Re: [Dovecot] Corrupted index cache files

2008-08-14 Thread Charles Marcus
On 8/13/2008, Mike Abbott ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
  Post your dovecot -n output?
 
 Here's some of it.  Not very enlightening.

Why just some of it? Its not like its that much, and what you may
*think* is irrelevant, may in fact be *very* relevant...

-- 

Best regards,

Charles


Re: [Dovecot] Corrupted index cache files

2008-08-14 Thread Mike Abbott
I re-ran imaptest on an empty mail store, single client, multiple  
users, using your dovecot-crlf input file, for a couple hours.  Here's  
the distribution of errors that imaptest reports:

 100 Error: user%d[%d]: ...: Header DELIVERED-TO changed
 167 Error: user%d[%d]: ...: Header CC changed
 417 Error: user%d[%d]: ...: Header TO changed
 438 Error: user%d[%d]: ...: Header IN-REPLY-TO changed
 445 Error: user%d[%d]: ...: Header REFERENCES changed
 485 Error: user%d[%d]: ...: Header FROM changed
 503 Error: user%d[%d]: ...: Header SUBJECT changed
 544 Error: user%d[%d]: ...: Header MESSAGE-ID changed
 764 Error: user%d[%d]: UID=%d INTERNALDATE changed
 823 Error: user%d[%d]: UID %d changed
1040 Error: user%d[%d]: uid=%d ...: BODY changed
1052 Error: user%d[%d]: uid=%d ...: BODYSTRUCTURE changed
1546 Error: user%d[%d]: uid=%d ...: ENVELOPE changed
1833 Error: user%d[%d]: uid=%d ...: RFC822.SIZE size changed
3493 Error: user%d[%d]: uid=%d ...: BODY[] size changed
3691 Error: user%d[%d]: uid=%d ...: BODY[HEADER] size changed
3695 Error: user%d[%d]: uid=%d ...: BODY[TEXT] size changed
3880 Error: user%d[%d]: uid=%d ...: BODY[%d] size changed
376365 Error: UIVALIDITY changed: %d - %d

During that time dovecot reported no corruption errors.

What does it mean that imaptest is having such trouble?


Re: [Dovecot] Corrupted index cache files

2008-08-14 Thread Timo Sirainen

On Aug 14, 2008, at 9:56 AM, Mike Abbott wrote:

I re-ran imaptest on an empty mail store, single client, multiple  
users, using your dovecot-crlf input file, for a couple hours.   
Here's the distribution of errors that imaptest reports:

100 Error: user%d[%d]: ...: Header DELIVERED-TO changed

..

During that time dovecot reported no corruption errors.


What do you need to do to get corruption errors? Is multiple clients  
enough?



What does it mean that imaptest is having such trouble?


I think it just means that imaptest's support for multiple users is  
broken. I always test it only using a single test user.




PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [Dovecot] Corrupted index cache files

2008-08-13 Thread Mike Abbott

One or more users?


Many different users.


Post your dovecot -n output?


Here's some of it.  Not very enlightening.
# 1.1.2: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
base_dir: /var/run/dovecot/
verbose_proctitle: yes
first_valid_uid: 6
last_valid_uid: 5
first_valid_gid: 6
last_valid_gid: 5
mail_access_groups: mail
mail_privileged_group: mail
mail_location: maildir:~/mail


Can you reproduce these easily with my imaptest tool? 
http://imapwiki.org/ImapTest


Some of them.  When running imaptest I see these dovecot errors:
Corrupted index cache file %s: record continues outside its allocated  
size

Corrupted index cache file %s: record points outside file
Corrupted index cache file %s: used_file_size too large

