Re: 1.7 Schema migrations and AUTH_PROFILE_MODULE / get_profile() deprecation

Dear All: After reading this discussion I see that my fears were misplaced. I can now see that schema migrations are not necessary to stop using the AUTH_PROFILE stuff thanks to the explanations from Russ and Carl. Had I done a bit more investigating I probably would have realized this. Sorry

1.7 Schema migrations and AUTH_PROFILE_MODULE / get_profile() deprecation

Hello, The deprecation timeline says this about Django 1.7: "The AUTH_PROFILE_MODULE setting, and the get_profile() method on the User model, will be removed." The dev 1.7 release notes say that the new schema migration is scheduled to land in 1.7. Does this mean we cannot use the new schema

Re: Allow changing form field properties after form creation

On Thursday, April 5, 2012 6:49:20 AM UTC-5, Chris Wilson wrote: > > Hi all, > > I've added this as a ticket but I wanted to make sure that the core > and forms developers have a chance to see and interact with it, so I'm > posting it here too. You can find the ticket at: >

Re: login_required decorator and user.is_active (yes, again)

On Oct 5, 2:59 pm, ptone wrote: > 13125 was wontfixed by Jacob at the end of the summer, this relates to > the login_required decorator not checking for user.is_active > > I had opened a duplicate ticket 16996 before catching it as a dupe > > I'm going to dredge this one back

Re: confusing things in Trac UI (was: Design decision for #1625...)

On Sep 20, 4:16 pm, Carl Meyer wrote: > > Yeah, this is confusing in our Trac UI. The "accept" radio button at the > bottom assigns the ticket to you, it doesn't actually do anything with > the triage state. To change the ticket from DDN to Accepted you'd use > the dropdown next

Re: Various small issues

On Jan 31, 7:35 pm, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > > The core team aren't the only people who can review tickets. In fact, > all you need is for someone who isn't you to review your ticket and > say that it looks good (by Django's standards -- which means > documentation,

Re: contrib.staticfiles settings suggestion

On Nov 4, 3:06 am, Jannis Leidel wrote: > Ok, thanks for your input, would you mind creating a ticket describing the > discrepancy in more detail? I thought the how to [1] explains enough of > purpose of the app, so any further input would be much appreciated. > > > I'd be

Re: #6375 -- Class Based Views: Opinions on commit plan

On Oct 16, 2:34 am, Gabriel Hurley wrote: > > What do you call this. I don't see how any software developer could > > consider constructive criticism as anything other than helping out. > > You've posted three messages in this thread, but none of them seem > "constructive" to