Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/megachips-stdp-ge-b850v3-fw.c: In function
'ge_b850v3_lvds_detect':
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/megachips-stdp-ge-b850v3-fw.c:145:16: error: too few
arguments to f
Hi,
Am Mittwoch, 28. Mai 2025, 09:17:13 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Damon
Ding:
> On 2025/5/28 11:42, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/anal
Hi Stephen,
On 2025/5/28 11:42, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c: In function
'analogix_dp_probe':
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c: In function
'analogix_dp_probe':
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/analogix/analogix_dp_core.c:1589:17: error: label
'err_disable_clk' used but n
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
scripts/Makefile.build:41: drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/Makefile: No such file or
directory
make[7]: *** No rule to make target 'drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/Makefile'. Stop.
Presuably caused by commit
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
In file included from include/linux/module.h:22,
from include/linux/device/driver.h:21,
from include/linux/device.h:32,
from include/linux/d
On Wed, Sep 4, 2024, 11:58 Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Sep 2024, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tdp158.c: In function 'tdp158_enable':
> > driv
On Wed, 04 Sep 2024, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tdp158.c: In function 'tdp158_enable':
> drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tdp158.c:31:9: error: implicit declaration
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tdp158.c: In function 'tdp158_enable':
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tdp158.c:31:9: error: implicit declaration of
function 'gpiod_set_value_cansleep' [-Wimplicit-funct
Hi,
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 12:35:31PM GMT, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_enc.c: In function
> 'sun4i_hdmi_connector_mode_valid':
> drivers/gpu/drm
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_enc.c: In function
'sun4i_hdmi_connector_mode_valid':
drivers/gpu/drm/sun4i/sun4i_hdmi_enc.c:213:17: error: implicit declaration of
function 'drm_connect
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_drv.h:14,
from drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_bo.c:26:
drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_performance_counters.h:118:43: warning:
'v3d_v42_per
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build
(x86_64_allmodconfig) failed like this:
In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_fw.c:19:
drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_fw.c: In function 'panthor_job_irq_suspend':
drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_device.h:326:13: er
Am 25.02.24 um 22:47 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
Hi all,
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 08:41:16 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 08:48:21 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 15:15:54 +0200 Jani Nikula
wrote:
On Tue, 06 Feb 2024, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
After merging
Hi all,
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 08:41:16 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 08:48:21 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 15:15:54 +0200 Jani Nikula
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 06 Feb 2024, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > >
> > > > After mergin
Hi all,
On Tue, 20 Feb 2024 08:48:21 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 15:15:54 +0200 Jani Nikula
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 06 Feb 2024, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (i386 defconfig)
> > > failed like this:
Hi Geert,
Thanks for the feedback.
> -Original Message-
> From: Geert Uytterhoeven
> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2024 8:29 AM
> Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
>
> Hi Biju,
>
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 9
Hi Maxime Ripard,
> -Original Message-
> From: Maxime Ripard
> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2024 8:32 AM
> To: Biju Das
> Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
>
> Hi Biju,
>
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 08:14
Hi Biju,
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 08:14:14AM +, Biju Das wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Stephen Rothwell
> > Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2024 1:46 AM
> > Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
> >
> > Hi all,
Hi Biju,
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 9:14 AM Biju Das wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Stephen Rothwell
> > Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2024 1:46 AM
> > Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
> >
> > After merging t
Hi All,
> -Original Message-
> From: Stephen Rothwell
> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2024 1:46 AM
> Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm-misc tree
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
>
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/renesas/rz-du/rzg2l_du_vsp.c:47:6: error: redefinition of
'rzg2l_du_vsp_enable'
47 | void rzg2l_du_vsp_enable(struct rzg2l_du_crtc *crtc)
| ^~~
Hi all,
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 15:15:54 +0200 Jani Nikula
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 06 Feb 2024, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (i386 defconfig)
> > failed like this:
> >
> > In function 'i915_ttm_placement_from_obj',
> > inlined from 'i915_t
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c: In function 'simple_error_capture':
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_guc_submit.c:814:48: error: passing argument 1 of
'drm_err_printer' from incompatible pointer ty
On Tue, 06 Feb 2024, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (i386 defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> In function 'i915_ttm_placement_from_obj',
> inlined from 'i915_ttm_get_pages' at
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c:847:2:
> dr
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2024, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
>> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>>
>> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_mm_test.c: In function 'drm_test_mm_debug':
>> drivers/gpu/d
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_mm_test.c: In function 'drm_test_mm_debug':
> drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_mm_test.c:191:32: error: implicit dec
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_mm_test.c: In function 'drm_test_mm_debug':
drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_mm_test.c:191:32: error: implicit declaration of
function 'drm_debug_printer'; did you mean 'd
Hi all,
On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 15:28:50 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (i386 defconfig)
> failed like this:
>
> In function 'i915_ttm_placement_from_obj',
> inlined from 'i915_ttm_get_pages' at
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm
On Wed, 07 Feb 2024, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> Indeed. Not even drm-misc itself compiles with xe enabled. I'll ping
> drm-misc maintainers.
