Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Son, 2002-10-13 at 17:54, Michel Dänzer wrote:
I've done some more clueless digging into the problem visible in
http://penguinppc.org/~daenzer/DRI/evas_test.jpeg and
http://penguinppc.org/~daenzer/DRI/celestia.jpeg . My first suspicion
was an off-by-one error in the
On Don, 2002-10-17 at 21:07, James Fung wrote:
The PCI radeon seems to work fairly well actually:
OpenGL vendor string: Tungsten Graphics, Inc.
OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI Radeon 20020611 AGP 1x x86/MMX/3DNow! TCL
OpenGL version string: 1.2 Mesa 4.0.4
glxgears gives 1000 frames in
On Die, 1999-11-30 at 03:07, Smitty wrote:
This has been sitting around for a long time, since I got pulled into
the website side of things.
I wish to put this up as high level design documentation.
Any comments?
The two documents look great! Up they go.
They match many of my
Keith Whitwell wrote:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Son, 2002-10-13 at 17:54, Michel Dänzer wrote:
I've done some more clueless digging into the problem visible in
http://penguinppc.org/~daenzer/DRI/evas_test.jpeg and
http://penguinppc.org/~daenzer/DRI/celestia.jpeg . My first suspicion
was an
Dieter Nützel wrote:
Mesa/tests ./multipal
r200CreateScreen
2 texture units supported
../images/tile.rgb 256 x 256
Mesa implementation error: unexpected texture format in r200ChoosTexFormat
Please report to the DRI bug database at dri.sourceforge.net
multipal: texstore.c:729:
I cvs-updated both Mesa and mesa-4-1-branch today, and I don't get any
more FPE's with R200_NO_TCL=1. Thanks!
Stefan
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
On Fre, 2002-10-18 at 15:13, Brian Paul wrote:
Keith Whitwell wrote:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Son, 2002-10-13 at 17:54, Michel Dänzer wrote:
I've done some more clueless digging into the problem visible in
http://penguinppc.org/~daenzer/DRI/evas_test.jpeg and
Stefan Lange wrote:
I cvs-updated both Mesa and mesa-4-1-branch today, and I don't get any
more FPE's with R200_NO_TCL=1. Thanks!
Hmmm, I don't recall changing anything that would account for this.
Bugs that magically go away always make me nervous.
-Brian
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Fre, 2002-10-18 at 15:13, Brian Paul wrote:
Keith Whitwell wrote:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Son, 2002-10-13 at 17:54, Michel Dänzer wrote:
I've done some more clueless digging into the problem visible in
http://penguinppc.org/~daenzer/DRI/evas_test.jpeg and
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 08:49:11AM -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
|
| ...(except polygon offset, IMHO).
Is the precision requirement too high, or is something more fundamental
broken?
Allen
---
This sf.net email is
Thanks for the gcc 3.2 indication!
And indeed card doesn't seem to make a difference: same problem with
mach64 (0-0-5 branch from a week ago, mobility M1 chipset).
I was so glad it didn't segfault anymore when trying to see Earth
(problem signaled a few months ago), but now no Saturn :(
So
Allen Akin wrote:
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 08:49:11AM -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
|
| ...(except polygon offset, IMHO).
Is the precision requirement too high, or is something more fundamental
broken?
IIRC, the test draws extremely small (subpixel) triangles.
btw is the DDX Driver what causes the XServer to be single threaded?
I think there are more fundamental reasons.
Better change that back then.
Also sticking up dri_driver_features table by Brian Paul, it may not
be complete but it is full of info already.
Yes, looks good. I'd change
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 11:49:46AM -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
|
| IIRC, the test draws extremely small (subpixel) triangles.
Yeah, the original version of the test did that. The current version
uses a full-window-size quad, so I think it's much better with respect
to the problems you mentioned.
I sent this message once, but I accidentally just sent it to Brian, so here
goes...
On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 01:16:13PM -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
In the DRI drivers we keep a bitfield to determine if/why we need a software
fallback. I suppose IsFast() could return a similar bitfield but coming
CLICK HERE
Unsubscribe click here
litohpicgeevpryrmchlqkvpoqedhdv
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
Access Your PC Securely with GoToMyPC. Try Free Now
https://www.gotomypc.com/s/OSND/DD
On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 12:03:05AM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
| Attached is the output of glean -c comparing two runs, one with the
| subpixel offset for the Y coordinate, the other without. It seems if it
| makes a difference, it's for the good ...
Did the trunk pass the tests involving
On Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
The problem WAS that this re-enabling did not always take place before
Marc's changes, which is why we added the explicit call to do this. I've
checked the code in current XFree86 CVS, but would very much like to know
(just for interest's
18 matches
Mail list logo
