Re: Can you add a build-in template tags?

Thank you very much!! Michael P. Jung wrote: > > How can I cache the sub-template witch is included in the main > > template? And how can I ensure it won't be render(parse) the next > > request? > > If you look at django.template.loader_tags.do_include you'll notice an > if statement that checks

Re: 1.2 Feature Suggestion

On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 9:40 AM, James Bennett wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Russell Keith-Magee > wrote: >> A wiki page doesn't really solve the problem either. If you make it an >> exclusive list, someone has to decide who is on the

Re: Doubt about urlencode filter implementation

I believe that's the expected outcome.. The use is to encode something for the use in an URL... Eg. convert "some-crazy//user?input" into something that can safely be passed into http://www.google.com/search?q=URL_ENCODED_STRING On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Danilo Cabello

Re: 1.2 Feature Suggestion

On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > A wiki page doesn't really solve the problem either. If you make it an > exclusive list, someone has to decide who is on the list and who > isn't. If you make it a comprehensive list, a wiki page will very >

Re: 1.2 Feature Suggestion

On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:30 AM, Russell Keith-Magee < freakboy3...@gmail.com> wrote: > > A wiki page doesn't really solve the problem either. If you make it an > exclusive list, someone has to decide who is on the list and who > isn't. If you make it a comprehensive list, a wiki page will very

Re: 1.2 Feature Suggestion

On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Tobias McNulty wrote: > On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Dan wrote: >> >> I didn't know about rosetta. What would you guys think of having a doc >> section about popular third party apps? Putting a list of

Doubt about urlencode filter implementation

Hi, Looking for urlencode[1] implementation, I saw[2] that it uses urlquote on django.utils.http[3] and when I try to encode and URL like "http://www.google.com; using that filter, I receive the follow return "http%3A//www.google.com": >>> from django.template.defaultfilters import urlencode

Re: 1.2 Feature Suggestion

On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 11:48 PM, Dan wrote: > I think this is best done through a third party site. Look at the success >> of DjangoGigs. I don't know that there's a de facto place to look for apps >> yet, but I bet a winner will emerge in time. >> >> Tobias >> >> > The

Re: 1.2 Feature Suggestion

> > I think this is best done through a third party site. Look at the success > of DjangoGigs. I don't know that there's a de facto place to look for apps > yet, but I bet a winner will emerge in time. > > Tobias > > The problem I see with that is that we clearly *are* standardizing toward some

Re: 1.2 Feature Suggestion

On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 7:39 PM, Dan wrote: > > I didn't know about rosetta. What would you guys think of having a doc > section about popular third party apps? I think this is best done through a third party site. Look at the success of DjangoGigs. I don't know that

Re: non-relational DB

On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:42 AM, Thomas Wanschik wrote: > > > > On 22 Okt., 23:52, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: >> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 5:09 AM, Thomas Wanschik >> >> wrote: >> >> >> When a new QuerySet is

Re: 1.2 Feature Suggestion

> A few things: > > a) The feature proposal phase has already passed, it went on for the > last 3 months or so. > b) There's already an external application that does this: > http://code.google.com/p/django-rosetta/ > > Alex > > I didn't know about rosetta. What would you guys think of having a

Re: non-relational DB

On 22 Okt., 23:52, Russell Keith-Magee wrote: > On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 5:09 AM, Thomas Wanschik > > wrote: > > >> When a new QuerySet is instantiated (e.g. by calling > >> Model.objects.all()) it asks the backend for its Query class and then

project folder with dots

Hello, django developers! On my server every project has it's own folder which name is the same as project hostname(ex. /home/testsite.com). Bug django don't allow dots in "project name". I think we can fix it. For example by avoiding starting import with project name.

Advocacy for Email-01 (email backends)

Hi all, The v1.2 votes are in, and it appears that Email-01 (introducing an email backend API) needs some more discussion. I am in complete agreement that Django shouldn't try to become an email framework. That isn't the intention of this proposal. The intention is to fix a specific problem