On Sunday 29 September 2002 10:13 pm, Jason Cook wrote:
> Nicholas,
>
> I have followed the advice that others gave you in their replies and
> have been able to find the info on environmental variables but I have
> not looked in the right place for XF86Config Options. Do you know
> where to find
Nicholas,
I have followed the advice that others gave you in their replies and
have been able to find the info on environmental variables but I have
not looked in the right place for XF86Config Options. Do you know
where to find them?
I use for my Radeon VIVO (QD)
Option "AGPMode" "4"
Jose,
Unfortunately that doesn't fix the problem for me. I get the same
results as before. I loose all visual context, X segfaults and all my
VTs are black. I reboot and restore.
Sorry I can't give feeback on the other cards. What could the problem
be? Do the latest snapshots work on your machin
On Mon, 2002-09-30 at 02:07, Brian Paul wrote:
> Felix Kühling wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Modifying the frame throttling code in r200_ioctl.c I removed
> > R200_MAX_OUTSTANDING which is no longer needed there. It is, however,
> > still used in r200Clear:
> >
> > if ( rmesa->sarea->last_clea
Title: RE: [Dri-devel] ATI Radeon VE QY (AGP) new drivers (personal) problems
> Hi! here is my problem: I was using the drm drivers wich
> comes with the 2.4.19 kernel (1.1.1),
Sounds stable for me, and compatible to XFree86 4.x.x versions.
> it was workig "right" exept fo this:
>
> (II
Thanks for the tip! I rebuilt X and now glxinfo reports DRI in use and
glxears confirms it.
n Sun, 2002-09-29 at 17:53, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> On 29 Sep 2002, Jay Phelps wrote:
> >
> > It looks to me like DRI claims to be starting up A-OK. However, glxinfo
> > reports no and gears FPS is as
Title: RE: [Dri-devel] Spam on this list, list email addresses are out in the open.
Set ML submission to moderated for non-subscribers
and few persons that check the backlog regularily.
Further add e.g. a 24 hours timeout (if possible),
so that nothing gets stuck unclassified forever.
This
I've posted an MGA framerate throttling patch at
http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/files/framethrottle5.diff
It works fine for me. However, I would like to get some linux users to
test it first, particularly with vt switching. Set the
LIBGL_THROTTLE_REFRESH environment variable to try it.
Am Montag, 30. September 2002 01:45 schrieb Dieter Nützel:
> Am Montag, 30. September 2002 00:41 schrieb Dieter Nützel:
> > Am Sonntag, 29. September 2002 23:48 schrieb Felix Kühling:
> > > On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 22:37:36 +0100
> > >
> > > Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Felix Kühli
Nope, dosen't work with that - I still have to comment out the
call in RADEONResetVideo. Appears to be a failure within the sync function
itself.
- Chad
On 30 Sep 2002, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote:
> On Son, 2002-09-29 at 19:24, Chad Page wrote:
> >
> > On 29 Sep 2002, M
Felix Kühling wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Modifying the frame throttling code in r200_ioctl.c I removed
> R200_MAX_OUTSTANDING which is no longer needed there. It is, however,
> still used in r200Clear:
>
> if ( rmesa->sarea->last_clear - clear <= R200_MAX_OUTSTANDING+1 ) {
>break;
>
On Son, 2002-09-29 at 19:24, Chad Page wrote:
>
> On 29 Sep 2002, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote:
>
> > On Son, 2002-09-29 at 04:47, Chad Page wrote:
> > >
> > > I did my own build from CVS and copied libxaa.a from it into the
> > > modules directory - 2D and 3D work with one head but I s
Am Montag, 30. September 2002 00:41 schrieb Dieter Nützel:
> Am Sonntag, 29. September 2002 23:48 schrieb Felix Kühling:
> > On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 22:37:36 +0100
> >
> > Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Felix Kühling wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 23:25:03 +0200
> > > > Dieter Nüt
On Son, 2002-09-29 at 23:42, José Fonseca wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 02:51:53PM -0600, Nicholas Leippe wrote:
> >Hi,
> >I was wondering if some dev out there could spend say 2-5 minutes
> >and post an email that lists all of the possible knobs that can
> >be turned. I know there's a bun
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 15:08:49 -0700 (PDT)
Mike Mestnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With my Radeon 8500 64M running CVS Head 20020928. I get 200FPS and 225FPS when
>moving the moues
> /w gears. I also get some jerking(Walls will move back and forth) when moving the
>mouse(Turning)
> and strafi
Hello,
Modifying the frame throttling code in r200_ioctl.c I removed
R200_MAX_OUTSTANDING which is no longer needed there. It is, however,
still used in r200Clear:
if ( rmesa->sarea->last_clear - clear <= R200_MAX_OUTSTANDING+1 ) {
break;
}
The corresponding radeonClear use
On 29 Sep 2002, Jay Phelps wrote:
>
> It looks to me like DRI claims to be starting up A-OK. However, glxinfo
> reports no and gears FPS is as such that it's certainly not using DRI,
> I'm including my log file for examination.
