On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:20 PM, Andrew Gwozdziewycz wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Richard
> Davies wrote:
>>
> I'm a fan of having more if tags, but am not a fan of having if tags that
> require me to remember all of the suffixes. Perhaps a smarter if tag in
> general would be bet
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 2:56 AM, mitch wrote:
>
> As a heavy SimpleDB user, I would love to see a way to use Django and
> SimpleDB together and I would certainly be willing to devote time to
> helping make that happen. I think I can contribute on the SimpleDB
> side (boto has supported SimpleDB f
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 3:11 AM, Mark Ferrer wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> This is my first time here, and I've been holding on to some code for a
> custom model field type for a little while now. I call it a DictionaryField
> and it takes a Python dictionary object and stores it in a database as a
> te
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:49 AM, Waldemar Kornewald wrote:
>
> On Aug 11, 10:01 am, Malcolm Tredinnick
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 00:03 -0700, Waldemar Kornewald wrote:
>> > And these are just the first few issues we've run into when analyzing
>> > the source.
>>
>> Most of those are the k
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Jerome Leclanche wrote:
> Might be slightly off-topic, but, if that's the main criterion, are we ever
> going to include django-tagging in contrib?
"Ever" is a very long time. I wouldn't be surprised if _eventually_
django-tagging is added to django.contrib. It is
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:24 AM, David wrote:
>
> After being unable to get any advice or further information via
> google, #django or the users' mailing list, I opened
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/11652 regarding the admin
> interface not preventing simultaneous editing of the same reco
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:55 AM, David wrote:
>
>
>
> On Aug 11, 10:29 pm, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>
>> There are any number of ways to solve this problem by adding a field
>> to the model (autofield with an 'edit number', timestamp tracking last
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 11:59 PM, Rob Hudson wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Russell
> Keith-Magee wrote:
>> Firstly, there is the simple issue of ownership and copyright.
>> Obviously, those that have written DDT components that are to be
>> included need t
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:45 AM, SmileyChris wrote:
>
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/11461
>
> DebugNodeList catches all exceptions, sticks them in a
> TemplateSyntaxError, and stuffs the original exception in the new
> exception. I'm not sure why this is done, but it breaks debugging and
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:51 PM, ashish tiwari wrote:
>
>
> when i try to run the "django-admin.py" file in my pardus linux system
> than i got the error"c:\python25\python.exebad interpreter"
> something like this...
> i enter the command "whereis django-admin.py"
> and i got the path w
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Rob Hudson wrote:
>
> I'm not sure if this is the place but here are some other issues or
> questions I have if this were to happen...
This is as good a place as any.
> * The jQuery question is a big one. I've taken strides to make the
> debug toolbar interopera
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Michael Glassford wrote:
>
> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/7539 suggests a way to add On
> Delete and On Update support to Django foreign key fields, and includes
> a patch that implements the suggestions. At the time I submitted it,
> getting Django 1.1 ou
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Michael Glassford wrote:
>
> Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Michael Glassford
>> wrote:
>>> http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/7539 suggests a way to add On
>>> Delete and On Update suppo
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 9:16 AM, Michael Glassford wrote:
>
> Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>>>> Secondly: I'm sensitive to the extent that 'on delete cascade' et al
>>>> are phrased in SQL specific terms. I fully acknowledge the use case -
>>>
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 8:09 AM, hcarvalhoalves wrote:
>
> On Aug 13, 9:30 am, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Michael Glassford
>> wrote:
>>
>> Secondly: I'm sensitive to the extent that 'on delete cascade' et
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Haroldo
Stenger wrote:
> I've seen the admin evolve to very sophisticated user interaction.
