yes, there wasn't anyone selected.
On Wednesday, April 10, 2019 at 3:24:50 AM UTC+6, makina wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Django doesn't have any projects in 2018.
> https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/archive/2018/organizations/5080222944722944/
> Does it mean there were no quality applicants in 2018?
I'm sorry, but the deadline has already passed for applications. It closed
on the 27th of March (2 days ago) according to the GSOC
timeline https://developers.google.com/open-source/gsoc/timeline. I do note
that Django's own timeline mentions April 3rd being the deadline, but I'm
not entirely s
I need response from the message I sent. Can I can get a reply please.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers (Contributions to Django itself)" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to dja
Correct. You'll have a much better chance of being accepted (next year) if
you're already a contributor to Django. This will give you a better
understanding of problems in the framework. Also, you're more likely to
find someone willing to spend the time mentoring you if you have a solid
track r
Thanks for your reply. Still on the Django girls, I would still like to
contribute in code. There was an issue #176 on developing form for coach just
like there is already form for Apply. It was posted since 2015 and it was
marked as help needed. I would like to contribute my code in creating fo
Please don't repost, you already posted this and got a reply in
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/django-developers/2aJbPvepHmo
On 26 March 2018 at 07:41, AGATEVURE GLORY wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Project Idea: Django Girls Tutorial Glossary documentation and Improvement
> of organizers promotio
Hi there,
I don't think the rules for Google Summer of Code allow for "projects" to
be documentation only. The extra promo materials would also count as
documentation I believe. The relevant rule would be 1.26:
https://summerofcode.withgoogle.com/rules/
"Project” means an open source coding pr
Thank you for advice. Is that means that my proposal won't be accepted by
Django this summer? If so, maybe I shouldn't submit it because it's
meaningless.
On Saturday March 24, 2018 at 12:44:35 AM UTC+8，Tim Graham wrote：
>
> I think GSoC students are much more likely to be successful working on
I think GSoC students are much more likely to be successful working on an
existing tool that has already proved its usefulness rather than trying to
invent a new tool. In either case, you'll need to find a mentor who's
excited about your project and can help you assess what's reasonable to do
i
Thanks for your comment. I noticed that the third category is "Work on
libraries that supplement or add new features to Django to ease development
- South and Django Debug Toolbar are good examples of existing projects
that would have fit here". And I think that the idea enable developers to
e
I don't think think the idea is suitable. It doesn't fit any of the three
categories described at
https://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/SummerOfCode2018.
On Thursday, March 22, 2018 at 9:56:59 AM UTC-4, jimw...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I've written my draft on Google Docs, here's the url
> https://do
I've written my draft on Google Docs, here's the url
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1hYVKrBJA1GIGYbkdlRG0Sq4GFIQnjw2Jb0QaFbsamLw/edit?usp=sharing
Thanks for any comments.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django developers (Contributions to Dja
Hi.
About javascript pipeline.
Basically having (pluggable) toolchain and practices to manage JavaScript
assests or stylesheets for example.
Tom Forbes described it quite well in his latter message.
la 17. maaliskuuta 2018 klo 9.49 Manasvi Saxena
kirjoitti:
> Hello Sir,
>
> On Saturday, March
Hello,
> On 18 Mar 2018, at 09:45, Manasvi Saxena wrote:
>
> I simply intend to create an option for the developer to use python for
> templating rather than DTL or jinja.
> Is Python fast compared to any other templating language? Yes.
No.
Jinja2 compiles to Python bytecode so it's as fast a
Hello Sir,
I like theses idea less and less evertime.
>
> What is your usecase for a smarter rendering engine ? You can already
> compute complex things in the view, store it in the rendering context and
> simply display it in the template.
>
> The first idea was only slightly in the wrong direc
On Sat, 17 Mar 2018, 21:55 Manasvi Saxena, wrote:
> Hello Sir,
>
> I'll give some background. The Django Templating Language was very
>> specifically designed to NOT allow putting business logic or allow calling
>> arbitrary functions in the template. Jinja2 loosened up that a bit, but it
>> stil
Hello Sir,
I'll give some background. The Django Templating Language was very
> specifically designed to NOT allow putting business logic or allow calling
> arbitrary functions in the template. Jinja2 loosened up that a bit, but it
> still doesn't let you do whatever you want. There's a couple
Hello Sir,
Well, you should probably look at past examples of such things, like TAL
> for the server side, and ... just about every JS framework of today
> (svelte, Vue, Knockout, etc :)
>
> lxml should make it easy to parse, iterate, walk, mutate the DOM tree...
> now you need to determine a syn
On 03/17/2018 08:18 PM, Manasvi Saxena wrote:
Hello Sir,
On Saturday, March 17, 2018 at 2:23:45 PM UTC+5:30, Curtis Maloney wrote:
On 03/17/2018 07:37 PM, Dmitriy Sintsov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Template languages are my favorite topic in programming.
Having written a few templ
Hello Sir,
On Saturday, March 17, 2018 at 2:49:41 PM UTC+5:30, Dmitriy Sintsov wrote:
>
> Hi!
