Just wanted to ask from curiosity if it were other factors besides broad
popularity, as BB is a great alternative. Most dev probably use both
services, at least passively, as lots of good code is here and there, and
I'm not against GH in any way. Per-line comments are actually a very good
I am not a Django contributor, just a user. Whether it's github or
bitbucket or something else, the more important question is stick with the
current system and workflow as well as policies or move the code and then
of course also have a somewhat different workflow when you start using
On 16-02-12 16:42, Łukasz Rekucki wrote:
1) I can't argue about popularity, because I have no data, but most
Django applications I use come from github, so it's also quite
popular.
Last year's djangocon.eu was instructive for me. We were debating
github/bitbucket at the office at the time.
On 16 February 2012 18:27, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> Hi folks --
>
> Please can we not have this argument? This is one of those holy wars
> that can get really, really ugly and I'd like to nip it in the bud.
>
Sorry for fueling this up. Should have think a few times more
Hi folks --
Please can we not have this argument? This is one of those holy wars
that can get really, really ugly and I'd like to nip it in the bud.
There's no way we'll come to consensus here any more than we'd be able
to come to consensus on a choice of text editor, operating system, or
A heavy bitbucket user here.
I personally prefer hg to git and bitbucket to github but I think github +
git would be better for django because of much larger community.
Guys, but please stop bashing bitbucket. Bitbucket supports both hg and git
(github don't), has nice bugtracker; bitbucket
Here are my 2 cents.
IMHO, any developer that is currently contributing with Django can easily
work with both Bitbucket or Github.
AFAIK, the purpose o this big change is to enable more people to contribute
lowering the contribution barrier. With that in mind, I don't think the
decision should
Github is just lightyears ahead of Bitbucket in design and usability. Beats
it on features and community too. They only time I consider Bitbucket is
only the circumstance that I need free private repos. That situation hasn't
come up yet.
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Andrew Ingram
On 16 February 2012 15:42, Łukasz Rekucki wrote:
> 1) I can't argue about popularity, because I have no data, but most
> Django applications I use come from github, so it's also quite
> popular.
>
> 2) I don't think Django should care if the collaboration tool runs
>
On 16 February 2012 16:02, Stan wrote:
>
>
> On Feb 9, 1:49 pm, zalew wrote:
>> > We're going
>> > to solve that with our move to Git/GitHub, which will make it much
>> > easier for people to fork and much easier for core developers to
>> > integrate
10 matches
Mail list logo