Re: Doubt about urlencode filter implementation

2009-10-25 Thread Joe Tyson
I believe that's the expected outcome.. The use is to encode something for the use in an URL... Eg. convert "some-crazy//user?input" into something that can safely be passed into http://www.google.com/search?q=URL_ENCODED_STRING On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Danilo Cabello wrote: > > Hi, > >

Re: Google-app-engine-patch

2009-07-29 Thread Joe Tyson
This list is for the development of django itself. Please direct this question to the django-users list, and for any further questions regarding developing with django. On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 7:12 AM, franxx wrote: > > does anyone have any idea how to serve non-html content on GAE using > the a

Re: Reading data from database tied to another Django project?

2009-07-10 Thread Joe Tyson
This list is about django development it-self, not about developing with django. Please send this question to django-users. On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Benjamin Kreeger wrote: > > Here's the situation: I've got two projects, both Django. One is a > simple, public-facing website that renders

Re: Posting to the wrong list (was: Re: Need Django Developer urgent)

2009-05-08 Thread Joe Tyson
Big bold letters: *** THIS LIST IS NOT FOR DJANGO HELP - USE DJANGO USERS FOR THAT *** On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 10:26 AM, Dave Smith wrote: > On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 4:49 AM, Ned Batchelder wrote: > >> Add the word "core" to make the first sentence, "Discussion group for >> Django core developers"

Re: Integrating fckeditor with django

2009-04-29 Thread Joe Tyson
This is a question that should be directed to django-users. Django-developers is a list dedicated to discussing of developing django itself. On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 2:53 PM, megaman821 wrote: > > I see fckeditor has python functions for its quick upload and image > browsing. Is anyone using this

Re: WTForm should be inbuilt to Django, and make admin & others use it.

2009-03-18 Thread Joe Tyson
I really hate to be a pessimist, but if the functionality already exists for that much generation, why bother integrating it with the main django package? On Mar 18, 8:06 pm, Jari Pennanen wrote: > WTForm is simple implementation built on top of existing (new)forms to > help create fieldsets, an

Re: django in javascript

2009-03-11 Thread Joe Tyson
I don't really want a bunch of javascript in my django libraries. There are a lot of opportunities for other developers to make something that's not part of the core, and let it be plug-able. It keeps django away from spending time maintaining javascript and being selective towards one framework ov

Re: Ticket #648 -- {# comment goes here #} style comments

2006-09-13 Thread Tyson Tate
r tag type (to avoid JSP's problems with 500 different damn tag types, I imagine), but I think the benefits of this one far outweigh the "ickyness" of adding another tag. Thanks for the patch! -Tyson On Sep 13, 2006, at 9:34 AM, Will McCutchen wrote: > > No pr

Free SVN and Issue Tracker

2006-07-27 Thread Tyson Tate
I imagine there are some people here who (like me) want to open source some of their Django code, contrib apps, or other things but cant run Subversion or Trac on their host. Google to the rescue, as always: http://code.google.com Hopefully this can be useful to many of you. -Tyson

Re: Re: Consider releasing a .95 beta

2006-07-27 Thread Tyson Tate
On 7/27/06, Ian Holsman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I for one would like a 0.95 release. ... Earlier today: On 7/27/06, Adrian Holovaty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: ... > We're working on the .95 release as I type > this, though. > > Adrian --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ Y

Re: Re: Consider releasing a .95 beta

2006-07-27 Thread Tyson Tate
d, your time might be better spent working on all those "non-kiddy" projects you work on. -Tyson --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, s

Re: Re: Consider releasing a .95 beta

2006-07-27 Thread Tyson Tate
number on it to appease management or do we wait and put out a stable release with the features and changes that developers have requested? I, for one, really hope Pete's date-based generic view patches get applied. :) Peace out, Tyson --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You r

Re: Re: Re: why are the date-based views restricted to only displaying past-events?

2006-07-26 Thread Tyson Tate
ne: http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/2386 I'm *really* hoping 2386 will get implemented soon. And 2433. :) -Tyson --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To pos

Re: Re: why are the date-based views restricted to only displaying past-events?

2006-07-26 Thread Tyson Tate
> Regards, > Malcolm I'm +50 on this because I'm about ready to jump in to a large calendar project next week and I'll need this functionality. If no one beats me to it, I'll try to remember to hammer out a patch next week. Any sugges

Re: Re: Generic View Bug and Issues (Please? Agh!)

2006-07-21 Thread Tyson Tate
is independant of your data is something that shouldn't be coupled with the view that displays such data. Information that is relevant to your data, such as the previous and next dates that contain your objects is something that should be coupled with the data. Regards, Tyson --~--~

Re: Generic View Bug and Issues (Please? Agh!)

