On 3/31/07, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok. I'll wait a day or two to make sure there aren't any late
> objections but otherwise go ahead with making spaceless actually
> spaceless.
I'll give it a +1; having "spaceless" really mean "well, kind of
spaceless but not really" see
On 3/30/07, Russell Keith-Magee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1) Is there a valid use case out there for the default 'leave 1 space'
> behaviour that I am missing?
>
> 2) What is the community opinion on changing the default behaviour of
> spaceless to 0 spaces (thereby introducing a backwards
> in
On 3/31/07, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 12:19 +0800, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> > Ok - initial opinion appears to be anti configurability and anti
> > changing the default. Another option is to introduce a different tag
> > for the 0-spaces case. Opini
> Ok - initial opinion appears to be anti configurability and anti
> changing the default. Another option is to introduce a different tag
> for the 0-spaces case. Opinions? Suggestions for names? Spaceless is
> the obvious choice, but that name is taken :-)
My thought was:
"spaceless" is no spac
> Ok - initial opinion appears to be anti configurability and anti
> changing the default. Another option is to introduce a different tag
> for the 0-spaces case. Opinions? Suggestions for names? Spaceless is
> the obvious choice, but that name is taken :-)
My thought was:
"spaceless" is no spac
On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 12:19 +0800, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> On 3/31/07, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 10:59 +0800, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> > [...]
> > > 1) Is there a valid use case out there for the default 'leave 1 space'
> > > behaviour tha
On 3/31/07, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 10:59 +0800, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
> [...]
> > 1) Is there a valid use case out there for the default 'leave 1 space'
> > behaviour that I am missing?
>
> Readability of the generated source is not to be sneez
Hey Russ --
I'm +0 on spaceless actually being spaceless; -0 on keeping a single
space as an option, -1 on one space being default or allowing an
arbitrary number of spaces.
Jacob
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the G
On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 10:59 +0800, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
[...]
> 1) Is there a valid use case out there for the default 'leave 1 space'
> behaviour that I am missing?
Readability of the generated source is not to be sneezed at. Using the
spaceless tag, you can have a nicely laid out template
Hi all,
This discussion is about _very_ trivial change, but it would break
backwards compatibility, so I want to get some consensus before I
commit anything.
Ticket #3532 ( http://code.django.project.com/tickets/3532 ) discusses
the spaceless templatetag. In particular, there has been a request
10 matches
Mail list logo