We'll need CONFIG_DRM_XE=m enabled in drm-rerere/drm-misc-*_defconfig,
and get people to use that.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel
On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 14:21 -0600, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 01:39:28PM +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 12:28 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > >
Hi all,
On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 12:28:22 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/xe/xe_bo.c:41:10: error: 'struct ttm_placement' has no member
named 'num_busy_placement'; did you mean 'num_
On Tue, Feb 06, 2024 at 01:39:28PM +0100, Thomas Hellström wrote:
Hi
On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 12:28 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
Caused by commit
a78a8da51b36 ("drm/ttm: replace busy p
Hi
On Tue, 2024-02-06 at 12:28 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
>
> Caused by commit
>
> a78a8da51b36 ("drm/ttm: replace busy placement with flags v6")
>
> interacting with comm
On Tue, 06 Feb 2024, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
>
> Caused by commit
>
> a78a8da51b36 ("drm/ttm: replace busy placement with flags v6")
>
> interacting with commit
>
> dd08ebf6c352
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (i386 defconfig)
failed like this:
In function 'i915_ttm_placement_from_obj',
inlined from 'i915_ttm_get_pages' at
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c:847:2:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_ttm.c:165:18: error: 'places[0
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
Caused by commit
a78a8da51b36 ("drm/ttm: replace busy placement with flags v6")
interacting with commit
dd08ebf6c352 ("drm/xe: Introduce a new DRM driver for Intel GPUs")
(and maybe
On 2023-11-26 18:38, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.c:21:41: error:
> 'DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_MIN' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean
>
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_sched.c:21:41: error: 'DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_MIN'
undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'DRM_SCHED_PRIORITY_LOW'?
21 | NOUVEAU_SCHED_PRIOR
Hi all,
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 12:27:49 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 12:22:09 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/usb/typec/altmodes/displayport.c: I
On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 12:27:49PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 12:22:09 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/usb/typec/altmodes/displaypo
Hi all,
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 12:22:09 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/usb/typec/altmodes/displayport.c: In function 'dp_altmode_vdm':
> drivers/usb/typec/altmodes/displayport.c:309:3
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/usb/typec/altmodes/displayport.c: In function 'dp_altmode_vdm':
drivers/usb/typec/altmodes/displayport.c:309:33: error: too few arguments to
function 'drm_connector_oob_hotplug_event
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c: In function
'nouveau_dmem_migrate_chunk':
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c:681:43: error: 'chunk' undeclared (first
use in this function)
681
Hi Qiang,
On Mon, 3 Apr 2023 16:51:27 +0800 Qiang Yu wrote:
>
> I think you can just revert the following three lima commits when merge:
> * 4a66f3da99dc ("drm/lima: add show_fdinfo for drm usage stats")
> * 87767de835ed ("drm/lima: allocate unique id per drm_file")
> * bccafec957a5 ("drm/lima: a
I think you can just revert the following three lima commits when merge:
* 4a66f3da99dc ("drm/lima: add show_fdinfo for drm usage stats")
* 87767de835ed ("drm/lima: allocate unique id per drm_file")
* bccafec957a5 ("drm/lima: add usage counting method to ctx_mgr")
Regards,
Qiang
On Mon, Apr 3, 20
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_ctx.c: In function 'lima_ctx_do_release':
drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_ctx.c:53:45: error: 'struct drm_sched_entity' has no
member named 'elapsed_ns'
53 |
Hi
Am 23.11.22 um 06:35 schrieb David Airlie:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 3:21 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi all,
On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 18:32:14 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc44x_defconfig) failed like this:
ld: drivers/vid
Hi Dave,
On Wed, 23 Nov 2022 15:35:50 +1000 David Airlie wrote:
>
> Nothing gone wrong as such, just the drm-misc-next pull request was
> sent on a regular weekly cadence, then I merged it a few days later.
