On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:45 AM, diogobaeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
Hi,
I'm Brazilian too.
>
> I'm willing to start contributing to Django, already, but in a field
> that will not be hard for me to understand, and in which I can be more
> usefull: the Brazillian-Portuguese
I'm also +1 for the change (and in fact, for any change that we would
regret not having done after 1.0 goes live). To back this up, the
above note has been hanging in the documentation for several months
(more than 8, as far as I can track back), so people could not say
that they weren't warned.
Johannes Dollinger wrote:
> Afaics the only other tag that would accept an arbitrary unquoted
> literal is {% ssi %}.
> Are there more?
Actually when I've first implemented {% url %} I looked for formatting
parameters at {% cycle %}. Which back then had only one syntax:
{% cycle
Thanks a lot, guys! I'm looking forward to make my move into helping
Django to evolve! :-)
See ya!
Diogo
On Jul 21, 3:26 am, "Andrews Medina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:45 AM, diogobaeder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi!
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm Brazilian too.
>
>
>
>
In [8015] I finally landed the patch to fix a number of issue with URL
parsing that we've been talking about. It explicitly fixes #285, #1516
and #3414, but possibly others as well, and is based on a patch that
John Melesky wrote at a sprint last year (although I forgot to thank him
in the commit
> However, if the user is _not_ using the views (e.g., they're using the
> auth.User model, but providing their own login views), there is an
> argument to be made for skipping the tests.
Is it safe to say that if we try to
reverse('django.contrib.auth.views.password_reset'), we should not run
Hi,
I'm using rev 7713 (I need to port to the new upload handling before I
can get back to trunk).
The code that actually adds to the table:
def do_update(self, event):
if event.countable:
matrix, new = self.get_or_create(date=event.time.date(),
On Sat, Jul 19, 2008 at 1:58 PM, Jason Yan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Re: http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/7611
>
> The current situation is that if you create a new Django project and
> run the unit tests, the contrib.auth baisc tests fail due to missing
> templates. These templates are
Johannes Dollinger wrote:
> Of course that's subjective, everything is.
You're in the wrong line of work, man... ;-)
--
Nicola Larosa - http://www.tekNico.net/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
First of all, thank you very much to Malcolm for fixing this - clearly
a massive step forwards towards 1.0!
I've subsequently had a discussion on the #3414 ticket tracker, which
I'm now moving to django-developers before it becomes too lengthy, as
per the "How to contribute".
The question is
Hi,
is there any reason at all for a formset used in edit inline to be
subclass of BaseModelFormSet aside from ease of use?
We currently have a few instances where we do not want the individual
forms to correspond 1to1 to model instances and this checks does not
make any sense in that case.
Hi folks --
Well, with #285 fixed (thanks, Malcolm!) we're looking pretty good to
release 1.0 alpha later today. Time-wise I think the plan is to do the
release late this afternoon (CST), but that's really up to James.
There's still a few tickets open in the 1.0 alpha milestone
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:18 AM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If there's anything that absolutely *MUST* be in 1.0 alpha, speak up
> now. Please keep in mind that the alpha release is intended only for
> the "must-have" features, which are now all in. This means that the
>
Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
> [If you happen to be at OSCON I'll be working on 1.0 alpha on the
> lower floor over by the Starbucks if you wanna come over and help
> out.]
I'm not at OSCON, but I can take care of #7864 (docs renaming), as I've
got a patch already in the works.
Gary
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Karen Tracey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it would be good if #7414 was fixed for alpha.
Good call. I'm on 10.5 here so I can test it and get it done.
Jacob
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Gary Wilson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not at OSCON, but I can take care of #7864 (docs renaming), as I've
> got a patch already in the works.
Cool - go ahead and check that in; I'll give it a quick skim-over but
doc fixes are easily done a bit after if
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 11:37 AM, Tom Tobin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gah, I really haven't had time to do the
> move-code-out-of-__init__-modules dance. I'm fairly certain that
> it'll be completely backwards compatible (via re-importing back into
> __init__), though, so I'm not too worried;
On Jul 21, 12:04 pm, "Karen Tracey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are you saying these JUST started failing for MySQL? This True/1 False/0
> issue has been known for a while (http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/7190
> ).
Wow...I'm on a roll today, lol. Somehow I didn't manage to find that
one
I just tried installing current svn (via setup.py) on a machine where I had
previously installed 0.96.2. Install works but I notice that there are
files (contrib/admin/urls.py, contrib/admin/utils.py are two I knew to check
for) that used to exist in the old version but have been deleted in
On Jul 21, 2008, at 12:17 PM, Karen Tracey wrote:
> I just tried installing current svn (via setup.py) on a machine
> where I had previously installed 0.96.2. Install works but I notice
> that there are files (contrib/admin/urls.py, contrib/admin/utils.py
> are two I knew to check for)
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Karen Tracey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just tried installing current svn (via setup.py) on a machine where I had
> previously installed 0.96.2. Install works but I notice that there are
> files (contrib/admin/urls.py, contrib/admin/utils.py are two I knew to
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 08:13 -0700, madhav wrote:
> Hello guys, I am just confused with a fundamental db problem. I have
> table which has got 48 lakh rows(each row has got 8 fields, all
> INDEXED) and I just need to fetch 500 rows from it. Would that take
> more time than extracting the same
I've opened #7867 for regressiontests.model_inheritance_regress
failures against MySQL. I've marked it 1.0 beta for now, but
depending on requirements of the test suite passing before tagging a
release. it may need to reassigned. It looks like a mix-up of True/1
and False/0, but I havent really
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:18 AM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If there's anything that absolutely *MUST* be in 1.0 alpha, speak up
> now. Please keep in mind that the alpha release is intended only for
> the "must-have" features, which are now all in. This means that the
> only
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Ramiro Morales <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 3:17 PM, Karen Tracey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I just tried installing current svn (via setup.py) on a machine where I
> had
> > previously installed 0.96.2. Install works but I notice
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 7:54 AM, Richard Davies
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The question is how Django should handle cases when PATH_INFO is not
> set in the environment with which WSGI is called. The options are:
>From the WSGI spec:
"""
environ Variables
[...] The following variables
Hi all-
I am having a very hard time tracking down some detailed documentation
on the sites subframework. I have read the django book and gone
through the tutorial. I've also read the Sites documentation page. I
find the documentations page provides the most details to the uses of
the
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Chris Hasenpflug <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've opened #7867 for regressiontests.model_inheritance_regress
> failures against MySQL. I've marked it 1.0 beta for now, but
> depending on requirements of the test suite passing before tagging a
> release. it
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 20:27 -0700, Trent wrote:
> Hi all-
>
> I am having a very hard time tracking down some detailed documentation
> on the sites subframework. I have read the django book and gone
> through the tutorial. I've also read the Sites documentation page. I
> find the
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Marty Alchin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I certainly hope 1.0 alpha isn't about hitting the
> backwards-compatible limit yet, because if it is, #5361 has failed to
> make the cut in time. The way I understand it, we still have some time
> to introduce mild
30 matches
Mail list logo