> Nonetheless, the param to HttpResponse() when a model object has been
> saved, is hardcoded and most of the times "../../.." or "../.." (see
> options.py in contrib.adm
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Michael Glassford wrote:
>
> Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 8:09 AM, hcarvalhoalves
>> wrote:
>>> On Aug 13, 9:30 am, Russell Keith-Magee
>>> wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 12:04 AM, M
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 10:46 PM, Michael Glassford wrote:
>
> Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Michael Glassford
>> wrote:
>>> Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 8:09 AM, hcarvalhoalves
>>>
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 1:45 AM, hcarvalhoalves wrote:
>
> On Aug 14, 11:48 pm, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 8:09 AM, hcarvalhoalves
>> wrote:
>>
>> > On Aug 13, 9:30 am, Russell Keith-Magee
>> > wrote:
>> >
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 12:31 PM,
hcarvalhoalves wrote:
>
> On Aug 15, 8:53 pm, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 1:45 AM, hcarvalhoalves
>> wrote:
>>
>> > On Aug 14, 11:48 pm, Russell Keith-Magee
>> > wrote:
>>
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 11:12 PM, Ian Kelly wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 8:19 AM, kmpm wrote:
>>
>> I'm working on issue http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/6148 and
>> have some questions.
>>
>> If a db_schema is defined, should it be created automatically or
>> should the user be required
2009/8/18 Filip Gruszczyński :
>
> What I was thinking, is to provide all Test classes (both cases and
> suites) as class attributes in a modified TestSuite. When such a
> TestSuite is run using django framework, it would feed with proper
> instances, basing on those classes. This way end user wou
2009/8/18 Filip Gruszczyński :
>
>> I don't think I understand your proposal. An example would be
>> extremely helpful here. Under your proposal, what would my new
>> tests.py look like? How would I invoke a single test? A single test
>> case? A single suite?
>
> That's not exactly my proposal. Pr
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 1:43 AM, drakkan wrote:
>
> Hey guys,
>
> not a flame only a consideration: the best python orm/sql toolkit
> (sqlalchemy) already support this and many many other features/
> database engines, why not move the efforts in sa integration? Using sa
> in django is simple but a
2009/8/19 Filip Gruszczyński :
>
> Still, I've got a question: if someone creates a suit through a
> function, how should it be invoked? Only explicitly
> app.module.suite_function or if run ./manage.py test should this suite
> be also invoked (and then some tests will be run twice)?
I see no rea
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Brian Rosner wrote:
>
>
> On Aug 19, 2009, at 3:32 PM, Manuel Saelices wrote:
>
>> This ticket was marked by duplicate of #8500, but I think #8572
>> approach is better (better explicit than implicit). Ticket number is
>> not important, but I think that functionali
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 5:45 AM, mrts wrote:
>
> At HTML level, a form is a set of fields that gets submitted when
> a the form submit button is pressed.
>
> However, this is not the case with model forms and inline formsets
> (e.g. an admin page with inlines) -- inline formsets are
> disparate fr
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 12:34 PM, Andi
Albrecht wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm interested in working on #10355 "Add support for email backends."
>
> IMHO it's an good idea to make the email backend configurable. There
> are at least two use cases I can think of. The first is to send email
> with other ser
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Zachary
Voase wrote:
>
> Hi Andi,
>
> On 21 Aug 2009, at 05:34, Andi Albrecht wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm interested in working on #10355 "Add support for email backends."
>>
>> IMHO it's an good idea to make the email backend configurable. There
>> are at least two
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 8:24 PM, Andi
Albrecht wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 7:23 AM, Russell
> Keith-Magee wrote:
>> A 'test email backend' (as well as a dummy no-mail-at-all backend, and
>> a log-to-console/log-to-file backend) is a different way to target
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 1:34 PM, Andi
Albrecht wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Russell
> Keith-Magee wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Zachary
>> Voase wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Andi,
>>>
>>> On 21 Aug 2009, at 05:34
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Tim
Chase wrote:
>
> James Bennett wrote:
>> The current proposal is for a "USPostalCodeField" which
>> corresponds to the US Postal Service's list of postal codes:
>>
>> http://www.usps.com/ncsc/lookups/abbr_state.txt
>>
>> [snip] Based on the various arguments up
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 9:14 PM, Manoj Govindan wrote:
>
> I recently came across a django ticket dealing with a pet issue of
> mine. I thought of expediting the chances of a fix by writing up a
> patch myself.
>
> Ticket: http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/5416
>
> I would like to know what ex
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Andrea Zilio wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Here's what I'm talking about:
> You have 3 models: Place, Restaurant and Cinema where Restaurant and
> Cinema both inherits from Place.
> So in the database you have some simple places, some places which
> really are Cinemas and
On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 11:00 PM, Andrea Zilio wrote:
>
> Great, but that wasn't exactly what I was looking for.
