--~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Perhaps a better solution would be to vary based on request.is_ajax().
Alex
On Dec 2, 11:37 pm, kernel1983 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> HTML debug page is good when you develop normal web page
>
> But when you debug ajax based web page with firebug, the HTML debug
> page
, the
django.utils.simplejson version could simply be removed in favor of a
system-installed simplejson or the one in the standard library.
Thanks,
Eric Florenzano
On Nov 28, 6:10 pm, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 01:56 -0800, Johan Bergström wrote:
> >
/queryset to be cached, the request, and whatever
else needs to be known to determine the key), and than get's or sets
the appropriate key.
Alex
On Nov 28, 9:18 am, "Jeremy Dunck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems like cache keys need to be created using various
> cros
On Nov 27, 2:13 pm, "James Bennett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Solaris: I'm unable to find information detailing which Python
> version ships with various releases of Solaris and OpenSolaris. If
> anyone has that information, please post it in a reply.
Solaris
, argument against is that some people don't
have access to it, the only question is that a sizeable portion of
Django users).
alex
On Nov 25, 12:33 pm, Ivan Sagalaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ludvig Ericson wrote:
> > On Nov 25, 2008, at 18:08, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> >>
not in excluded_fields].
On Nov 21, 3:23 pm, "Ian Kelly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 1:05 PM, David Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I won't use defer, and I won't recommend people use it. I think it's
> > not good practice. It's like us
To generate the files just cd django; django-admin.py compilemessages -
l LANG_CODE
Another language ticket is: http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/9597
On Nov 18, 2:44 pm, "Karen Tracey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 7:46 PM, James Bennett <[
As long as you get the connection itself, i would think that would be
sufficient, obviously the receiver should know which connection it is
in the multi-db scenario, as it won't be able to just infer that based
on the settings.
On Nov 17, 6:15 pm, "Matthew D. Hancher" <[EMAIL PROT
Matthew, would you mind sticking the script you used to test this up
on dpaste?
Alex
On Nov 17, 3:01 pm, "Matthew D. Hancher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Nov 16, 11:03 pm, "Russell Keith-Magee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > I know
Right, I understand the need for absolute numbers, I just meant that
we don't need to start rewriting new benchmarks if Jeremy still has
the benchmark script.
Alex
On Nov 16, 11:03 pm, "Russell Keith-Magee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 12:21 P
Well, Jeremy Dunck was kind enough to do a benchmark against the old
system:
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers/browse_thread/thread/815f76ad7e823cbf/b008a757fbdefa2b
On Nov 16, 9:49 pm, "Russell Keith-Magee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 a
In terms of signal overhead, the most likely case here is probably no
receivers, and in the signal refactor, that particular case is now
hugely faster.
On Nov 16, 8:55 pm, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-11-16 at 17:14 -0800, Matthew D. Hancher wrote:
&
This sounds like a good feature, however, it's very difficult to read
a patch in either email or on google groups, so could you please open
a ticket in trac, and post this as a patch there.
On Nov 16, 2:57 pm, jothan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PsycoPg2 with a remote DB over a WAN
This: http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/9613 seems to be of the
same vein. I haven't confirmed it however.
On Nov 16, 7:54 pm, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-11-16 at 17:42 -0600, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Karen
p.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
://www.oebfare.com/blog/2008/nov/03/writing-custom-management-command/
On Nov 16, 1:39 am, "Calvin Spealman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does it need to be multi-threaded? Can you get a multi-process dev
> server instead/also?
>
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 1:26 A
I'd just like to point out that this isn't something to solve just for
many to many's, it's also for ForeignKeys.
On Nov 12, 6:58 pm, Jonas Pfeil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The idea of an ordered many-to-many field is very old [1] and has been
> proposed a lot over the years (
This just seems like a generalization of this:
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/3400
On Oct 31, 7:28 pm, Cornbread <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've ran into an issue I think that many will run into.
>
> In our project we have a profile for each user and we have integrate
There is a ticket about reverse not respecting request.urlconf.
Alex
On Oct 31, 7:50 pm, "ludvig.ericson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 29, 8:06 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > You can already do what your proposal
Ahh whoops, I have a patch for that(only covers unique right now),
will upload now.
