On 02/28/2013 11:24 AM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
This will allow me to call functions that have multiple arguments if fastpath
fails.
This is required to support ticket mutexes, because they need to be able to
pass an
extra argument to the fail function.
Originally I duplicated the
When make with EXTRA_CFLAGS=-W, it will report error.
so give a check in Makefile.
Signed-off-by: Chen Gang gang.c...@asianux.com
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Kondratiev qca_vkond...@qca.qualcomm.com
---
drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/Makefile |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1
Hello David Airlie:
link fail:
drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_slave.o:(.data+0x54): multiple definition of
`__mod_of_device_table'
drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_tfp410.o:(.data+0x54):first defined here
drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_panel.o:(.data+0x54): multiple definition of
Hi,
There's nouveau crash during boot with 3.9-rc1 on iMac G5 (nVidia GeForce
FX 5200 Ultra). This happens also with current mainline kernel HEAD
(0aefda3e8188ad71168bd32152d41b3d72f04087).
git bisect tells the first bad commit is
1d7c71a3e2f77336df536855b0efd2dc5bdeb41b (drm/nouveau/disp: port
When make with EXTRA_CFLAGS=-W, it will report error.
so give a check in Makefile.
Signed-off-by: Chen Gang gang.c...@asianux.com
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Kondratiev qca_vkond...@qca.qualcomm.com
---
drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/Makefile |5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1
oh, it has been mentioned by Russell King.
please reference: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/4/114
this mail can be obsoleted.
gchen.
于 2013年03月10日 12:56, Chen Gang 写道:
Hello David Airlie:
link fail:
drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/tilcdc_slave.o:(.data+0x54): multiple definition
of
Signed-off-by: Mihnea Dobrescu-Balaur mihne...@gmail.com
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
index df08e81..5300526 100644
---
This fixes the following checkpatch warning :
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fence.c:996:5: warning: symbol
'vmw_event_fence_action_create' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Ghennadi Procopciuc unix...@gmail.com
---
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fence.c |2 +-
1 file
This fixes the following checkpatch warning :
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fence.c:274:6: warning: symbol
'vmw_fences_perform_actions' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Ghennadi Procopciuc ghennadi.procopci...@gmail.com
---
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fence.c |2 +-
1
This fixes the following checkpatch warning :
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fence.c:274:6: warning: symbol
'vmw_fences_perform_actions' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Ghennadi Procopciuc ghennadi.procopci...@gmail.com
---
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_fence.c |2 +-
1
This replaces the manual read/write routines in debugfs with the common
simple attribute helpers. Doing this gets rid of repeated copy/pasting
of copy_from_user and value formatting code.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook keesc...@chromium.org
Cc: Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch
---
On 08.03.2013 22:43, Thierry Reding wrote:
A bo is just a buffer object, so I don't see why the name shouldn't
be used. The name is in no way specific to DRM or GEM. But the point
that I was trying to make was that there is nothing to suggest that
we couldn't use drm_gem_object as the
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 08:29:59AM +0200, Terje Bergström wrote:
On 08.03.2013 22:43, Thierry Reding wrote:
A bo is just a buffer object, so I don't see why the name shouldn't
be used. The name is in no way specific to DRM or GEM. But the point
that I was trying to make was that there is
On 11.03.2013 09:18, Thierry Reding wrote:
This sound a bit over-engineered at this point in time. DRM is currently
the only user. Is anybody working on any non-DRM drivers that would use
this?
Well, this contains beginning of that:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:21:05AM +0200, Terje Bergström wrote:
On 11.03.2013 09:18, Thierry Reding wrote:
This sound a bit over-engineered at this point in time. DRM is currently
the only user. Is anybody working on any non-DRM drivers that would use
this?
