Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect

2002-04-29 Thread Reggie Burnett
ly" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 10:57 AM > Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect > > > > Neither does the charter require respect for all organizations by all > > people. Respect is not the same as decorum, which

Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect / IE 5.01 requirement

2002-04-29 Thread Steve Loughran
- Original Message - From: "Reggie Burnett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 1:42 PM Subject: Re: Disrespect / IE 5.01 requirement > yes, I have several responses concerning distributino of IE but the second > part of my question specifically asked for a technical reason

Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect

2002-04-29 Thread Henk de Koning
t; behave in their space, nobody, but nobody, anywhere has the right to tell > me who I must respect. > > -Original Message- > From: Brad Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 28 April 2002 16:53 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect >

Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect

2002-04-29 Thread Brady Kelly
me who I must respect. -Original Message- From: Brad Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 April 2002 16:53 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect Reggie Burnett wrote: > There is not a person there to be hurt. Really? Microsoft is an advanced artific

Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect

2002-04-28 Thread Gregory DiSisto
*flush...swirl...gone* This sender is now on my auto-delete list. Sunday, April 28, 2002, 11:42:46 AM, you wrote: DOR> Brad you are one of... [snip] DOR> Declan O'Reilly. You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at htt

Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect / IE 5.01 requirement

2002-04-28 Thread Reggie Burnett
> > By my count you have 8 responses helping you to redistribute IE 5.01. > It's possible that people don't know your other desired answer. yes, I have several responses concerning distributino of IE but the second part of my question specifically asked for a technical reason why IE 5.01 sp2 is

Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect (pls move to Advocacy)

2002-04-28 Thread Reggie Burnett
dotnet discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Beauchemin, Bob > Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 10:57 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect (pls move to Advocacy) > > > Please take this thread to the advocacy list (there is one)... As > the ori

Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect / IE 5.01 requirement

2002-04-28 Thread Andrew Cherry
<--cut--> I completely agree that this is a technical forum and, as such, needs to be focused on answering people problems. Just yesterday I posted a question asking why IE 5.01 is required for the .Net runtime to install. No answers. I am working on an application right now that I would love to

Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect

2002-04-28 Thread Declan O'Reilly
t: Sunday, April 28, 2002 9:52 AM Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect > Reggie Burnett wrote: > > > There is not a person there to be hurt. > > Really? Microsoft is an advanced artificial intelligence, devoid of any > humans at all? This is real news! > > > M$ is not

Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect (pls move to Advocacy)

2002-04-28 Thread Beauchemin, Bob
are, after all, professionals". ;-) (Hunter S Thompson) Bob Beauchemin [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: Reggie Burnett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 8:20 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect I apologize to the other members of the

Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect

2002-04-28 Thread Reggie Burnett
I apologize to the other members of the list that have been exposed to this thread and tell you that I intend this to be my last mailing on this thread. > > > There is not a person there to be hurt. > > Really? Microsoft is an advanced artificial intelligence, devoid of any > humans at all? This

Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect

2002-04-28 Thread Brad Wilson
Reggie Burnett wrote: > There is not a person there to be hurt. Really? Microsoft is an advanced artificial intelligence, devoid of any humans at all? This is real news! > M$ is not a sign of disrespect, it is a sign of disapproval. No, disapproval is writing opinion pieces in papers, and havi

Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect

2002-04-28 Thread Reggie Burnett
ideas, and questions could be exchanged. I guess I was wrong. -Original Message- From: dotnet discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Thomas Tomiczek Sent: Sunday, April 28, 2002 5:23 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect Then still behave respectfull. I

Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect

2002-04-28 Thread Michael Weller
hi! > Michael Weller wrote: > > > M$ Dev Environment 2002 v7.0.9466 > > M$ .NET Framework 1.0 v1.0.3705 > > Can you please show proper respect when posting to a technical forum? This > sort of behavior is fitting of adolescents, not professionals. respect??? all right, I'll behave! coming from SU

Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect

2002-04-28 Thread Thomas Tomiczek
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET) -Original Message- From: Reggie Burnett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sonntag, 28. April 2002 07:38 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect What? I didn't catch the origination of this thread but feel compelled to respond. True this

Re: [DOTNET] Disrespect

2002-04-27 Thread Reggie Burnett
What? I didn't catch the origination of this thread but feel compelled to respond. True this is a technical forum which means we use the tools discussed in this forum to solve our problems. It does not mean that we are all employees of Microsoft or agree with all of their decisions. It is very