Re: [dwm] snapping bugs with multiple screens

2008-05-08 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
e Xinerama/XrandR support - still the ability to use a layout among different physical screens due to variables (maybe layout variables) - removing all the clunk which isn't used (it's time again to get rid of some stuff in hg tip, after a lot has been applied and needs to be reconsidered if it's really used). - the bar won't go away Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] command line tool to notify()

2008-05-07 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
ldnt be hard to do. but i have not many time these days :( I'd prefer a tiny input language read from stdin. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] EWMH code would enable some code cuts

2008-05-07 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Wed, May 07, 2008 at 07:57:44AM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote: > On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 12:14:10AM +0200, Henrik Holst wrote: > > > I think an implementation of EWMH would make it possible to rem

Re: [dwm] EWMH code would enable some code cuts

2008-05-07 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
eleases and it is right in my opinion. Hence I don't think it's worth the parsing effort in two applications just for the price of a nice concept. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] snapping bugs with multiple screens

2008-05-06 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
rds, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] EWMH code would enable some code cuts

2008-05-06 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
ain. Esp. DEFGEOM seems to have a lot of potential for simplification(s). Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] hg tip minor modification proposals

2008-05-06 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
; > > /* configuration, allows nested code to access above variables */ > +Layout layouts[]; > +Geom geoms[]; > +Layout *lt = layouts; > +Geom *geom = geoms; > #include "config.h" > #define TAGSZ (LENGTH(tags) * sizeof(Bool)) > -Layout *lt = layouts; > -Geom *geom = geoms; > -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] JUCE app patch

2008-05-06 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 02:08:09PM +0200, Tinou wrote: > I just noticed dwm crashed every time I start a JUCE app ( > www.rawmaterialsoftware.com/*juce*/). > Here is a simple patch to make it work. Applied, thanks. -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] snapping bugs with multiple screens

2008-05-06 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 02:12:10PM +0200, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote: > "Anselm R. Garbe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I can confirm your observation and it took quite a while that > > someone reported it. I expected it much earlier ;) > > > > Th

Re: [dwm] snapping bugs with multiple screens

2008-05-05 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
define a region of the root window) then you could > completely remove snap. The only remaining issue would be positioning > a window in the barrier between monitors, but this solution could be > better than no snaping at all, and not too complicated. The point is there are no monit

Re: [dwm] snapping bugs with multiple screens

2008-05-05 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
tihead setups through setting it to 0. Proper snap-support would make dwm dependend from XrandR or Xinerama and I don't want to do that (or alternatively of yet another complex geometrie setup at compile time). I see some potential to make SNAP a variable however, which could be set in DEFGEOMs for this reason. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] Java patch

2008-04-29 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
n we can delete the patches in dwm and XMonad and people just run setwmname FooBarBaz to work around the XToolkit bug(s)? Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] Java patch

2008-04-28 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 09:33:59PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote: > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Antoni Grzymala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Anselm R. Garbe dixit (2008-04-28, 20:06): > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 04:32:47PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrot

Re: [dwm] Java patch

2008-04-28 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 08:21:36PM +0200, Antoni Grzymala wrote: > Anselm R. Garbe dixit (2008-04-28, 20:06): > > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 04:32:47PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote: > > > anyway, I took a look at DEFGEOMS and am not sure whether I > > > have to fiddl

Re: [dwm] Java patch

2008-04-28 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
mx+mw, wy, ww-mw, wh, wx, wy, ww, wh) Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] Yet another simplification, this time sel/prevtags

2008-04-27 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 07:41:08PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 10:24:32PM +0200, Premysl Hruby wrote: > > void > > view(const char *arg) { > > seltags ^= 1; > > memset(tagset[seltag], (NULL == arg), TAGSZ); > > tag

Re: [dwm] Yet another simplification, this time sel/prevtags

2008-04-27 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 10:24:32PM +0200, Premysl Hruby wrote: > void > view(const char *arg) { > seltags ^= 1; > memset(tagset[seltag], (NULL == arg), TAGSZ); > tagset[seltag][idxoftag(arg)] = True; > arrange(); > } I simplified view() accordingly.