Well, this contains beginning
Hello Ben Skeggs,
The patch ebb945a94bba: drm/nouveau: port all engines to new engine
module format from Jul 20, 2012, leads to the following warning:
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/graph/nvc0.c:570
nvc0_graph_ctor()
error: buffer overflow 'priv-tpc_nr' 4 = 30
With that I am still getting the issues (even with an insance delay of 100
seconds).
Here is the serial log with various runs.
Any thoughts?
[ 13.523878] initcall init_sg+0x0/0x1000 [sg] returned 0 after 5355 usecs
^G^G[ 13.621376] nouveau [ PTHERM][:00:0d.0] programmed thresholds
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56139
Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60439
Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60439
--- Comment #9 from Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com ---
Does switching to another VT before suspending help?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
dri-devel
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Chen Gang gang.c...@asianux.com wrote:
When make with EXTRA_CFLAGS=-W, it will report error.
so give a check in Makefile.
Signed-off-by: Chen Gang gang.c...@asianux.com
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Kondratiev qca_vkond...@qca.qualcomm.com
Signed-off-by: Rob
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62170
Priority: medium
Bug ID: 62170
Assignee: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Summary: [bisected] R600 LLVM build broken
Severity: normal
Classification: Unclassified
OS: All
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60553
--- Comment #3 from lethar...@gmail.com ---
I can confirm I have the same issue. Works in windowed, colors wrong in
fullscreen, and some objects fail to render completely during gameplay.
Radeon HD 6550D
Mesa 9.1
xf86-video-ati 7.1.0
--
You
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62170
--- Comment #1 from maxi...@free.fr ---
Oh, I'm using llvm from SVN at revision 176687 (fairly recent)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
dri-devel mailing
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60439
--- Comment #11 from Dmitry Cherkassov dcherkas...@gmail.com ---
Hi.
I can't reproduce this bug on cayman with 3.8-rc3 (using pm-suspend).
Resuming works.
What software do you use?
I've used xmonad launched via legacy startx while testing
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60439
--- Comment #12 from Alexandre Demers alexandre.f.dem...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #11)
Hi.
I can't reproduce this bug on cayman with 3.8-rc3 (using pm-suspend).
Resuming works.
What software do you use?
I've used xmonad
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=58372
Serkan Hosca ser...@hosca.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Hi Rob,
On 2 March 2013 20:40, Rob Clark robdcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Sachin Kamat sachin.ka...@linaro.org wrote:
Instead of checking if num_encoders is zero, it is being assigned 0.
Convert the assignment to a check.
Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat
On 2013-03-05 16:17, Archit Taneja wrote:
The support outputs struct for overlay managers is incorrect for OMAP4. Make
these changes:
- DPI isn't supported via the LCD1 overlay manager, remove DPI as a supported
output.
- the TV manager can suppport DPI, but the omapdss driver doesn't
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62170
maxi...@free.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60439
--- Comment #13 from Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com ---
Created attachment 76349
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=76349action=edit
possible fix
This patch should fix the issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57919
--- Comment #4 from Thilo Cestonaro th...@cestona.ro ---
Tried with cdimage:
http://cdimages.ubuntu.com/daily-live/20130311/raring-desktop-amd64.iso
Still very ugly glitches!
Please, if I can provide any more details or something, tell me!
I
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57919
--- Comment #5 from Thilo Cestonaro th...@cestona.ro ---
Created attachment 76350
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=76350action=edit
LiveCD GlxInfo 03/11/13
another LIBGL_DEBUG=verbose glxinfo output. This time generated by
From: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com
Create a new N: entry type in MAINTAINERS which performs a regex match
against filenames; either those extracted from patch +++ or --- lines,
or those specified on the command-line using the -f option.
This provides the same benefits as using a K: regex
Masks kernel address info-leak in object dumps with the %pK suffix,
so they cannot be used to target kernel memory corruption attacks if
the kptr_restrict sysctl is set.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook keesc...@chromium.org
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c |2 +-
1
This clarifies the comment above the access_ok check so a missing
VERIFY_READ doesn't alarm anyone.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook keesc...@chromium.org
Cc: Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c |6 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
The boxes parameter points into userspace memory. It should be verified
like any other operation against user memory.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook keesc...@chromium.org
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r300_cmdbuf.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff
Replaced ERR_PTR and PTR_ERR calls with ERR_CAST.
