On Tue, Nov 1, 2022, at 6:54 AM, C. Kirby wrote:
> Having run the elections for the current technical board I agree with
> Andrew's assessment that a more open requirement to run is a good idea. It
> may create a bit more work on candidate verification for the DSF Board and
> Fellows, but
Having run the elections for the current technical board I agree with
Andrew's assessment that a more open requirement to run is a good idea. It
may create a bit more work on candidate verification for the DSF Board and
Fellows, but anything that can work to encourage new blood in the
On Sun, Oct 30, 2022, at 10:42 PM, James Bennett wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 4:34 PM Andrew Godwin wrote:
>> __
>>
>> I have copied in the DSF Members mailing list as it is a governance-related
>> DEP, but if we could keep all discussion on the thread in the Django
>> Developers mailing
On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 4:34 PM Andrew Godwin wrote:
> I have copied in the DSF Members mailing list as it is a
> governance-related DEP, but if we could keep all discussion on the thread
> in the Django Developers mailing list, as per DEP 0001, that would be great.
>
My main concern remains
Hi all,
As a followup to my previous post about potential changes to the Technical
Board - for which I thank you all for the feedback - I have taken the process
to the next step and written a draft DEP:
https://github.com/django/deps/pull/75/files
(If you wish to see the DEP with styling, it