Re: [dwm] fgeom patch

2008-04-27 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
ows much more flexibility in > dwm, especially in floating layouts (now you can have floating layouts > to arrange your windows in a grid, for example), and I won't need > defines to not remember floating layout (I can use "<>="). > Well, now I will really wait to s

Re: [dwm] Yet another simplification, this time sel/prevtags

2008-04-27 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
do the XOR inside memcpy you can save another line of code. > I have also changed a little your notation (because I don't like > underscores in variable names), but maybe you can think of better > names. > I think I will like dwm 5.0... Applied tagset patch > > > -- >

Re: [dwm] small cleanup of drawtext()

2008-04-27 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
inted text is zero Thanks a lot, applied. -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] Java patch

2008-04-27 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
is available here: > http://files.luizribeiro.org/dwm/dwm-4.9-java.diff Does this really work for everyone? I remember I evaluated a similiar solution last year without success. ;( Regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] Hackers mail-list

2008-04-20 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 07:18:37PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 09:37:53PM +0200, Premysl Hruby wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail-list is no longer working? I didn't get any > > commit mail from March and latter. > > Unfortunately it is

Re: [dwm] fgeom patch

2008-04-20 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
e what you have to say, going back > to plan9,,, sorry again for all this noise. It took me a while, but I will integrate your patch with some modifications. Thanks a lot for your work! I'm not sure if I'm able to integrate your patch into the current code-base until tomorrow, but I hope so. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] faster focus to client

2008-04-20 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
MODKEY|ShiftMask, XK_j, > focusnext, NULL }, > so you can advance several clients with only one key stroke. There has been a similiar approach which I had in mind for 4.7 already, but for some reasons it has been delayed. Due the fact that we can view multiple tags, the idea was to implement two two additional focus-functions which focus the next/prev client with exactly the same tag(s) of the current client, which are bound to the Mod1-Shift-{j,k}. I reconsider this now for dwm-5.0. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] Yet another simplification, this time sel/prevtags

2008-04-20 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
ps of same types. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] Compile time initialization of lt and geom

2008-04-20 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
or manipulation. But let's see if someone complains ;) Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] Anothor (this time semi-) simplification

2008-04-20 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 03:21:24PM +0200, Premysl Hruby wrote: > this patch creates macros MAX and MIN, and use it where it is possible. Thanks a lot, that looks a lot cleaner, applied! Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] off the topic, let sselp support multibyte charactors?

2008-04-20 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
ib A sselp release will be available during next week. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] Compile time initialization of lt and geom

2008-04-20 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
rom extensions included in config.h Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] [PATCH] rules fix

2008-04-20 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
e will match for xev. > > { "Minefield", "Navigator", NULL,> tags[2],> False } > > I attached a patch which fixes this issue. It's already included in dwm-gtx. Thanks a lot, your patch is applied. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] Hackers mail-list

2008-04-20 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
l be around mid May. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] off the topic, let sselp support multibyte charactors?

2008-04-20 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 02:10:03PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > I consider this going upstream. Pushed upstream. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] off the topic, let sselp support multibyte charactors?

2008-04-17 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
p_string, > + XConvertSelection(dpy, XA_PRIMARY, utf8_string, xa_clip_string, > w, CurrentTime); > XFlush(dpy); > XNextEvent(dpy, &ev); -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] fgeom patch

2008-04-14 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
t; #define BOOLTOIDX(x) (x) ? 1 : 0 And then in resize: c->x[BOOLTOIDX(lt->isfloating || c->isfloating)] = x; ... etc. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] Comix fullscreen mode

2008-04-14 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
work). But the > bar thing still remains. It's a problem with evince too. I will recheck, it is quite likely that the fullscreen implementation still suffers from some cornercases. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] Preventing xterm from closing by killclient()

