What do you think about this?
regards,
Sylvain
Some people already use this patch:
http://na.srck.net/dwm/dwm-4.3-taglayouts.patch
Maarten.
On 8/9/07, Sylvain Bertrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you think about this?
regards,
Sylvain
On 8/9/07, Sylvain Bertrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you think about this?
Tags != workspaces.
You can use them as such, but they aren't the same. In dwm, there's
only _one_ workspace. (de-)selecting certain tags influences what
windows are (not) displayed in that workspace. Since you
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 12:17:59PM +0200, Sander van Dijk wrote:
On 8/9/07, Sylvain Bertrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you think about this?
Tags != workspaces.
You can use them as such, but they aren't the same. In dwm, there's
only _one_ workspace. (de-)selecting certain tags
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 12:23:00PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
So how about having a floating tag then? Or more generally spoken, tags
with different layouts.
And how would you handle windows with multiple tags (that could have
different layouts) then?
Regards,
--
Jeroen Schot
[EMAIL
On 8/9/07, Diego Biurrun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So how about having a floating tag then? Or more generally spoken, tags
with different layouts.
Can you elaborate a bit? I'm not sure I understand what you mean.
Sander.
schot-dwm:
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 12:23:00PM +0200, Diego Biurrun wrote:
So how about having a floating tag then? Or more generally spoken, tags
with different layouts.
And how would you handle windows with multiple tags (that could have
different layouts) then?
Does tagging
Well I currently think about shortcuts to the desired
functionality. Currently we have inchratio() bound to
Mod1-{h,l}, and Mod1-{j,k} for up/down navigation. This feels
convenient, even if it breaks consistency. Besides this, there
is Mod1-Shift-{j,k} for dec-/incrementing nmaster.
Nice
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 12:29:07PM +0200, Sander van Dijk wrote:
On 8/9/07, Diego Biurrun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So how about having a floating tag then? Or more generally spoken, tags
with different layouts.
Can you elaborate a bit? I'm not sure I understand what you mean.
If I mark a
On (09/08/07 12:17), Sander van Dijk wrote:
On 8/9/07, Sylvain Bertrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you think about this?
Tags != workspaces.
You can use them as such, but they aren't the same. In dwm, there's
only _one_ workspace. (de-)selecting certain tags influences what
windows
Is this the same as the {h,v}ratio patch?
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 07:59:59PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
I have a working algorithm already called rtile. See here for
how the new tile is intended to work (on the screenshot you see
an rtile algorithm with ratio 0.7, this means that each
Hi, i have finally patched my dwm with the latests mercurial
changes. and this is my config:
{ MODKEY, XK_h, inchratio, .1 },
\
{ MODKEY, XK_l, inchratio, -.1
}, \
{ MODKEY|ShiftMask,
On 8/9/07, Diego Biurrun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I mark a client as tag X it gets float layout, if I mark it as a
different tag, it gets tiled again with the rest of the clients of that
tag.
Yes, but what if you tag it as _both_?
Gr. Sander.
On 8/9/07, Anydot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Imho it doesn't collide with tagging approach, it only change their
(tags) behaviour. Even with that patch you can choose to view multiple
tags at once etc. It only transfer where the state of selected layout is
saved from workspace to tag.
But what
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 01:53:33PM +0200, Sander van Dijk wrote:
On 8/9/07, Diego Biurrun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I mark a client as tag X it gets float layout, if I mark it as a
different tag, it gets tiled again with the rest of the clients of that
tag.
Yes, but what if you tag it
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 11:15:28AM +0200, Sylvain Bertrand wrote:
What do you think about this?
I need use it and I definitely need it :-)
See http://www.cgarbs.de/dwm-mitch.en.html
It contains a patch to use normal workspaces instead of tags and
another one to set a different layout on every
Maybe *you* only ever look at one tag; I tend to look at two or three
at a time. That's the difference between a tag and a workspace,
remember?
