Re: [Dri-devel] Snapshots now being built with gcc 3.2

2002-09-27 Thread Charl P. Botha
On Fri, 2002-09-27 at 04:25, Andy Dustman wrote: Still getting the same problem with the r200. Interestingly, the amount of memory used for textures has gone up recently, from about 93 MB to 113 MB. Most obvious feature of this is what looks like a NULL pointer reference at the end. Also

Re: [Dri-devel] Snapshots now being built with gcc 3.2

2002-09-26 Thread José Fonseca
On Wed, Sep 25, 2002 at 10:32:32PM -0400, Andy Dustman wrote: On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 09:25, José Fonseca wrote: I've updated my workstation to the RedHat Linux 7.3.94 beta, which has gcc 3.2. So now forward the snapshots will be built with this version. AFAIK this shouldn't pose any problem to

Re: [Dri-devel] Snapshots now being built with gcc 3.2

2002-09-26 Thread Andy Dustman
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 03:40, Charl P. Botha wrote: serious note, have you tried replacing your libxaa.a yet to eliminate the possibility of that signal 11 that we've been seeing with the last few snapshots? You could also try a snapshot of today or later, because Michel has fixed the XAA

Re: [Dri-devel] Snapshots now being built with gcc 3.2

2002-09-26 Thread Andy Dustman
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 19:22, José Fonseca wrote: AFAIK the announced breakeage concerned C++ only. Well, there is some c++ code in libnurbs, and so apparently libGLU.so. However it appears that wouldn't affect the DRI snapshots. RedHat does indeed provides a compat-gcc package. I'll see

Re: [Dri-devel] Snapshots now being built with gcc 3.2

2002-09-26 Thread Dieter Ntzel
Am Freitag, 27. September 2002 03:20 schrieb Andy Dustman: On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 19:22, José Fonseca wrote: AFAIK the announced breakeage concerned C++ only. Well, there is some c++ code in libnurbs, and so apparently libGLU.so. However it appears that wouldn't affect the DRI snapshots.

Re: [Dri-devel] Snapshots now being built with gcc 3.2

2002-09-26 Thread Andy Dustman
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 20:50, Andy Dustman wrote: On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 03:40, Charl P. Botha wrote: serious note, have you tried replacing your libxaa.a yet to eliminate the possibility of that signal 11 that we've been seeing with the last few snapshots? You could also try a snapshot

Re: [Dri-devel] Snapshots now being built with gcc 3.2

2002-09-25 Thread Andy Dustman
On Tue, 2002-09-24 at 09:25, José Fonseca wrote: I've updated my workstation to the RedHat Linux 7.3.94 beta, which has gcc 3.2. So now forward the snapshots will be built with this version. AFAIK this shouldn't pose any problem to the users since the key issue is that the kernel modules are

[Dri-devel] Snapshots now being built with gcc 3.2

2002-09-24 Thread José Fonseca
Hi guys. Yep, vacations ended. I've updated my workstation to the RedHat Linux 7.3.94 beta, which has gcc 3.2. So now forward the snapshots will be built with this version. AFAIK this shouldn't pose any problem to the users since the key issue is that the kernel modules are compiled with the

Re: [Dri-devel] Snapshots now being built with gcc 3.2

2002-09-24 Thread Sergey V. Udaltsov
Hi Jose I've updated my workstation to the RedHat Linux 7.3.94 beta, which has gcc 3.2. So now forward the snapshots will be built with this version. AFAIK this shouldn't pose any problem to the users since the key issue is that the kernel modules are compiled with the same version of gcc