2008-04-12 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
> you just need to check c->iskillable in killclient(). > > If I do that, iskillable is set to False by default, right? > > Yes, thats why I changed it to isunkillable. Yea, I propose to call it isimmortal. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] Preventing xterm from closing by killclient()

2008-04-11 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 04:57:29PM +0200, Martin Sander wrote: > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 12:26:04PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > > Though, I would propose to set c->iskillable to True during > > killclient() to allow getting rid of unresponsive clients which > > cannot

Re: [dwm] Preventing xterm from closing by killclient()

2008-04-11 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
straight away. So you can delete the whole killable() function, which is also rather slow if it is performed on each killclient() invocation. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] dmenu, slock patches; slock DPMS crash

2008-04-09 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 11:12:23AM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 02:37:10PM +0200, Peter Hartlich wrote: > > >> Also, with the new DPMS code from changeset 31, slock crashes here > > >> (X.org server 1.4.0.90, DPMS disabled in xorg.conf):

Re: [dwm] dmenu, slock patches; slock DPMS crash

2008-04-09 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
Sorry for odd reasons the applied patches weren't present in the dmenu hg tip, this is fixed now. On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 10:57:20AM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 10:51:15PM +0200, Peter Hartlich wrote: > > dmenu_run.patch: > > - replace $* with

Re: [dwm] Preventing xterm from closing by killclient()

2008-04-09 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
ld have to disable the XKillClient or the XSendEvent part > to do it properly. > > Any hints? Hmm, what about changing the binding to Ctrl-d in your setup then? Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] dmenu, slock patches; slock DPMS crash

2008-04-09 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 11:49:33AM +0200, markus schnalke wrote: > Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Though, > > I'm not totally sure if the sort -u breaks anything with wmii. > > This needs to be tested first. > > What is the problem with

Re: [dwm] togglemax substiute in 4.9?

2008-04-09 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 11:40:09AM +0200, yy wrote: > 2008/4/9, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 07:52:03PM +0200, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote: > > > yy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Well, this i

Re: [dwm] dmenu, slock patches; slock DPMS crash

2008-04-09 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
it is expected to prefer the sh-related userland first, even if in use with wmii. Though, I'm not totally sure if the sort -u breaks anything with wmii. This needs to be tested first. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] togglemax substiute in 4.9?

2008-04-09 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 07:16:03PM +0200, yy wrote: > Well, this is my proposal in patch form. I'm not sure about the > convenience of setting fx and fy in tileresize, but you get the idea. I think about your solution. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckles

Re: [dwm] togglemax substiute in 4.9?

2008-04-09 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
d a similar patch on 31st March, so it is wasted effort. Hehe, indeed your both solutions are very close. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] mouse limits

2008-04-09 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
endend from s{x,y,w,h} because we need to support fullscreen apps as well -- and they are by definition floating. So there needs to be a compromise here. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] dmenu, slock patches; slock DPMS crash

2008-04-09 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
ed in hg tip now. Please confirm this due to > > a recheck. > > Still crashes at DPMSForceLevel. It seems that DPMSCapable returns True > even with DPMS disabled... Well, then I need to add an error handler. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] togglemax substiute in 4.9?

2008-04-08 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 01:35:40PM +0200, yy wrote: > 2008/4/8, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 01:55:29PM +0200, Joerg van den Hoff wrote: > > > as `togglemax' seems gone in 4.9: I agree, that `monocle' > > > is very

Re: [dwm] dmenu, slock patches; slock DPMS crash

2008-04-08 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
led request: 27 > | Current serial number in output stream: 28 Right, should be fixed in hg tip now. Please confirm this due to a recheck. Many thanks! Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] togglemax substiute in 4.9?