Alex
On Oct 31, 9:26 am, "Jacob Kaplan-Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 4:38 AM, mrts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The only major issue
And whoops again, brosner has a patch that covers the parent fkey
issue. My patch covers the issue of duplicate data within the
formset.
On Oct 31, 9:26 am, "Jacob Kaplan-Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 4:38 AM, mrts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You can already do what your proposal would allow in middleware as
seen here: http://www.b-list.org/weblog/2007/nov/06/urlconf/
On Oct 29, 1:31 pm, Ludvig Ericson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Oct 29, 2008, at 18:23, Ludvig Ericson wrote:> class MyTest(object):
> >
regular modules and eggs.
Alex
On Oct 23, 12:20 am, "Waylan Limberg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 7:16 PM, Clint Ecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > I've opened a ticket on this matter (http://code.djangopr
:56 pm, "Marty Alchin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 12:34 PM, Jesse Young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > A LazyTextField that manages a dynamic model behind the scenes sounds
> > like a neat idea. That would certainly make the Dja
I'll go upload a fix now, the current behavior doesn't make sense,
since the SQL spec says that NULL != NULL, does anyone know if there
are any dbs for which this isn't true?
On Sep 19, 11:10 am, "Karen Tracey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:51
o developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
posed to adding them as non-default
options). In what case does someone need the extraneous writes in
Django's save() impmlementation which can undo previous updates?
jack.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
jack.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL P
is one down.
jack.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more option
roups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
ht
at you
hide this means people aren't even aware of the problems.
jack.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers
models will be commentable. I'd agree it's probably
not ideal, but I can't think of a better solution.
On Sep 19, 12:50 pm, Ludvig Ericson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 16, 2008, at 23:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>
> > It's intentional, usually you see an objec
If I follow you are saying that it is lispy in that flow control
statements and functions are handled just the same way(meaning you can
define your own statements if you like)?
On Sep 17, 8:02 pm, zvoase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know if anyone's noticed, but the templating
It's intentional, usually you see an object_pk as an integer field,
however that means it won't work with any field with a custom primary
key, specifically those with string type pks. And a textfield offers
the flexibility to work with all of those.
On Sep 16, 3:42 pm, smcoll <[EMAIL PROTEC
I'll take a look at this, the reason the second part didn't go in
originally(yeah, we thought of it), was that it was considered to be
in a different scope then the rest of the work on unique validation.
On Sep 16, 7:14 am, mrts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A bug in 1.0 makes unique
On Sep 11, 2:27 am, "Adrian Holovaty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 4:08 PM, Jeff Forcier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Second: if not possible, is it desirable? I recognize that with any
> > nontrivial hierarchy/number of
send email to crrsexpage@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/crrsexpage?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
p.
To post to~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit
to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
On Aug 30, 1:40 am, "Bruce Kroeze" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm mostly through with a drop-in replacement for the old comments, using
> the new Comment system and signals. It should be slick.
>
> When it tests out, I'll also commit the new save() parameters
~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this
or in
IRC.
Thanks for your work
On Aug 27, 9:54 pm, varikin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I grabbed ticket #6842 and added a patch that has some documentation
> for the exceptions Django raises since I needed some of this info:)
> The file I added, exceptions.txt is no
"We're not in complete and total feature freeze. "
I assume you mean the opposite of this.
On Aug 27, 9:15 am, "Jacob Kaplan-Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi folks --
>
> Right, so this is it.
>
> We've got about a week until the scheduled release
That branch is totally dead, there is some external work attempting to
add multi-db support, I don't know the status of it though.
On Aug 27, 4:40 am, Romain Gaches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thinking about switching from a homemade framework to django, I
a property of the
print statement?
Btw, I couldn't agree more on the importance of adhering to the letter
and spirit of
HTTP. The whole RESTful approach makes perfect sense to me.
On Aug 26, 2:38 pm, "James Bennett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 8:05 AM, [EMAIL PRO
g that need to be weeded out or am I doing something
wrong?
Henrik
I'm on:
git-svn-id: http://code.djangoproject.com/svn/django/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
bcc190cf-cafb-0310-a4f2-bffc1f526a37
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
django-newcomments is now in trunk.
On Aug 25, 8:41 pm, Jonathan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any thoughts on when a beta is going to be released?
