On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 09:05 -0400, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
> On 08/05/2011 03:17 AM, Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 08:50 +0200, Martin Fox wrote:
> >> On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 13:11:03 +1000
> >> Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 21:58 -0400, Andrew D
On 08/05/2011 09:14 AM, Tom Davies wrote:
Someone on the Users List mentioned Andrew's new book
http://www.pitonyak.org/OOME_3_0.odt
Just remember, it is currently a work in progress. The in process German
translation is currently hosted here:
http://www.uni-due.de/~abi070/ooo.html
which i
Hi :)
At the top of the page i don't know which of the 4 things does what. I can
guess at a couple of them but it's worth testing imo.
I thought the desktop integration packages (libreoffice-gnome, etc) had to be
installed separately on any distro, not just *buntu? I could easily be wrong
a
Le 05/08/2011 23:09, Tom Davies a écrit :
Hi :)
I like it :) At the top of the page i have been editing a lot is a line like
this at the top
{{TopMenu}} {{Menu}} {{Menu.Documentation}} {{OrigLang|}}
Nice! :-)
I think the 3.x is smart :)
ok. Should also apply to 3.5 afaik
I like the idea of
On 08/05/2011 07:26 PM, Tom Cloyd wrote:
> Go forward with using Base as frontend to sqlite (which looks really
wonderful, and has a nice admin. addon available in Firefox), and use it
as long as Base works.
The only thing that _SQLite Manager_ is good for, is eye candy.
Databases can only have o
Hi :)
I like it :) At the top of the page i have been editing a lot is a line like
this at the top
{{TopMenu}} {{Menu}} {{Menu.Documentation}} {{OrigLang|}}
It might be nice to put a small section about being able to install LibreOffice
using the normal package manager or adding the PPA for
I was trying to update this page:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Installing_LibreOffice_on_Linux#Installation_of_LibreOffice_3.x_Linux_systems
in order to have a more generic one.
So what I've done:
1) withdrawing references to betas release, I think everybody agrees
2) replacing "3.3" by
Hi,
2011/8/5 planas
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 12:17 +0100, Tom Davies wrote:
>
> > Hi :)
> > There is no plan. No effort is being made to attract people to it and no
> plan
> > to do that. No thought given to why devs and others avoid it even if
> they
> > started out being keen to work
Hi,
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 12:17 +0100, Tom Davies wrote:
> Hi :)
> There is no plan. No effort is being made to attract people to it and no
> plan
> to do that. No thought given to why devs and others avoid it even if they
> started out being keen to work on it.
>
>
> The greatest amou
Johathan,
Briefly, this is the reply I was hoping for but not expecting. You know
more than I, but what I know confirms what you say. WONDERFUL reply.
Thanks so much.
So, now I will do this:
Go forward with using Base as frontend to sqlite (which looks really
wonderful, and has a nice admin
Jonathon,
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 17:43 +, toki wrote:
> On 08/05/2011 04:07 AM, Tom Cloyd wrote:
>
> > I remain concerned about TDF's abandoning it, with the result that it
> > slowly falls apart with each release,
>
> For all practical purposes, the database component of OOo was treated
On 08/05/2011 04:07 AM, Tom Cloyd wrote:
> I remain concerned about TDF's abandoning it, with the result that it slowly
> falls apart with each release,
For all practical purposes, the database component of OOo was treated
like the red haired stepchild. Under the TDF, LibO has simply continued
Hi :)
Excellent. It's good to see a lot of good stuff is being produce by quite a
few
hard-workers here.
Someone on the Users List mentioned Andrew's new book
http://www.pitonyak.org/OOME_3_0.odt
which i think would be good to link to from our Macro Chapters?
I remember Andrew asking about
On 08/05/2011 03:17 AM, Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 08:50 +0200, Martin Fox wrote:
On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 13:11:03 +1000
Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 21:58 -0400, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
I suppose that I have good news and bad news...
Thanks for r
On 08/05/2011 04:30 AM, Nino Novak wrote:
The new extensions repository[1] is still under development but will
probably soon replace[2] the wiki page.
