[DX-CHAT] F Y I

2012-05-20 Thread ragnar otterstad
 
How would N1DG know that income immediately dries up when uploading early to 
LoTW? He has never tried it!
Tom is right: it makes no difference to anything, in my experience anyway.
73 de Roger/G3SXW.


From: Tom Wylie 
Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 12:06 PM
To: Trevor Dunne 
Cc: Roger Western ; c...@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: Re: [CDXC] 3C6A and 3C0E

  
Doesn't sound exactly right to me, becuase according to the ARRL there 
are only 50,000 users of LOTW many of whom are unactive or historical 
logs. Sounds like a lot of hoo hah to me to try to justify their 
position, and can be considered a red herring.

In my experience of meing a QSL Manager and on going on expeditions 
myself, those who want a paper card, will STILL want a paper card no 
matter the state of LOTW. I have no noticed any visible change in the 
number of direct requests 1 year after my last trip to Senegal, when I 
uploaded the logs to LOTW each day. I am still receiving
hundreds via the buro in addition.

Tom
GM4FDM

On 20/05/2012 12:01, Trevor Dunne wrote:
 Seen this intresting tweet from one of the DX dinners at Dayton last
 night it was a talk on DXpedition funding,

 NCDXF (@NCDXF)
 19/05/2012 20:10
 Great discussion about #DXpedition funding! N1DG: ”The minute the LOTW
 upload happens, you might as well close the bank account.”

 Goes against the general feeling posted here,

 Trevor
 EI2GLB




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CDXC/

* Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CDXC/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
    cdxc-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    cdxc-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    cdxc-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org 

In the message body put either 

unsubscribe dx-chat

or 

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---


Re: [DX-CHAT] Re: [DX-CHAT] F Y I

2012-05-20 Thread Mecseri


I have 48,613 QSO records in my LOTW log.
I also have 19,108 QSL records.
That is a 39% match.
Considering the cost of a new QSL confirmation of $2-$3 U.S. dollars, 
ARRL's LOTW is a cost effective alternative to paper QSL.


My 2c worth of observation

Lou




On 5/20/2012 9:11 AM, char...@thegallos.com wrote:





Sent from my phone, please excuse any mistakes
73 de KG2V

- Reply message -
From: ragnar otterstad la...@yahoo.no
To: dx-chat dx-chat@njdxa.org, d...@dxhf.darc.de d...@dxhf.darc.de
Cc: dx-qsl dx-...@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [DX-CHAT] F Y I
Date: Sun, May 20, 2012 7:37 am


How would N1DG know that income immediately dries up when uploading 
early to LoTW? He has never tried it!

Tom is right: it makes no difference to anything, in my experience anyway.
73 de Roger/G3SXW.


From: Tom Wylie
Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 12:06 PM
To: Trevor Dunne
Cc: Roger Western ; c...@yahoogroups.com mailto:c...@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [CDXC] 3C6A and 3C0E


Doesn't sound exactly right to me, becuase according to the ARRL there
are only 50,000 users of LOTW many of whom are unactive or historical
logs. Sounds like a lot of hoo hah to me to try to justify their
position, and can be considered a red herring.

In my experience of meing a QSL Manager and on going on expeditions
myself, those who want a paper card, will STILL want a paper card no
matter the state of LOTW. I have no noticed any visible change in the
number of direct requests 1 year after my last trip to Senegal, when I
uploaded the logs to LOTW each day. I am still receiving
hundreds via the buro in addition.

Tom
GM4FDM

On 20/05/2012 12:01, Trevor Dunne wrote:
 Seen this intresting tweet from one of the DX dinners at Dayton last
 night it was a talk on DXpedition funding,

 NCDXF (@NCDXF)
 19/05/2012 20:10
 Great discussion about #DXpedition funding! N1DG: ”The minute the LOTW
 upload happens, you might as well close the bank account.”

 Goes against the general feeling posted here,

 Trevor
 EI2GLB




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CDXC/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CDXC/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
cdxc-dig...@yahoogroups..com mailto:cdxc-dig...@yahoogroups.com
cdxc-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com 
mailto:cdxc-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com


* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cdxc-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com mailto:cdxc-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org

In the message body put either

unsubscribe dx-chat

or

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---
---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org

In the message body put either

unsubscribe dx-chat

or

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---




---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org 

In the message body put either 


unsubscribe dx-chat

or 


subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---

[DX-CHAT] Vedr: funding the DXpedition

2012-05-20 Thread ragnar otterstad
 
Dr Charles
 
IMHO there is no human right to go on a DXpedition.  If we cannot afford it, 
there will no operation.  If somebody has or can get the means,  and has the 
inclination, all very good.
 
I just dont like the idea of not uploading to lOTW unless.
 
It goes against the spirit of  hamradio, in my wiev.
 
 
 
73  and good luck
 
Rag la5he
 
 Hey Rag, the problem for me in S E Asia and being retired, it is the lack of 
funding UP FRONT during the planning phase.  I am struggling to find about 
$6,000 usd to travel repeatedly to Myanmar Burma to talk to the right people in 
the right way to launch a big DXpedition there.  I think money can come in, BUT 
MY PROBLEM IS WHAT IF THE PLAN FAILS?  The money is spent, no refunds possible, 
and no operation.



Advance funding is somewhat possible, but if the effort fails, there will be no 
money to refund.  Do u have any ideas about that situation?



de HS0ZCW, Charly



Harpole
k4...@hotmail.com



 Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 12:37:30 +0100 
 From: la...@yahoo.no 
 Subject: [DX-CHAT] F Y I 
 To: dx-chat@njdxa.org; d...@dxhf.darc.de 
 CC: dx-...@mailman.qth.net 
 
 
 How would N1DG know that income immediately dries up when uploading 
 early to LoTW? He has never tried it! 
 Tom is right: it makes no difference to anything, in my experience anyway. 
 73 de Roger/G3SXW. 
 
 
 From: Tom Wylie 
 Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 12:06 PM 
 To: Trevor Dunne 
 Cc: Roger Western ; c...@yahoogroups.commailto:c...@yahoogroups.com 
 Subject: Re: [CDXC] 3C6A and 3C0E 
 
 
 Doesn't sound exactly right to me, becuase according to the ARRL there 
 are only 50,000 users of LOTW many of whom are unactive or historical 
 logs. Sounds like a lot of hoo hah to me to try to justify their 
 position, and can be considered a red herring. 
 
 In my experience of meing a QSL Manager and on going on expeditions 
 myself, those who want a paper card, will STILL want a paper card no 
 matter the state of LOTW. I have no noticed any visible change in the 
 number of direct requests 1 year after my last trip to Senegal, when I 
 uploaded the logs to LOTW each day. I am still receiving 
 hundreds via the buro in addition. 
 
 Tom 
 GM4FDM 
 
 On 20/05/2012 12:01, Trevor Dunne wrote: 
  Seen this intresting tweet from one of the DX dinners at Dayton last 
  night it was a talk on DXpedition funding, 
  
  NCDXF (@NCDXF) 
  19/05/2012 20:10 
  Great discussion about #DXpedition funding! N1DG: ”The minute the LOTW 
  upload happens, you might as well close the bank account.” 
  
  Goes against the general feeling posted here, 
  
  Trevor 
  EI2GLB 
 
 
 
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] 
 
 
 
  
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links 
 
 * To visit your group on the web, go to: 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CDXC/ 
 
 * Your email settings: 
 Individual Email | Traditional 
 
 * To change settings online go to: 
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CDXC/join 
 (Yahoo! ID required) 
 
 * To change settings via email: 
 cdxc-dig...@yahoogroups.commailto:cdxc-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
 
 cdxc-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.commailto:cdxc-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com 
 
 * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: 
 cdxc-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.commailto:cdxc-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com 
 
 * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: 
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
 
 
 
 
 --- 
 To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to 
 
 imail...@njdxa.org 
 
 In the message body put either 
 
 unsubscribe dx-chat 
 
 or 
 
 subscribe dx-chat 
 
 This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org 
 ---                   
        

---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org 

In the message body put either 

unsubscribe dx-chat

or 

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---


Vedr: [DX-CHAT] Re: [DX-CHAT] F Y I

2012-05-20 Thread ragnar otterstad
 
Not excactly rocket science, so even I understand and agree ! Hi
 
73  rag  la5he
 

I have 48,613 QSO records in my LOTW log.
I also have 19,108 QSL records.
That is a 39% match.
Considering the cost of a new QSL confirmation of $2-$3 U.S. dollars, ARRL's 
LOTW is a cost effective alternative to paper QSL.

My 2c worth of observation

Lou 




On 5/20/2012 9:11 AM, char...@thegallos.com wrote: 




Sent from my phone, please excuse any mistakes
73 de KG2V


- Reply message -
From: ragnar otterstad la...@yahoo.no
To: dx-chat dx-chat@njdxa.org, d...@dxhf.darc.de d...@dxhf.darc.de
Cc: dx-qsl dx-...@mailman.qth.net
Subject: [DX-CHAT] F Y I
Date: Sun, May 20, 2012 7:37 am



How would N1DG know that income immediately dries up when uploading early to 
LoTW? He has never tried it!
Tom is right: it makes no difference to anything, in my experience anyway.
73 de Roger/G3SXW.


From: Tom Wylie 
Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 12:06 PM
To: Trevor Dunne 
Cc: Roger Western ; c...@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: Re: [CDXC] 3C6A and 3C0E

  
Doesn't sound exactly right to me, becuase according to the ARRL there 
are only 50,000 users of LOTW many of whom are unactive or historical 
logs. Sounds like a lot of hoo hah to me to try to justify their 
position, and can be considered a red herring.

In my experience of meing a QSL Manager and on going on expeditions 
myself, those who want a paper card, will STILL want a paper card no 
matter the state of LOTW. I have no noticed any visible change in the 
number of direct requests 1 year after my last trip to Senegal, when I 
uploaded the logs to LOTW each day. I am still receiving
hundreds via the buro in addition.

Tom
GM4FDM

On 20/05/2012 12:01, Trevor Dunne wrote:
 Seen this intresting tweet from one of the DX dinners at Dayton last
 night it was a talk on DXpedition funding,

 NCDXF (@NCDXF)
 19/05/2012 20:10
 Great discussion about #DXpedition funding! N1DG: ”The minute the LOTW
 upload happens, you might as well close the bank account.”

 Goes against the general feeling posted here,

 Trevor
 EI2GLB




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CDXC/

* Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CDXC/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
    cdxc-dig...@yahoogroups..com 
    cdxc-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    cdxc-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org 

In the message body put either 

unsubscribe dx-chat

or 

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
--- 
---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org 

In the message body put either 

unsubscribe dx-chat

or 

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---

---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org 

In the message body put either 

unsubscribe dx-chat

or 

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---

---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org 

In the message body put either 

unsubscribe dx-chat

or 

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---


RE: [DX-CHAT] F Y I

2012-05-20 Thread Ron Notarius W3WN

Administrative note:

 

Folks, this is an argument from another set of reflectors that was dropped
in here.  

