On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Zachary
Voase wrote:
>
> I just found out that a particular Django ORM trick [1] seems to work
> just fine but is undocumented.
>
> Could I ask what the official status is with regards to this ‘trick’?
> Is it intentional? Also, since there isn’t any documentation
I just found out that a particular Django ORM trick [1] seems to work
just fine but is undocumented.
Could I ask what the official status is with regards to this ‘trick’?
Is it intentional? Also, since there isn’t any documentation for it,
if it is in fact an intended feature, would you like me t
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 4:05 PM, dan wrote:
>
>>
>> If a model A has a foreign key on model B, then the table for A
>> requires a field to track the relation. However, if model B has a
>> "many to one" on A table A requires a field.
>
> sorry, can you clarify that for me? - specifically: "mode
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 4:05 AM, dan wrote:
>
[snip]
>
> I think what the original question is asking is, can the definition of
> Parent have a "one-to-many" which points to Child? At the database
> level there would be no difference: Child would still have the foreign
> key field.
>
Right, and w
>
> If a model A has a foreign key on model B, then the table for A
> requires a field to track the relation. However, if model B has a
> "many to one" on A table A requires a field.
>
sorry, can you clarify that for me? - specifically: "model A has a
foreign key on model B" - which direction
you can simply make a db connectioin and insert the new data in a
different table says which mantained the history.And if you want to the
value in after some lag then used a cron simple.
Have u ever try this check out :
in forms.py
just write in ur modelForm
test(somename) = CharField(max_le
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 3:16 PM, Ali Rıza KELEŞ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a model which keeps texts, dates, author, etc.. something like a
> clasical content model.
>
> I want to allow admins to save modified versions of these contents. If
> possible in another db table like this:
>
> ...
> same tab
Go Django! Thanks to everybody and specially developers!
Dhruv Adhia
http://thirdimension.com
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 7:35 PM, James Bennett wrote:
>
> Hi folks! Tonight we've pushed out the Django 1.1 release candidate,
> which is hopefully the last stepping-stone to the final 1.1 release.
> I
Hi,
I have a model which keeps texts, dates, author, etc.. something like a
clasical content model.
I want to allow admins to save modified versions of these contents. If
possible in another db table like this:
...
same table fields with referer table which keeps modified contents by
adminuse
Hi,
Thanks for the update, I am looking forward to the release there is a lot of
good stuff in there.
Thanks again,
Michael
2009/7/21 Russell Keith-Magee
>
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Michael Kerrin
> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I am working on a project that is currently running Django
10 matches
Mail list logo