[1] http://extensions2.libreoffice.org/
[2] http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/msg05737.html
Nino
Excellent
--
Andrew
Making suggestions is good. And they deserve a more detailed response
than I can manage.
On Friday, August 5, 2011, Tom Davies wrote:
> Hi :)
> Well you have more experience than me but i think it's better to suggest ideas
> at this stage rather than have regrets later. Hopefully bad ideas get
Hi everyone,
As a follow-up to my message last Thursday, I have now uploaded a draft copy of
the manuscript and lesson files for the Conceptual Guides port for LibreOffice.
You can find these files in the following location within the Alfresco site
repository:
English Content | Documentation
Hi :)
Well you have more experience than me but i think it's better to suggest ideas
at this stage rather than have regrets later. Hopefully bad ideas get
shot-down
fast as part of the process.
Regards from
Tom :)
From: Jean Weber
To: documentation@globa
Hi :)
There is no plan. No effort is being made to attract people to it and no plan
to do that. No thought given to why devs and others avoid it even if they
started out being keen to work on it.
The greatest amount of support Base gets is from a couple of people that hope
that someday th
I don't have the energy to type out all the reasons why I think that
is a BAD idea. Sorry, Tom.
--Jean
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 20:56, Tom Davies wrote:
> Hi :)
> I agree with Jean. It might be good to have something after the chapter title
> to show which documentation-release. So something lik
Hi :)
I agree with Jean. It might be good to have something after the chapter title
to show which documentation-release. So something like
CCnnBB-Name-v#
where # is a single digit. At most there are only likely to be about 2
re-releases of a chapter for a particular series. The 1st is a bit
Hi Jean,
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 7:12 AM, Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
> David asked for my recommendations, so here they are.
>
> 1) Create spaces for v3.3.x and 3.4.x. (Either path suggested earlier by
> David is fine with me.) Save the published v3.3.x chapters in the 3.3.x
> stream.
>
> 2) Copy th
Hi Jean,
On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
> Before we leap into renaming the files, I'd like to mention what the
> numbers mean. This info is in "Producing LibreOffice User Guides" btw.
>
> ---
> File names take the following form: AABBCC3-Name,
> where AA=book
Hi,
My 2 cents would be that Base is an important asset for LibreOffice.
It may have its fragilities at the moment, but I feel that it should
definitely be kept in the suite and that we should still work on
documentation for it.
I'm trusting that the project is going to, at some time hopefully
so
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 6:43 AM, Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
> David would know, but I don't think that would work. At the moment you
> need a login to get to files on Alfresco, so I would think a link from
> the wiki would fail.
media.libreoffice.org is well underway and should be ready "soon"
On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 17:17:48 +1000
Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
>
> I will definitely take you up on that offer! In fact, if you wanted to
> grab the file and make all the corrections Andrew noted and check on the
> unclear things and fix the screenshots, I'm sure both he and I would be
> delighted
2011/8/5 Tom Cloyd
> On 08/04/2011 10:59 PM, planas wrote:
>
>> Tom
>>
>> On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 22:07 -0600, Tom Cloyd wrote:
>>
>> On 08/01/2011 05:48 PM, Tom Davies wrote:
>>>
Hi :)
I have been getting the same impression of Base as Jean. Apparently
Base has
different unpr
All,
Am Freitag, 5. August 2011, um 05:11:03 schrieb Jean Hollis Weber:
> On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 21:58 -0400, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > Any idea when the extensions library for LO will be online? It is
> > referenced, but it takes you to a WIKI.
>
> ...
>
> I don't know about the
On 08/04/2011 10:59 PM, planas wrote:
Tom
On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 22:07 -0600, Tom Cloyd wrote:
On 08/01/2011 05:48 PM, Tom Davies wrote:
Hi :)
I have been getting the same impression of Base as Jean. Apparently Base has
different unpredictable flaky quirks in different releases. There appear
On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 08:50 +0200, Martin Fox wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Aug 2011 13:11:03 +1000
> Jean Hollis Weber wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2011-08-04 at 21:58 -0400, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
> > >
> > > I suppose that I have good news and bad news...
> > >
> >
> >
> > Thanks for reporting thes
30 matches
Mail list logo