> The fix for this is still in the drm-misc-next queue for the next PR
> which I will get
On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 3:21 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 18:32:14 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > ppc44x_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > ld: drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmon.o: in
Hi all,
On Thu, 17 Nov 2022 18:32:14 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc44x_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> ld: drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmon.o: in function `fb_modesetting_disabled':
> fbmon.c:(.text+0x1e4): multiple defi
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc44x_defconfig) failed like this:
ld: drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmon.o: in function `fb_modesetting_disabled':
fbmon.c:(.text+0x1e4): multiple definition of `fb_modesetting_disabled';
drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.o:fb
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
ERROR: modpost: missing MODULE_LICENSE() in
drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_kunit_helpers.o
Caused by commit
44a3928324e9 ("drm/tests: Add Kunit Helpers")
I have used the drm-misc tree from n
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c: In function 'nouveau_drm_probe':
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_drm.c:797:17: error: implicit declaration of
function 'drm_fbdev_generic_setup' [-W
On Fri, 2022-10-21 at 11:02 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c: In function
> 'nouveau_display_create':
> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_di
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c: In function 'nouveau_display_create':
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_display.c:662:29: error: unused variable
'device' [-Werror=unused-variable]
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 11:04:51AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 10:48:17 +0300 Ville Syrjälä
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 12:36:56PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > >
Hi all,
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 10:48:17 +0300 Ville Syrjälä
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 12:36:56PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> > allmodconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/zynqmp_disp.c: In fun
On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 12:36:56PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/zynqmp_disp.c: In function 'zynqmp_disp_create_planes':
> drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/zynqmp_disp.c
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/zynqmp_disp.c: In function 'zynqmp_disp_create_planes':
drivers/gpu/drm/xlnx/zynqmp_disp.c:1260:17: error: implicit declaration of
function 'drm_plane_create_zpos_immuta
Hello Stephen,
On 6/10/22 06:49, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> allyesconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/firmware/efi/sysfb_efi.c:29:10: fatal error: asm/efi.h: No such file
> or directory
>29 | #include
>
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/firmware/efi/sysfb_efi.c:29:10: fatal error: asm/efi.h: No such file or
directory
29 | #include
| ^~~
Caused by commit
fa0e256450f2 ("fbdev: vesafb: A
Am 08.04.22 um 03:10 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
In file included from include/drm/drm_gem.h:38,
from include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h:34,
from drivers/gpu/drm
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
In file included from include/drm/drm_gem.h:38,
from include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h:34,
from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_deps.c:9:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_deps
Hi Stephen,
Le mer., avril 6 2022 at 10:50:49 +1000, Stephen Rothwell
a écrit :
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-newvision-nv3052c.c:478:19: error:
initialization of 'void (*)(struct spi_dev
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-newvision-nv3052c.c:478:19: error: initialization
of 'void (*)(struct spi_device *)' from incompatible pointer type 'int
(*)(struct spi_device *)' [-Werror=incom
On Tue, 09 Nov 2021, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 09:40:08AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> On Sat, 06 Nov 2021, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> > Hi Jani,
>> >
>> > On Fri, 05 Nov 2021 13:03:43 +0200 Jani Nikula
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I probably should have pushed c4f08d7246a5 ("dr
On Tue, Nov 09, 2021 at 09:40:08AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Sat, 06 Nov 2021, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi Jani,
> >
> > On Fri, 05 Nov 2021 13:03:43 +0200 Jani Nikula
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I probably should have pushed c4f08d7246a5 ("drm/locking: fix
> >> __stack_depot_* name conflict")
On Sat, 06 Nov 2021, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jani,
>
> On Fri, 05 Nov 2021 13:03:43 +0200 Jani Nikula wrote:
>>
>> I probably should have pushed c4f08d7246a5 ("drm/locking: fix
>> __stack_depot_* name conflict") to drm-misc-next-fixes.