>
> On Aug 10, 8:50 pm, Thejaswi Puthraya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> > It's been
Try this link instead: http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/
On Aug 22, 12:21 pm, AmanKow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've tried several times yesterday and today to go to the new docs
> link above, but unfortunately 404'ed every time.
> Thanks,
> Wayne
>
> On Aug 19
I'd also just like to say thanks, it looks like a tremendous amount of
work, and a big gain for the entire django community!
On Aug 22, 7:03 am, "Russell Keith-Magee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 4:12 AM, Nicolas Lara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Awesome! Simply, awesome! Thanks for all your hard work. I can't
wait to see this in trunk!
-Eric Florenzano
On Aug 21, 1:12 pm, "Nicolas Lara" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am writing to let you know that I have posted the latest patches on
> aggregat
the time.
Cheers,
Holm
On Aug 21, 10:17 pm, Eric Montgomery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The reason I posted this here is that it seems like it might be a
> problem with the way django generates the mysql.
> From what I understand, problems with foreign-key constraints with
>
; group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
roup, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
On Jul 25, 3:59 pm, "Karen Tracey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 6:42 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <
>
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Jul 24, 3:24 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> &
On Jul 24, 3:24 pm, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I think i stumbled over a bug. And i wanted to know if this a known
> issue or not..a search here and in the bug db revealed nothing.
>
> Calling full_clean in forms.py with a ModelChoiceField resul
It sounds like what you are looking for is an intermediary model, this
is ticket #6905 I believe, and is currently considered a django beta
maybe-feature, which is to say if it's ready by beta, it's in 1.0 else
it will be afterwords.
On Jul 22, 6:38 am, Mathieu Richardoz <[EMAIL PROTEC
Model validation is ticket #6845 , and is considered a 1.0 beta maybe-
feature. I believe Honza's latest patch is just about complete,
perhaps you could test it out, I believe it has docs.
On Jul 22, 10:36 am, "Alex Rades" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> sorry
Oh, I thought it was just a bad joke about how the server would be
getting a ton of load since the alpha was just released :/
On Jul 22, 3:55 pm, Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ludvig Ericson wrote:
> >> In general, expect DNS hiccups for a while; the whole worl
to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
I'm almost positivie #7353 is no longer an issue. I was getting that
error with oldforms-admin, and once upgrading to newforms-admin it was
resolved.
On Jul 16, 12:16 am, "Joseph Kocherhans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 11:50 PM, Brian Rosner <[E
I think Jacob is correct, both choices result in the entire result set
being read into memory, however #2 leaves the users code database
agnostic.
On Jul 14, 7:21 pm, "Jacob Kaplan-Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 7:13 PM, Malcolm Tredinnick
&g
On Jul 13, 12:56 pm, David Danier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So making the whole field () clickable should really be enough, the
> row itself (everything inside ) does not need to be clickable by
> default.
If I'm not mistaken, in NFA, you can create a custom subclass of
ModelAd
with additional meta data separate from the raw "data".
This was also influenced by the Amazon S3 API which was going to be
implemented as an alternate strategy for this project.
- Justin
On Jun 13, 9:21 am, "Marty Alchin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 20
Both "sublass" and "dubclass" are supposed to be "subclass" up there,
sorry.
On Jul 10, 10:05 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The admin site is currently being entirely redone, and in the new
> system it will be very easy t
I believe oldforms will be moved to oldforms and newforms will go in
forms, but old forms won't be completely removed, someone let me know
if I'm wrong.
On Jul 10, 2:10 am, Julien Phalip <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I couldn't find a precise indication for that in t
Ok, thanks Russell, Nicholas said he is going to be taking a look at
it during the sprint, so I will try to talk with him then.
On Jul 9, 6:40 pm, "Russell Keith-Magee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 1:45 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> <[EMAIL PROT
Russell, if you can post the feedback for #7210 either here, or on the
ticket(or on IRC), I'd try to take a look at fixing it.
On Jul 9, 7:40 am, "Russell Keith-Magee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 2:58 AM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss
>
> <[EMAIL PROTEC
. Any assistance or ideas
would(as always) be welcome.