2006-07-20 Thread Tyson Tate
us month's worth of data? "next_month" is empty if there's no >> next data for next month. Which is logical. > > Continuing with a theme, this behavior does match the documentation > precisely. Whether it should be changed is a

Re: Generic View Bug and Issues (Please? Agh!)

2006-07-20 Thread Tyson Tate
please, I'm begging, can someone, *anyone*, acknowledge these problems, at the very least? I'm at the end of my rope with these problems. I've spent the past two weeks trying to get the barest acknowledgment of these problems on the lists and on IRC, but I feel like a

Re: Generic View Bug and Issues

2006-07-18 Thread Tyson Tate
quot;working around it". Who wouldn't?! After all, we're perfectionists on deadlines! :)Regards,Tyson --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this

Re: Generic View Bug and Issues

2006-07-18 Thread Tyson
e.e-scribe.com/775/ entry_archive_day.html: http://paste.e-scribe.com/776/ entry_archive_month.html: http://paste.e-scribe.com/777/ entry_archive_year.html: http://paste.e-scribe.com/778/ entry_archive.html: http://paste.e-scribe.com/779/ generic_entry_list.html: http://paste.e-scribe.com/78

Re: Generic View Bug and Issues

2006-07-18 Thread Tyson Tate
thing! Regards, Tyson On Jul 16, 2006, at 2:10 PM, Tyson Tate wrote: > > Note: I originally posted part of the following to the users list, > but I realized today that it's probably better posted here because it > deals with a potential bug and developer rationale behind some > gen

Generic View Bug and Issues

2006-07-16 Thread Tyson Tate
us Month: {{ next_month|date:"F Y"}} {% endif %} {% if previous_month %} Next Month: {{ previous_month|date:"F Y"}} {% endif %} --- Thanks in advance for any help/suggestions, Tyson Tate -- Tyson Tate - CalPoly Graphic Design Student - Work: Graphic Designer (CalPoly L

Re: #2217 - Filtering using objects rather than IDs

2006-06-30 Thread Tyson Tate
) I'm +1 on this too. I've done it many a time, expecting it to "just work". Thanks! -Tyson --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group

Re: [#2228] Add e-mail and URL fields to free comments

2006-06-26 Thread Tyson Tate
On Jun 24, 2006, at 11:14 AM, Tyson Tate wrote: > > Most comment systems that I know of allow the commenter to optionally > supply an e-mail address and/or a URL along with their comment for > attribution or administrator records. I thought it would be really > handy to have i

Re: Single-step object creation?

2006-06-26 Thread Tyson Tate
On Jun 26, 2006, at 7:16 PM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote: > Yeah, as I read over my own email I'm inclined to agree with you -- I > think ``objects.create()`` seems a bit nicer. > > Jacob +1 Agreed! I'd very much like the ability to save me all those crazy p.save()

[#2228] Add e-mail and URL fields to free comments

2006-06-24 Thread Tyson Tate
ust random junk?) I couldn't find where I should include this sort of field validation in the contrib.comments code, so perhaps someone can point me in the right direction and I'll throw in some simple RegEx validators with validation error messages. Let me know what you guys th

Re: Proposal: default escaping (and branch request)

2006-06-21 Thread Tyson Tate
fiasco. Do you have any links or more information about this? If it blew up for the PHP folks, I think I'd be prone to changing my position on the issue. Regards, Tyson --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to th

Re: Proposal: default escaping (and branch request)

2006-06-21 Thread Tyson Tate
escaping automatically turned on. Regards, Tyson --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To post to this group, send email to django-developers@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe fro

Re: Empty models don't get created (#1972)

2006-06-21 Thread Tyson Tate
lems outside of the admin interface. If anyone could point me to the relevant areas of code (i.e. where in Django's code does it determine if a model shouldn't be created because it's empty, etc.), I'd be happy to take a crack at a patch or two to give these ideas a shot.

Re: Better input validation (was Proposal: default escaping)

2006-06-21 Thread Tyson Tate
;basic security check" function that is either run only explicitly by the user or as part of some other function (syncdb etc.) that checks for untrusted strings that are publicly viewabel and simply lists them as warnings. > Thoughts? Given! -Tyson [1] Here at work, we have dozens of

Empty models don't get created (#1972)

2006-06-21 Thread Tyson Tate
s a signup list, which has a one-to-many relationship with signup slots.) I have two ideas on how this could be addressed: 1. Throw a warning or error in Syncdb, letting the user know that every model must have at least one explicit field. 2. Build the field as the programmer defined them. Any