 

If you wish to reply, keep in mind that YOU may not have privileges on the
other reflectors, so your comments won't be read by those intended to see
it, AND you will get bounce backs.  That's one of the reasons that the no
cross posting rule on this reflector exists.

 

Thanks for your understanding.

 

And I will now take off my administrative hat, and make my own personal
comments, in a separate email.

 

73,  ron w3wn

Administrator, DX Chat

 

  _  

From: kf...@njdxa.org [mailto:kf...@njdxa.org] On Behalf Of ragnar otterstad
Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 7:38 AM
To: dx-chat; d...@dxhf.darc.de
Cc: dx-qsl
Subject: [DX-CHAT] F Y I

 

How would N1DG know that income immediately dries up when uploading early to
LoTW? He has never tried it!
Tom is right: it makes no difference to anything, in my experience anyway.
73 de Roger/G3SXW.


From: Tom Wylie 
Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 12:06 PM
To: Trevor Dunne 
Cc: Roger Western ; c...@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: Re: [CDXC] 3C6A and 3C0E

  
Doesn't sound exactly right to me, becuase according to the ARRL there 
are only 50,000 users of LOTW many of whom are unactive or historical 
logs. Sounds like a lot of hoo hah to me to try to justify their 
position, and can be considered a red herring.

In my experience of meing a QSL Manager and on going on expeditions 
myself, those who want a paper card, will STILL want a paper card no 
matter the state of LOTW. I have no noticed any visible change in the 
number of direct requests 1 year after my last trip to Senegal, when I 
uploaded the logs to LOTW each day. I am still receiving
hundreds via the buro in addition.

Tom
GM4FDM

On 20/05/2012 12:01, Trevor Dunne wrote:
 Seen this intresting tweet from one of the DX dinners at Dayton last
 night it was a talk on DXpedition funding,

 NCDXF (@NCDXF)
 19/05/2012 20:10
 Great discussion about #DXpedition funding! N1DG: The minute the LOTW
 upload happens, you might as well close the bank account.

 Goes against the general feeling posted here,

 Trevor
 EI2GLB




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CDXC/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CDXC/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
cdxc-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
cdxc-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cdxc-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/





---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org 

In the message body put either 

unsubscribe dx-chat

or 

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---


---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org 

In the message body put either 

unsubscribe dx-chat

or 

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---

RE: [DX-CHAT] F Y I

2012-05-20 Thread Ron Notarius W3WN

With all due respect to Roger, who's opinion I do respect. the comments
quoted below from N1DG are taken out of context.  If the context had been
clearer, he might not have asked the question.

 

Doug's presentation yesterday at the DX Forum, which led off all of the
presentations, was on the cost of major DXpeditions.  It was an analysis of
at least 20-25 such groups over the last few years, data that they
voluntarily provided to him, or were required to provide as part of the
donation conditions given to them by NCDXF and other DX foundations.  If I
recall correctly, the time span was about 20 years - and my only quibble
with his data is that I don't believe that he adjusted the numbers for
inflation.

 

With that in mind, also consider that he explicitly stated that as the
treasurer for one of the groups involved, it was HIS observation based on
the QSL requests that crossed HIS desk, that the donations  contributions
that came with QSL requests dwindled from a few a day to almost nothing,
once the major log upload to Logbook of the World happened.  

 

And, several of the groups he talked with told him the same thing - nor did
it matter if the LotW upload was 3 months, 6 months, or a year after the
trip was over.  

 

Is this true for every group?  Probably not, as there are many unique
factors in every DXpedition.  One can argue about sample size, and other
factors.  But, that's not the point.

 

Roger may well ask how does Doug know, but only because the original tweet
took one single line, out of context.  And that context explained, in
detail, how he did so.

 

Finally, Doug also stated that his analysis, and the PowePoint presentation
he used, would be made available on the NCDXF web site.  I'm sure it's going
to take him a few days, between getting home and recovering from Dayton, but
it will be there.  

 

I'd respectfully suggest that if anyone disagrees with his numbers or
analysis, take a look at it FIRST and then discuss it - with Doug.

 

73, ron w3wn

 

  _  

From: kf...@njdxa.org [mailto:kf...@njdxa.org] On Behalf Of ragnar otterstad
Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 7:38 AM
To: dx-chat; d...@dxhf.darc.de
Cc: dx-qsl
Subject: [DX-CHAT] F Y I

 

How would N1DG know that income immediately dries up when uploading early to
LoTW? He has never tried it!
Tom is right: it makes no difference to anything, in my experience anyway.
73 de Roger/G3SXW.


From: Tom Wylie 
Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 12:06 PM
To: Trevor Dunne 
Cc: Roger Western ; c...@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: Re: [CDXC] 3C6A and 3C0E

  
Doesn't sound exactly right to me, becuase according to the ARRL there 
are only 50,000 users of LOTW many of whom are unactive or historical 
logs. Sounds like a lot of hoo hah to me to try to justify their 
position, and can be considered a red herring.

In my experience of meing a QSL Manager and on going on expeditions 
myself, those who want a paper card, will STILL want a paper card no 
matter the state of LOTW. I have no noticed any visible change in the 
number of direct requests 1 year after my last trip to Senegal, when I 
uploaded the logs to LOTW each day. I am still receiving
hundreds via the buro in addition.

Tom
GM4FDM

On 20/05/2012 12:01, Trevor Dunne wrote:
 Seen this intresting tweet from one of the DX dinners at Dayton last
 night it was a talk on DXpedition funding,

 NCDXF (@NCDXF)
 19/05/2012 20:10
 Great discussion about #DXpedition funding! N1DG: The minute the LOTW
 upload happens, you might as well close the bank account.

 Goes against the general feeling posted here,

 Trevor
 EI2GLB




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CDXC/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CDXC/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
cdxc-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
cdxc-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
cdxc-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/





---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org 

In the message body put either 

unsubscribe dx-chat

or 

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---


---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org 

In the message body put either 

unsubscribe dx-chat

or 

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---

Re: [DX-CHAT] Vedr: funding the DXpedition

2012-05-20 Thread Don Berger
 
This seems to me a manifestation of the entitlement mentality as it relates to 
ham radio and dx-peditions? Financial support should be gratuitous, not a 
pre-requisite and a group which withholds qsls pending receipt of money from 
individual for confirmation of a contact is essentially extortion (e.g., ST0R). 
Just my 2 cents
k1VSK 
  - Original Message - 
  From: ragnar otterstad 
  To: Charles Harpole ; DX Chat ; d...@dxhf.darc.de 
  Cc: dx qsl qsls 
  Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 10:41 AM
  Subject: [DX-CHAT] Vedr: funding the DXpedition




  Dr Charles

  IMHO there is no human right to go on a DXpedition.  If we cannot afford it, 
there will no operation.  If somebody has or can get the means,  and has the 
inclination, all very good.

  I just dont like the idea of not uploading to lOTW unless.

  It goes against the spirit of  hamradio, in my wiev.



  73  and good luck

  Rag la5he

   Hey Rag, the problem for me in S E Asia and being retired, it is the lack of 
funding UP FRONT during the planning phase.  I am struggling to find about 
$6,000 usd to travel repeatedly to Myanmar Burma to talk to the right people in 
the right way to launch a big DXpedition there.  I think money can come in, BUT 
MY PROBLEM IS WHAT IF THE PLAN FAILS?  The money is spent, no refunds possible, 
and no operation.



  Advance funding is somewhat possible, but if the effort fails, there will be 
no money to refund.  Do u have any ideas about that situation?



  de HS0ZCW, Charly



  Harpole
  k4...@hotmail.com


  
   Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 12:37:30 +0100 
   From: la...@yahoo.no 
   Subject: [DX-CHAT] F Y I 
   To: dx-chat@njdxa.org; d...@dxhf.darc.de 
   CC: dx-...@mailman.qth.net 
   
   
   How would N1DG know that income immediately dries up when uploading 
   early to LoTW? He has never tried it! 
   Tom is right: it makes no difference to anything, in my experience anyway. 
   73 de Roger/G3SXW. 
   
   
   From: Tom Wylie 
   Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 12:06 PM 
   To: Trevor Dunne 
   Cc: Roger Western ; c...@yahoogroups.commailto:c...@yahoogroups.com 
   Subject: Re: [CDXC] 3C6A and 3C0E 
   
   
   Doesn't sound exactly right to me, becuase according to the ARRL there 
   are only 50,000 users of LOTW many of whom are unactive or historical 
   logs. Sounds like a lot of hoo hah to me to try to justify their 
   position, and can be considered a red herring. 
   
   In my experience of meing a QSL Manager and on going on expeditions 
   myself, those who want a paper card, will STILL want a paper card no 
   matter the state of LOTW. I have no noticed any visible change in the 
   number of direct requests 1 year after my last trip to Senegal, when I 
   uploaded the logs to LOTW each day. I am still receiving 
   hundreds via the buro in addition. 
   
   Tom 
   GM4FDM 
   
   On 20/05/2012 12:01, Trevor Dunne wrote: 
Seen this intresting tweet from one of the DX dinners at Dayton last 
night it was a talk on DXpedition funding, 

NCDXF (@NCDXF) 
19/05/2012 20:10 
Great discussion about #DXpedition funding! N1DG: ”The minute the LOTW 
upload happens, you might as well close the bank account.” 

Goes against the general feeling posted here, 

Trevor 
EI2GLB 
   
   
   
   
   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] 
   
   
   
    
   
   Yahoo! Groups Links 
   
   * To visit your group on the web, go to: 
   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CDXC/ 
   
   * Your email settings: 
   Individual Email | Traditional 
   
   * To change settings online go to: 
   http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CDXC/join 
   (Yahoo! ID required) 
   
   * To change settings via email: 
   cdxc-dig...@yahoogroups.commailto:cdxc-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
   
   cdxc-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.commailto:cdxc-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com 
   
   * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: 
   cdxc-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.commailto:cdxc-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com 
   
   * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: 
   http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ 
   
   
   
   
   --- 
   To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to 
   
   imail...@njdxa.org 
   
   In the message body put either 
   
   unsubscribe dx-chat 
   
   or 
   
   subscribe dx-chat 
   
   This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org 
   --- 
 



  ---
  To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to

  imail...@njdxa.org 

  In the message body put either 

  unsubscribe dx-chat

  or 

  subscribe dx-chat

  This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
  --- 


Re: [DX-CHAT] F Y I

2012-05-20 Thread Donald R Greenbaum
 
Well do you know the context of the sentence being quoted?