2008-04-08 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
lows restoring the geometry when switching from tiled to monocle and back, resp. when switching from floating to tiled and back or vice versa. At manage() time I consider, that the previous geometry is the initial geometry as it would be for the floating case. Any complains? Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] dmenu, slock patches; slock DPMS crash

2008-04-08 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
> > a missing -u option. > > http://www.suckless.org/pipermail/dwm/2007-February/002128.html I doubt that is a valid assumption still, so I'm fine with the sort -u. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] focus changes with recent dwm

2008-04-07 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
move. > > Is this considered a feature? Is there an easy way to get the old > behaviour back? Glancing at the code revealed that selscreen is gone... > > > Regards, Jukka > > -- > bashian roulette: > $ ((RANDOM%6)) || rm -rf ~ > -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] Monocle question

2008-04-05 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
g a nextclient() function which works on lt->isfloating and which replaces nexttiled()... Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] Monocle question

2008-04-04 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 12:29:43PM +0200, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote: > "Anselm R. Garbe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 01:05:51AM +0200, Dashing wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > > I use monocle mode a lot,

Re: [dwm] Monocle question

2008-04-04 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
ut still working on all clients of course. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] use of class and instance (was: Re: dwm-4.9 / dmenu-3.6)

2008-04-04 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
-title "bla" and match for "bla" in the rules in the title. If either value is NULL it is not checked or not applied. Hope this helps, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

[dwm] dwm-4.9 / dmenu-3.6

2008-04-03 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
fig.h - revival of setmfact and MFACT in config.h (same applies to Mod1-h and Mod1-l) - certain bugfixes and polishing of the code again Many thanks go to all contributors and the dwm community! Enjoy the new release! Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] [wmii] suckless.org host will change soon

2008-04-03 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
Well, I just decided to delay the host change until May for various reasons. But the preparation will take place soon anyways. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] suckless.org host will change soon

2008-04-03 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
l issues which apply to the current host because it is located in Germany, and secondly I believe something smaller is cheaper for me. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

[dwm] suckless.org host will change soon

2008-04-03 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
provider today, and will backup everything. I ask the community to not make any changes to the diri markdown contents after April 4 23:59 UTC. I will keep you informed about the ongoing issues. The mailinglists are the first target being moved. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< ht

[dwm] final testing call for dwm-4.9

2008-04-02 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
Hi there, I kindly ask you to give hg tip a try. If there are no bugs, it will be dwm-4.9 tomorrow evening. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] setmfact improvements

2008-04-02 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
; to restore your initial master factor. > > Taken together, they add 1 LOC. Thanks, I applied the second one which re-introduces MFACT. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] experimental patch: "escher"

2008-04-02 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
t; 1884 dwm.c > 109 config.def.h >78 dwindle.c > 2071 total > > +17 LOC for nmaster and two spiral modes isn't shabby. > > me Well that's a good result, but I will postpone a decision here. I plan to refactor the layout stuff a little bit after dwm 4.9, th

[dwm] again, don't expect the change I discussed about happen

2008-04-02 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
See subject, this is related to the column layout discussion ;) -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

[dwm] there won't be a radical change

2008-04-02 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
t; more rows and columns as needed, is fairly simple, and doesn't require > more state. Well, I think it might go into this direction. I agree on most people claiming to not do too major changes. So see this as a statement to not expect a radical change ;) Kind regards, -- Anselm R

Re: [dwm] simplify grabbuttons()

2008-04-02 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 07:01:11PM +0200, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > below is a patch that shortens grabbuttons() a bit. Of course this will make it to hg tip ;) Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] A rather radical thought

2008-04-02 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 08:27:11PM +0400, Michael wrote: > On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 06:04:26PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > > Well if it is not possible to view several tags at a time, two > > tagall/dropall functions could be considered to apply/drop a certain > > tag to al

Re: [dwm] A rather radical thought

2008-04-02 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 07:43:06PM +0400, Michael wrote: > Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > >What about getting rid of supporting the selection of multiple > >tags at a time > > Please, don't do it, personaly, I use this feature very much. > Don't you think that e

Re: [dwm] A rather radical thought

2008-04-02 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 04:37:47PM +0200, Matthias Kirschner wrote: > * Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-04-02 16:11:54 +0200]: > > > Initially there is 1 column, a new client is inserted below the > > currently selected window in the column, similiar to the s

