Re: [DNSOP] Further observationon AS112 ipv4 cull

2011-07-28 Thread bmanning
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 02:11:41PM -0400, Warren Kumari wrote: On Jul 27, 2011, at 10:08 PM, William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote: On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, George Michaelson wrote: I would support this latter approach William: I think we should seek WG adoption of three drafts 1) the

Re: [DNSOP] Further observationon AS112 ipv4 cull

2011-07-27 Thread William F. Maton Sotomayor
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, George Michaelson wrote: I would support this latter approach William: I think we should seek WG adoption of three drafts 1) the michaelson as112-ipv6 draft, aiming for at least one 01 spin to a small set of non-controversial V6 delegations, moving to WGLC and IANA asap.

[DNSOP] Further observationon AS112 ipv4 cull

2011-07-26 Thread William F. Maton Sotomayor
All, As a data point, the original draft of -00 really started life as a straight copy of George's and Geoff's draft. I was looking for a way to establish a procedure for sending instructions to IANA for new delegations to AS112 nodes, so they paved the way. That said, I also don't have a

Re: [DNSOP] Further observationon AS112 ipv4 cull

2011-07-26 Thread George Michaelson
On 26/07/2011, at 1:48 PM, William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote: All, As a data point, the original draft of -00 really started life as a straight copy of George's and Geoff's draft. I was looking for a way to establish a procedure for sending instructions to IANA for new delegations