Or the fact that I was referring to a study of over 20 dxpeditions including 
one that uploaded within a week of the end of operations?

You will note the phrase uploading early is not in the sentence you quoted me 
as saying.  I was asked about a six month upload timeframe.

I think you might ask someone for some Clarification of his remarks before 
publicly questioning what he does or does not know.

Don N1DG



On May 20, 2012, at 7:37 AM, ragnar otterstad la...@yahoo.no wrote:

 
 How would N1DG know that income immediately dries up when uploading early to 
 LoTW? He has never tried it!
 Tom is right: it makes no difference to anything, in my experience anyway.
 73 de Roger/G3SXW.
 
 
 From: Tom Wylie 
 Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 12:06 PM
 To: Trevor Dunne 
 Cc: Roger Western ; c...@yahoogroups.com 
 Subject: Re: [CDXC] 3C6A and 3C0E
 
   
 Doesn't sound exactly right to me, becuase according to the ARRL there 
 are only 50,000 users of LOTW many of whom are unactive or historical 
 logs. Sounds like a lot of hoo hah to me to try to justify their 
 position, and can be considered a red herring.
 
 In my experience of meing a  QSL Manager and on going on expeditions 
 myself, those who want a paper card, will STILL want a paper card no 
 matter the state of LOTW. I have no noticed any visible change in the 
 number of direct requests 1 year after my last trip to Senegal, when I 
 uploaded the logs to LOTW each day. I am still receiving
 hundreds via the buro in addition.
 
 Tom
 GM4FDM
 
 On 20/05/2012 12:01, Trevor Dunne wrote:
  Seen this intresting tweet from one of the DX dinners at Dayton last
  night it was a talk on DXpedition funding,
 
  NCDXF (@NCDXF)
  19/05/2012 20:10
  Great discussion about #DXpedition funding! N1DG: ”The minute the LOTW
  upload happens, you might as well close the bank account.”
 
  Goes against the general feeling posted here,
 
  Trevor
  EI2GLB
 
 
 
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 
 
 
 
 
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 * To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CDXC/
 
 * Your email settings:
 Individual Email | Traditional
 
 * To change settings online go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CDXC/join
 (Yahoo! ID required)
 
 * To change settings via email:
 cdxc-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
 cdxc-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com
 
 * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 cdxc-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com
 
 * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
 http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 
 
 
 
 ---
 To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to
 
 imail...@njdxa.org 
 
 In the message body put either 
 
 unsubscribe dx-chat
 
 or 
 
 subscribe dx-chat
 
 This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
 ---



---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org 

In the message body put either 

unsubscribe dx-chat

or 

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---


[DX-CHAT] DX-PEDITIONS FOR US POOR FOLKS?

2012-05-20 Thread JIM Abercrombie

What about us who have limited incomes? I was preparing for retirement, but 
unfortunately I became disabled before I was vested in 
the retirement system.  How are we supposed to buy our QSL's? I have a fairly 
good station and I have been able to work all the 
recent DXpeditions. I was at #66 in Zone 5 from Yemen. I got my station by 
being very frugal with my money. If I were able I would 
be glad to donate and I have donated small sums.  There are those who are less 
fortunate than me. How are they going to buy their 
cards?  It seems to me they think everyone is fortunate financially as the guys 
who go on DXpeditions. I belong to the ARRL and 
LOTW.
It reminds me of the ham I know who told me the other day that everyone could 
be able to invest money so they can retire, when I 
know there are thousands who have more month left after the money is gone.
I guess if you can't afford this hobby, you should go buy yourself a kite and a 
ball of string. 



---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org 

In the message body put either 

unsubscribe dx-chat

or 

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---



Re: [DX-CHAT] Vedr: funding the DXpedition

2012-05-20 Thread Barry


QSLing has always been a business for some.  For example, let's not 
forget some DX stations in Reunion and Lebanon, and some QSL mgrs from 
France and Germany (at least THEY return a card).


It has just become more blatant in recent years.

Barry W2UP

On 5/20/2012 9:27 AM, Don Berger wrote:



This seems to me a manifestation of the entitlement mentality as it 
relates to ham radio and dx-peditions? Financial support should be 
gratuitous, not a pre-requisite and a group which withholds qsls 
pending receipt of money from individual for confirmation of a contact 
is essentially extortion (e.g., ST0R).

Just my 2 cents
k1VSK

- Original Message -
*From:* ragnar otterstad mailto:la...@yahoo.no
*To:* Charles Harpole mailto:k4...@hotmail.com ; DX Chat
mailto:dx-chat@njdxa.org ; d...@dxhf.darc.de
mailto:d...@dxhf.darc.de
*Cc:* dx qsl qsls mailto:dx-...@mailman.qth.net
*Sent:* Sunday, May 20, 2012 10:41 AM
*Subject:* [DX-CHAT] Vedr: funding the DXpedition


Dr Charles
IMHO there is no human right to go on a DXpedition.  If we cannot
afford it, there will no operation.  If somebody has or can get
the means,  and has the inclination, all very good.
I just dont like the idea of not uploading to lOTW
unless.
It goes against the spirit of  hamradio, in my wiev.
73  and good luck
Rag la5he
 Hey Rag, the problem for me in S E Asia and being retired, it is
the lack of funding UP FRONT during the planning phase.  I am
struggling to find about $6,000 usd to travel repeatedly to
Myanmar Burma to talk to the right people in the right way to
launch a big DXpedition there.  I think money can come in, BUT MY
PROBLEM IS WHAT IF THE PLAN FAILS?  The money is spent, no refunds
possible, and no operation.



Advance funding is somewhat possible, but if the effort fails,
there will be no money to refund.  Do u have any ideas about that
situation?



de HS0ZCW, Charly



Harpole
k4...@hotmail.com mailto:k4...@hotmail.com



 Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 12:37:30 +0100
 From: la...@yahoo.no mailto:la...@yahoo.no
 Subject: [DX-CHAT] F Y I
 To: dx-chat@njdxa.org mailto:dx-chat@njdxa.org;
d...@dxhf.darc.de mailto:d...@dxhf.darc.de
 CC: dx-...@mailman.qth.net mailto:dx-...@mailman.qth.net


 How would N1DG know that income immediately dries up when uploading
 early to LoTW? He has never tried it!
 Tom is right: it makes no difference to anything, in my
experience anyway.
 73 de Roger/G3SXW.


 From: Tom Wylie
 Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 12:06 PM
 To: Trevor Dunne
 Cc: Roger Western ; c...@yahoogroups.com
mailto:c...@yahoogroups.commailto:c...@yahoogroups.com
mailto:c...@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [CDXC] 3C6A and 3C0E


 Doesn't sound exactly right to me, becuase according to the ARRL
there
 are only 50,000 users of LOTW many of whom are unactive or
historical
 logs. Sounds like a lot of hoo hah to me to try to justify their
 position, and can be considered a red herring.

 In my experience of meing a QSL Manager and on going on expeditions
 myself, those who want a paper card, will STILL want a paper
card no
 matter the state of LOTW. I have no noticed any visible change
in the
 number of direct requests 1 year after my last trip to Senegal,
when I
 uploaded the logs to LOTW each day. I am still receiving
 hundreds via the buro in addition.

 Tom
 GM4FDM

 On 20/05/2012 12:01, Trevor Dunne wrote:
  Seen this intresting tweet from one of the DX dinners at
Dayton last
  night it was a talk on DXpedition funding,
 
  NCDXF (@NCDXF)
  19/05/2012 20:10
  Great discussion about #DXpedition funding! N1DG: ”The minute
the LOTW
  upload happens, you might as well close the bank account.”
 
  Goes against the general feeling posted here,
 
  Trevor
  EI2GLB




 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



 

 Yahoo! Groups Links

 * To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CDXC/

 * Your email settings:
 Individual Email | Traditional

 * To change settings online go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CDXC/join
 (Yahoo! ID required)

 * To change settings via email:
 cdxc-dig...@yahoogroups.com
mailto:cdxc-dig...@yahoogroups.commailto:cdxc-dig...@yahoogroups.com
mailto:cdxc-dig...@yahoogroups.com

 cdxc-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

mailto:cdxc-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.commailto:cdxc-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com
mailto:cdxc-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

 * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 

Re: [DX-CHAT] DX-PEDITIONS FOR US POOR FOLKS?

2012-05-20 Thread Ryan Jairam
 
If you don't have a lot of money then it would seem to me that the
bureau would work nicely.

If you want something a little faster than the bureau, you can try
WF5E. The outgoing QSLs go quickly to the other incoming bureaus and
your incoming cards arrive via the bureau.

A lot of DXpeditions send out bureau cards for free. You can even
request them with OQRS in many cases.

In fact if you have a lot of spare time and are close to the club that
does the bureau work, that would work out nicely. You get your cards
free and many of them need the extra help.

73, Ryan, N2RJ
(also a bureau volunteer)


On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 12:15 PM, JIM Abercrombie 4...@prtcnet.com wrote:

 What about us who have limited incomes? I was preparing for retirement, but 
 unfortunately I became disabled before I was vested in
 the retirement system.  How are we supposed to buy our QSL's? I have a 
 fairly good station and I have been able to work all the
 recent DXpeditions. I was at #66 in Zone 5 from Yemen. I got my station by 
 being very frugal with my money. If I were able I would
 be glad to donate and I have donated small sums.  There are those who are 
 less fortunate than me. How are they going to buy their
 cards?  It seems to me they think everyone is fortunate financially as the 
 guys who go on DXpeditions. I belong to the ARRL and
 LOTW.
 It reminds me of the ham I know who told me the other day that everyone could 
 be able to invest money so they can retire, when I
 know there are thousands who have more month left after the money is gone.
 I guess if you can't afford this hobby, you should go buy yourself a kite and 
 a ball of string.



 ---
 To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

 imail...@njdxa.org

 In the message body put either

 unsubscribe dx-chat

 or

 subscribe dx-chat

 This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
 ---




-- 
Ryan A. Jairam


---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org 

In the message body put either 

unsubscribe dx-chat

or 

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---



[DX-CHAT] F Y I

2012-05-20 Thread ragnar otterstad
 
Hello Don

I dont know more than what I read, but I am sure you will put everything in 
perspective.   We are an who look forward to that.

Perhaps it yet again all boils down to the old  trans-atlantic cultural divide. 
QSLing habits, charitable donations, commercialisation are all different in USA 
than anywhere else in the world. 


73  Rag   LA5HE 


Well do you know the context of the sentence being quoted?

Or the fact that I was referring to a study of over 20 dxpeditions including 
one that uploaded within a week of the end of operations?