Patch found using coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghiu gheorghiuan...@gmail.com
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_prime.c
Replaced calls kzalloc followed by memcpy with call to kmemdup.
Patch found using coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghiu gheorghiuan...@gmail.com
---
drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/intel_bios.c |3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:26:30PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
This clarifies the comment above the access_ok check so a missing
VERIFY_READ doesn't alarm anyone.
Do we really need to copy the interface documentation?
/**
* access_ok: - Checks if a user space pointer is valid
* @type: Type of
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:27:16PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
It is possible to wrap the counter used to allocate the buffer for
relocation copies. This could lead to heap writing overflows.
Seems a sensible check, just in the wrong location. You need to do the
checking upfront in
From: Alex Deucher alexander.deuc...@amd.com
This patch set is a bit of a heavy hammer, but I'm
not sure it's worth the effort to create separate
suspend functions for all sub-allocator
users that basically just calls radeon_sa_bo_manager_suspend()
and fix up all the sub allocator init functions
From: Alex Deucher alexander.deuc...@amd.com
Otherwise we may end up with stale MC addresses
after resume.
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher alexander.deuc...@amd.com
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen.c |1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ni.c|1 +
You are right. I shall resend :)
Thanks!
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 10:25 PM, Josh Triplett j...@joshtriplett.orgwrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 09:30:40PM +0200, Alexandru Gheorghiu wrote:
Replaced calls to kmalloc followed by memcpy with a single call to
kmemdup.
This patch was found using
Replaced calls to kmalloc followed by memcpy with a single call to kmemdup.
Also removed a now redundant if statement.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghiu gheorghiuan...@gmail.com
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c |5 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:26:30PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
This clarifies the comment above the access_ok check so a missing
VERIFY_READ doesn't alarm anyone.
Do we really need to copy the interface documentation?
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:27:16PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
It is possible to wrap the counter used to allocate the buffer for
relocation copies. This could lead to heap writing overflows.
Seems a sensible check,
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 02:04:51PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
Probably not. It just seemed like the existing comment was
insufficient after the removal of the redundant VERIFY_READ check that
happened recently.
That's certainly true, the remaining comment is a little cryptic.
Something more like:
On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 22:39 +0200, Alexandru Gheorghiu wrote:
Replaced calls to kmalloc followed by memcpy with a single call to kmemdup.
Also removed a now redundant if statement.
[]
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
[]
@@ -2335,11 +2335,8 @@
11 mar 2013 21:19, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org napisał(a):
From: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com
Create a new N: entry type in MAINTAINERS which performs a regex match
against filenames; either those extracted from patch +++ or --- lines,
or those specified on the command-line
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60439
--- Comment #14 from Alexandre Demers alexandre.f.dem...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to comment #13)
Created attachment 76349 [details] [review]
possible fix
This patch should fix the issue.
It does over here.
--
You are receiving this mail
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 02:23:29PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
It is possible to wrap the counter used to allocate the buffer for
relocation copies. This could lead to heap writing overflows.
I'd keep the return value as EINVAL so that we can continue to
distinguish between the user passing garbage
On 03/11/2013 03:36 PM, Marcin Ślusarz wrote:
11 mar 2013 21:19, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org
mailto:swar...@wwwdotorg.org napisał(a):
Create a new N: entry type in MAINTAINERS which performs a regex match
against filenames; either those extracted from patch +++ or --- lines,
or
From: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com
ARCH_TEGRA always enabled OF, so there's no need for any driver to
depend on it.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren swar...@nvidia.com
---
drivers/gpu/drm/tegra/Kconfig |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
It is possible to wrap the counter used to allocate the buffer for
relocation copies. This could lead to heap writing overflows.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook keesc...@chromium.org
Reported-by: Pinkie Pie
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
---
v2:
- move check into validate_exec_list
---
This clarifies the comment above the access_ok check so a missing
VERIFY_READ doesn't alarm anyone.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook keesc...@chromium.org
Cc: Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch
---
v2:
- rewrote comment, thanks to Chris Wilson
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_execbuffer.c |6
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 02:23:29PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
It is possible to wrap the counter used to allocate the buffer for
relocation copies. This could lead to heap writing overflows.