I had something similar the other week. XFree86.log showed that X
Am Sonntag, 29. September 2002 23:48 schrieb Felix Kühling:
> On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 22:37:36 +0100
>
> Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Felix Kühling wrote:
> > > On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 23:25:03 +0200
> > > Dieter Nützel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > >>Is r100/r200 a complete
Am Montag, 30. September 2002 00:08 schrieb Mike Mestnik:
> With my Radeon 8500 64M running CVS Head 20020928. I get 200FPS and 225FPS
> when moving the moues /w gears. I also get some jerking(Walls will move
> back and forth) when moving the mouse(Turning) and strafing in Quake3.
Try "setenv R
On Sunday 29 September 2002 03:42 pm, José Fonseca wrote:
> Check http://dri.sourceforge.net/doc/faq/testing.html#AEN1637 .
> If you see any other 'knobs' worthy to mention (even not necessarily
> environment vars) then I would appreciate that you forward them to me so
> that I can add them to the
With my Radeon 8500 64M running CVS Head 20020928. I get 200FPS and 225FPS when
moving the moues
/w gears. I also get some jerking(Walls will move back and forth) when moving the
mouse(Turning)
and strafing in Quake3.
__
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 22:37:36 +0100
Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Felix Kühling wrote:
> > On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 23:25:03 +0200
> > Dieter Nützel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
[snip]
> >>Is r100/r200 a completely different thing?
> >>If not why not a patch against both?
> >>Then
Nick,
On Sun, Sep 29, 2002 at 02:51:53PM -0600, Nicholas Leippe wrote:
>Hi,
>I was wondering if some dev out there could spend say 2-5 minutes
>and post an email that lists all of the possible knobs that can
>be turned. I know there's a bunch, but they're scattered though
>several postings and h
Felix Kühling wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 23:25:03 +0200
> Dieter Nützel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Am Sonntag, 29. September 2002 22:57 schrieb Felix Kühling:
>>
>>>On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 22:47:47 +0200
>>>
>>>Felix Kühling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 13:22:44 -07
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 23:25:03 +0200
Dieter Nützel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 29. September 2002 22:57 schrieb Felix Kühling:
> > On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 22:47:47 +0200
> >
> > Felix Kühling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 13:22:44 -0700
> > >
> > > Keith Whitwell <[E
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 22:52:57 +0200
Dieter Nützel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 29. September 2002 22:34 schrieb Ian Molton:
> > Hi.
> >
> > Is there any known bug in the radeon driver?
> >
> > the 0929 snapshot doesnt work for me. it segfaults when I start X.
> >
> > I have pageflip an
Am Sonntag, 29. September 2002 22:57 schrieb Felix Kühling:
> On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 22:47:47 +0200
>
> Felix Kühling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 13:22:44 -0700
> >
> > Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > CVSROOT: /cvsroot/dri
> > > Module name: xc
> > > Repos
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 22:47:47 +0200
Felix Kühling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 13:22:44 -0700
> Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > CVSROOT:/cvsroot/dri
> > Module name:xc
> > Repository: xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/radeon/
> > Changes by: keithw@usw-pr-c
Hi,
I was wondering if some dev out there could spend say 2-5 minutes
and post an email that lists all of the possible knobs that can
be turned. I know there's a bunch, but they're scattered though
several postings and hard to find.
For example:
ENV VARS
LIBGL_DEBUG # enable debuggin
Am Sonntag, 29. September 2002 22:34 schrieb Ian Molton:
> Hi.
>
> Is there any known bug in the radeon driver?
>
> the 0929 snapshot doesnt work for me. it segfaults when I start X.
>
> I have pageflip and fast writes enables, as well as AGP4x.
Radeon 7xxx or 8xxx (r100/r200)?
A little bit more
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 13:22:44 -0700
Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CVSROOT: /cvsroot/dri
> Module name: xc
> Repository: xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/radeon/
> Changes by: keithw@usw-pr-cvs1. 02/09/29 13:22:44
>
> Log message:
> irqwait patch from felix
>
> Modified fil
Hi.
Is there any known bug in the radeon driver?
the 0929 snapshot doesnt work for me. it segfaults when I start X.
I have pageflip and fast writes enables, as well as AGP4x.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek he
It looks to me like DRI claims to be starting up A-OK. However, glxinfo
reports no and gears FPS is as such that it's certainly not using DRI,
I'm including my log file for examination.
XFree86 Version 4.2.0 (Red Hat Linux release: 4.2.0-8) / X Window System
(protocol Version 11, revision 0, v
On 29 Sep 2002, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote:
> On Son, 2002-09-29 at 04:47, Chad Page wrote:
> >
> > I did my own build from CVS and copied libxaa.a from it into the
> > modules directory - 2D and 3D work with one head but I still get signal 11
> > with two heads, with and without xin
Hi! here is my problem: I was using the drm drivers wich comes with the
2.4.19 kernel (1.1.1), it was workig "right" exept fo this:
(II) RADEON(0): Using 8 MB AGP aperture
it looks like it is only using 8Mb and my has 64Mb (glxgear only
gives 480FPS). The real problem started when I updated
On 29 Sep 2002, Michel [ISO-8859-1] Dänzer wrote:
> On Son, 2002-09-29 at 04:47, Chad Page wrote:
> >
> > I did my own build from CVS and copied libxaa.a from it into the
> > modules directory - 2D and 3D work with one head but I still get signal 11
> > with two heads, with and without xi
> > otherwise alphbetically eg Manufacturers & Distros (I'll fix distro's now)
>
> Then you only have to fix status.phtml (Supported Cards) to make it equally to
> links.phtml (Graphics Card Manufacturers).
Well spotted, I'll make the status.phtml alphabetical.
cheers
Liam
--
On Sun, 2002-09-29 at 17:04, Luciano Montanaro wrote:
> To summarize:
> - I bought a graphics card, with drivers from the vendor that I don't need.
> - Those drivers have support for the 'clever' texture compression format.
> - My vendor already paid for the implementation of the patented technolo
Alle 17:32, domenica 29 settembre 2002, Brian Paul ha scritto:
> > So instead I would hope that ATI (or
> > possibly S3) would provide a closed-source binary module to add S3
> > Texture Compression to the Radeon / all DRI drivers.
> >
> > Is this possible? (ie the DRI Radeon module with a sup
Ayahuasca wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I'm a proud Radeon owner with an Gentoo-1.4 / Unreal Tournament 2003
> Demo CD.
> I also have a Geforce 2 MX 400 (my brother's but he gave it to me when
> he sold the rest of his computer) and I've confirmed that UT runs GREAT
> on it.
> Anyway, I understand that
On 29 Sep 2002 01:58:16 +0200
Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sam, 2002-09-28 at 19:59, Felix Kühling wrote:
> > On Sat, 28 Sep 2002 18:02:08 +0100
> > José Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I just uploaded a set of binary snapshots built from the CVS head
> > > using R
On Son, 2002-09-29 at 15:51, Jay Phelps wrote:
> The latest snapshot does not report DRI in use by glxinfo and glxgears
> confirms this.
>
> An older snapshot 18092002 does work for these glx tests.
Is direct rendering reported as enabled in the server log with a current
snapshot? If not, does i
On Son, 2002-09-29 at 04:47, Chad Page wrote:
>
> I did my own build from CVS and copied libxaa.a from it into the
> modules directory - 2D and 3D work with one head but I still get signal 11
> with two heads, with and without xinerama. I can disable acceleration and
> it will work, so th
On Son, 2002-09-29 at 11:02, José Fonseca wrote:
> - Forwarded message from John Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
[...]
> On Sat, 2002-09-28 at 13:02, José Fonseca wrote:
> > I just uploaded a set of binary snapshots built from the CVS head
> > using RedHat's compat-gcc-7.3-2.96.110 package
Keith,
I implemented the smart waiting scheme we discussed yesterday. Just to
get the purpose of the whole thing straight again: it is to minimize the
amount of busy waiting as well as the number of lost IRQs. In that case
the attached patch does a pretty good job.
The simple cases are when eith
The latest snapshot does not report DRI in use by glxinfo and glxgears
confirms this.
An older snapshot 18092002 does work for these glx tests.
However, using this older snapshot with mplayer or xine either hangs my
machine, usually after corrupting the screen or trashes the window of
the progra
On Son, 2002-09-29 at 12:00, Ayahuasca wrote:
>
> While I'm at it, I read that some Gatos stuff has been merged recently,
Where have you read that?
> but I haven't been able to get TV-out running (I used to have it working
> under XFree86-4.1.0 / Gatos, but it was a little crashy and WineX
>
Hi all.
I'm a proud Radeon owner with an Gentoo-1.4 / Unreal Tournament 2003
Demo CD.
I also have a Geforce 2 MX 400 (my brother's but he gave it to me when
he sold the rest of his computer) and I've confirmed that UT runs GREAT
on it.
Anyway, I understand that S3 have been approached a few ti
- Forwarded message from John Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: 28 Sep 2002 23:34:22 -0400
From: John Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [Dri-users] Ann: gcc-2.96 compiled snapshots available
To: José Fonseca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Sat, 2002-09-28 at 13:02, José Fonseca wrote:
> I ju
49 matches
Mail list logo