You will note the phrase uploading early is not in the sentence you quoted me 
as saying.  I was asked about a six month upload timeframe.

I think you might ask someone for some Clarification of his remarks before 
publicly questioning what he does or does not know.

Don N1DG




On May 20, 2012, at 7:37 AM, ragnar otterstad la...@yahoo.no wrote:




How would N1DG know that income immediately dries up when uploading early to 
LoTW? He has never tried it!
Tom is right: it makes no difference to anything, in my experience anyway.
73 de Roger/G3SXW.


From: Tom Wylie 
Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 12:06 PM
To: Trevor Dunne 
Cc: Roger Western ; c...@yahoogroups.com 
Subject: Re: [CDXC] 3C6A and 3C0E

  
Doesn't sound exactly right to me, becuase according to the ARRL there 
are only 50,000 users of LOTW many of whom are unactive or historical 
logs. Sounds like a lot of hoo hah to me to try to justify their 
position, and can be considered a red herring.

In my experience of meing a QSL Manager and on going on expeditions 
myself, those who want a paper card, will STILL want a paper card no 
matter the state of LOTW. I have no noticed any visible change in the 
number of direct requests 1 year after my last trip to Senegal, when I 
uploaded the logs to LOTW each day. I am still receiving
hundreds via the buro in addition.

Tom
GM4FDM

On 20/05/2012 12:01, Trevor Dunne wrote:
 Seen this intresting tweet from one of the DX dinners at Dayton last
 night it was a talk on DXpedition funding,

 NCDXF (@NCDXF)
 19/05/2012 20:10
 Great discussion about #DXpedition funding! N1DG: ”The minute the LOTW
 upload happens, you might as well close the bank account.”

 Goes against the general feeling posted here,

 Trevor
 EI2GLB




[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CDXC/

* Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/CDXC/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
    cdxc-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    cdxc-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    cdxc-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org 

In the message body put either 

unsubscribe dx-chat

or 

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
--- 
---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list. Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org 

In the message body put either 

unsubscribe dx-chat

or 

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
--- 

---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org 

In the message body put either 

unsubscribe dx-chat

or 

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---


Re: [DX-CHAT] DX-PEDITIONS FOR US POOR FOLKS?

2012-05-20 Thread Elsie Gerry



Actually, WF5E is more efficient than that. I used them for many years in my 
earlier QSLs days. You send  Les your cards and $$ (or have an account with 
$$ on file with Les). He packages your cards with others for DX stations and 
managers and send them direct. with an SASE for return to Les. He then send 
your cards to your local bureau or if you pay, he send them direct to you. 
If there not enough cards for an economical send to the DX after a while, he 
send them to the DX's bureau. An excellent service for the price.


73,
Gerry VE6LB/VA6XDX
DXCC, VUCC, WAS Card Checker-Southern Alberta
VE/VA6 QSL Bureau Team
(403) 251-0384
ve...@telus.net
http://www.qsl.net/ve6lb/


-Original Message- 
From: Ryan Jairam

Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 10:31 AM
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] DX-PEDITIONS FOR US POOR FOLKS?


If you don't have a lot of money then it would seem to me that the
bureau would work nicely.

If you want something a little faster than the bureau, you can try
WF5E. The outgoing QSLs go quickly to the other incoming bureaus and
your incoming cards arrive via the bureau.

A lot of DXpeditions send out bureau cards for free. You can even
request them with OQRS in many cases.

In fact if you have a lot of spare time and are close to the club that
does the bureau work, that would work out nicely. You get your cards
free and many of them need the extra help.

73, Ryan, N2RJ
(also a bureau volunteer)


On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 12:15 PM, JIM Abercrombie 4...@prtcnet.com wrote:


What about us who have limited incomes? I was preparing for retirement, 
but unfortunately I became disabled before I was vested in
the retirement system.  How are we supposed to buy our QSL's? I have a 
fairly good station and I have been able to work all the
recent DXpeditions. I was at #66 in Zone 5 from Yemen. I got my station by 
being very frugal with my money. If I were able I would
be glad to donate and I have donated small sums.  There are those who are 
less fortunate than me. How are they going to buy their
cards?  It seems to me they think everyone is fortunate financially as the 
guys who go on DXpeditions. I belong to the ARRL and

LOTW.
It reminds me of the ham I know who told me the other day that everyone 
could be able to invest money so they can retire, when I

know there are thousands who have more month left after the money is gone.
I guess if you can't afford this hobby, you should go buy yourself a kite 
and a ball of string.




---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org

In the message body put either

unsubscribe dx-chat

or

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---





--
Ryan A. Jairam


---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org

In the message body put either

unsubscribe dx-chat

or

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
--- 




---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org 

In the message body put either 


unsubscribe dx-chat

or 


subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---



Re: [DX-CHAT] DX-PEDITIONS FOR US POOR FOLKS?

2012-05-20 Thread Crownhaven


Have you tried WF5E lately?  He came highly recommended.  My % of 
returned cards has been dismal and I'm being kind.  I sent him a LOT of 
cards too.


Steve, N4JQQ

Elsie  Gerry wrote:



Actually, WF5E is more efficient than that. I used them for many years 
in my earlier QSLs days. You send  Les your cards and $$ (or have an 
account with $$ on file with Les). He packages your cards with others 
for DX stations and managers and send them direct. with an SASE for 
return to Les. He then send your cards to your local bureau or if you 
pay, he send them direct to you. If there not enough cards for an 
economical send to the DX after a while, he send them to the DX's 
bureau. An excellent service for the price.


73,
Gerry VE6LB/VA6XDX
DXCC, VUCC, WAS Card Checker-Southern Alberta
VE/VA6 QSL Bureau Team
(403) 251-0384
ve...@telus.net
http://www.qsl.net/ve6lb/


-Original Message- From: Ryan Jairam
Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 10:31 AM
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] DX-PEDITIONS FOR US POOR FOLKS?


If you don't have a lot of money then it would seem to me that the
bureau would work nicely.

If you want something a little faster than the bureau, you can try
WF5E. The outgoing QSLs go quickly to the other incoming bureaus and
your incoming cards arrive via the bureau.

A lot of DXpeditions send out bureau cards for free. You can even
request them with OQRS in many cases.

In fact if you have a lot of spare time and are close to the club that
does the bureau work, that would work out nicely. You get your cards
free and many of them need the extra help.

73, Ryan, N2RJ
(also a bureau volunteer)


On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 12:15 PM, JIM Abercrombie 4...@prtcnet.com 
wrote:


What about us who have limited incomes? I was preparing for 
retirement, but unfortunately I became disabled before I was vested in
the retirement system.  How are we supposed to buy our QSL's? I 
have a fairly good station and I have been able to work all the
recent DXpeditions. I was at #66 in Zone 5 from Yemen. I got my 
station by being very frugal with my money. If I were able I would
be glad to donate and I have donated small sums.  There are those who 
are less fortunate than me. How are they going to buy their
cards?  It seems to me they think everyone is fortunate financially 
as the guys who go on DXpeditions. I belong to the ARRL and

LOTW.
It reminds me of the ham I know who told me the other day that 
everyone could be able to invest money so they can retire, when I
know there are thousands who have more month left after the money is 
gone.
I guess if you can't afford this hobby, you should go buy yourself a 
kite and a ball of string.




---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org

In the message body put either

unsubscribe dx-chat

or

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---








---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org 

In the message body put either 


unsubscribe dx-chat

or 


subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---



RE: [DX-CHAT] DX-PEDITIONS FOR US POOR FOLKS?

2012-05-20 Thread Doug Renwick

I would not recommend the WF5E service.  I tried the service several times
in the past and had really, really poor returns.

Doug

Logic, reason and science don't define everything in this world. 

-Original Message-


Actually, WF5E is more efficient than that. I used them for many years in
my
earlier QSLs days. You send  Les your cards and $$ (or have an account with
$$ on file with Les). He packages your cards with others for DX stations
and
managers and send them direct. with an SASE for return to Les. He then send
your cards to your local bureau or if you pay, he send them direct to you.
If there not enough cards for an economical send to the DX after a while,
he
send them to the DX's bureau. An excellent service for the price.

73,
Gerry VE6LB/VA6XDX
DXCC, VUCC, WAS Card Checker-Southern Alberta
VE/VA6 QSL Bureau Team
(403) 251-0384
ve...@telus.net
http://www.qsl.net/ve6lb/


-Original Message-
From: Ryan Jairam
Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 10:31 AM
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] DX-PEDITIONS FOR US POOR FOLKS?


If you don't have a lot of money then it would seem to me that the
bureau would work nicely.

If you want something a little faster than the bureau, you can try
WF5E. The outgoing QSLs go quickly to the other incoming bureaus and
your incoming cards arrive via the bureau.

A lot of DXpeditions send out bureau cards for free. You can even
request them with OQRS in many cases.

In fact if you have a lot of spare time and are close to the club that
does the bureau work, that would work out nicely. You get your cards
free and many of them need the extra help.

73, Ryan, N2RJ
(also a bureau volunteer)



---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org 

In the message body put either 

unsubscribe dx-chat

or 

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---



Re: [DX-CHAT] DX-PEDITIONS FOR US POOR FOLKS?

2012-05-20 Thread Elsie Gerry



I found that sending Les cards for regular Qs was a waste as they ended up 
going through the bureau both ways. I had great luck with using Les for semi 
rare and DXpedition cards where there where high volumes going both ways. My 
return rate was very high. It's been a couple year since I last used Les but 
I've only got 3 countries left and coming up on 2500 Challenge so don't send 
many cards and mostly go direct or OQRS.


Gerry VE6LB

-Original Message- 
From: Crownhaven

Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 12:04 PM
To: telw...@telusplanet.net
Cc: rjai...@gmail.com ; dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] DX-PEDITIONS FOR US POOR FOLKS?

Have you tried WF5E lately?  He came highly recommended.  My % of
returned cards has been dismal and I'm being kind.  I sent him a LOT of
cards too.

Steve, N4JQQ

Elsie  Gerry wrote:



Actually, WF5E is more efficient than that. I used them for many years in 
my earlier QSLs days. You send  Les your cards and $$ (or have an account 
with $$ on file with Les). He packages your cards with others for DX 
stations and managers and send them direct. with an SASE for return to 
Les. He then send your cards to your local bureau or if you pay, he send 
them direct to you. If there not enough cards for an economical send to 
the DX after a while, he send them to the DX's bureau. An excellent 
service for the price.


73,
Gerry VE6LB/VA6XDX
DXCC, VUCC, WAS Card Checker-Southern Alberta
VE/VA6 QSL Bureau Team
(403) 251-0384
ve...@telus.net
http://www.qsl.net/ve6lb/


-Original Message- From: Ryan Jairam
Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 10:31 AM
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] DX-PEDITIONS FOR US POOR FOLKS?