>
> Please do so as builds will start failing otherwise
Hi Jani,
On Fri, 05 Nov 2021 13:03:43 +0200 Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> I probably should have pushed c4f08d7246a5 ("drm/locking: fix
> __stack_depot_* name conflict") to drm-misc-next-fixes.
Please do so as builds will start failing otherwise :-(
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
pgpAxSxKLNrL7.pgp
Des
Hi,
On Fri, Nov 05, 2021 at 01:03:43PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Nov 2021, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > On Mon, 1 Nov 2021 19:42:23 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 20:26:48 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > After mergi
On Fri, 05 Nov 2021, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, 1 Nov 2021 19:42:23 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 20:26:48 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
>> > multi_v7_defconfig) failed li
Hi all,
On Mon, 1 Nov 2021 19:42:23 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 20:26:48 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modeset_lock.c:111:29
Hi all,
On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 20:26:48 +1100 Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modeset_lock.c:111:29: error: conflicting types for
> '__stack_depot_save'
> 111 | static depo
Hi Jani,
On Fri, 15 Oct 2021 12:56:58 +0300 Jani Nikula wrote:
>
> The fix looks good, but I'd rename __stack_depot_print too added in the
> same commit. Do you want to respin or shall I take it from here?
If you are happy to take it on, then thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
pgpMzYtLeuRtv
On Fri, 15 Oct 2021, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modeset_lock.c:111:29: error: conflicting types for
> '__stack_depot_save'
> 111 | static depot_stack_handle_
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modeset_lock.c:111:29: error: conflicting types for
'__stack_depot_save'
111 | static depot_stack_handle_t __stack_depot_save(void)
|
On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 5:02 AM wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I review the code.
>
> It seems I forget to delete the definition of the variable "inst",I'm sry for
> that.: (
>
> I'll submit another patch soon.
>
I already wrote the patch and pushed it:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/l
uhh, that's on me. I will send out a patch today. I just noticed that
the config file I used for testing had WERROR disabled.
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 4:18 AM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mmu/vmmgp100.c: In function
'gp100_vmm_fault_cancel':
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/mmu/vmmgp100.c:491:6: error: unused
variable 'inst' [-Werror=un
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
modules_install) failed like this:
depmod: ERROR: Cycle detected: drm_kms_helper -> drm -> drm_kms_helper
depmod: ERROR: Cycle detected: cec
depmod: ERROR: Found 2 modules in dependency cycles!
Caused by commit
87ea9580
On Tue, Jun 08, 2021 at 09:11:57AM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> Am 08.06.21 um 09:06 schrieb Felix Kuehling:
> > Am 2021-06-08 um 2:55 a.m. schrieb Christian König:
> > > Hi Felix,
> > >
> > > that should already be fixed in drm-tip as part of the merge of the
> > > TTM changes.
> > No, the pre
Am 08.06.21 um 09:06 schrieb Felix Kuehling:
Am 2021-06-08 um 2:55 a.m. schrieb Christian König:
Hi Felix,
that should already be fixed in drm-tip as part of the merge of the
TTM changes.