On Jul 8, 12:23 am, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> My suggestion is that we make AdminSite have an attr that is actually
> a getter that dynamically generates a module like object that just has
> a
e part of v1?
thanx,
-- Ben Scherrey
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from th
together. If there is any interest in this
at all I can put together a prototype.
On Jul 7, 11:24 pm, Collin Grady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know it's kind of late to bring this up, but I haven't been using the
> branch,
> so it hasn't been at the front of my mind at all
best regards,
christian schilling
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group
, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-07-05 at 19:53 -0700, Ken Arnold wrote:
> > On Jul 5, 9:51 pm, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > > Solution #1
> > > ===
> > > SITE_PREFIX=
groups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
On Jun 25, 11:48 pm, "Jacob Kaplan-Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Two things:
>
>
> I don't know the background of whether Tom tried these things or not.
> Again, I don't care to ague about it. Let's not make this happen again
> in the future, OK?
>
&g
ceived this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
It sounds like what you are advocating is changing the password reset
to work similar to the way activation works in James Bennett's django-
registration, is that correct?
On Jun 27, 4:01 pm, Luke Plant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Currently password reset is d
Full test pass on Ubuntu Hardy Heron, with python 2.5, and sqlite3. I
also did some general testing of uploading files, which were
succesful, and I was able to observe large uploads going to my /tmp
dir.
On Jun 27, 4:41 am, David Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Jacob,
>
To avoid spam detection sign up.
On Jun 26, 3:06 pm, Andreas Klöckner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey there,
>
> I tried to submit this bug, but it wouldn't let me--it thought I'm a spammer.
> You should really work on that spam detection thing, it should not turn away
Also, if anyone is going to PyOhio(July 26) perhaps we can get some
work done there.
On Jun 26, 10:41 am, Rob Hudson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OSCON is July 21st to the 25th in Portland, OR. It's not in a date
> range listed but I'm curious if something could
ing people through the same
5 newbie stumbling blocks--he puts more volunteer hours in on IRC than
most of us combined.
It really comes down to cost/benefit of your dislike for his demeanor
versus his assistance as a developer--I know my decision.
-S
On Jun 25, 5:21 pm, "Tom Tobin" <[EMAIL
o-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
That one looks like it should have been #4148:
http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/4148
On Jun 25, 1:25 am, Collin Grady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeff Anderson said the following:
>
> > #4118
>
> Do you have the wrong # here? That ticket is closed: duplicate
:15 am, tifosi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Thank for your code and the repository, I use the django-rest-interface and
> it's good news, that someone continue the job.
>
> I would like to get nested resources (e.g.: /articles/1/comments/ or
> /user/user
It seems to me you can just do:
if self.field.cache_choices:
qs = self.queryset
else:
qs = self.queryset.all()
for obj in qs:
On Jun 19, 10:04 am, Jason Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We have a reasonably high-traffic site, which started intermitte
Is this only going to offer the trunk branch?
On Jun 19, 11:39 am, "Jacob Kaplan-Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hi folks --
>
> I've published an experimental Git clone of Django's SVN repository
> (created with git-svn). If you're a Git user and want to use th
.
On Jun 19, 1:25 am, "Alexander Solovyov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 2:58 AM, Jeff Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > *http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/4996- I don't know if it would be a
> > good idea to make 'runserver'
to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For mo
com -- will be finished some day.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Also for anyone interested, there's this:
http://djangosearch.com/
I'm not sure who maintains it, but it seems up-to-date.
On Jun 13, 10:19 am, "Jacob Kaplan-Moss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Marty Alchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wr
:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Arien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Tom Tobin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> The Django community aggregator includes non-English posts, which are
> >> unfortunately
won't be a
problem at all :)
jack.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL P
--~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-dev
, so take it with a grain of salt :)
-Eric Florenzano
On Jun 9, 12:11 pm, "Marty Alchin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I've been fairly quiet on the file storage front for a while, since
> it's basically done now, and is just waiting on the streaming upload
I'd be +1 on this, the only downside is that whoever commits the patch
will need to insert the correct revision at commit time.
PS: http://www.pointy-stick.com/blog/2008/05/21/not-here-right-now/
On Jun 7, 7:46 pm, Marc Fargas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there,
> Right n
1 - 100 of 659 matches
Mail list logo