If you don't have a lot of money then it would seem to me that the
bureau would work nicely.

If you want something a little faster than the bureau, you can try
WF5E. The outgoing QSLs go quickly to the other incoming bureaus and
your incoming cards arrive via the bureau.

A lot of DXpeditions send out bureau cards for free. You can even
request them with OQRS in many cases.

In fact if you have a lot of spare time and are close to the club that
does the bureau work, that would work out nicely. You get your cards
free and many of them need the extra help.

73, Ryan, N2RJ
(also a bureau volunteer)


On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 12:15 PM, JIM Abercrombie 4...@prtcnet.com wrote:


What about us who have limited incomes? I was preparing for retirement, 
but unfortunately I became disabled before I was vested in
the retirement system.  How are we supposed to buy our QSL's? I have a 
fairly good station and I have been able to work all the
recent DXpeditions. I was at #66 in Zone 5 from Yemen. I got my station 
by being very frugal with my money. If I were able I would
be glad to donate and I have donated small sums.  There are those who are 
less fortunate than me. How are they going to buy their
cards?  It seems to me they think everyone is fortunate financially as 
the guys who go on DXpeditions. I belong to the ARRL and

LOTW.
It reminds me of the ham I know who told me the other day that everyone 
could be able to invest money so they can retire, when I
know there are thousands who have more month left after the money is 
gone.
I guess if you can't afford this hobby, you should go buy yourself a kite 
and a ball of string.




---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org

In the message body put either

unsubscribe dx-chat

or

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---









---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org 

In the message body put either 


unsubscribe dx-chat

or 


subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---



Re: [DX-CHAT] DX-PEDITIONS FOR US POOR FOLKS?

2012-05-20 Thread Ryan Jairam
 
I've never personally tried WF5E. I just read about him. I don't have
an opinion on how reliable he is other than what people have been
saying.

And yes, you can wait a few years and they upload to LoTW. Between the
time I was (and still am) busy with the kids my QSLing of DXpeditions
dropped off substantially. I have a backlog of about 35 entities I
need to QSL. THis week they'll be going out in the mail with the hope
of getting QSLs back for most if not all of them.

But also during that time some of them uploaded to LoTW. I've been
grateful for that.

So you'll get LoTW if you are on a tight budget, but instant
gratification costs money.

I don't begrudge a DXpedition for asking for a few $ or € to cover
their costs. It's your choice to work them. It may not fit someone's
definition of ham spirit but I also understand that without the
donations, many rare entities wouldn't be activated. It's just how it
is.

Some hams spend more than just money - they risk life and limb, just
so you can get a QSO in the log.

Ryan, N2RJ

On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Crownhaven crownha...@bellsouth.net wrote:

 The bureau still works great.  Instant gratification is hard to fight
 though.  Most of the DXpeditions eventually upload to LOTW so that works.  I
 wouldn't recommend WF5E to anyone.
 Steve, N4JQQ

 Ryan Jairam wrote:

  If you don't have a lot of money then it would seem to me that the
 bureau would work nicely.

 If you want something a little faster than the bureau, you can try
 WF5E. The outgoing QSLs go quickly to the other incoming bureaus and
 your incoming cards arrive via the bureau.

 A lot of DXpeditions send out bureau cards for free. You can even
 request them with OQRS in many cases.

 In fact if you have a lot of spare time and are close to the club that
 does the bureau work, that would work out nicely. You get your cards
 free and many of them need the extra help.

 73, Ryan, N2RJ
 (also a bureau volunteer)


 On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 12:15 PM, JIM Abercrombie 4...@prtcnet.com wrote:


 What about us who have limited incomes? I was preparing for retirement,
 but unfortunately I became disabled before I was vested in
 the retirement system.  How are we supposed to buy our QSL's? I have a
 fairly good station and I have been able to work all the
 recent DXpeditions. I was at #66 in Zone 5 from Yemen. I got my station
 by being very frugal with my money. If I were able I would
 be glad to donate and I have donated small sums.  There are those who are
 less fortunate than me. How are they going to buy their
 cards?  It seems to me they think everyone is fortunate financially as
 the guys who go on DXpeditions. I belong to the ARRL and
 LOTW.
 It reminds me of the ham I know who told me the other day that everyone
 could be able to invest money so they can retire, when I
 know there are thousands who have more month left after the money is
 gone.
 I guess if you can't afford this hobby, you should go buy yourself a kite
 and a ball of string.



 ---
 To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

 imail...@njdxa.org

 In the message body put either

 unsubscribe dx-chat

 or

 subscribe dx-chat

 This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
 ---










 ---
 To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

 imail...@njdxa.org
 In the message body put either
 unsubscribe dx-chat

 or
 subscribe dx-chat

 This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
 ---




-- 
Ryan A. Jairam


---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org 

In the message body put either 

unsubscribe dx-chat

or 

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---



Re: [DX-CHAT] DX-PEDITIONS FOR US POOR FOLKS?

2012-05-20 Thread Barry


I used WF5E in the past, when I was actively chasing DX.  My return rate 
was pretty good, though some cards took a few years.  Be aware that 
there are QSL managers and DX stations that will not respond to QSLs 
sent through Les.  He has a list of them on his web page.


Barry W2UP

On 5/20/2012 12:25 PM, Doug Renwick wrote:

I would not recommend the WF5E service.  I tried the service several times
in the past and had really, really poor returns.

Doug

Logic, reason and science don't define everything in this world.


-Original Message-

Actually, WF5E is more efficient than that. I used them for many years in

my

earlier QSLs days. You send  Les your cards and $$ (or have an account with
$$ on file with Les). He packages your cards with others for DX stations

and

managers and send them direct. with an SASE for return to Les. He then send
your cards to your local bureau or if you pay, he send them direct to you.
If there not enough cards for an economical send to the DX after a while,

he

send them to the DX's bureau. An excellent service for the price.

73,
Gerry VE6LB/VA6XDX
DXCC, VUCC, WAS Card Checker-Southern Alberta
VE/VA6 QSL Bureau Team
(403) 251-0384
ve...@telus.net
http://www.qsl.net/ve6lb/


-Original Message-
From: Ryan Jairam
Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 10:31 AM
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] DX-PEDITIONS FOR US POOR FOLKS?


If you don't have a lot of money then it would seem to me that the
bureau would work nicely.

If you want something a little faster than the bureau, you can try
WF5E. The outgoing QSLs go quickly to the other incoming bureaus and
your incoming cards arrive via the bureau.

A lot of DXpeditions send out bureau cards for free. You can even
request them with OQRS in many cases.

In fact if you have a lot of spare time and are close to the club that
does the bureau work, that would work out nicely. You get your cards
free and many of them need the extra help.

73, Ryan, N2RJ
(also a bureau volunteer)



---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org

In the message body put either

unsubscribe dx-chat

or

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---





---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org 

In the message body put either 


unsubscribe dx-chat

or 


subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---



RE: [DX-CHAT] DX-PEDITIONS FOR US POOR FOLKS?

2012-05-20 Thread Peter W2IRT
 
Ryan hit the nail on the head, gents. Please download and analyze Don's 
PowerPoint presentation when it becomes available on the site. There are two 
facts that become blatantly obvious. One, the cost-per-QSO incurred by the 
DXpeditions to bring you that rare on is very high. In some cases, the cost 
they bear to bring you that new one is over $5.00 USD PER CONTACT. In other 
less-difficult-to-get-to places it's in the $3 range. So those who toss $2 or 
an IRC into the envelope and nothing more are putting more of the burden on 
your fellow hams. This is not sustainable as prices to put these operations on 
increase. I can see it if you work a guy once or twice, request a bureau card 
or wait out the LoTW hit or toss a couple of bucks into an envelope. It's not 
right if you picked up 20 greenies on Clublog. Sorry. They're not telling you 
that you have to *pay* $5 or $3 per Q, but that's what THEY HAVE SPENT to bring 
you the chance.

The second issue is that certain parts of the world are more readily willing to 
lend financial support through QSL-request donations than other parts of the 
world. I didn't take notes during Don's presentation but I'm pretty sure the 
European donation percentage was infinitesimally small as compared to the NA 
donation base (again, as averaged over 20-odd years by major DXpeditions). 
Less-than-1% if memory serves--Don, if I'm wrong, please feel free to beat me 
about the head with a large abacus. 

Regardless of the exact percentages, it's irresponsible and outright selfish to 
sit there and work these big-league ops and not toss something into the hat not 
as a way to say thank you (which is a great gesture in and of itself) but as a 
way to ensure they'll be able to commit to going to that one place you need 
that'll put you over the top and into the Honor Roll or to HR#1, maybe.

If you're so poor that you can't afford $10 or $20 a couple of times a year, 
when you've bagged a biggie across a bunch of bands and modes, then there's 
something wrong and I definitely think you should reconsider your choice of 
hobby, or your desire to be a DXer.

Yeah, there are DXpeditions that I work once or twice and I'll send an SASE or 
an IRC or even request a bureau card for. These are nominally the ones I worked 
just 'cuz they were there and I thought gee, it's been a couple of years since 
I worked entity on band. But if it's something I spend 2 weeks chasing up 
and down the spectrum, damned straight I'll toss at least $10-25 into the hat, 
maybe more if money's not as big an issue as it is now.


 - pjd


-Original Message-
From: kf...@njdxa.org [mailto:kf...@njdxa.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Jairam


I don't begrudge a DXpedition for asking for a few $ or € to cover their costs. 
It's your choice to work them. It may not fit someone's definition of ham 
spirit but I also understand that without the donations, many rare entities 
wouldn't be activated. It's just how it is.

Some hams spend more than just money - they risk life and limb, just so you can 
get a QSO in the log.

Ryan, N2RJ



---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org 

In the message body put either 

unsubscribe dx-chat

or 

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---



Re: [DX-CHAT] DX-PEDITIONS FOR US POOR FOLKS?

2012-05-20 Thread Elsie Gerry



And there are others that process Les's requests as a priority (at the 
bureau priority level).


Gerry VE6LB

-Original Message- 
From: Barry

Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 12:44 PM
To: Dx-Chat
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] DX-PEDITIONS FOR US POOR FOLKS?


I used WF5E in the past, when I was actively chasing DX.  My return rate
was pretty good, though some cards took a few years.  Be aware that
there are QSL managers and DX stations that will not respond to QSLs
sent through Les.  He has a list of them on his web page.

Barry W2UP

On 5/20/2012 12:25 PM, Doug Renwick wrote:

I would not recommend the WF5E service.  I tried the service several times
in the past and had really, really poor returns.

