On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 14:19, Tony Rogvall wrote:
> "José Fonseca" wrote:
>
> > On 2002.04.13 04:36 Leif Delgass wrote:
> > > On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, José Fonseca wrote:
> > >
> > > Do we know for sure that pci gart is supported on mach64? The rage 128
> > > and radeon drivers both write to PCI GART
"José Fonseca" wrote:
> On 2002.04.13 04:36 Leif Delgass wrote:
> > On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, José Fonseca wrote:
> >
> > Do we know for sure that pci gart is supported on mach64? The rage 128
> > and radeon drivers both write to PCI GART registers, but I don't see
> > anything analogous in the Rage
Leif Delgass wrote:
>
> Do we know for sure that pci gart is supported on mach64? The rage 128
> and radeon drivers both write to PCI GART registers, but I don't see
> anything analogous in the Rage PRO docs. My understanding is that to use
> the scatter/gather memory, the card has to implement
On 2002.04.13 04:36 Leif Delgass wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, José Fonseca wrote:
>
> Do we know for sure that pci gart is supported on mach64? The rage 128
> and radeon drivers both write to PCI GART registers, but I don't see
> anything analogous in the Rage PRO docs. My understanding is tha
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, José Fonseca wrote:
> I've just commited support for PCI only Mach64 cards to the 2D driver. It
> should recognize a PCI card and allocate memory from the PCIGART. There is
> still missing support for PCI operation of an AGP card when agpgart isn't
> available - not much r
On 2002.04.11 01:40 José Fonseca wrote:
> ...
> There is still missing support for PCI operation of an AGP card when
> agpgart isn't available - not much really - just a question of
> book-keeping so it will be done shortly.
Done.
> I'm still not sure if everything is in place for DRI on Mach6
I've just commited support for PCI only Mach64 cards to the 2D driver. It
should recognize a PCI card and allocate memory from the PCIGART. There is
still missing support for PCI operation of an AGP card when agpgart isn't
available - not much really - just a question of book-keeping so it will
On Fri, 5 Apr 2002, José Fonseca wrote:
> On 2002.04.04 18:47 Tony Rogvall wrote:
> > "José Fonseca" wrote:
> >
> > > On 2002.04.04 11:46 Tony Rogvall wrote:
> > > > ...
> > > >
> > > > Found it, I assumed it was a printk and removed DRM_INFO voila it
> > started
> > > > without
> > > > a crash.
On 2002.04.04 18:47 Tony Rogvall wrote:
> "José Fonseca" wrote:
>
> > On 2002.04.04 11:46 Tony Rogvall wrote:
> > > ...
> > >
> > > Found it, I assumed it was a printk and removed DRM_INFO voila it
> started
> > > without
> > > a crash. In mach64_dma there is code for printing AGP_BASE !! Just
>
"José Fonseca" wrote:
> On 2002.04.04 11:46 Tony Rogvall wrote:
> > ...
> >
> > Found it, I assumed it was a printk and removed DRM_INFO voila it started
> > without
> > a crash. In mach64_dma there is code for printing AGP_BASE !! Just put
> > some
> > __REALLY_HAVE_AGP around it.
> >
>
> __REAL
On 2002.04.04 11:46 Tony Rogvall wrote:
> ...
>
> Found it, I assumed it was a printk and removed DRM_INFO voila it started
> without
> a crash. In mach64_dma there is code for printing AGP_BASE !! Just put
> some
> __REALLY_HAVE_AGP around it.
>
__REALLY_HAVE_AGP is a constant macro. It must b
Tony Rogvall wrote:
> Thomas Kunze wrote:
>
> > On Saturday 23 March 2002 04:31, you wrote:
> > > Tony,
> > >
> > > I've just commited a simple change to remove the AGP requirement in the
> > > mach64-0-0-3-branch, as suggested by Michel. This is rather preliminary
> > > and I'm not sure if it's
Thomas Kunze wrote:
> On Saturday 23 March 2002 04:31, you wrote:
> > Tony,
> >
> > I've just commited a simple change to remove the AGP requirement in the
> > mach64-0-0-3-branch, as suggested by Michel. This is rather preliminary
> > and I'm not sure if it's enough to get it running on a PCI Ma
José Fonseca wrote:
> Tony,
>
> I've just commited a simple change to remove the AGP requirement in the
> mach64-0-0-3-branch, as suggested by Michel. This is rather preliminary
> and I'm not sure if it's enough to get it running on a PCI Mach64.
>
> Unfortunately I have agpgart statically linked
On Saturday 23 March 2002 04:31, you wrote:
> Tony,
>
> I've just commited a simple change to remove the AGP requirement in the
> mach64-0-0-3-branch, as suggested by Michel. This is rather preliminary
> and I'm not sure if it's enough to get it running on a PCI Mach64.
Hi,
I've just tested the
Tony,
I've just commited a simple change to remove the AGP requirement in the
mach64-0-0-3-branch, as suggested by Michel. This is rather preliminary
and I'm not sure if it's enough to get it running on a PCI Mach64.
Unfortunately I have agpgart statically linked in the kernel and not as a
mo
16 matches
Mail list logo