I'd keep the return value
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 10:09:26PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 03/07/2013 09:28 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Yinghai Lu ying...@kernel.org wrote:
They are not using memblock_find_in_range(), so 1ULL will not help.
Really hope i915 drm guys could clean that
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 03:25:59PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Chris Wilson ch...@chris-wilson.co.uk
wrote:
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 02:23:29PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
It is possible to wrap the counter used to allocate the buffer for
relocation copies. This
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 02:22:48PM +0200, Mihnea Dobrescu-Balaur wrote:
Signed-off-by: Mihnea Dobrescu-Balaur mihne...@gmail.com
Queued for -next, thanks for the patch.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 02:10:06PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
This replaces the manual read/write routines in debugfs with the common
simple attribute helpers. Doing this gets rid of repeated copy/pasting
of copy_from_user and value formatting code.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:50:48PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 10:09:26PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 03/07/2013 09:28 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Yinghai Lu ying...@kernel.org wrote:
They are not using memblock_find_in_range(), so 1ULL
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 02:37:35PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
This clarifies the comment above the access_ok check so a missing
VERIFY_READ doesn't alarm anyone.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook keesc...@chromium.org
Cc: Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch
---
v2:
- rewrote comment, thanks to
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:25:19PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
Masks kernel address info-leak in object dumps with the %pK suffix,
so they cannot be used to target kernel memory corruption attacks if
the kptr_restrict sysctl is set.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook keesc...@chromium.org
Cc:
From: Alex Deucher alexander.deuc...@amd.com
Need to adjust the backend map depending on which RB is
enabled. This is the trinity equivalent of:
f7eb97300832f4fe5fe916c5d84cd2e25169330e
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher alexander.deuc...@amd.com
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57919
--- Comment #6 from Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com ---
Created attachment 76354
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=76354action=edit
possible fix
Does the attached kernel patch fix the issue?
--
You are receiving this mail
The problem is that the code will be broken, and so it makes no sense. The #if
0 is really confusing.
Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 10:09:26PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
On 03/07/2013 09:28 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 9:27 PM, Yinghai Lu
Good point.
Acked-by: Seung-Woo Kim sw0312@samsung.com
On 2013년 03월 12일 04:25, Alexandru Gheorghiu wrote:
Replaced calls to kzalloc followed by memcpy with call to kmemdup.
Patch found using coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghiu gheorghiuan...@gmail.com
---
Applied.
Thanks,
Inki Dae
2013/3/12 Alexandru Gheorghiu gheorghiuan...@gmail.com:
Replaced calls to kzalloc followed by memcpy with call to kmemdup.
Patch found using coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghiu gheorghiuan...@gmail.com
---
drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_vidi.c |
Hi all,
After merging the final tree, today's linux-next build (i386 defconfig)
failed like this:
drivers/built-in.o: In function `i915_min_freq_set':
i915_debugfs.c:(.text+0xb1adc): undefined reference to `__udivdi3'
drivers/built-in.o: In function `i915_max_freq_set':
--
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20130311/54b4fb84/attachment.html>
s mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20130311/b3f04470/attachment.html>
org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20130311/e65a0d79/attachment.html>
On 08.03.2013 22:43, Thierry Reding wrote:
> A bo is just a buffer object, so I don't see why the name shouldn't
> be used. The name is in no way specific to DRM or GEM. But the point
> that I was trying to make was that there is nothing to suggest that
> we couldn't use drm_gem_object as the
The memory manager doesn't really
exist anymore so keeping the name in the API is only confusing. Your
current proposal deals with memory handles directly already so it's
really just making the naming more consistent.
