Re: SOPA bill question

2011-12-28 Thread Ryan McIntosh
y Solutions ph: (204) 480-0314 cell: (204) 770-3682 r...@peaceworks.ca - Original Message - From: "James Bennett" To: django-developers@googlegroups.com Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 11:07:53 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central Subject: Re: SOPA bill question Folks, we've

Re: SOPA bill question

2011-12-28 Thread James Bennett
Folks, we've had three different members of core point out that, important as it is, this is a topic for another list/forum. Please take the discussion there, now. -- "Bureaucrat Conrad, you are technically correct -- the best kind of correct." -- You received this message because you are sub

Re: SOPA bill question

2011-12-28 Thread Daniel Sokolowski
OMG - why don't we all go for a coffee and discuss if we are going to be discussing what we think of discussing. The above is meant as a a joke. On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 12:04 PM, Andre Terra wrote: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Etienne Robillard > wrote: > >> Further I disagree this is a

Re: SOPA bill question

2011-12-28 Thread Andre Terra
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Etienne Robillard wrote: > Further I disagree this is a bad list for discussing the implications > SOPA, and encourages everyone to sharpen their minds on this issue, so > please don't be "sorry" to talk about it. The fact that developers who have subscribed to

Re: SOPA bill question

2011-12-28 Thread Etienne Robillard
... > > Ryan > > - Original Message - > From: "Justin Holmes" mailto:jus...@justinholmes.com>> > To: django-developers@googlegroups.com <mailto:django-developers@googlegroups.com> > Sent: Monday, December 26, 2011 10:12:10

Re: SOPA bill question

2011-12-28 Thread Henrique Bastos
uot; of an electronic entity. This isn't about politics at all. > > User contributed content is about to become a liability... > > > > Ryan > > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Justin Holmes" > > To: django-developers@googlegroups.

Re: SOPA bill question

2011-12-27 Thread Alex Gaynor
gt; > From: "Justin Holmes" > > To: django-developers@googlegroups.com > > Sent: Monday, December 26, 2011 10:12:10 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central > > Subject: Re: SOPA bill question > > > > Yep, there's no doubt that having these kinds of discussio

Re: SOPA bill question

2011-12-27 Thread James Richards
ility... > > Ryan > > - Original Message - > From: "Justin Holmes" > To: django-developers@googlegroups.com > Sent: Monday, December 26, 2011 10:12:10 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central > Subject: Re: SOPA bill question > > Yep, there's no doubt th

Re: SOPA bill question

2011-12-27 Thread James Bennett
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Ryan McIntosh wrote: > With the utmost respect, I must rebuke Paul's claim that this discussion is > misplaced on the dev list.  We all have a stake in this legislation.  All > free software projects have a stake in this legislation.  I urge those > unfamiliar w

Re: SOPA bill question

2011-12-27 Thread Ryan McIntosh
django-developers@googlegroups.com Sent: Monday, December 26, 2011 10:12:10 PM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central Subject: Re: SOPA bill question Yep, there's no doubt that having these kinds of discussions on the dev list (which already struggles at times to keep a good signal / noise ratio) i

Re: SOPA bill question

2011-12-27 Thread Etienne Robillard
On 12/26/2011 11:12 PM, Justin Holmes wrote: Yep, there's no doubt that having these kinds of discussions on the dev list (which already struggles at times to keep a good signal / noise ratio) is not the way. However, it was clear at djangocon (and is also clear in the various django IRC channel

Re: SOPA bill question

2011-12-26 Thread Russell Keith-Magee
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Justin Holmes wrote: > Yep, there's no doubt that having these kinds of discussions on the > dev list (which already struggles at times to keep a good signal / > noise ratio) is not the way. > > However, it was clear at djangocon (and is also clear in the various

Re: SOPA bill question

2011-12-26 Thread Justin Holmes
Yep, there's no doubt that having these kinds of discussions on the dev list (which already struggles at times to keep a good signal / noise ratio) is not the way. However, it was clear at djangocon (and is also clear in the various django IRC channels) that: 1) Many django developers are politic

Re: SOPA bill question

2011-12-26 Thread Paul McMillan
While this bill certainly merits discussion, and may indeed be related to sites created with and using Django, this forum is not the place for it. Please do not continue this thread here. -Paul -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" grou

Re: SOPA bill question

2011-12-26 Thread Etienne Robillard
On 12/26/2011 07:46 PM, Jeremy Dunck wrote: On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Etienne Robillard wrote: What thus you Django developers all think of this proposed law and how could this may affect open source communities such as Django and Python to develop novel apps specifically for creating us

Re: SOPA bill question

2011-12-26 Thread Jeremy Dunck
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Etienne Robillard wrote: > What thus you Django developers all think of this proposed law and how could > this may affect open source communities such as Django and Python > to develop novel apps specifically for creating user-generated content? This feels off-top

SOPA bill question

2011-12-26 Thread Etienne Robillard
Hi, I'm curious and at the same time a little worried by the upcoming "SOPA" bill, which would imposes in US new laws for blocking down websites and user-generated content on the basis of copyright violation. What thus you Django developers all think of this proposed law and how could this m