Plus I see LOTS of errors from imaptest itself:
Error: UIVALIDITY changed: %d - %d
Error: user%d[%d]: ...: Header CC changed
Error: user%d[%d]: ...: Header DELIVERED-TO changed
Error: user%d[%d]: ...: Header FROM changed
Error: user%d[%d]: ...: Header IN-REPLY-TO changed
Error: user%d[%d]: ...: Header MESSAGE-ID changed
Error: user%d[%d]: ...: Header REFERENCES changed
Error: user%d[%d]: ...: Header SUBJECT changed
Error: user%d[%d]: ...: Header SUBJECT changed
Error: user%d[%d]: ...: Header TO changed
Error: user%d[%d]: UID %d changed Message-Id
Error: user%d[%d]: UID=%d INTERNALDATE changed
Error: user%d[%d]: uid=%d ...: BODY changed
Error: user%d[%d]: uid=%d ...: BODYSTRUCTURE changed
Error: user%d[%d]: uid=%d ...: BODY[%d] size changed
Error: user%d[%d]: uid=%d ...: BODY[HEADER] size changed
Error: user%d[%d]: uid=%d ...: BODY[TEXT] size changed
Error: user%d[%d]: uid=%d ...: BODY[] size changed
Error: user%d[%d]: uid=%d ...: ENVELOPE changed
Error: user%d[%d]: uid=%d ...: RFC822.SIZE size changed

One problem with HFS+ is that hard links are more or less buggy. But  
v1.1's default settings should include dotlock_use_excl=yes. You  
maybe should set maildir_copy_with_hardlinks=no, but that shouldn't  
cause this bug.


Changing maildir_copy_with_hardlinks makes no difference.

You say that the dovecot errors are harmless because dovecot fixes  
them, but still there must be some downside, if only a performance  
hit.  Any other info I can provide to help you figure this out?


Re: [Dovecot] Corrupted index cache files

2008-08-13 Thread Timo Sirainen

On Aug 13, 2008, at 6:09 PM, Mike Abbott wrote:


mail_access_groups: mail
mail_privileged_group: mail


You probably won't need either of these. And there's no point in  
setting them to the same value.



Can you reproduce these easily with my imaptest tool? 
http://imapwiki.org/ImapTest


Some of them.  When running imaptest I see these dovecot errors:
Corrupted index cache file %s: record continues outside its  
allocated size

Corrupted index cache file %s: record points outside file
Corrupted index cache file %s: used_file_size too large


How soon? With what kind of imaptest parameters? I can't reproduce  
this on my Macbook (OS X 10.5.4, HFS+).



Plus I see LOTS of errors from imaptest itself:
Error: UIVALIDITY changed: %d - %d


Did you test with a single user or multiple users? imaptest's support  
for testing multiple users is currently a bit broken, but this  
shouldn't happen with a single user..



Error: user%d[%d]: ...: Header CC changed
Error: user%d[%d]: ...: Header DELIVERED-TO changed
Error: user%d[%d]: ...: Header FROM changed


These shouldn't be happening as long as you use a test mbox file that  
has unique Message-ID headers. Were you using the recommended dovecot- 
crlf as the input?


You say that the dovecot errors are harmless because dovecot fixes  
them, but still there must be some downside, if only a performance  
hit.  Any other info I can provide to help you figure this out?



Yes, there's a performance hit since all the cached data is lost.


PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [Dovecot] Corrupted index cache files

2008-08-13 Thread Timo Sirainen

On Aug 13, 2008, at 6:09 PM, Mike Abbott wrote:


Can you reproduce these easily with my imaptest tool? 
http://imapwiki.org/ImapTest


Some of them.  When running imaptest I see these dovecot errors:
Corrupted index cache file %s: record continues outside its  
allocated size

Corrupted index cache file %s: record points outside file
Corrupted index cache file %s: used_file_size too large


You could try if it makes a difference to set mmap_disable=yes or  
lock_method=flock.




PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [Dovecot] Corrupted index cache files

2008-08-13 Thread Mike Abbott
How soon? With what kind of imaptest parameters? I can't reproduce  
this on my Macbook (OS X 10.5.4, HFS+).


I ran imaptest for just a few minutes and saw all these errors in that  
time.  Default imaptest parameters except for user/host names etc.



Error: UIVALIDITY changed: %d - %d


Did you test with a single user or multiple users? imaptest's  
support for testing multiple users is currently a bit broken, but  
this shouldn't happen with a single user..


This error happens with clients=1, clients=10 and clients=100.


Error: user%d[%d]: ...: Header CC changed
Error: user%d[%d]: ...: Header DELIVERED-TO changed
Error: user%d[%d]: ...: Header FROM changed


These shouldn't be happening as long as you use a test mbox file  
that has unique Message-ID headers. Were you using the recommended  
dovecot-crlf as the input?


