Patrik,
Also note that there are ccTLDs allocated for codes that are not registered
in ISO3166 (UK, EU etc).
IIUC these two are on the 3166 list as exceptionally reserved codes.
Yes, but not REGISTERED, and that difference is something that created more
than just a little bit of
Hi,
From the point of view of the DNS, there is no difference between a
ccTLD and a gTLD. This distinction is relevant only for policies.
Not quite true. From the perspective of the protocol, a TLD is a TLD. From the
point of view of the system, a ccTLD is different than a gTLD, e.g., the
On 4 May 2015, at 3:22, David Conrad wrote:
Patrik,
Also note that there are ccTLDs allocated for codes that are not
registered in ISO3166 (UK, EU etc).
IIUC these two are on the 3166 list as exceptionally reserved codes.
Yes, but not REGISTERED, and that difference is something that
again, this is where the document tries to cover terminology for both the DNS
protocol and the DNS policy/operations (as seen through the lens of today).
I don’t see any reason to define anything other than TLD.
manning
bmann...@karoshi.com
PO Box 12317
Marina del Rey, CA 90295
310.322.8102
On 30 Apr 2015, at 16:40, George Michaelson wrote:
economy and economycode is a useful concept sometimes. it avoids the CN/TW
issue. and encompasses HK.
state or territory can be useful. covers some of the intermediate things.
eg much of the CIS is a 'transitional state' according to the
On May 1, 2015, at 11:56 AM, Marc Blanchet marc.blanc...@viagenie.ca wrote:
From the point of view of the DNS, there is no difference between a
ccTLD and a gTLD. This distinction is relevant only for policies.
right. I completly agree and I was going to write almost the same thing.
suggest
Le 2015-05-01 à 15:27, Paul Hoffman paul.hoff...@vpnc.org a écrit :
On May 1, 2015, at 11:56 AM, Marc Blanchet marc.blanc...@viagenie.ca wrote:
From the point of view of the DNS, there is no difference between a
ccTLD and a gTLD. This distinction is relevant only for policies.
right. I
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 09:31:11AM +0200,
Patrik Fältström p...@frobbit.se wrote
a message of 189 lines which said:
Suggested new text:
ccTLD -- A TLD that is allocated to distinct economies.
Historically, these were two-letter TLDs, and were allocated to
economies using the two letter
Le 2015-05-01 à 14:47, Stephane Bortzmeyer bortzme...@nic.fr a écrit :
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 09:31:11AM +0200,
Patrik Fältström p...@frobbit.se wrote
a message of 189 lines which said:
Suggested new text:
ccTLD -- A TLD that is allocated to distinct economies.
Historically, these
On 1 May 2015, at 08:31, Patrik Fältström p...@frobbit.se wrote:
Also note that there are ccTLDs allocated for codes that are not registered
in ISO3166 (UK, EU etc).
IIUC these two are on the 3166 list as exceptionally reserved codes.
Suggested new text:
ccTLD -- A TLD that is allocated
On 30 Apr 2015, at 18:34, Kim Davies wrote:
If an allusion to the purpose is useful, then:
A TLD that is allocated for use based on an entry in the ISO 3166-1
standard [ISO 3166-1]. The ISO 3166 standard provides codings of
countries and their subdivisions.
A TLD that is allocated for use
On 1 May 2015, at 12:00, Jim Reid wrote:
On 1 May 2015, at 08:31, Patrik Fältström p...@frobbit.se wrote:
Also note that there are ccTLDs allocated for codes that are not registered
in ISO3166 (UK, EU etc).
IIUC these two are on the 3166 list as exceptionally reserved codes.
Yes, but not
Tony Finch wrote:
Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net wrote:
NXDOMAIN -- A colloquial expression for RCODE 3, also commonly written
as 'NXDomain' or 'Non-Existent Domain'
NXDOMAIN etc. are not colloquialisms, they come from the 4.3BSD resolver
API. (Spelling them in lower case is weird if not
Quoting Andrew Sullivan on Thursday April 30, 2015:
|
| Country is a loaded term. I don't have a better suggestion in mind but
| there are many instances where a ccTLD is a territory, etc. I don't mean
| to open a rathole, just point this out.
|
| If we changed this to say, A TLD that is
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 04:34:15PM +, Kim Davies wrote:
Also note that not all ccTLDs are two-letter codes pulled from the
standard. With the advent of IDN ccTLDs, the domain itself is not
derived from the ISO 3166-1 standard, only whether a particular
geographic entity has standing to
On Apr 29, 2015, at 12:54 PM, Warren Kumari war...@kumari.net wrote:
First off - thanks for writing this. I personally *hate* writing
terminology sections in drafts; that someone is willing to write an
entire terminology draft, especially one on DNS fills me with awe...
Anyway, Section 3:
Somewhere I saw domaine in the doc - can't find it now - and that
started me trying to mark this up. (I hadn't read the document in full
before, so this is a first review for me.)
On 4/29/15, 14:13, internet-dra...@ietf.org internet-dra...@ietf.org
wrote:
A New Internet-Draft is available from
First off - thanks for writing this. I personally *hate* writing
terminology sections in drafts; that someone is willing to write an
entire terminology draft, especially one on DNS fills me with awe...
Anyway, Section 3:
Some of response codes that are defined in [RFC1035] have gotten
their
Thanks for the comments.
On Apr 29, 2015, at 12:28 PM, Edward Lewis edward.le...@icann.org wrote:
Somewhere I saw domaine in the doc - can't find it now - and that
started me trying to mark this up. (I hadn't read the document in full
before, so this is a first review for me.)
sigh Found it.
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Domain Name System Operations Working Group
of the IETF.
Title : DNS Terminology
Authors : Paul Hoffman
Andrew Sullivan
On Apr 29, 2015, at 1:26 PM, Jaap Akkerhuis j...@nlnetlabs.nl wrote:
Paul Hoffman writes:
Country is a term of art in politics. There are definitions that most
people agree to, at least when it suits them.
RFC 1591 purposely does not define what a country is. ISO 3166-1
contains a
On 29 Apr 2015, at 21:36, Paul Hoffman paul.hoff...@vpnc.org wrote:
On Apr 29, 2015, at 1:26 PM, Jaap Akkerhuis j...@nlnetlabs.nl wrote:
Paul Hoffman writes:
Country is a term of art in politics. There are definitions that most
people agree to, at least when it suits them.
RFC 1591
On 4/29/15, 16:02, Paul Hoffman paul.hoff...@vpnc.org wrote:
I think sTLD is a term used in ICANN, not in the DNS, whereas gTLD has
definitely slipped into DNS language.
This confuses me, given the definition in RFC 2308. Are you saying that a
NODATA response might have an RCODE that is not 0?
On Apr 29, 2015, at 4:56 PM, Edward Lewis edward.le...@icann.org wrote:
The above responses give me a confused idea of what the guidelines of the
draft is following.
Yep. We have some guidelines at the front of the document, and we generally try
to follow them. However, this is now an WG
On 4/29/15 7:56 PM, Edward Lewis wrote:
I'll start with an observation that does not directly relate to the draft
which does put me in an awkward position. The language used in the RFCs
is not exactly the language used in operations. Yes, most words are the
same but not all.
If the draft is
25 matches
Mail list logo
