I just reverted the guilty change, so 2.77 should be OK now.
Cheers,
Simon.
On 08/04/17 00:55, Pedro MG Palmeiro wrote:
> The latest firmware for the printer is from 2015. This is one of those
> shared Epson/Fuji/Xerox models which I believe is entering EOL, since
> there is already another
On 08/04/17 12:01, Floris Bos wrote:
> On 04/08/2017 12:00 AM, Simon Kelley wrote:
>>
>> But RFC 6842 assures us that no clients are broken by this change :)
>>
>> The options here, as I see it are
>>
>> 1) revert the change and don't support 6842
>> 2) provide a way to disable the client-id reply
On 04/08/2017 12:00 AM, Simon Kelley wrote:
But RFC 6842 assures us that no clients are broken by this change :)
The options here, as I see it are
1) revert the change and don't support 6842
2) provide a way to disable the client-id reply for broken clients.
3) provide a flag to disable the
On 04/08/2017 10:29 AM, Kevin Darbyshire-Bryant wrote:
On 07/04/17 23:00, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 06/04/17 14:01, Pedro MG Palmeiro wrote:
Dnsmasq trunk replies are being ignored by some devices, in my case,
two
epson printers (AL-M200).
Dnsmasq 2.76 works fine.
This could be related with
On 07/04/17 23:00, Simon Kelley wrote:
On 06/04/17 14:01, Pedro MG Palmeiro wrote:
Dnsmasq trunk replies are being ignored by some devices, in my case, two
epson printers (AL-M200).
Dnsmasq 2.76 works fine.
This could be related with
http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit;
The latest firmware for the printer is from 2015. This is one of those
shared Epson/Fuji/Xerox models which I believe is entering EOL, since there
is already another printer
called M200 (Ecotank). Anyway, I'll report it.
Should the the implementation be correct in dnsmasq, then there will be
more
On 06/04/17 14:01, Pedro MG Palmeiro wrote:
> Dnsmasq trunk replies are being ignored by some devices, in my case, two
> epson printers (AL-M200).
> Dnsmasq 2.76 works fine.
>
> This could be related with
> http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit;
>
Dnsmasq trunk replies are being ignored by some devices, in my case, two
epson printers (AL-M200).
Dnsmasq 2.76 works fine.
This could be related with
http://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit;
=88a77a78ad27adc3ed87b7ee603643d26cb896ee
Please refer to