Doug

Logic, reason and science don't define everything in this world.


-Original Message-

Actually, WF5E is more efficient than that. I used them for many years in

my
earlier QSLs days. You send  Les your cards and $$ (or have an account 
with

$$ on file with Les). He packages your cards with others for DX stations

and
managers and send them direct. with an SASE for return to Les. He then 
send
your cards to your local bureau or if you pay, he send them direct to 
you.

If there not enough cards for an economical send to the DX after a while,

he

send them to the DX's bureau. An excellent service for the price.

73,
Gerry VE6LB/VA6XDX
DXCC, VUCC, WAS Card Checker-Southern Alberta
VE/VA6 QSL Bureau Team
(403) 251-0384
ve...@telus.net
http://www.qsl.net/ve6lb/


-Original Message-
From: Ryan Jairam
Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 10:31 AM
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] DX-PEDITIONS FOR US POOR FOLKS?


If you don't have a lot of money then it would seem to me that the
bureau would work nicely.

If you want something a little faster than the bureau, you can try
WF5E. The outgoing QSLs go quickly to the other incoming bureaus and
your incoming cards arrive via the bureau.

A lot of DXpeditions send out bureau cards for free. You can even
request them with OQRS in many cases.

In fact if you have a lot of spare time and are close to the club that
does the bureau work, that would work out nicely. You get your cards
free and many of them need the extra help.

73, Ryan, N2RJ
(also a bureau volunteer)



---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org

In the message body put either

unsubscribe dx-chat

or

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---





---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org

In the message body put either

unsubscribe dx-chat

or

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
--- 




---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org 

In the message body put either 


unsubscribe dx-chat

or 


subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---



Re: [DX-CHAT] DX-PEDITIONS FOR US POOR FOLKS?

2012-05-20 Thread Mecseri


-pjd is making a valid point, but.

On the other side of the coin, how can you put a price on the thrill of 
being on the receiving end of a huge pileup for a week or two???.
If it cost me $5,000 to go to a Dx Expedition, I would not compute my 
cost per contact. If I would have to, I should not be going..


Just my 2cents worth

Lou   KE1F



On 5/20/2012 3:47 PM, Peter W2IRT wrote:


Ryan hit the nail on the head, gents. Please download and analyze Don's 
PowerPoint presentation when it becomes available on the site. There are two 
facts that become blatantly obvious. One, the cost-per-QSO incurred by the 
DXpeditions to bring you that rare on is very high. In some cases, the cost 
they bear to bring you that new one is over $5.00 USD PER CONTACT. In other 
less-difficult-to-get-to places it's in the $3 range. So those who toss $2 or 
an IRC into the envelope and nothing more are putting more of the burden on 
your fellow hams. This is not sustainable as prices to put these operations on 
increase. I can see it if you work a guy once or twice, request a bureau card 
or wait out the LoTW hit or toss a couple of bucks into an envelope. It's not 
right if you picked up 20 greenies on Clublog. Sorry. They're not telling you 
that you have to *pay* $5 or $3 per Q, but that's what THEY HAVE SPENT to bring 
you the chance.

The second issue is that certain parts of the world are more readily willing to 
lend financial support through QSL-request donations than other parts of the 
world. I didn't take notes during Don's presentation but I'm pretty sure the 
European donation percentage was infinitesimally small as compared to the NA 
donation base (again, as averaged over 20-odd years by major DXpeditions). 
Less-than-1% if memory serves--Don, if I'm wrong, please feel free to beat me 
about the head with a large abacus.

Regardless of the exact percentages, it's irresponsible and outright selfish to 
sit there and work these big-league ops and not toss something into the hat not 
as a way to say thank you (which is a great gesture in and of itself) but as a 
way to ensure they'll be able to commit to going to that one place you need 
that'll put you over the top and into the Honor Roll or to HR#1, maybe.

If you're so poor that you can't afford $10 or $20 a couple of times a year, 
when you've bagged a biggie across a bunch of bands and modes, then there's 
something wrong and I definitely think you should reconsider your choice of 
hobby, or your desire to be a DXer.

Yeah, there are DXpeditions that I work once or twice and I'll send an SASE or an IRC or even request 
a bureau card for. These are nominally the ones I worked just 'cuz they were there and I thought 
gee, it's been a couple of years since I workedentity  onband. But if 
it's something I spend 2 weeks chasing up and down the spectrum, damned straight I'll toss at least 
$10-25 into the hat, maybe more if money's not as big an issue as it is now.


  - pjd


-Original Message-
From: kf...@njdxa.org [mailto:kf...@njdxa.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Jairam


I don't begrudge a DXpedition for asking for a few $ or € to cover their costs. It's your 
choice to work them. It may not fit someone's definition of ham spirit but I 
also understand that without the donations, many rare entities wouldn't be activated. 
It's just how it is.

Some hams spend more than just money - they risk life and limb, just so you can 
get a QSO in the log.

Ryan, N2RJ



---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org

In the message body put either

unsubscribe dx-chat

or

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---







---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org 

In the message body put either 


unsubscribe dx-chat

or 


subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---



Re: [DX-CHAT] DX-PEDITIONS FOR US POOR FOLKS?

2012-05-20 Thread Don
 
Go or don't go. But demanding a fee for a qsl is still extortion in the true 
sense of the term

Sent from my iPod

On May 20, 2012, at 6:31 PM, Ron Notarius W3WN wn3...@verizon.net wrote:

 
 Lou,
 
 Once again, context is important.  
 
 Don's presentation was not talking about the casual DXpedition that might 
 cost one or two people a few thousand.  Yes, this was mentioned, but it was 
 not the main focus.  
 
 And within THAT context only, if I can't afford to go on a vacation to the 
 Caribbean that happens to include a radio op for $5K, I'm not going to go 
 either.  If I do go, I'm not going to expect to recoup my vacation costs from 
 those who worked me, either.
 
 But -- that's not what the main focus here is.
 
 You're not going to Heard Island, or Bouvet, or Navassa, or Baker  Howland, 
 etc., for $5000 either.  Between logistics, licensing, boat chargers, food  
 fuel, you're talking in the neighborhood (today) of US$500,000.  
 
 Don's plea, as I recall (and Don, please correct me if I'm wrong) was that 
 the DX community as a whole, world-wide, find a way to continue to fund these 
 trips.  Or they will stop, and the rarest of the rare will be off the air for 
 decades to come.  
 
 The cost-per-QSO breakdown simply gives you, or should give you, an 
 appreciation for what was involved.  It was not meant (at least as I heard 
 it) as a suggestion that this should be a mandatory minimum amount that you 
 should include along with your QSL request.
 
 Don also had a comment that more should join their local DX associations, 
 societies, foundations, etc., in order to strengthen those organizations, and 
 permit THEM to continue to help fund future super-rare operations.  Let's not 
 let that get lost in the discussion either.
 
 The bottom line is that we as a community simply can't expect others to go to 
 these places that we seek to contact purely for the thrill of a pileup.  
 Because when the costs to go far outstrip the means of the operating team, 
 they won't be able to go whether they want the thrill or not.
 
 73
 
 -Original Message-
 From: kf...@njdxa.org [mailto:kf...@njdxa.org] On Behalf Of Mecseri
 Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 4:11 PM
 To: li...@w2irt.net
 Cc: dx-chat@njdxa.org
 Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] DX-PEDITIONS FOR US POOR FOLKS?
 
 
 -pjd is making a valid point, but.
 
 On the other side of the coin, how can you put a price on the thrill of 
 being on the receiving end of a huge pileup for a week or two???.
 If it cost me $5,000 to go to a Dx Expedition, I would not compute my 
 cost per contact. If I would have to, I should not be going..
 
 Just my 2cents worth
 
 Lou   KE1F
 
 
 
 On 5/20/2012 3:47 PM, Peter W2IRT wrote:
 
 Ryan hit the nail on the head, gents. Please download and analyze Don's 
 PowerPoint presentation when it becomes available on the site. There are two 
 facts that become blatantly obvious. One, the cost-per-QSO incurred by the 
 DXpeditions to bring you that rare on is very high. In some cases, the cost 
 they bear to bring you that new one is over $5.00 USD PER CONTACT. In other 
 less-difficult-to-get-to places it's in the $3 range. So those who toss $2 
 or an IRC into the envelope and nothing more are putting more of the burden 
 on your fellow hams. This is not sustainable as prices to put these 
 operations on increase. I can see it if you work a guy once or twice, 
 request a bureau card or wait out the LoTW hit or toss a couple of bucks 
 into an envelope. It's not right if you picked up 20 greenies on Clublog. 
 Sorry. They're not telling you that you have to *pay* $5 or $3 per Q, but 
 that's what THEY HAVE SPENT to bring you the chance.
 
 The second issue is that certain parts of the world are more readily willing 
 to lend financial support through QSL-request donations than other parts of 
 the world. I didn't take notes during Don's presentation but I'm pretty sure 
 the European donation percentage was infinitesimally small as compared to 
 the NA donation base (again, as averaged over 20-odd years by major 
 DXpeditions). Less-than-1% if memory serves--Don, if I'm wrong, please feel 
 free to beat me about the head with a large abacus.
 
 Regardless of the exact percentages, it's irresponsible and outright selfish 
 to sit there and work these big-league ops and not toss something into the 
 hat not as a way to say thank you (which is a great gesture in and of 
 itself) but as a way to ensure they'll be able to commit to going to that 
 one place you need that'll put you over the top and into the Honor Roll or 
 to HR#1, maybe.
 
 If you're so poor that you can't afford $10 or $20 a couple of times a year, 
 when you've bagged a biggie across a bunch of bands and modes, then there's 
 something wrong and I definitely think you should reconsider your choice of 
 hobby, or your desire to be a DXer.
 
 Yeah, there are DXpeditions that I work once or twice and I'll send an SASE 
 or an IRC or even request a 

Re: [DX-CHAT] DX-PEDITIONS FOR US POOR FOLKS?

2012-05-20 Thread Don Greenbaum

Who is demanding any fees for a QSL?

Name one DXpedition that refuses to answer bureau cards?   Or a major 
DXPedition that doesn't post their logs to LOTW (most within 6 months).   Most 
foundations require that in return for funding.

Just because someone who donates $5 gets his card first does not translate into 
extortion for those who opt out of supporting dxpeditions and wait for the slow 
method.

73

Don
N1DG

At 06:45 PM 5/20/2012, Don wrote:
 
Go or don't go. But demanding a fee for a qsl is still extortion in the true 
sense of the term

Sent from my iPod

On May 20, 2012, at 6:31 PM, Ron Notarius W3WN wn3...@verizon.net wrote:

 
 Lou,
 
 Once again, context is important.  
 
 Don's presentation was not talking about the casual DXpedition that might 
 cost one or two people a few thousand.  Yes, this was mentioned, but it was 
 not the main focus.  
 
 And within THAT context only, if I can't afford to go on a vacation to the 
 Caribbean that happens to include a radio op for $5K, I'm not going to go 
 either.  If I do go, I'm not going to expect to recoup my vacation costs 
 from those who worked me, either.
 
 But -- that's not what the main focus here is.
 
 You're not going to Heard Island, or Bouvet, or Navassa, or Baker  Howland, 
 etc., for $5000 either.  Between logistics, licensing, boat chargers, food  
 fuel, you're talking in the neighborhood (today) of US$500,000.  
 
 Don's plea, as I recall (and Don, please correct me if I'm wrong) was that 
 the DX community as a whole, world-wide, find a way to continue to fund 
 these trips.  Or they will stop, and the rarest of the rare will be off the 
 air for decades to come.  
 
 The cost-per-QSO breakdown simply gives you, or should give you, an 
 appreciation for what was involved.  It was not meant (at least as I heard 
 it) as a suggestion that this should be a mandatory minimum amount that you 
 should include along with your QSL request.
 
 Don also had a comment that more should join their local DX associations, 
 societies, foundations, etc., in order to strengthen those organizations, 
 and permit THEM to continue to help fund future super-rare operations.  
 Let's not let that get lost in the discussion either.
 
 The bottom line is that we as a community simply can't expect others to go 
 to these places that we seek to contact purely for the thrill of a pileup.  
 Because when the costs to go far outstrip the means of the operating team, 
 they won't be able to go whether they want the thrill or not.
 
 73
 
 -Original Message-
 From: kf...@njdxa.org [mailto:kf...@njdxa.org] On Behalf Of Mecseri
 Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 4:11 PM
 To: li...@w2irt.net
 Cc: dx-chat@njdxa.org
 Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] DX-PEDITIONS FOR US POOR FOLKS?
 
 
 -pjd is making a valid point, but.
 
 On the other side of the coin, how can you put a price on the thrill of 
 being on the receiving end of a huge pileup for a week or two???.
 If it cost me $5,000 to go to a Dx Expedition, I would not compute my 
 cost per contact. If I would have to, I should not be going..
 
 Just my 2cents worth
 
 Lou   KE1F
 
 
 
 On 5/20/2012 3:47 PM, Peter W2IRT wrote:
 
 Ryan hit the nail on the head, gents. Please download and analyze Don's 
 PowerPoint presentation when it becomes available on the site. There are 
 two facts that become blatantly obvious. One, the cost-per-QSO incurred by 
 the DXpeditions to bring you that rare on is very high. In some cases, the 
 cost they bear to bring you that new one is over $5.00 USD PER CONTACT. In 
 other less-difficult-to-get-to places it's in the $3 range. So those who 
 toss $2 or an IRC into the envelope and nothing more are putting more of 
 the burden on your fellow hams. This is not sustainable as prices to put 
 these operations on increase. I can see it if you work a guy once or twice, 
 request a bureau card or wait out the LoTW hit or toss a couple of bucks 
 into an envelope. It's not right if you picked up 20 greenies on Clublog. 
 Sorry. They're not telling you that you have to *pay* $5 or $3 per Q, but 
 that's what THEY HAVE SPENT to bring you the chance.
 
 The second issue is that certain parts of the world are more readily 
 willing to lend financial support through QSL-request donations than other 
 parts of the world. I didn't take notes during Don's presentation but I'm 
 pretty sure the European donation percentage was infinitesimally small as 
 compared to the NA donation base (again, as averaged over 20-odd years by 
 major DXpeditions). Less-than-1% if memory serves--Don, if I'm wrong, 
 please feel free to beat me about the head with a large abacus.
 
 Regardless of the exact percentages, it's irresponsible and outright 
 selfish to sit there and work these big-league ops and not toss something 
 into the hat not as a way to say thank you (which is a great gesture in and 
 of itself) but as a way to ensure they'll be able to commit to going to 
 that one place you need 

Re: [DX-CHAT] DX-PEDITIONS FOR US POOR FOLKS?

2012-05-20 Thread Zack Widup
 
First off, great presentation Don!

I thought it gave a great perspective of what these icebreaker
DXpeditions and others to exotic places cost. Someone has to pay for
them. The operators on some DXpeditions often bear a great deal of the
cost themselves. I know a few people who have gotten involved in a
DXpedition without knowing what it would cost them personally. They
put forth an amount of money that hurt them personally financially,
hoping they could get at least some of it back. Some didn't - they
have not been on a DXpedition since. Live and learn, I guess. And our
loss when a fine operator can't or won't go on another DXpedition.

I know some of the people who were on the VP8ORK DXpedition. Some of
the fees they had to pay were downright weird - and sounded exorbitant
to me. But what are you going to do? Refuse to pay a fee to get your
equipment out of storage? You would be in a bad position thousands of
miles from home, trying to meet an expedition timetable and unable to
speak the language of the country, trying to negotiate with those
people.

If you want the DXpedition, if you want it there for you to work, it
seems only right to me that you voluntarily contribute what you can.
Not that it has to be $5 per QSO, but every little bit helps.

None of the DXpeditions I wished to have confirmed recently have
demanded any fees for QSL'ing. But I do voluntarily send them
something. I hope it helps just a little. If enough people do that, it
increases the chance that they will go on another DXpedition to a rare
place in a few years.

And I agree - if the DXpedition so chooses to send out confirmation to
contributors first, that is their choice and it doesn't mean that
non-contributors are not going to get their confirmation. If you had
to wait for 20 years for an entity to be put on the air, what's a
couple extra months waiting for the confirmation?

73, Zack W9SZ


On 5/20/12, Don Greenbaum d...@aurumtel.com wrote:

 Who is demanding any fees for a QSL?

 Name one DXpedition that refuses to answer bureau cards?   Or a major
 DXPedition that doesn't post their logs to LOTW (most within 6 months).
 Most foundations require that in return for funding.

 Just because someone who donates $5 gets his card first does not translate
 into extortion for those who opt out of supporting dxpeditions and wait for
 the slow method.

 73

 Don
 N1DG

 At 06:45 PM 5/20/2012, Don wrote:

Go or don't go. But demanding a fee for a qsl is still extortion in the
 true sense of the term

Sent from my iPod

On May 20, 2012, at 6:31 PM, Ron Notarius W3WN wn3...@verizon.net
 wrote:


 Lou,

 Once again, context is important.

 Don's presentation was not talking about the casual DXpedition that might
 cost one or two people a few thousand.  Yes, this was mentioned, but it
 was not the main focus.

 And within THAT context only, if I can't afford to go on a vacation to
 the Caribbean that happens to include a radio op for $5K, I'm not going
 to go either.  If I do go, I'm not going to expect to recoup my vacation
 costs from those who worked me, either.

 But -- that's not what the main focus here is.

 You're not going to Heard Island, or Bouvet, or Navassa, or Baker 
 Howland, etc., for $5000 either.  Between logistics, licensing, boat
 chargers, food  fuel, you're talking in the neighborhood (today) of
 US$500,000.

 Don's plea, as I recall (and Don, please correct me if I'm wrong) was
 that the DX community as a whole, world-wide, find a way to continue to
 fund these trips.  Or they will stop, and the rarest of the rare will be
 off the air for decades to come.

 The cost-per-QSO breakdown simply gives you, or should give you, an
 appreciation for what was involved.  It was not meant (at least as I
 heard it) as a suggestion that this should be a mandatory minimum amount
 that you should include along with your QSL request.

 Don also had a comment that more should join their local DX associations,
 societies, foundations, etc., in order to strengthen those organizations,
 and permit THEM to continue to help fund future super-rare operations.
 Let's not let that get lost in the discussion either.

 The bottom line is that we as a community simply can't expect others to
 go to these places that we seek to contact purely for the thrill of a
 pileup.  Because when the costs to go far outstrip the means of the
 operating team, they won't be able to go whether they want the thrill or
 not.

 73

 -Original Message-
 From: kf...@njdxa.org [mailto:kf...@njdxa.org] On Behalf Of Mecseri
 Sent: Sunday, May 20, 2012 4:11 PM
 To: li...@w2irt.net
 Cc: dx-chat@njdxa.org
 Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] DX-PEDITIONS FOR US POOR FOLKS?


 -pjd is making a valid point, but.

 On the other side of the coin, how can you put a price on the thrill of
 being on the receiving end of a huge pileup for a week or two???.
 If it cost me $5,000 to go to a Dx Expedition, I would not compute my
 cost per contact. If I would have to, I 

RE: [DX-CHAT] DX-PEDITIONS FOR US POOR FOLKS?

2012-05-20 Thread Doug Renwick
 
There is another point of view to consider.  I have been on a number of group 
and single DXpeditions.  It has cost me thousands of dollars to participate.  I 
feel that I have already contributed enough money to support the DX community 
by operating as DX.  Anything that I may contribute above what I have already 
invested is my choice.  I do not owe anyone, anything.  Maybe it should be 
mandatory for anyone to reach the top of the honour role, they must have 
operated as significant DX.

Doug

Logic, reason and science don't define everything in this world. 

-Original Message-


Ryan hit the nail on the head, gents. Please download and analyze Don's
PowerPoint presentation when it becomes available on the site. There are two 
facts
that become blatantly obvious. One, the cost-per-QSO incurred by the 
DXpeditions
to bring you that rare on is very high. In some cases, the cost they bear to 
bring you
that new one is over $5.00 USD PER CONTACT. In other less-difficult-to-get-to
places it's in the $3 range. So those who toss $2 or an IRC into the envelope 
and
nothing more are putting more of the burden on your fellow hams. This is not
sustainable as prices to put these operations on increase. I can see it if you 
work a
guy once or twice, request a bureau card or wait out the LoTW hit or toss a 
couple of
bucks into an envelope. It's not right if you picked up 20 greenies on 
Clublog. Sorry.
They're not telling you that you have to *pay* $5 or $3 per Q, but that's what 
THEY
HAVE SPENT to bring you the chance.

The second issue is that certain parts of the world are more readily willing 
to lend
financial support through QSL-request donations than other parts of the world. 
I
didn't take notes during Don's presentation but I'm pretty sure the European
donation percentage was infinitesimally small as compared to the NA donation 
base
(again, as averaged over 20-odd years by major DXpeditions). Less-than-1% if
memory serves--Don, if I'm wrong, please feel free to beat me about the head 
with a
large abacus.