>
> What I need is a way to get the right instances from a *single* query.
>
> This means that I should do LEFT JOINS on direct subclasses of the
> base class.
>
> What I need to know i
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 1:40 PM, tom wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The form_class property for generic views such a
> django.views.generic.create_update.* should accept either a ModelForm?
> class or a ModelForm? object. This would allow generic "wrapper views"
> to easily inject run-time data into the form
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Andrea Zilio wrote:
>
> So the answer to the question "Can I get the right instances with one
> single and only DB query" seems to be:
> "No, you cannot do so without touching the Django orm code".
>
> Am I right?
If, by "one single and only DB query", you mean a
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 5:09 AM, Jukka wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've been working with Django for a bit now, and decided to try
> contributing, by submitting a patch to fix a problem I ran into at
> work. This seems like something that requires a design decision.
>
> So, what do you think?
On the w
On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 8:47 PM, Andi
Albrecht wrote:
>
> I've attached a patch to the issue on the tracker. The patch splits up
> the mail module into a package and provides the backend functionality.
> Documented functions and classes are of course available in the
> top-level module. Undocument
On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 11:08 AM,
ch...@moffitts.net wrote:
>
>
>
> On Aug 22, 8:12 am, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Tim
>>
>> Chase wrote:
>>
>> > James Bennett wrote:
>> >> The current proposal is
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 4:41 PM, Joshua Russo wrote:
> I figured someone had done this at some time.
> What's the general consensus on when some thing like this should
> be considered to be added to the project and when it should just stay as an
> outside utility?
It's certainly worth putting up
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 5:54 AM, Waldemar Kornewald wrote:
>
> The active contributors currently are:
> * Andi Albrecht (working on email backend support)
> * Thomas Wanschik (my colleague)
> * Waldemar Kornewald (that's me ;)
>
> Since we're all busy guys who can't work full-time on this project
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 6:01 AM, Waldemar Kornewald wrote:
>
> On Aug 27, 11:54 pm, Waldemar Kornewald wrote:
>> We also have a few other potential contributors on our list, but right
>> now they're too busy or not ready for contributing, yet:
>> * Thomas Bohmbach (from Giftag)
>> * Curtis Thomps
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 3:10 AM, Luke Plant wrote:
>
> Can I have some feedback on this please?
...
> As far as I'm concerned, this is ready for checkin, except that I
> haven't had *any* recent feedback or thumbs up etc. from the list or
> other core devs.
Apologies, Luke. I had this one flagged
On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 11:25 PM, Luke Plant wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Some big changes to the CSRF protection nearly got in to Django 1.1,
> but didn't. Since then, more work has been done, overhauling the
> whole thing really. There has been a huge amount of discussion on
> mailing lists and ticke
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 2:54 AM, sjtirtha wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> From this point of view, I would propose, to make a new Model that
> supports non SQL DB.
> So developer can decide whether they want to store the object in SQL
> or in non SQL DB.
There are two problems here:
1. You want Django to be
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 2:48 AM, sjtirtha wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm starting using CouchDB with Python.
> Django db models always work with Queries. I can understand this,
> because SQL is a query language.
> However, the non sql DBs do not always have the concept of queries.
> For example, in CouchD
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Waldemar Kornewald wrote:
>
> On Aug 28, 1:49 am, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> To the extent that I'm in a position to provide design guidance and
>> feedback from the perspective of the Django Core, put me on this list
>> too.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 8:45 PM, Luke Plant wrote:
>
> Thanks for your response Russell:
>
>> I've had a quick look at the patch, and found a few minor cosmetic
>> things. I've also done a lot of reading of the archives to
>> understand why the patch is the way it is. A comprehensive teardown
>> o
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 6:46 PM, Mat Clayton wrote:
> I'm sure you have this covered but thought I would throw it into the mix. We
> are currently having lots of problems with blacklisting and spam filters
> blocking our email servers, one way we are investigating to avoid this is to
> outsource th
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Waldemar Kornewald wrote:
>
> Hi,
> why does the backend's query_class() function get the default query
> class as its parameter? Can't the backend just import BaseQuery? I'm
> asking because with different BaseQuery implementations (for SQL and
> non-SQL) there is
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 4:21 PM, Waldemar Kornewald wrote:
>
> Also, when will your branch be merged into trunk? Is there any
> roadmap?