I passed in your dovecot-crlf file to imaptest, but the message store  
was cloned from elsewhere first.  So you're saying that dovecot only  
works with special hand-crafted input, and not with real-world mail?   
Hmmm :) :)


Actually I do see plenty of duplicate Message-ID headers in the mail  
store (not from your input file).  I'll investigate that further.   
Thanks for the tip.


Re: [Dovecot] Corrupted index cache files

2008-08-13 Thread Timo Sirainen

On Aug 13, 2008, at 7:12 PM, Mike Abbott wrote:


Error: UIVALIDITY changed: %d - %d


Did you test with a single user or multiple users? imaptest's  
support for testing multiple users is currently a bit broken, but  
this shouldn't happen with a single user..


This error happens with clients=1, clients=10 and clients=100.


I mean the user parameter, do you use user=something or user=something 
%d or similar to specify one/multiple different users where imaptest  
logs on to?



Error: user%d[%d]: ...: Header CC changed
Error: user%d[%d]: ...: Header DELIVERED-TO changed
Error: user%d[%d]: ...: Header FROM changed


These shouldn't be happening as long as you use a test mbox file  
that has unique Message-ID headers. Were you using the recommended  
dovecot-crlf as the input?


I passed in your dovecot-crlf file to imaptest, but the message  
store was cloned from elsewhere first.  So you're saying that  
dovecot only works with special hand-crafted input, and not with  
real-world mail?  Hmmm :) :)


Actually I do see plenty of duplicate Message-ID headers in the mail  
store (not from your input file).  I'll investigate that further.   
Thanks for the tip.


Dovecot doesn't care about any of that, but imaptest's state tracking  
requires that Message-ID header uniquely identifies a mail.


So the imaptest run was done with a mailbox that already contained  
other data? Can you break if if you try with an empty mailbox where  
only imaptest starts appending new mails?


PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [Dovecot] Corrupted index cache files

2008-08-12 Thread Timo Sirainen

On Aug 8, 2008, at 9:59 PM, Mike Abbott wrote:

I see these errors more often than I'd like from Dovecot-1.1.2 on  
Mac OS X 10.5.4 (names and numbers elided):


One or more users?

Corrupted index cache file %s: Corrupted virtual size for uid=%d:  
%d != %d

Corrupted index cache file %s: Broken virtual size for mail UID %d
Corrupted index cache file %s: used_file_size too large

How bad are these?


As long as Dovecot detects the corruption, the errors are transparent  
to users since Dovecot fixes them automatically.



 What should I look for to find out why they happen?

Other details:
File system is HFS+
Mail store is maildir
Hardware is Intel (Mac Pro)


Post your dovecot -n output? Can you reproduce these easily with my  
imaptest tool? http://imapwiki.org/ImapTest


One problem with HFS+ is that hard links are more or less buggy. But  
v1.1's default settings should include dotlock_use_excl=yes. You maybe  
should set maildir_copy_with_hardlinks=no, but that shouldn't cause  
this bug.


PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: [Dovecot] Corrupted index cache files

2008-08-09 Thread Charles Marcus

On 8/8/2008 9:59 PM, Mike Abbott wrote:
I see these errors more often than I'd like from Dovecot-1.1.2 on Mac OS 
X 10.5.4 (names and numbers elided):


Corrupted index cache file %s: Corrupted virtual size for uid=%d: %d != %d
Corrupted index cache file %s: Broken virtual size for mail UID %d
Corrupted index cache file %s: used_file_size too large

How bad are these?  What should I look for to find out why they happen?

Other details:
File system is HFS+
Mail store is maildir
Hardware is Intel (Mac Pro)


Any reason you left out your config?

--

Best regards,

Charles


[Dovecot] Corrupted index cache files

2008-08-08 Thread Mike Abbott
I see these errors more often than I'd like from Dovecot-1.1.2 on Mac  
OS X 10.5.4 (names and numbers elided):


Corrupted index cache file %s: Corrupted virtual size for uid=%d: %d ! 
= %d

Corrupted index cache file %s: Broken virtual size for mail UID %d
Corrupted index cache file %s: used_file_size too large

How bad are these?  What should I look for to find out why they happen?

Other details:
File system is HFS+
Mail store is maildir
Hardware is Intel (Mac Pro)

Thanks.