> I think you should read the links about Knockout.js templates, Vue.js
> templates and about XSLT templates and their support via lxml library.
> Read about custom tags in XSLT and maybe in JSX.
> Also
Hi!
I think you should read the links about Knockout.js templates, Vue.js
templates and about XSLT templates and their support via lxml library.
Read about custom tags in XSLT and maybe in JSX.
Also read more about lxml library and how to use it.
Hope that will help you to improve your proposal.
Dm
Hello Sir,
On Saturday, March 17, 2018 at 2:23:45 PM UTC+5:30, Curtis Maloney wrote:
>
> On 03/17/2018 07:37 PM, Dmitriy Sintsov wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Template languages are my favorite topic in programming.
>
> Having written a few template engines myself... I guess it's high on my
> list t
Hello sir,
On Saturday, March 17, 2018 at 2:07:03 PM UTC+5:30, Dmitriy Sintsov wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Template languages are my favorite topic in programming.
>
> If you implement html library yourself, it is much better to define tags
> not as functions but as classes with base Tag class which has p
On 03/17/2018 07:37 PM, Dmitriy Sintsov wrote:
Hi!
Template languages are my favorite topic in programming.
Having written a few template engines myself... I guess it's high on my
list too :)
If you implement html library yourself, it is much better to define tags
not as functions but as c
Hi!
Template languages are my favorite topic in programming.
If you implement html library yourself, it is much better to define tags
not as functions but as classes with base Tag class which has properties
for tag name, attributes and the nested list of tags. Such way you will
re-implement DO
Hello Sir,
On Saturday, March 17, 2018 at 1:16:15 PM UTC+5:30, Jani Tiainen wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> Yes I read your initial proposal and in my experience putting any frontend
> stuff to python code is disaster. Hard to maintain hard to understand when
> pages do get more complex.
>
> In my understa
Hi.
Yes I read your initial proposal and in my experience putting any frontend
stuff to python code is disaster. Hard to maintain hard to understand when
pages do get more complex.
In my understanding it is also general consencus and for that reason Django
itself moved form widget rendering from
Hello,
On Saturday, March 17, 2018 at 12:42:50 PM UTC+5:30, Jani Tiainen wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> As pointed out I believe this is not getting accepted as GSoC project for
> Django.
>
> But if you really believe that your approach is beneficial to larger
> audience and you feel that it is right thing
Hi.
As pointed out I believe this is not getting accepted as GSoC project for
Django.
But if you really believe that your approach is beneficial to larger
audience and you feel that it is right thing to do just do it. It is only
way to prove that you're right. Of course you could be wrong as well
Hello Sir,
Hey Manasvi,
>
> I'm perhaps a bit biased but I would be very interested in anything that
> can make JavaScript a real first class citizen in Django. There are a
> number of third party packages out there that attempt something like this
> (i.e django-webpack-loader). Django is class
Hey Manasvi,
I'm perhaps a bit biased but I would be very interested in anything that
can make JavaScript a real first class citizen in Django. There are a
number of third party packages out there that attempt something like this
(i.e django-webpack-loader). Django is classically quite conservativ
Hello Sir,
On Saturday, March 17, 2018 at 5:39:34 AM UTC+5:30, Tom Forbes wrote:
>
> Hey Manasvi,
> I don't have any say in the choice of a GSOC student, but I'd like to add
> my two cents nonetheless.
>
> I can see the logic behind your proposal, but I'm skeptical about the
> usefulness of such
Hello Sir,
On Saturday, March 17, 2018 at 5:39:34 AM UTC+5:30, Tom Forbes wrote:
>
> Hey Manasvi,
> I don't have any say in the choice of a GSOC student, but I'd like to add
> my two cents nonetheless.
>
> I can see the logic behind your proposal, but I'm skeptical about the
> usefulness of such
Hey Manasvi,
I don't have any say in the choice of a GSOC student, but I'd like to add
my two cents nonetheless.
I can see the logic behind your proposal, but I'm skeptical about the
usefulness of such a project. Libraries that implemented something similar
to this have come and gone, and got good
Hello Sir,
Okay, so the idea is to render HTML by generally defining it in Python. I
> could've sworn that I'd seen something like this years ago, but I'm failing
> to find it. That stated, I think this is basically a generating version of
> BeautifulSoup (https://www.crummy.com/software/Beauti
Hello Sir,
On Saturday, March 17, 2018 at 3:08:02 AM UTC+5:30, Josh Smeaton wrote:
>
> This isn't going to work.
>
> 1. If you're going to "pre-render" your python files into html files
> **before** they're filled with data, then you will still need to run
> django/jinja templating over this pre
Okay, so the idea is to render HTML by generally defining it in Python. I
could've sworn that I'd seen something like this years ago, but I'm failing
to find it. That stated, I think this is basically a generating version of
BeautifulSoup (https://www.crummy.com/software/BeautifulSoup/bs4/doc/) as
Hello Sir,
On Saturday, March 17, 2018 at 2:44:03 AM UTC+5:30, Rotund wrote:
>
> I'll give some background. The Django Templating Language was very
> specifically designed to NOT allow putting business logic or allow calling
> arbitrary functions in the template. Jinja2 loosened up that a bit, b
Am 16/03/2018 um 21:48 schrieb Manasvi Saxena:
> import pyhtml
>
> a = p("hello world")
> a.style("color":"red")
>
> OUTPUT:
> hello world
I'm not the best expert around here, but trying to build HTML from *any*
pseudo-language sounds like a nightmare to keep the engine updated. HTML
is a fast
This isn't going to work.
