Re: CFS review

Rene Herman [2007-08-30 09:05]: > On 08/29/2007 09:56 PM, Rene Herman wrote: > > Realised the BUGs may mean the kernel DRM people could want to be in CC... > > > On 08/29/2007 05:57 PM, Keith Packard wrote: > > > >> With X server 1.3, I'm getting consistent crashes with two glxgear > >> instance

[Bug 12193] segment fault when call glBitmap if DrawBuffer mode is GL_LEFT

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12193 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED -- Configure bugmail: ht

Re: ring buffer space error?!

> Hi, > I am a newbie whos trying to make to work a 945GM integrated card. > I have this problem with the last version of xf86-video-intel driver > (downloaded from git on 30/08/07..yesterday) where I can't run any 3D > application using DRI. > stop using intelfb would be a good starting point.

Re: [PATCH 00/23] drm: introduce drm_zalloc

> > Note the slab has a memory tracking feature that accounts memory to > callers of the allocator. IF that's not enough for you please help > improving the common code instead of inventing your own. Christoph that code was written over 6-7 years ago, feel free to provide a patch for it to use t

ring buffer space error?!

Hi, I am a newbie whos trying to make to work a 945GM integrated card. I have this problem with the last version of xf86-video-intel driver (downloaded from git on 30/08/07..yesterday) where I can't run any 3D application using DRI. the X server crashes..these are my logfiles: dmesg: [drm] Ini

[Bug 11434] RADEON with [Radeon X300 (PCIE)] RV370

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11434 [EMAIL PROTECTED] changed: What|Removed |Added CC||[EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Comment

[Bug 11870] AIGLX DRM Probe Removes RADEON DRM Lock

http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11870 --- Comment #4 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2007-08-30 10:54 PST --- Created an attachment (id=11334) --> (http://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=11334&action=view) Revised patch with style(9) fixes. -- Configure bugmail: http://b

Re: [PATCH 00/23] drm: introduce drm_zalloc

On Tue, 2007-08-28 at 21:50 +0100, Dave Airlie wrote: > On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 10:57:50PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >>As there are many places in drm code where drm_alloc + memset is used > >> this patch series intr

Re: [PATCH 00/23] drm: introduce drm_zalloc

On Thu, Aug 30, 2007 at 12:20:32PM -0400, Kristian H?gsberg wrote: > > The wrappers aren't useless the drm alloc/free passes in a memory space > > for debugging purposes so we can track memory abuse when developing, > > Do we ever use that, though? Having to pass in the pointer, the size > and t

Re: uncached page allocator

Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 16:05 +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > > >>So you can see why some sort of uncached+writecombined page cache >>would be useful, I could just allocate a bunch of pages at startup as >>uncached+writecombined, and allocate pixmaps from them and when I >>bind/

Re: CFS review

* Rene Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Realised the BUGs may mean the kernel DRM people could want to be in CC... and note that the schedule() call in there is not part of the crash backtrace: > >Call Trace: > > [] drm_lock+0x255/0x2de > > [] mga_dma_buffers+0x0/0x2e3 > > [] drm_ioctl+0x14

Re: CFS review

On 08/29/2007 09:56 PM, Rene Herman wrote: Realised the BUGs may mean the kernel DRM people could want to be in CC... > On 08/29/2007 05:57 PM, Keith Packard wrote: > >> With X server 1.3, I'm getting consistent crashes with two glxgear >> instances running. So, if you're getting any output, it'