Kurt
On 8/9/07, Diego Biurrun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 01:53:33PM +0200, Sander van Dijk wrote:
On 8/9/07, Diego Biurrun
And what happens when my xterm window is tagged with 3(tiled) and
6(floating)? What happens when I'm viewing tags 1+3+6? Is xterm
tiled or floating? If it's floating on 6 and tiled on 3, and I switch
to 3, where in the stack does xterm go? When I switch to 6, does it
remember its previous
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 08:00:45AM -0500, Kurt H Maier wrote:
On 8/9/07, Diego Biurrun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 01:53:33PM +0200, Sander van Dijk wrote:
On 8/9/07, Diego Biurrun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I mark a client as tag X it gets float layout, if I mark
karmaflux:
And what happens when my xterm window is tagged with 3(tiled) and
6(floating)? What happens when I'm viewing tags 1+3+6? Is xterm
tiled or floating? If it's floating on 6 and tiled on 3, and I switch
to 3, where in the stack does xterm go? When I switch to 6, does it
remember
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 08:20:12AM -0500, Kurt H Maier wrote:
And what happens when my xterm window is tagged with 3(tiled) and
6(floating)? What happens when I'm viewing tags 1+3+6?
I thought that wmii could assign more than one tag to a window, but only
display one tag at any given time,
On 8/9/07, Kai Grossjohann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 08:20:12AM -0500, Kurt H Maier wrote:
And what happens when my xterm window is tagged with 3(tiled) and
6(floating)? What happens when I'm viewing tags 1+3+6?
I thought that wmii could assign more than one tag to
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 02:21:37PM +0200, pancake wrote:
Is this the same as the {h,v}ratio patch?
Yes.
On Thu, Aug 02, 2007 at 07:59:59PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
I have a working algorithm already called rtile. See here for
how the new tile is intended to work (on the screenshot you
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 03:08:56PM +0200, pancake wrote:
Hi, i have finally patched my dwm with the latests mercurial
changes. and this is my config:
{ MODKEY, XK_h, inchratio, .1
}, \
{ MODKEY, XK_l,
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 08:56:17PM +0200, Xavier wrote:
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 08:13:42PM +0200, Xavier wrote:
Maybe you could use an extension like tab mix plus to force
firefox to open all links in new tabs instead of new windows, I do that
and it works really well with dwm.
I dislike {H|V}ratio, but I think NMASTER is a good option. I use it
once in a while.
On 8/9/07, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 03:08:56PM +0200, pancake wrote:
Hi, i have finally patched my dwm with the latests mercurial
changes. and this is my config:
I also think the ratio thing is not a good idea (at least for main
dwm). About nmaster, imo you can remove it. I'm making more tests with
bwm and 0.2 will let you having several master clients and change
between them like you change layers now, i'm still thinking about it
but if somebody wants
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 07:43:09PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
Hi!
Actually, more and more I come to the same conclusion. The ratio
stuff just feels wrong. I also think the NMASTER thing feels
wrong and should/might be removed.
What is the impression of others regarding this?
I ended up
* Enno Gottox Boland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [Aug 09 2007 19:14] wrote:
I wrote a little patch which hides borders if there is only one window
in tiled mode. This makes it also easier to differ between fullscreen
floated windows and a single tiled window. Also it feels just better
to me.
Yeah, i
On 8/9/07, Damjan Vrencur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 07:43:09PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
Hi!
Actually, more and more I come to the same conclusion. The ratio
stuff just feels wrong. I also think the NMASTER thing feels
wrong and should/might be removed.
As to the ratio -- I'm still not sure. As to nmaster, yes, it's most
definitely evil. Nmaster should go!
i use it quite a bit - 3 x 2 or similar count between master and right stacks
fits pretty well compard to 1x5 or similar..
the ratio stuff definitely feels weird though
c
[a]
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 12:58 -0500, Kurt H Maier wrote:
I dislike {H|V}ratio, but I think NMASTER is a good option. I use it
once in a while.
+1
-RPM
Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, more and more I come to the same conclusion. The ratio
stuff just feels wrong. I also think the NMASTER thing feels
wrong and should/might be removed.
Actually, i do use NMASTER for file sorting occasionally but with the
master windows
Hi,
thanks for the feedback to {V,H}RATIO and NMASTER. Here is the
way things will change:
- VRATIO will be removed
- HRATIO will slightly change
- NMASTER will be removed by default, but it will be possible to
use it
All inc*() functions will go away, same with all global
variables
34 matches
Mail list logo