1. If you're going to "pre-render" your python files into html files
**before** they're filled with data, then you will still need to run
django/jinja templating over this pre-rendered template.
2. If you're **not** going to pre-render your python files into html files,
I'll give some background. The Django Templating Language was very
specifically designed to NOT allow putting business logic or allow calling
arbitrary functions in the template. Jinja2 loosened up that a bit, but it
still doesn't let you do whatever you want. There's a couple reasons, but
one is p
Hello Sir,
On Saturday, March 17, 2018 at 1:57:00 AM UTC+5:30, Josh Smeaton wrote:
>
> I'm confused by your proposal. You state one of the drawbacks with current
> templating is the readability issues for frontend developers that have
> templating logic defined within the template. But isn't you
I'm confused by your proposal. You state one of the drawbacks with current
templating is the readability issues for frontend developers that have
templating logic defined within the template. But isn't your proposal to
replace html templates with one defined in python? How does this make it
any
Hello Sir,
On Thursday, March 15, 2018 at 11:29:46 PM UTC+5:30, Aymeric Augustin wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> 2018-03-15 14:24 GMT+01:00 Manasvi Saxena
> >:
>
>> Think of this library as a bridge between Python and HTML, you don't need
>> to know the syntax of HTML, just need to know which function of
I'm sorry to say that I haven't seen it before. But I notice that it only
deals with the models and I want to deal with the views, URLs and settings
too. Has someone done that before?
On Thursday, March 15, 2018 at 10:29:01 AM UTC+8, uri...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Have you seen
> https://github.c
Hello Sir,
On Thursday, March 15, 2018 at 11:29:46 PM UTC+5:30, Aymeric Augustin wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> 2018-03-15 14:24 GMT+01:00 Manasvi Saxena
> >:
>
>> Think of this library as a bridge between Python and HTML, you don't need
>> to know the syntax of HTML, just need to know which function of
Hello,
On Thursday, March 15, 2018 at 11:29:46 PM UTC+5:30, Aymeric Augustin wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> 2018-03-15 14:24 GMT+01:00 Manasvi Saxena
> >:
>
>> Think of this library as a bridge between Python and HTML, you don't need
>> to know the syntax of HTML, just need to know which function of the
Hello,
2018-03-15 14:24 GMT+01:00 Manasvi Saxena :
> Think of this library as a bridge between Python and HTML, you don't need
> to know the syntax of HTML, just need to know which function of the library
> creates what output. After you have created the content of your page just
> pass it to a f
Hello Sir,
On Thursday, March 15, 2018 at 3:52:36 AM UTC+5:30, Aymeric Augustin wrote:
>
> Hello Manasvi,
>
> On 14 Mar 2018, at 09:09, Manasvi Saxena >
> wrote:
>
>
> Create libraries in python and integrate them with Django to generate HTML
> code for front-end development and thus contributin
Hello Sir,
On Thursday, March 15, 2018 at 3:24:04 AM UTC+5:30, uri...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > existing libraries like Brython or pyjs for the Javascript side
>
> Also http://www.skulpt.org/ , used by https://anvil.works/
>
>
> On Wednesday, March 14, 2018 at 10:36:03 AM UTC-4, Rotund wrote:
>>
>>
Hello sir,
On Wednesday, March 14, 2018 at 8:06:03 PM UTC+5:30, Rotund wrote:
>
> While I'm not a deciding member by any means, I have seen enough proposals
> to get a feel for what may be chosen. You left a very open idea of what you
> plan to do. You are going to need to be specific as to what
Have you
seen https://github.com/LegoStormtroopr/django-spaghetti-and-meatballs ?
On Wednesday, March 14, 2018 at 9:11:59 PM UTC-4, jimw...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> My name is Chenxu Wang from China and I'd like to participate in the GSoC
> with coding for Django.
>
> *My idea:*
> I want
Hello Manasvi,
> On 14 Mar 2018, at 09:09, Manasvi Saxena wrote:
>
> Create libraries in python and integrate them with Django to generate HTML
> code for front-end development and thus contributing to make Django a
> full-stack framework.
>
> For Python developers, it is an extra work to lea
> existing libraries like Brython or pyjs for the Javascript side
Also http://www.skulpt.org/ , used by https://anvil.works/
On Wednesday, March 14, 2018 at 10:36:03 AM UTC-4, Rotund wrote:
>
> While I'm not a deciding member by any means, I have seen enough proposals
> to get a feel for what
While I'm not a deciding member by any means, I have seen enough proposals
to get a feel for what may be chosen. You left a very open idea of what you
plan to do. You are going to need to be specific as to what you plan to do
to accomplish your end goals and probably provide at least some sample th
55 matches
Mail list logo