Regardless of the exact percentages, it's irresponsible and outright selfish 
to sit
there and work these big-league ops and not toss something into the hat not as 
a
way to say thank you (which is a great gesture in and of itself) but as a way 
to
ensure they'll be able to commit to going to that one place you need that'll 
put you
over the top and into the Honor Roll or to HR#1, maybe.

If you're so poor that you can't afford $10 or $20 a couple of times a year, 
when
you've bagged a biggie across a bunch of bands and modes, then there's 
something
wrong and I definitely think you should reconsider your choice of hobby, or 
your
desire to be a DXer.

Yeah, there are DXpeditions that I work once or twice and I'll send an SASE or 
an
IRC or even request a bureau card for. These are nominally the ones I worked 
just
'cuz they were there and I thought gee, it's been a couple of years since I 
worked
entity on band. But if it's something I spend 2 weeks chasing up and down 
the
spectrum, damned straight I'll toss at least $10-25 into the hat, maybe more if
money's not as big an issue as it is now.


 - pjd


-Original Message-
From: kf...@njdxa.org [mailto:kf...@njdxa.org] On Behalf Of Ryan Jairam


I don't begrudge a DXpedition for asking for a few $ or € to cover their 
costs. It's your
choice to work them. It may not fit someone's definition of ham spirit but I 
also
understand that without the donations, many rare entities wouldn't be 
activated. It's
just how it is.

Some hams spend more than just money - they risk life and limb, just so you 
can get
a QSO in the log.

Ryan, N2RJ



---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org

In the message body put either

unsubscribe dx-chat

or

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---




---
To unsubscribe or subscribe to this list.  Please send a message to

imail...@njdxa.org 

In the message body put either 

unsubscribe dx-chat

or 

subscribe dx-chat

This is the DX-CHAT reflector sponsored by the NJDXA http://njdxa.org
---



Re: [DX-CHAT] DX-PEDITIONS FOR US POOR FOLKS?

2012-05-20 Thread Crownhaven


I'm thinking we all can make the choices we want to make.  In terms of 
DXpeditions costing a lot of money, if you can't take the heat, stay out 
of the kitchen??  However, any operator has the right to set his own 
rules for QSL cards, etc.  And the rest of us have a choice as to 
whether we want to abide by those terms.  Let's call it free 
enterprise.  We're beginning to sound likeI won't say it here.


Steve, N4JQQ

Zack Widup wrote:
 
First off, great presentation Don!


I thought it gave a great perspective of what these icebreaker
DXpeditions and others to exotic places cost. Someone has to pay for
them. The operators on some DXpeditions often bear a great deal of the
cost themselves. I know a few people who have gotten involved in a
DXpedition without knowing what it would cost them personally. They
put forth an amount of money that hurt them personally financially,
hoping they could get at least some of it back. Some didn't - they
have not been on a DXpedition since. Live and learn, I guess. And our
loss when a fine operator can't or won't go on another DXpedition.

I know some of the people who were on the VP8ORK DXpedition. Some of
the fees they had to pay were downright weird - and sounded exorbitant
to me. But what are you going to do? Refuse to pay a fee to get your
equipment out of storage? You would be in a bad position thousands of
miles from home, trying to meet an expedition timetable and unable to
speak the language of the country, trying to negotiate with those
people.

If you want the DXpedition, if you want it there for you to work, it
seems only right to me that you voluntarily contribute what you can.
Not that it has to be $5 per QSO, but every little bit helps.

None of the DXpeditions I wished to have confirmed recently have
demanded any fees for QSL'ing. But I do voluntarily send them
something. I hope it helps just a little. If enough people do that, it
increases the chance that they will go on another DXpedition to a rare
place in a few years.

And I agree - if the DXpedition so chooses to send out confirmation to
contributors first, that is their choice and it doesn't mean that
non-contributors are not going to get their confirmation. If you had
to wait for 20 years for an entity to be put on the air, what's a
couple extra months waiting for the confirmation?

73, Zack W9SZ


On 5/20/12, Don Greenbaum d...@aurumtel.com wrote:
  

Who is demanding any fees for a QSL?

Name one DXpedition that refuses to answer bureau cards?   Or a major
DXPedition that doesn't post their logs to LOTW (most within 6 months).
Most foundations require that in return for funding.

Just because someone who donates $5 gets his card first does not translate
into extortion for those who opt out of supporting dxpeditions and wait for
the slow method.

73

Don
N1DG

At 06:45 PM 5/20/2012, Don wrote:


Go or don't go. But demanding a fee for a qsl is still extortion in the
true sense of the term

Sent from my iPod

On May 20, 2012, at 6:31 PM, Ron Notarius W3WN wn3...@verizon.net
wrote:

  

Lou,

Once again, context is important.

Don's presentation was not talking about the casual DXpedition that might
cost one or two people a few thousand.  Yes, this was mentioned, but it
was not the main focus.

And within THAT context only, if I can't afford to go on a vacation to
the Caribbean that happens to include a radio op for $5K, I'm not going
to go either.  If I do go, I'm not going to expect to recoup my vacation
costs from those who worked me, either.

But -- that's not what the main focus here is.

You're not going to Heard Island, or Bouvet, or Navassa, or Baker 
Howland, etc., for $5000 either.  Between logistics, licensing, boat
chargers, food  fuel, you're talking in the neighborhood (today) of
US$500,000.

Don's plea, as I recall (and Don, please correct me if I'm wrong) was
that the DX community as a whole, world-wide, find a way to continue to
fund these trips.  Or they will stop, and the rarest of the rare will be
off the air for decades to come.

The cost-per-QSO breakdown simply gives you, or should give you, an
appreciation for what was involved.  It was not meant (at least as I
heard it) as a suggestion that this should be a mandatory minimum amount
that you should include along with your QSL request.

Don also had a comment that more should join their local DX associations,
societies, foundations, etc., in order to strengthen those organizations,
and permit THEM to continue to help fund future super-rare operations.
Let's not let that get lost in the discussion either.

The bottom line is that we as a community simply can't expect others to
go to these places that we seek to contact purely for the thrill of a
pileup.  Because when the costs to go far outstrip the means of the
operating team, they won't be able to go whether they want the thrill or
not.

73

-Original Message-
From: kf...@njdxa.org [mailto:kf...@njdxa.org] On Behalf Of Mecseri
Sent: Sunday, May 

Re: [DX-CHAT] DX-PEDITIONS FOR US POOR FOLKS?

2012-05-20 Thread Joe Subich, W4TV



On 5/20/2012 9:14 PM, Crownhaven wrote:


However, any operator has the right to set his own rules for QSL
cards, etc. And the rest of us have a choice as to whether we want to
abide by those terms.


Absolutely not!  No operator has a right to discriminate in his QSL
policy or hold the QSL hostage in return for a contribution in
excess of the cost of mailing that QSL.  To do so is de facto grounds
for disqualification under DXCC Rules (12 d):


d) Blatant inequities in confirmation (QSL) procedures. Continued
refusal to issue QSLs under certain circumstances may lead to
disqualification.


Any large DXpedition can - and should - seek individual contributions
before the operation.  I would argue that they have a right to cancel
an operation if the support goals have not been met.  However, the
policy of not uploading logs to LotW for six months or a year after
a DXPedition, not sending bureau QSLs for six months to a year after
a DXPedition and policies of not mailing QSLs to non-contributors until
after the end of the calendar year should be loudly and roundly denounced.

Given the ease of uploading QSOs to LotW - after all it is no more
difficult in uploading the raw logs to ClubLog daily which has become
standard practice for most major DXpeditions - there is *no* valid
reason for not uploading the raw logs immediately after the operation
if not daily during the operation.

73,

  ... Joe, W4TV


On 5/20/2012 9:14 PM, Crownhaven wrote:


I'm thinking we all can make the choices we want to make. In terms of
DXpeditions costing a lot of money, if you can't take the heat, stay out
of the kitchen?? However, any operator has the right to set his own
rules for QSL cards, etc. And the rest of us have a choice as to whether
we want to abide by those terms. Let's call it free enterprise. We're
beginning to sound likeI won't say it here.

Steve, N4JQQ

Zack Widup wrote:


First off, great presentation Don!

I thought it gave a great perspective of what these icebreaker
DXpeditions and others to exotic places cost. Someone has to pay for
them. The operators on some DXpeditions often bear a great deal of the
cost themselves. I know a few people who have gotten involved in a
DXpedition without knowing what it would cost them personally. They
put forth an amount of money that hurt them personally financially,
hoping they could get at least some of it back. Some didn't - they
have not been on a DXpedition since. Live and learn, I guess. And our
loss when a fine operator can't or won't go on another DXpedition.

I know some of the people who were on the VP8ORK DXpedition. Some of
the fees they had to pay were downright weird - and sounded exorbitant
to me. But what are you going to do? Refuse to pay a fee to get your
equipment out of storage? You would be in a bad position thousands of
miles from home, trying to meet an expedition timetable and unable to
speak the language of the country, trying to negotiate with those
people.

If you want the DXpedition, if you want it there for you to work, it
seems only right to me that you voluntarily contribute what you can.
Not that it has to be $5 per QSO, but every little bit helps.

None of the DXpeditions I wished to have confirmed recently have
demanded any fees for QSL'ing. But I do voluntarily send them
something. I hope it helps just a little. If enough people do that, it
increases the chance that they will go on another DXpedition to a rare
place in a few years.

And I agree - if the DXpedition so chooses to send out confirmation to
contributors first, that is their choice and it doesn't mean that
non-contributors are not going to get their confirmation. If you had
to wait for 20 years for an entity to be put on the air, what's a
couple extra months waiting for the confirmation?

73, Zack W9SZ


On 5/20/12, Don Greenbaum d...@aurumtel.com wrote:

Who is demanding any fees for a QSL?

Name one DXpedition that refuses to answer bureau cards? Or a major
DXPedition that doesn't post their logs to LOTW (most within 6 months).
Most foundations require that in return for funding.

Just because someone who donates $5 gets his card first does not
translate
into extortion for those who opt out of supporting dxpeditions and
wait for
the slow method.

73

Don
N1DG

At 06:45 PM 5/20/2012, Don wrote:

Go or don't go. But demanding a fee for a qsl is still extortion in the
true sense of the term

Sent from my iPod

On May 20, 2012, at 6:31 PM, Ron Notarius W3WN wn3...@verizon.net
wrote:


Lou,

Once again, context is important.

Don's presentation was not talking about the casual DXpedition that
might
cost one or two people a few thousand. Yes, this was mentioned, but it
was not the main focus.

And within THAT context only, if I can't afford to go on a vacation to
the Caribbean that happens to include a radio op for $5K, I'm not
going
to go either. If I do go, I'm not going to expect to recoup my
vacation
costs from those who worked me, either.

But -- that's not what