Thierry
-- next part ------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20130311/b61add17/attachment.pgp>
On 11.03.2013 09:18, Thierry Reding wrote:
> This sound a bit over-engineered at this point in time. DRM is currently
> the only user. Is anybody working on any non-DRM drivers that would use
> this?
Well, this contains beginning of that:
they're not. They aren't meant
to be used very frequently so the extra function call shouldn't matter
much. It might be easier to do add some additional checks if they aren't
inlined. I'm fine either way.
Thierry
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20130311/a9615687/attachment.pgp>
Hello Ben Skeggs,
The patch ebb945a94bba: "drm/nouveau: port all engines to new engine
module format" from Jul 20, 2012, leads to the following warning:
"drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/engine/graph/nvc0.c:570
nvc0_graph_ctor()
error: buffer overflow 'priv->tpc_nr' 4 <= 30"
> With that I am still getting the issues (even with an insance delay of 100
> seconds).
> Here is the serial log with various runs.
Any thoughts?
> [ 13.523878] initcall init_sg+0x0/0x1000 [sg] returned 0 after 5355 usecs
> ^G^G[ 13.621376] nouveau [ PTHERM][:00:0d.0] programmed
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20130311/dfd87ec3/attachment.html>
:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20130311/23be5337/attachment.html>
:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20130311/84e85bd5/attachment.html>
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
>
> When make with EXTRA_CFLAGS=-W, it will report error.
> so give a check in Makefile.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Kondratiev
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/Makefile |5 -
>
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
>
> When make with EXTRA_CFLAGS=-W, it will report error.
> so give a check in Makefile.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Gang
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Kondratiev
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/tilcdc/Makefile |5 -
>
ttp://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20130311/dd35aa79/attachment-0001.html>
ing this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20130311/22be693b/attachment.html>
are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20130311/11afe4dc/attachment.html>
was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20130311/f1b3d572/attachment.html>
ttp://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20130311/9b6c5335/attachment.html>
the bug. However, doing the same under KDE or Gnome-Shell does
exhibit it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20130311/f39861c1/attachment.html>
org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20130311/b1ade6c8/attachment.html>
Hi Rob,
On 2 March 2013 20:40, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Sachin Kamat
> wrote:
>> Instead of checking if num_encoders is zero, it is being assigned 0.
>> Convert the assignment to a check.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat
>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
Just curious.
ignature
Size: 899 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20130311/4a9ea618/attachment-0001.pgp>
On 03/07/13 12:20, Arend van Spriel wrote:
> On 03/04/13 22:16, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>> New -rc1, so let the stabilization games begin.
>>
>> I see the following on rc1, let me know if you need more info.
>>
>>
>> [ 0.633617] =
>> [ 0.633618] [ INFO:
vel/attachments/20130311/ea26ec50/attachment.html>
nee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20130311/11f37e7d/attachment.html>
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57919
--- Comment #4 from Thilo Cestonaro ---
Tried with cdimage:
http://cdimages.ubuntu.com/daily-live/20130311/raring-desktop-amd64.iso
Still very ugly glitches!
Please, if I can provide any more details or something, tell me!
I added a glxinfo
ecd of 03/11/13 of ubuntu raring ringtail.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20130311/2882f9ab/attachment.html>
From: Stephen Warren
Create a new N: entry type in MAINTAINERS which performs a regex match
against filenames; either those extracted from patch +++ or --- lines,
or those specified on the command-line using the -f option.
This provides the same benefits as using a K: regex
Masks kernel address info-leak in object dumps with the %pK suffix,
so they cannot be used to target kernel memory corruption attacks if
the kptr_restrict sysctl is set.
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook
Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo