the feedback.
Sri
From: dmm on behalf of "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)"
Date: Wednesday, January 20, 2021 at 10:43 AM
To: dmm
Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a
WG document
Thank you all. This adoption call is now closed. We will review th
Dear All,
As suggested by WG chairs, we would like to spin one more version to
address the comments during the adoption call and in that process will
reach out to Joel and Hannu (separately) for specific inputs where
terminology alignment has to happen w.r.t TEAS slicing definition draft.
Will
t;
> Jie
>
>
>
> *From:* dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Sri Gundavelli
> (sgundave)
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 21, 2021 2:43 AM
> *To:* dmm
> *Subject:* Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of
> draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a WG document
>
>
>
use case.
Best regards,
Jie
From: dmm [mailto:dmm-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2021 2:43 AM
To: dmm
Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a
WG document
Thank you all. This adoption call is now closed
Thank you Luis.
Regards
Sri
From: "Luis M. Contreras"
Date: Wednesday, January 20, 2021 at 11:08 AM
To: Sri Gundavelli
Cc: dmm
Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a
WG document
Hi Sri, all,
apologies for being late, just to express
group and that’s based on AD/Chair inputs and on the review
> expertise that is needed for this work completion.
>
>
>
> -Chairs
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *dmm on behalf of "Sri Gundavelli
> (sgundave)"
> *Date: *Wednesday, December 30, 20
Thank you all. This adoption call is now closed. We will review the feedback.
* Chairs
From: dmm on behalf of "Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)"
Date: Thursday, January 14, 2021 at 10:56 AM
To: dmm
Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a
W
Hi, all,
I support adoption of the draft.
Z.W. Yan
From: Sri Gundavelli \(sgundave\)
Date: 2020-12-31 02:45
To: dmm
Subject: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a WG
document
Folks:
The authors of the document, Transport Network aware Mobility for 5G, have
ject: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a WG
document
Folks:
The authors of the document, Transport Network aware Mobility for 5G, have
presented the proposal and the need for standardization in multiple IETF WG
meetings. There have been good amount of d
In line,
Joel
On 1/6/2021 5:29 PM, Kaippallimalil John wrote:
Joel,
This draft is not attempting to lay out a new architecture. The figure and
architecture section are there to provide context for the reader.
The draft is also not asserting that these are the only ways to solve the issue.
The
-
From: dmm On Behalf Of Joel M. Halpern
Sent: Tuesday, January 05, 2021 6:10 PM
To: dmm
Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a
WG document - Objections
Looking agin at the document, I have multiple problems with adoption of this
document.
First, as just
This is an excellent review.
More below.
On Tue, Jan 5, 2021 at 6:11 PM Joel M. Halpern wrote:
> Looking agin at the document, I have multiple problems with adoption of
> this document.
>
> First, as just discussed, it seems to be laying out an archtiecture, but
> that architecture is not
Looking agin at the document, I have multiple problems with adoption of
this document.
First, as just discussed, it seems to be laying out an archtiecture, but
that architecture is not consistent with the other work going on in the
IETF (specifically in the routing area, and known to many of
and improve it further.
Regards,
Kausik
From: dmm On Behalf Of Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
Sent: Wednesday, December 30, 2020 10:45 AM
To: dmm
Subject: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a WG
document
Folks: The authors of the document, Transport Network aware Mobility
N9, for a slice defined between 3GPP provider
> and subscriber) should be mapped to various transport network segments (SR,
> MPLS, IP, L2 etc).
> >
> > Regards,
> > John
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: dmm On Behalf Of Joel
; Best regards
> Hannu
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dmm On Behalf Of Joel M. Halpern
> Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2021 3:46 AM
> To: Kiran Makhijani ; Joel M. Halpern <
> j...@joelhalpern.com>; dmm@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-
nda Dunbar
---
From: *Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)* mailto:40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org>>
Date: Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 10:45 AM
Subject: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08
as a WG document
To: dmm mailto:dmm@ietf.org>>
Folks:
The authors of the document, Transport
-Original Message-
From: dmm On Behalf Of Joel M. Halpern
Sent: Monday, January 04, 2021 6:23 PM
To: dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a
WG document
Hmmm.
It seems to me that this document ought to align with the ongoing work
As co-author
Support WG adoption.
-Praveen
---
From: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
mailto:40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org>>
Date: Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 10:45 AM
Subject: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a WG
document
To: dmm mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
lf Of Joel M. Halpern
> > Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 4:23 PM
> > To: dmm@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of
> draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as
> > a WG document
> >
> > Hmmm.
> >
> > It seems to me that this document
.
> For example, section 2 should be split into 'xhaul background' and 'TN
> mobility
> procedure' - things related to mapping and management of TN context and its
> mobility.
> >
> > -Kiran
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: dmm On Behalf Of Joel M. H
regards
Hannu
-Original Message-
From: dmm On Behalf Of Joel M. Halpern
Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2021 3:46 AM
To: Kiran Makhijani ; Joel M. Halpern
; dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a
WG document
Kiran, the TEAS work is focused
2021 4:23 PM
To: dmm@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as
a WG document
Hmmm.
It seems to me that this document ought to align with the ongoing work in the
TEAS working group that is attempting to define terminology and framework
(and then any necessary
. Halpern
> Sent: Monday, January 4, 2021 4:23 PM
> To: dmm@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as
> a WG document
>
> Hmmm.
>
> It seems to me that this document ought to align with the ongoing work in the
> TEAS working gro
(sgundave)* <mailto:40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org>>
Date: Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 10:45 AM
Subject: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08
as a WG document
To: dmm mailto:dmm@ietf.org>>
Folks:
The authors of the document, Transport Network aware Mobility for 5G,
ha
Support WG adoption.
Linda Dunbar
---
From: Sri Gundavelli (sgundave)
mailto:40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org>>
Date: Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 10:45 AM
Subject: [DMM] Call for adoption of draft-clt-dmm-tn-aware-mobility-08 as a WG
document
To: dmm mailto:dmm@ietf.org>
Folks:
The authors of the document, Transport Network aware Mobility for 5G, have
presented the proposal and the need for standardization in multiple IETF WG
meetings. There have been good amount of discussions in the mailers and there
is some level of interest for the work from the community.
27 matches
Mail list logo