No, the preempt_mgr doesn't exist in drm-misc-next. It does exist in
drm-next, but that doesn't seem to ha
Am 2021-06-08 um 2:55 a.m. schrieb Christian König:
> Hi Felix,
>
> that should already be fixed in drm-tip as part of the merge of the
> TTM changes.
No, the preempt_mgr doesn't exist in drm-misc-next. It does exist in
drm-next, but that doesn't seem to have the TTM changes yet.
Is there another
Hi Felix,
that should already be fixed in drm-tip as part of the merge of the TTM
changes.
Regards,
Christian.
Am 08.06.21 um 07:37 schrieb Felix Kuehling:
Hi Christian,
I based amdgpu_preempt_mgr on amdgpu_gtt_mgr and now I'm looking at what
changed there. Looks like I'll need to create a
Hi Christian,
I based amdgpu_preempt_mgr on amdgpu_gtt_mgr and now I'm looking at what
changed there. Looks like I'll need to create a dummy node in
amdgpu_preempt_mgr_new to satisfy TTM, and free it in
amdgpu_preempt_mgr_del.
Thanks,
Felix
Am 2021-06-07 um 10:50 p.m. schrieb Stephen Rothwell
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_preempt_mgr.c: In function
'amdgpu_preempt_mgr_new':
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_preempt_mgr.c:75:5: error: 'struct
ttm_resource' has no member named
Ah, yes. I've forgot to include the infiniband subdir in the automated
rename. I should have done that treewide.
Going to provide a fix in a minute, sorry for the noise.
Christian.
Am 07.06.21 um 04:33 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next buil
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/infiniband/core/umem_dmabuf.c: In function 'ib_umem_dmabuf_map_pages':
drivers/infiniband/core/umem_dmabuf.c:69:10: error: implicit declaration of
function 'dma_resv_get_excl'; d
Hi
Am 12.05.21 um 07:00 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_connector.c: In function
'nouveau_connector_of_detect':
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_connector.c:463:
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_connector.c: In function
'nouveau_connector_of_detect':
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_connector.c:463:59: error: 'struct drm_device'
has no member named '
Op 2021-02-10 om 04:11 schreef Stephen Rothwell:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_sched.c:263:1: error: return type is an incomplete
> type
> 263 | v3d_gpu_reset_for_timeout(struct v3d_de
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_sched.c:263:1: error: return type is an incomplete type
263 | v3d_gpu_reset_for_timeout(struct v3d_dev *v3d, struct drm_sched_job
*sched_job)
| ^~
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
allmodconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/v3d/v3d_sched.c:263:1: error: return type is an incomplete type
263 | v3d_gpu_reset_for_timeout(struct v3d_dev *v3d, struct drm_sched_job
*sched_job)
| ^~
Hi
Am 14.01.21 um 01:31 schrieb Stephen Rothwell:
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cache.c: In function 'drm_need_swiotlb':
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cache.c:202:6: error: implicit declaration of function
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cache.c: In function 'drm_need_swiotlb':
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_cache.c:202:6: error: implicit declaration of function
'mem_encrypt_active' [-Werror=implicit-function-dec
On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 05:10:15PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 05:19:06 -0500 "Michael S. Tsirkin"
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 12:43:27PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > >
> > > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (ar
Hi Michael,
On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 05:19:06 -0500 "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 12:43:27PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> > After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
> > multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
> >
> > In file included from drivers/
Hi all,
After merging the drm-misc tree, today's linux-next build (arm
multi_v7_defconfig) failed like this:
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c:1014:10: error: initialization of 'int (*)(struct
drm_gem_object *, struct dma_buf_map *)' from incompatible pointer type 'void *
(*)(struct drm_gem_object
On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:27:11AM +, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 10:28:34AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > --- a/include/linux/swiotlb.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/swiotlb.h
> > > @@ -5,6 +5,9 @@
> > > #include
> > > #include
> > > #include
> > > +#ifndef CONFIG_
1 - 100 of 211 matches
Mail list logo
