Antoin Verschuren writes:
> Op 24-04-13 15:18, Wes Hardaker schreef:
>
>> + operate on a single record at a time (publish this DS, don't
>> touch the rest)
>
> I don't understand the rationale behind this one.
> Can someone please explain to me?
>
> I would think a child knows what "the rest" is
Hi Wes,
On 2013-04-24, at 09:18, Wes Hardaker wrote:
> I
> think part of the problem has been we don't have a good list of
> requirements to compare any given solution to and we're talking around
> them all because they're not written down (at least in one place).
I like your list. I think it's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Op 24-04-13 15:18, Wes Hardaker schreef:
> + operate on a single record at a time (publish this DS, don't
> touch the rest)
I don't understand the rationale behind this one.
Can someone please explain to me?
I would think a child knows what "the res
Ed pointed me to a message he wrote [1] and some of the text there
triggered my "oh yeah; we need to start with the requirements" bell. I
think part of the problem has been we don't have a good list of
requirements to compare any given solution to and we're talking around
them all because they're
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Op 23-04-13 17:18, Edward Lewis schreef:
>
> For zones that operate under a mandate of the ICANN-style shared
> registry model, you can't bypass the registrar.
I think this is the essence of why previous attempts to automate
technical DNS maintenanc