When It's Done (tm) :-)
I would like to think this is on target for v1.2, but that does depend
somewhat on solving one or two outstanding design issues. So,
op
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Anssi Kaariainen wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> The problem I am trying to solve is this: I have defined some views
> and corresponding models with managed = False. Now when I issue
> manage.py reset I get an error because the views block dropping the
> tables. I need to
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Craig Kimerer wrote:
> I've spent a little time using this branch and looking at the possibility of
> using it with my project. Below is a short list of problems and ponies that
> I have encountered (or want).
>
> 1. It'd be awesome if we could mark certain databas
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 8:56 AM, Craig Kimerer wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 7:14 AM, Craig Kimerer
>> wrote:
>> > I've spent a little time using this branch and looking at t
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 6:30 AM, Ben Davis wrote:
> Hi I've submitted a patch for this bug that I'd like to have considered for
> some trunk action... I can't take the credit for all the work on this, but
> it seems I'm taking the initiative to get it resolved.
... which is exactly what is neede
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 7:19 PM, patrickk wrote:
>
> thanks for the reply.
>
> On 4 Sep., 13:02, Luke Plant wrote:
>> On Friday 04 September 2009 10:00:37 patrickk wrote:
>>
>> > e.g, when I´m using djangos auth-app and I´m extending the user-model
>> > with a user-profile, I´m having "auth" (with
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 12:07 PM, bendavis78 wrote:
>
> This issue has been up with a patch for quite awhile, and wanted to
> get some feedback from some devs on this. The fix is pretty simple,
> and seems to work ok for me.
>
> Here's my thoughts on it: When I specify ordering with multiple
>
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 6:21 PM, Evgeny Sizikov wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'd like the developers community to review the #8010 and the last
> patch attached to the ticket. It still seems to me that it makes a
> great sense and worth to make it go into the mainline Django.
I echo Malcolm's comment when h
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 8:37 PM, patrickk wrote:
>
> fair enough.
>
> I don´t have a problem with just seperating INSTALLED_APPS from
> ADMIN_APPS within the settings-file. I just thought another admin-file
> is nicer (but that´s not the key argument of my proposal).
>
> INSTALLED_APPS = (
> 'dj
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 3:32 AM, James Bennett wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 2:21 PM, andybak wrote:
>> 1. I think worrying about projects vs. apps is a red-herring. We are
>> talking about a way to configure an admin app. There might be several
>> of these on a 'site/project/whatever'
>
> Sinc
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 12:35 PM, vegas wrote:
>
> Okay, so I've looked at the previous discussion on this topic, and the
> code. Firstly let me say a big thank you to everyone who has worked on
> Django, it's a fabulously useful piece of software, and a lot of fun
> to work with.
Hi Alex,
Thanks
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Waldemar Kornewald
wrote:
>
> On Sep 3, 4:06 pm, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>> Adding non-SQL backends into the mix complicates things a little
>> further, since a query could be directed at a non-SQL backend. Working
>> out exactly ho
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 1:36 AM, Alex Gaynor wrote:
>
> Hey!
>
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 6:40 AM, Jacob Kaplan-Moss wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks --
>>
>> I'd like to start thinking about merging the SoC branches. As far as I
>> can tell we've got solid, worth-merging work out of all six of 'em --
>> WO
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 4:30 AM, Bret Taylor wrote:
>
> I am one of the authors of Tornado (http://www.tornadoweb.org/), the
> web server/framework we built at FriendFeed that we open sourced last
> week (see http://bret.appspot.com/entry/tornado-web-server).
>
> I just checked in change to Torna
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Luke Plant wrote:
>
> On Monday 31 August 2009 15:26:42 Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>
>> 3. CSRF is currently a contrib app. Why? CSRF control is the very
>> model of a feature that shouldn't be decoupled from the base
>> framewo
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 3:19 AM, Marcob wrote:
>
> On Sep 15, 8:05 pm, Alex Gaynor wrote:
>
>> This has already been filed as a bug in Django's ticket
>> tracker:http://code.djangoproject.com/ticket/10790. In the future please try
>> searching the tracker before filing a bug.
>
> Thanks Alex,
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:35 PM, Simon Willison wrote:
>
> On Sep 13, 12:52 pm, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> Although the branch isn't ready for merge yet, the code that is
>> present is all up to spec. I think the sprints have produced workable
>> soluti
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Simon Willison wrote:
>
> On Sep 15, 2:57 pm, Luke Plant wrote:
>> OK, I'll wait and see.
>
> Here's the code: http://github.com/simonw/django-safeform
>
>> * it requires using Django's form system. I've got plenty of views that
>> don't (e.g. anything with a d
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Ivan Sagalaev
wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> Simon Willison wrote:
>> 1. We'll be able to de-emphasise the current default "e-mail all
>> errors to someone" behaviour, which doesn't scale at all well.
>
> In a recent thread[1] on a similar topic Russel has also emphasiz
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Simon Willison wrote:
>
> I think we should add logging to Django in version 1.2, implemented as
> a light-weight wrapper around the Python logging module
> (django.core.log maybe?) plus code to write errors to the Apache error
> log under the mod_python handler a
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 2:49 AM, Ben Davis wrote:
> I noticed this ticket is currently assigned to Malcolm; in the comments he
> says it's on his list of patches to work on. It looks like the last thing
> he did was set the milestone to 1.2 back in March, but haven't seen any
> comments on the
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 5:08 PM, Suno Ano wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I was wondering, are there any plans to support couchdb [0] as
> backend/database at some point?
I don't want to seem rude, but a search of very recent activity in
django-developers will answer your question
http://groups.go
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Luke Plant wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> OK, here is my response. I hope this doesn't turn into a personal my-code-vs-
> your-code match (especially as most of "my code" is really other people's code
> and ideas :-) but I want to make sure we do this right, as it pote
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 2:49 PM, zweb wrote:
>
> When I try to download a file through django in IE , I get
>
> [Sun Sep 20 05:34:20 2009] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] response =
> func(request, response), referer: http://www.com
> [Sun Sep 20 05:34:20 2009] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] Fil
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:29 PM, PiotrLegnica wrote:
>
> Hi. There is a feature described in a ticket #9194[1], which has been
> marked as 'Design decision needed'.
>
> Is it still being discussed, or has it been forgotten completely? I'm
> working on a patch for myself, but I'm not sure whether
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 12:35 PM, vegas wrote:
>
> Okay, so I've looked at the previous discussion on this topic, and the
> code. Firstly let me say a big thank you to everyone who has worked on
> Django, it's a fabulously useful piece of software, and a lot of fun
> to work with.
>
> By my lights
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Waldemar Kornewald
wrote:
>
> On Sep 17, 1:48 pm, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> My hesitation here is that there one of the outstanding changes is a
>> fairly big refactor of the way the SQL backend handles queries, and I
>> want to
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 7:00 AM, Tobias wrote:
>
> In the spirit of Russell's No! Bad Pony! talk at DjangoCon I'd like to
> start a conversation about cleaning up session messages enough to get
> them into core or contrib. Alex suggested that the ticket (http://
> code.djangoproject.com/ticket/4
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 10:44 PM, vegas wrote:
>
> Cool, will do. I guess the earliest release this could get into
> would be django 1.2?
>
> Looking at http://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/internals/contributing/
> , it seems to me like this would definitely be considered a non-
> trivial patc
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 6:13 AM, Chris Beaven wrote:
>
>> One of the questions that needs to be answered
>> is "why should [a session based notification system] be shipped with Django?"
>
>> Another piece of the puzzle that is missing from my perspective is any
>> discussion of how session-based
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Daniel Watkins
wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> As part of the third year of my computer science degree (at the
> University of Warwick), I need to complete an individual project. I'd
> quite like to use this to do something for Django. The project is meant
> to be do
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Waldemar Kornewald
wrote:
>
> On Sep 20, 1:54 pm, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> Based on the discussion Alex and I had at the sprints, query_class()
>> will still exist, but it will play a slightly different role -
>> essentially, it
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 2:57 AM, Luke Plant wrote:
>
> On Saturday 19 September 2009 16:56:52 Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 6:09 AM, Luke Plant wrote:
>> > If the target of a is internal:
>> > * add {% load csrf %} to the template
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Luke Plant wrote:
>
> OK, you convinced me. I really would rather this wasn't baked in, but given
> the migration issues and the fact that it is security related, I guess I can
> stomach it.
>
> I've updated the patch [1] to move things to builtin functionality.
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 1:55 AM, Tobias McNulty wrote:
> Vaclav,
> I think this is less of an issue, because you'd have to switch to another
> tab and perform a second operation that generated feedback in the ~200
> millisecond window of time between clicking a link and the new page loading.
Ah.
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 10:40 AM, Jay wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> I have a question on customize the db field. For this field, I want to
> save integers in db, but want them to be my custom class when they are
> used in Python code. In Django docs, it's said that I should set the
> __metaclass__ to
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 1:18 AM, Simon Willison wrote:
>
> As mentioned in the thread about cookie-based notifications, at the
> DjangoCon Sprints I raised the subject of adding signing (and signed
> cookies) to Django core.
>
> I've found myself using signing more and more over time, and I think
2009/9/26 Аркадий Левин :
>
> Pong.
OK - that is rude and complety uncalled for. Johannes has gone to a
lot of effort to make a complex proposal; if you aren't going to
contribute back in kind, I would kindly ask you to keep your comments
to yourself.
Johannes - I apologize for not giving you fe
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Rob Hudson wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Simon Willison
> wrote:
>> Yes - I looked briefly at how much work was involved in doing this and
>> it's not insubstantial, which is why I opted for string replacement
>> just to demonstrate the API. I'm co
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 9:41 PM, Johannes Dollinger
wrote:
>
> The proposal and motivation are essentially the same as in the last
> thread [1] and the ticket description [2]. I put it on the 1.2 feature
> list.
> I tried to split my patch into smaller, more readable commits here:
> http://gith
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 12:44 AM, Johannes Dollinger
wrote:
>
>>> Variable and FilterExpression will be deprecated as they require the
>>> caller to know the length of the expression in advance.
>>
>> I'm not sure I follow this assertion. I have no problem believing
>> FilterExpression can be mad
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Alex Gaynor wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:24 PM, SeanOC wrote:
>>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> During the Djangocon sprints I started to work on a patch which would
>> add a nicer interface for dealing with raw SQL queries. While there I
>> talked to RKM about whe
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Peter Cicman wrote:
>
> Wouldn't it be handy to add get_form_instance function to ModelAdmin?
> Currently there is function get_form, which actually returns
> FormClass. This is then getting instantiated on several places.
> Sometimes its important to have possibi
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 4:27 PM, David Reynolds
wrote:
>
> Russ,
>
> On 29 Sep 2009, at 03:25, Russell Keith-Magee wrote:
>
>> (1) know about the trick of instantiating an object with the
>> unrolled list version of a cursor, and
>
>
> Any chance you cou
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
>
> On Sep 17, 3:04 pm, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>> In the absence of specifics, this makes me a little bit nervous. The
>> Python logging interface may be very Java-heavy and complex, but it is
>> a thorou
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 9:00 PM, Waylan Limberg wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 4:36 AM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sep 17, 9:25 am, Simon Willison wrote:
>>> Problems and challenges
>>> ===
>>>
>>> 1. The Python logging module isn't very nicely designed - its Java
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 3:47 AM, Simon Willison wrote:
>
> On Sep 29, 7:34 pm, Rob Madole wrote:
>> TEST_RUNNER = 'django.contrib.test.nose.run_tests'
>>
>> There might be some futzy bits to make that actually work, but I think
>> it'd doable.
>
> I'd love to see this working. Obviously this wou
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:59 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote:
>
> On Sep 29, 1:53 pm, Russell Keith-Magee
> wrote:
>>
>> However, since you're interested in feedback, my suggestion would be
>> to look at every defense you've made of logging in this thread (and
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 7:35 PM, mrts wrote:
>
> Wishful thinking follows.
>
> It would be awesome if one could mix ordinary QuerySet methods
> with raw() (or, rather, raw_extra(), see below for that).
While I can see what you're aiming at here, I'm not really a fan of the idea.
Django's ORM is
1 - 100 of 2850 matches
Mail list logo