Re: [dwm] A rather radical thought

2008-04-02 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 04:27:34PM +0200, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote: > "Anselm R. Garbe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Here is what I have exactly in mind from a user perspective: > > > > Initially there is 1 column, a new client is inserted below

Re: [dwm] A rather radical thought

2008-04-02 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
rather straight-forward: Focussing the previous/next window in the current column is done with Mod1-{j,k}, focussing the previous/next column is done with Mod1-{h,l}. So the whole layout concept consists of basically 4 keys with 3 kinds of modifiers. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe ><

Re: [dwm] A rather radical thought

2008-04-02 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 03:37:49PM +0200, Marc Andre Tanner wrote: > Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > >What about getting rid of supporting the selection of multiple > >tags at a time and celebrating the revival of the column layout > >of wmii again in dwm 5.0? What about getting

Re: [dwm] A rather radical thought

2008-04-02 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 03:53:10PM +0200, Sander van Dijk wrote: > On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 3:34 PM, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 03:23:39PM +0200, Sander van Dijk wrote: > > > If you're serious though, what exactly do you mean

Re: [dwm] A rather radical thought

2008-04-02 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 03:23:39PM +0200, Sander van Dijk wrote: > On Wed, Apr 2, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > What about getting rid of supporting the selection of multiple > > tags at a time and celebrating the revival of the column layo

[dwm] A rather radical thought

2008-04-02 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
What about getting rid of supporting the selection of multiple tags at a time and celebrating the revival of the column layout of wmii again in dwm 5.0? What about getting rid of all the tiled layout flavors in favor for the column layout? Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe ><

Re: [dwm] ii best practices

2008-04-01 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
> Do you have any best practices for using ii? echo(1), I'm not using ii but sic, but I usually create a fifo for sending input to sic using echo or sometimes cat(1), if I plan to have longer conversations than the usual hello. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] st progress?

2008-03-27 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
s serious software ;) Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] Fibonacci in 4.8?

2008-03-26 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
e some > situation where this change could have negative results? > > Also, I can't find anything that seems to ban/unban anything, and > nexttiled() does get used, so I suppose there's no need to change > anything for that either. > > Cheers, Valentin > > On We

Re: [dwm] Fibonacci in 4.8?

2008-03-26 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
trouble? Thanks :) > > > > Cheers, Valentin > > > > > In anyway, if you don't use xinerama you can still using dwm 4.7 and the > patch for 4.6 it will work. > > On the other hand, dwm 4.8 is great :) Well, to be honest I don't recommend using 4.8 anymore, use hg tip. 4.9 will be released quite soon. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] Fibonacci in 4.8?

2008-03-26 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
Client’ has no member named ‘ismax’ > fibonacci.c:44: error: ‘way’ undeclared (first use in this function) > > My C isn't that good, so could somebody help me getting this to work, > if it's not too much trouble? Thanks :) > > Cheers, Valentin > -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] dealing with badly-behaved GUI applications

2008-03-26 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
le screen. > > As a stop-gap, I'm running a nested X server (Xephyr), with a very basic VM. > This works fine, but I'm curious to know how others may have dealt with > similar problems, possibly with other applications. Did you try running this app in floating layout? Kin

Re: [dwm] st progress?

2008-03-26 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
evised some concepts in my mind about it, I think the idea of an interface to change the background colors dynamically depending on some patterns in the terminal window is worth consideration. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] hg tip / upcoming 4.9

2008-03-25 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
ur other fix is more correct. It should be ev->x >= bgw && ev->x < x. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

[dwm] hg tip / upcoming 4.9

2008-03-24 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
change allowed me to introduce double mfact and setmfact() again, which decreases/increases the master size. The key bindings for this are Mod1-h and Mod1-l again. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] DWM Tricot

2008-03-24 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
logo for anything as you like unless you don't make profit from it. The whole project is meant as liberal as possible. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] horizontal/vertical tiling behaviour

2008-03-21 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
if you toggle quite > a bit. > > So in short, yes, it's the intended behaviour. I'm not totally satisfied with the current solution, but yes it was intended. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] Bug in idxoftag (hg tip)

2008-03-20 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
i++); > > and should be, eg: > > for(i = 0; t && (i < LENGTH(tags)) && strcmp(tags[i], t); i++); > > due to t could be NULL (modkey+0, modkey+shift+0), so strcmp would crash dwm. You are right! Thanks for this hint. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] found a nice way to do the setgeom stuff

2008-03-19 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 12:50:23PM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > On 3/19/08, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, it's not very general. If you use bottom stack, then > > growm() should touch mh, th and ty instead. With DEFGEOM this is > >

Re: [dwm] found a nice way to do the setgeom stuff

2008-03-19 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:04:35AM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote: > On 3/19/08, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The problem is: > > > > void > > configurenotify(XEvent *e) { > > XConfigureEvent *ev = &e->xconfigure; > > > > if(

Re: [dwm] found a nice way to do the setgeom stuff

2008-03-19 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
sh = ev->height; setgeom(NULL); } } This event handler is invoked whenever X changes the screen resolution dynamically. So for the case of shrinkmaster/growmaster being the current geometry this means, that the master area will shrink/grow whenever the screen resolution is changed dynamically. That's the reason why I propose to get over the idea of shrink/growmaster. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] How do I remove the bar? Re: dwm-4.8 / dmenu-3.5 / slock-0.8

2008-03-19 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
a shortcut { MODKEY, XK_b, setgeom,"||" } Kind regards, Anselm On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:02:59AM +0200, Vasil Dimov wrote: > On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 18:08:03 +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > > Hi there, > > > > I'm glad

Re: [dwm] [wmii] $MODKEY-t binding stopped working!

2008-03-18 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 04:51:39PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:55:01PM +0900, Martin Swift wrote: > > On 3/18/08, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Maybe negative -x/-y values could be interpreted as reverse direction, &g

Re: [dwm] found a nice way to do the setgeom stuff

2008-03-18 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 05:56:49PM -0400, Samuel Baldwin wrote: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:05:09PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > > Do you mean the firefox blinking? That's a ff 2.x bug, ff 3.x > > does not have this behavior anymore. > > Naw, but I've go

Re: [dwm] found a nice way to do the setgeom stuff

2008-03-17 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
ght. This fixed mine. Thanks. Well, sorry, I hacked it untested into my mail. I have two similiar definitions as a sample in hg tip. However, I pretty much recommend not using shrink/grow in this way, but to stick to some usual geometries, with a bigger and with a smaller master area, and maybe a geometry with a hidden bar. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] Bug in applyrules(Client *c) (hg tip)

2008-03-17 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
strstr(c->name, r->title) > || (ch.res_class && r->class && strstr(ch.res_class, r->class)) > || (ch.res_name && r->instance && strstr(ch.res_name, r->instance))) Well, c->name is always true, but I agree on the r->title. Thanks for the hint, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] found a nice way to do the setgeom stuff

2008-03-17 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 04:49:34PM -0400, Samuel Baldwin wrote: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 08:35:59PM +0100, Johannes Hofmann wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 05:44:25PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote: > > > Hi there, as mentioned yesterday, I found a nice way how to > > &g

[dwm] found a nice way to do the setgeom stuff

2008-03-17 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
{ MODKEY, XK_h, setgeom, "|-" }, { MODKEY, XK_l, setgeom, "+|" }, Toggling the bar or bottom stack stuff works equivalently. You can upgrade to hg tip, to check this new approach. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] Bug in monocle (dwm 4.8 and hg tip)

2008-03-17 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
* c->border, moh - 2 * c->border, RESIZEHINTS); Right. > or > resize(c, mox - c->border, moy - c->border, mow, moh, RESIZEHINTS); No, then x and y might be negative. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

Re: [dwm] dwm-4.8 / dmenu-3.5 / slock-0.8

2008-03-16 Thread Anselm R. Garbe
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 02:51:49PM -0400, G David Modica wrote: > In config.h is there any way to make bottomstack the default. Yea the first layout in the array is the default one. Kind regards, -- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >