the tickets so they don't get lost, but my browsers acting up and
closing when I try to login, so I'm posting here.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 7:58 PM, Jeff Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
>
> *
Hey Jeff --
Thanks for doing this! If you want to make it a regular thing, please feel free.
I've reviewed and marked the ones I feel qualified to call (#4996,
#6709, #6496, and #6932); I think Joseph should call #2259 and Russ
#6719.
Jacob
Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
This is helpful, and it is the right way to go about it. The only way
to improve on this would be to include more than just your opinion,
and summarize any debate (if any) that has occurred on the ticket.
Sounds great!
I'll definitely include that in any future
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 7:58 AM, Jeff Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've picked a few tickets that have been marked as "Design Decision Needed".
> I am only interested in getting discussion going to help reduce the backlog
> of tickets that exist right now. I will voice my opinion on each
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 5:43 AM, Johannes Dollinger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd like to propose the following changes to django.template. Some of
> them are partially or fully implemented in my patch[1] for #3544.
> Which of these have a chance to land in 1.0 (assumed I provide a
> patch,
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 3:44 AM, Michael Glassford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> from what that says I'd guess you are using the InnoDB MySQL storage backend,
>
> Right you are. That limitation is a bit of a pain.
Yes, it is. Unfortunately, the best way to fix this is for MySQL to
either (1)
I'd like to propose the following changes to django.template. Some of
them are partially or fully implemented in my patch[1] for #3544.
Which of these have a chance to land in 1.0 (assumed I provide a
patch, docs and tests)?
1.) Allow recursive includes, #3544 [2]
2.) Add a template_cache
Ramiro Morales wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Michael Glassford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'm trying to run the Django unit tests for the first time using
>> runtests.py and I'm getting a lot of errors like this:
[snip]
> This could be related to the "MySQL and Fixtures" note
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 3:51 PM, Michael Glassford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm trying to run the Django unit tests for the first time using
> runtests.py and I'm getting a lot of errors like this:
>
> [...]
>
I'm trying to run the Django unit tests for the first time using
runtests.py and I'm getting a lot of errors like this:
> Problem installing fixture
'/develop/django/tests/regressiontests/views/fixtures/testdata.json':
Traceback (most recent call last):
> File
Excellent.
This could be added to google code? Is more easy run on trunk thta
doing the patching dance...
I test this shortly. I hope we could do this and prove that is doable
to all the *nix db guys ;)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you
Please see
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3591
http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/DjangoSpecifications/NfAdmin/FlexibleAppHandling
http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/InstalledAppsRevision
Will
http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/DjangoSpecifications/NfAdmin/FlexibleAppHandling
do what you
Not really no.
With this solution I would override the entire admin index. Meaning
other applications I use for the same project will not have the luxury
of having their own way with the admin index page.
My understanding is that applications should plug into projects
without overriding each
Hi,
I have just posted a patch that improves the simple_tag by allowing it
to take the context and/or the inner block. See the patch in ticket
#1105 [1].
It is backward compatible, and while the patch is quite simple it
would make the creation of template tag even more super easy. For
example:
I recently ran in to the a problem/snag when overriding the admin
index page. The thing is that I would like to change the index
displayed for a specific application, and not the entire admin index.
So I though that it might be a good idea to suggest a system where
each application has a
15 matches
Mail list logo
